Mailing List Archive: SpamAssassin: devel

[vote] proposed 3.3.0-alpha1 release

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

jm at jmason

Jul 1, 2009, 2:34 PM

Post #1 of 12 (481 views)
Permalink

[vote] proposed 3.3.0-alpha1 release

Hi guys -- I've cut tarballs for the alpha. Here goes! Please give me a few
votes for a public release of these (my vote: +1 of course). Here's the
proposed announcement...

To: users, dev, announce
Subject: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.0-alpha1 available

Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.0-alpha1 is now available for testing.

Downloads are available from:
http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/

md5sum of archive files:

04141392e1f20ea4a91bb63937351c65 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.bz2
1532b02384c37b4fb40ff1244bca3ec5 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.gz
c2d80477b20b571b591eae11993dcf03 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.zip
3cb55fc1bd84bc93013638f9f8fa88c0 Mail-SpamAssassin-rules-3.3.0-alpha1.tgz

sha1sum of archive files:

f8b5236c0ef1de82699b4bf8e29cd3e0f0b18bfd Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.bz2
de65e1d5f29b954b2c60d58f10a6dc710a8a3629 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.gz
cc0c7531f666e48e1593054cfa2bb70336ca2f13 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.zip
83b0559399a1849063cfcf209be9d23eab1f8267 Mail-SpamAssassin-rules-3.3.0-alpha1.tgz

The release files also have a .asc accompanying them. The file serves
as an external GPG signature for the given release file. The signing
key is available via the wwwkeys.pgp.net key server, as well as
http://spamassassin.apache.org/released/GPG-SIGNING-KEY

The key information is:

pub 1024D/265FA05B 2003-06-09 SpamAssassin Signing Key <release[at]spamassassin.org>
Key fingerprint = 26C9 00A4 6DD4 0CD5 AD24 F6D7 DEE0 1987 265F A05B

See the INSTALL and UPGRADE files in the distribution for important
installation notes.

Summary of major changes since 3.2.6
------------------------------------

Changes to the core code:

[TODO: write changes list]

maddoc at maddoc

Jul 1, 2009, 2:59 PM

Post #2 of 12 (464 views)
Permalink

Re: [vote] proposed 3.3.0-alpha1 release [In reply to]

Justin Mason wrote:
> Hi guys -- I've cut tarballs for the alpha. Here goes! Please give me a few
> votes for a public release of these (my vote: +1 of course). Here's the
> proposed announcement...
>
>
> To: users, dev, announce
> Subject: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.0-alpha1 available
>
> Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.0-alpha1 is now available for testing.
>
> Downloads are available from:
> http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/
>
> md5sum of archive files:
>
> 04141392e1f20ea4a91bb63937351c65 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.bz2
> 1532b02384c37b4fb40ff1244bca3ec5 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.gz
> c2d80477b20b571b591eae11993dcf03 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.zip
> 3cb55fc1bd84bc93013638f9f8fa88c0 Mail-SpamAssassin-rules-3.3.0-alpha1.tgz
>
> sha1sum of archive files:
>
> f8b5236c0ef1de82699b4bf8e29cd3e0f0b18bfd Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.bz2
> de65e1d5f29b954b2c60d58f10a6dc710a8a3629 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.gz
> cc0c7531f666e48e1593054cfa2bb70336ca2f13 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.zip
> 83b0559399a1849063cfcf209be9d23eab1f8267 Mail-SpamAssassin-rules-3.3.0-alpha1.tgz
>
>
> The release files also have a .asc accompanying them. The file serves
> as an external GPG signature for the given release file. The signing
> key is available via the wwwkeys.pgp.net key server, as well as
> http://spamassassin.apache.org/released/GPG-SIGNING-KEY
>
> The key information is:
>
> pub 1024D/265FA05B 2003-06-09 SpamAssassin Signing Key <release[at]spamassassin.org>
> Key fingerprint = 26C9 00A4 6DD4 0CD5 AD24 F6D7 DEE0 1987 265F A05B
>
> See the INSTALL and UPGRADE files in the distribution for important
> installation notes.
>
> Summary of major changes since 3.2.6
> ------------------------------------
>
> Changes to the core code:
>
> [TODO: write changes list]
>

+1 from me. And it builds and tests fine for me on various OS's.

