Mailing List Archive: SpamAssassin: devel

[Bug 6271] [review] FH_DATE_PAST_20XX rule should be dropped, or fixed to use eval function instead of fixed date

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Feb 5, 2010, 3:07 PM

Post #1 of 6 (808 views)
Permalink

[Bug 6271] [review] FH_DATE_PAST_20XX rule should be dropped, or fixed to use eval function instead of fixed date

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6271

Adam Katz <antispam [at] khopis> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|FH_DATE_PAST_20XX rule |[review] FH_DATE_PAST_20XX
|should be dropped, or fixed |rule should be dropped, or
|to use eval function |fixed to use eval function
|instead of fixed date |instead of fixed date
Status Whiteboard| |needs two more votes

--- Comment #7 from Adam Katz <antispam [at] khopis> 2010-02-05 15:07:40 UTC ---
Looking for two voting periods; one to move forward on my proposal from
comment 6 and then if the resulting GA scores don't look so hot, a second one
to determine if we want to push it further or just lapse back to
DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_XX.

--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Feb 5, 2010, 3:35 PM

Post #2 of 6 (787 views)
Permalink

[Bug 6271] [review] FH_DATE_PAST_20XX rule should be dropped, or fixed to use eval function instead of fixed date [In reply to]

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6271

Sidney Markowitz <sidney [at] sidney> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sidney [at] sidney

--- Comment #8 from Sidney Markowitz <sidney [at] sidney> 2010-02-05 15:35:40 UTC ---
+1 on moving forward with the proposal in comment #6 deciding based on results
what to do next.

--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Feb 5, 2010, 3:50 PM

Post #3 of 6 (790 views)
Permalink

[Bug 6271] [review] FH_DATE_PAST_20XX rule should be dropped, or fixed to use eval function instead of fixed date [In reply to]

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6271

Adam Katz <antispam [at] khopis> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status Whiteboard|needs two more votes |needs one more vote

--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Feb 6, 2010, 1:28 AM

Post #4 of 6 (771 views)
Permalink

[Bug 6271] [review] FH_DATE_PAST_20XX rule should be dropped, or fixed to use eval function instead of fixed date [In reply to]

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6271

--- Comment #9 from Jonathan <spamassassin-bugzilla [at] snetram> 2010-02-06 01:28:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> +1 on moving forward with the proposal in comment #6 deciding based on results
> what to do next.

+1 from me as well.

--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Feb 8, 2010, 5:41 PM

Post #5 of 6 (660 views)
Permalink

[Bug 6271] [review] FH_DATE_PAST_20XX rule should be dropped, or fixed to use eval function instead of fixed date [In reply to]

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6271

Adam Katz <antispam [at] khopis> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status Whiteboard|needs one more vote |

--- Comment #10 from Adam Katz <antispam [at] khopis> 2010-02-08 17:41:38 UTC ---
help wanted

I'm not sure how to properly remove a rule. I can remove it from
rulesrc/10_force_active.cf, but should I also modify rules/20_head_tests.cf and
rules/50_scores.cf? Also, we'll need new translations of the description.

--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Feb 12, 2010, 9:31 AM

Post #6 of 6 (523 views)
Permalink

[Bug 6271] [review] FH_DATE_PAST_20XX rule should be dropped, or fixed to use eval function instead of fixed date [In reply to]

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6271

--- Comment #11 from Justin Mason <jm [at] jmason> 2010-02-12 17:31:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> help wanted
>
> I'm not sure how to properly remove a rule. I can remove it from
> rulesrc/10_force_active.cf, but should I also modify rules/20_head_tests.cf and
> rules/50_scores.cf? Also, we'll need new translations of the description.

the safest thing is simply to replace with

meta NAMEOFRULE (0)
score NAMEOFRULE 0

if you're worried about causing problems. it'll never hit, so there's
no need for a translation.

--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads