wtogami at redhat
Nov 25, 2009, 8:27 AM
Post #2 of 2
(344 views)
Permalink
|
The scores have changed since that snapshot of spamassassin. You will
get the new scores if you sa-update.
* TVD_FROM_1 is not an active rule.
* score BAYES_50 0 0 2.0 0.8
* score RDNS_NONE 2.399 1.274 1.228 0.793
So it appears RDNS_NONE will become more hostile toward you than before.
Hmm, why is BAYES_50 fixed to such a high number? This doesn't seem right.
Warren Togami
wtogami [at] redhat
On 11/25/2009 09:31 AM, Florian Lohoff wrote:
>
> Hi,
> i guess you are "censoring" my e-mail adress in one of the default
> spamassin rules - not very nice and probably a litle overparanoid ...
>
> ##{ TVD_FROM_1
> header TVD_FROM_1 From:addr =~ /[^\@0-9]{2}\d{3}\.(?:com|net|org|info|biz)$/i
> ##} TVD_FROM_1
>
>> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-alpha3-r816412 (2009-09-17) on
>> eddie.linux-mips.org
>> X-Spam-Flag: YES
>> X-Spam-Level: *****
>> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE,TVD_FROM_1
>> autolearn=no version=3.3.0-alpha3-r816412
>> X-Spam-Report:
>> * 1.0 TVD_FROM_1 TVD_FROM_1
>> * 3.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
>> * [score: 0.5000]
>> * 1.0 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
>
> Flo
|
signature.asc