--

-Doc

Penguins: Do it on the ice.
Cairns: Do it underground

kmcgrail at pccc

Jul 1, 2009, 3:13 PM

Post #3 of 12 (464 views)
Permalink

Re: [vote] proposed 3.3.0-alpha1 release [In reply to]

I'm running long tests and net tests and getting a lot of failures in the
DKIM area. I'm running 0.28.

Is this a known issue? Should I upgrade DKIM and try again which would like
make me suggest a higher version requirement for the makefile.

Regards,KAM

t/dkim2......................... Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 1 in t/SATest.pm at line 707
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 2 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #2
Output can be examined in: log/d.dkim/1
t/dkim2.........................NOK 1# Failed test 3 in t/dkim2.t at line 50
# t/dkim2.t line 50 is: ok ok_all_patterns();
t/dkim2.........................NOK 3 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 4 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #3
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
t/dkim2.........................NOK 4# Failed test 5 in t/SATest.pm at line
707 fail #4
Output can be examined in: log/d.dkim/4
# Failed test 6 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #2
t/dkim2.........................NOK 6 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 7 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #5
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
t/dkim2.........................NOK 7# Failed test 8 in t/SATest.pm at line
707 fail #6
Output can be examined in: log/d.dkim/7
# Failed test 9 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #3
t/dkim2.........................NOK 9 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 10 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #7
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
t/dkim2.........................NOK 10# Failed test 11 in t/SATest.pm at
line 707 fail #8
Output can be examined in: log/d.dkim/10
# Failed test 12 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #4
t/dkim2.........................NOK 12 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 13 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #9
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
t/dkim2.........................NOK 13# Failed test 14 in t/SATest.pm at
line 707 fail #10
Output can be examined in: log/d.dkim/13
# Failed test 15 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #5
t/dkim2.........................NOK 15 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 16 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #11
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 17 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #12
t/dkim2.........................NOK 16Output can be examined in:
log/d.dkim/16
# Failed test 18 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #6
t/dkim2.........................NOK 18 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 19 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #13
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
t/dkim2.........................NOK 19# Failed test 20 in t/SATest.pm at
line 707 fail #14
Output can be examined in: log/d.dkim/19
# Failed test 21 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #7
t/dkim2.........................NOK 21 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 22 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #15
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
t/dkim2.........................NOK 22# Failed test 23 in t/SATest.pm at
line 707 fail #16
Output can be examined in: log/d.dkim/22
# Failed test 24 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #8
t/dkim2.........................NOK 24 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 25 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #17
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 26 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #18
t/dkim2.........................NOK 25Output can be examined in:
log/d.dkim/25
# Failed test 27 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #9
t/dkim2.........................NOK 27 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 28 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #19
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 29 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #20
t/dkim2.........................NOK 28Output can be examined in:
log/d.dkim/28
# Failed test 30 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #10
t/dkim2.........................NOK 30 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 31 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #21
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
t/dkim2.........................NOK 31# Failed test 32 in t/SATest.pm at
line 707 fail #22
Output can be examined in: log/d.dkim/31
# Failed test 33 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #11
t/dkim2.........................NOK 33 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 34 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #23
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
t/dkim2.........................NOK 34# Failed test 35 in t/SATest.pm at
line 707 fail #24
Output can be examined in: log/d.dkim/34
# Failed test 36 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #12
t/dkim2.........................NOK 36 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 37 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #25
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
t/dkim2.........................NOK 37# Failed test 38 in t/SATest.pm at
line 707 fail #26
Output can be examined in: log/d.dkim/37
# Failed test 39 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #13
t/dkim2.........................NOK 39 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 40 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #27
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
t/dkim2.........................NOK 40# Failed test 41 in t/SATest.pm at
line 707 fail #28
Output can be examined in: log/d.dkim/40
# Failed test 42 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #14
t/dkim2.........................NOK 42 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 43 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #29
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 44 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #30
t/dkim2.........................NOK 43Output can be examined in:
log/d.dkim/43
# Failed test 45 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #15
t/dkim2.........................NOK 45 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 46 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #31
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
t/dkim2.........................NOK 46# Failed test 47 in t/SATest.pm at
line 707 fail #32
Output can be examined in: log/d.dkim/46
# Failed test 48 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #16
t/dkim2.........................NOK 48 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 49 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #33
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 50 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #34
t/dkim2.........................NOK 49Output can be examined in:
log/d.dkim/49
# Failed test 51 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #17
t/dkim2.........................NOK 51 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 52 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #35
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 53 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #36
t/dkim2.........................NOK 52Output can be examined in:
log/d.dkim/52
# Failed test 54 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #18
t/dkim2.........................NOK 54 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 55 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #37
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 56 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #38
t/dkim2.........................NOK 55Output can be examined in:
log/d.dkim/55
# Failed test 57 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #19
t/dkim2.........................ok 58/80 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 72.
# Failed test 60 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #39
Output can be examined in: log/d.dkim/60
t/dkim2.........................NOK 60# Failed test 62 in t/dkim2.t at line
72
# t/dkim2.t line 72 is: ok ok_all_patterns();
t/dkim2.........................NOK 62 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 72.
# Failed test 63 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #40
Output can be examined in: log/d.dkim/63
t/dkim2.........................NOK 63# Failed test 65 in t/dkim2.t at line
72 fail #2
t/dkim2.........................NOK 65 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 72.
# Failed test 66 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #41
Output can be examined in: log/d.dkim/66
t/dkim2.........................NOK 66# Failed test 68 in t/dkim2.t at line
72 fail #3
t/dkim2.........................NOK 68 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 72.
# Failed test 69 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #42
t/dkim2.........................NOK 69Output can be examined in:
log/d.dkim/69
# Failed test 71 in t/dkim2.t at line 72 fail #4
t/dkim2.........................NOK 71 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 72.
# Failed test 72 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #43
Output can be examined in: log/d.dkim/72
t/dkim2.........................NOK 72# Failed test 74 in t/dkim2.t at line
72 fail #5
t/dkim2.........................NOK 74 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 72.
# Failed test 75 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #44
Output can be examined in: log/d.dkim/75
t/dkim2.........................NOK 75# Failed test 77 in t/dkim2.t at line
72 fail #6
t/dkim2.........................NOK 77 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 72.
# Failed test 78 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #45
t/dkim2.........................NOK 78Output can be examined in:
log/d.dkim/78
# Failed test 80 in t/dkim2.t at line 72 fail #7
t/dkim2.........................FAILED tests 1-57, 60, 62-63, 65-66, 68-69,
71-72, 74-75, 77-78, 80
Failed 71/80 tests, 11.25% okay

