bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla
Feb 9, 2010, 6:11 AM
Post #1 of 1
(161 views)
Permalink
|
|
[Bug 6325] New: FH_HAS_XID Poor S/O, strong score.
|
|
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6325
Summary: FH_HAS_XID Poor S/O, strong score.
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.3.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Rules
AssignedTo: dev [at] spamassassin
ReportedBy: christian.kuehn [at] mcs
CC: mkettler_sa [at] verizon, christian.kuehn [at] mcs
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #5501 +++
FH_HAS_XID got a S/O of 0.786 in the 3.2 mass-checks but the perceptron wound
up
assigning it a score of aproximately 2.40
Is it still policy that spam rules with a S/O of under 0.80 get dropped from
the
ruleset? If so, we should consider dropping or revising this rule as it's not
living up to the standards but is causing problems.
In #5501 this rule was downscored to zero, but in 3.3.0 back to a high score:
score FH_HAS_XID 3.299 3.215 3.003 1.782 # n=2
in
# UPDATE version 903765
Why???
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
|