----- Original Message -----
From: "Justin Mason" <jm[at]jmason.org>
To: <dev[at]spamassassin.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 5:34 PM
Subject: [vote] proposed 3.3.0-alpha1 release

> Hi guys -- I've cut tarballs for the alpha. Here goes! Please give me a
> few
> votes for a public release of these (my vote: +1 of course). Here's the
> proposed announcement...
>
>
> To: users, dev, announce
> Subject: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.0-alpha1 available
>
> Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.0-alpha1 is now available for testing.
>
> Downloads are available from:
> http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/
>
> md5sum of archive files:
>
> 04141392e1f20ea4a91bb63937351c65 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.bz2
> 1532b02384c37b4fb40ff1244bca3ec5 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.gz
> c2d80477b20b571b591eae11993dcf03 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.zip
> 3cb55fc1bd84bc93013638f9f8fa88c0
> Mail-SpamAssassin-rules-3.3.0-alpha1.tgz
>
> sha1sum of archive files:
>
> f8b5236c0ef1de82699b4bf8e29cd3e0f0b18bfd
> Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.bz2
> de65e1d5f29b954b2c60d58f10a6dc710a8a3629
> Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.gz
> cc0c7531f666e48e1593054cfa2bb70336ca2f13
> Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.zip
> 83b0559399a1849063cfcf209be9d23eab1f8267
> Mail-SpamAssassin-rules-3.3.0-alpha1.tgz
>
>
> The release files also have a .asc accompanying them. The file serves
> as an external GPG signature for the given release file. The signing
> key is available via the wwwkeys.pgp.net key server, as well as
> http://spamassassin.apache.org/released/GPG-SIGNING-KEY
>
> The key information is:
>
> pub 1024D/265FA05B 2003-06-09 SpamAssassin Signing Key
> <release[at]spamassassin.org>
> Key fingerprint = 26C9 00A4 6DD4 0CD5 AD24 F6D7 DEE0 1987 265F A05B
>
> See the INSTALL and UPGRADE files in the distribution for important
> installation notes.
>
> Summary of major changes since 3.2.6
> ------------------------------------
>
> Changes to the core code:
>
> [TODO: write changes list]
>
>

jm at jmason

Jul 2, 2009, 2:40 AM

Post #4 of 12 (452 views)
Permalink

Re: [vote] proposed 3.3.0-alpha1 release [In reply to]

BTW, don't forget. If you "make install" this, you need to either run
"sa-update" immediately, or download the rules .tgz and "sa-update
--install" it, as 3.3.0 doesn't come with any rules bundled by
default.

Anyone planning to give another +1 so Mark can talk about it tomorrow? ;)

--j.

On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 22:34, Justin Mason<jm[at]jmason.org> wrote:
> Hi guys -- I've cut tarballs for the alpha. Here goes! Please give me a few
> votes for a public release of these (my vote: +1 of course). Here's the
> proposed announcement...
>
>
> To: users, dev, announce
> Subject: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.0-alpha1 available
>
> Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.0-alpha1 is now available for testing.
>
> Downloads are available from:
> http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/
>
> md5sum of archive files:
>
> 04141392e1f20ea4a91bb63937351c65 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.bz2
> 1532b02384c37b4fb40ff1244bca3ec5 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.gz
> c2d80477b20b571b591eae11993dcf03 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.zip
> 3cb55fc1bd84bc93013638f9f8fa88c0 Mail-SpamAssassin-rules-3.3.0-alpha1.tgz
>
> sha1sum of archive files:
>
> f8b5236c0ef1de82699b4bf8e29cd3e0f0b18bfd Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.bz2
> de65e1d5f29b954b2c60d58f10a6dc710a8a3629 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.gz
> cc0c7531f666e48e1593054cfa2bb70336ca2f13 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.zip
> 83b0559399a1849063cfcf209be9d23eab1f8267 Mail-SpamAssassin-rules-3.3.0-alpha1.tgz
>
>
> The release files also have a .asc accompanying them. The file serves
> as an external GPG signature for the given release file. The signing
> key is available via the wwwkeys.pgp.net key server, as well as
> http://spamassassin.apache.org/released/GPG-SIGNING-KEY
>
> The key information is:
>
> pub 1024D/265FA05B 2003-06-09 SpamAssassin Signing Key <release[at]spamassassin.org>
> Key fingerprint = 26C9 00A4 6DD4 0CD5 AD24 F6D7 DEE0 1987 265F A05B
>
> See the INSTALL and UPGRADE files in the distribution for important
> installation notes.
>
> Summary of major changes since 3.2.6
> ------------------------------------
>
> Changes to the core code:
>
> [TODO: write changes list]
>
>
>

sa-list at alexb

Jul 2, 2009, 2:49 AM

Post #5 of 12 (453 views)
Permalink

Re: [vote] proposed 3.3.0-alpha1 release [In reply to]

On 7/2/2009 11:40 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
> BTW, don't forget. If you "make install" this, you need to either run
> "sa-update" immediately, or download the rules .tgz and "sa-update
> --install" it, as 3.3.0 doesn't come with any rules bundled by
> default.
>
> Anyone planning to give another +1 so Mark can talk about it tomorrow? ;)

AXB sez +1
(booting a VM to install <blush>)

>
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 22:34, Justin Mason<jm[at]jmason.org> wrote:
>> Hi guys -- I've cut tarballs for the alpha. Here goes! Please give me a few
>> votes for a public release of these (my vote: +1 of course). Here's the
>> proposed announcement...
>>
>>
>> To: users, dev, announce
>> Subject: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.0-alpha1 available
>>
>> Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.0-alpha1 is now available for testing.
>>
>> Downloads are available from:
>> http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/
>>
>> md5sum of archive files:
>>
>> 04141392e1f20ea4a91bb63937351c65 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.bz2
>> 1532b02384c37b4fb40ff1244bca3ec5 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.gz
>> c2d80477b20b571b591eae11993dcf03 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.zip
>> 3cb55fc1bd84bc93013638f9f8fa88c0 Mail-SpamAssassin-rules-3.3.0-alpha1.tgz
>>
>> sha1sum of archive files:
>>
>> f8b5236c0ef1de82699b4bf8e29cd3e0f0b18bfd Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.bz2
>> de65e1d5f29b954b2c60d58f10a6dc710a8a3629 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.gz
>> cc0c7531f666e48e1593054cfa2bb70336ca2f13 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.zip
>> 83b0559399a1849063cfcf209be9d23eab1f8267 Mail-SpamAssassin-rules-3.3.0-alpha1.tgz
>>
>>
>> The release files also have a .asc accompanying them. The file serves
>> as an external GPG signature for the given release file. The signing
>> key is available via the wwwkeys.pgp.net key server, as well as
>> http://spamassassin.apache.org/released/GPG-SIGNING-KEY
>>
>> The key information is:
>>
>> pub 1024D/265FA05B 2003-06-09 SpamAssassin Signing Key <release[at]spamassassin.org>
>> Key fingerprint = 26C9 00A4 6DD4 0CD5 AD24 F6D7 DEE0 1987 265F A05B
>>
>> See the INSTALL and UPGRADE files in the distribution for important
>> installation notes.
>>
>> Summary of major changes since 3.2.6
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> Changes to the core code:
>>
>> [TODO: write changes list]
>>
>>
>>

Mark.Martinec+sa at ijs

Jul 2, 2009, 3:53 AM

Post #6 of 12 (452 views)
Permalink

Re: [vote] proposed 3.3.0-alpha1 release [In reply to]

On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:13:52 +0200, Kevin A. McGrail <kmcgrail[at]pccc.com>
wrote:

> I'm running long tests and net tests and getting a lot of failures in
> the DKIM area. I'm running 0.28.
>
> Is this a known issue? Should I upgrade DKIM and try again which would
> like make me suggest a higher version requirement for the makefile.

Don't know, it passes all tests for me.
Does it happen to others too?

Is the plugin enabled at all?
I would expect at least the tests for a presence of a signature
(the DKIM_SIGNED) should work regardless of the version of Mail::DKIM.

The DKIM_VALID would probably fail in some tests with older
version on Mail::DKIM, but most of them should still pass.

Please do try with Mail::DKIM 0.36, to see if that helps.

Btw, you could run the following one-liner, giving it on stdin
each of the 'pass' sample messages int/data/dkim/ :

perl -MMail::DKIM::Verifier -ne '
BEGIN{$dkim=Mail::DKIM::Verifier->new_object};
s/\r?\n\z/\015\012/; $dkim->PRINT($_); END{$dkim->CLOSE;
printf("%s\n",$_->result_detail) for $dkim->signatures}'
< t/data/dkim/test-pass-19.msg

Mark

kmcgrail at pccc

Jul 2, 2009, 5:57 AM

Post #7 of 12 (448 views)
Permalink

Re: [vote] proposed 3.3.0-alpha1 release [In reply to]

I'll vote +1 so he can talk about it. With sa-update now we required, we
should add Archive::Tar as a requirement to the Makefile.PL, yes?

# also see CURRENT_PM below
'PREREQ_PM' => {
'Digest::SHA1' => 0, # 2.0 is oldest tested version
'File::Spec' => 0.8, # older versions lack some
routines we need
'File::Copy' => 2.02, # this version is shipped with
5.005_03, the oldest version known to work
'Pod::Usage' => 1.10, # all versions prior to this do
seem to be buggy
'HTML::Parser' => 3.43, # the HTML code is based on this
parser, older versions have utf-8 bugs
'Net::DNS' => (RUNNING_ON_WINDOWS ? 0.46 : 0.34), # bugs in
older revs
'NetAddr::IP' => 0,
'Sys::Hostname' => 0,
'Time::HiRes' => 0,
'Time::Local' => 0,
'Errno' => 0,
},
Regards,
KAM
----- Original Message -----
From: "Justin Mason" <jm[at]jmason.org>
To: <dev[at]spamassassin.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 5:40 AM
Subject: Re: [vote] proposed 3.3.0-alpha1 release

> BTW, don't forget. If you "make install" this, you need to either run
> "sa-update" immediately, or download the rules .tgz and "sa-update
> --install" it, as 3.3.0 doesn't come with any rules bundled by
> default.
>
> Anyone planning to give another +1 so Mark can talk about it tomorrow? ;)
>
> --j.
>
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 22:34, Justin Mason<jm[at]jmason.org> wrote:
>> Hi guys -- I've cut tarballs for the alpha. Here goes! Please give me a
>> few
>> votes for a public release of these (my vote: +1 of course). Here's the
>> proposed announcement...
>>
>>
>> To: users, dev, announce
>> Subject: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.0-alpha1 available
>>
>> Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.0-alpha1 is now available for testing.
>>
>> Downloads are available from:
>> http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/
>>
>> md5sum of archive files:
>>
>> 04141392e1f20ea4a91bb63937351c65 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.bz2
>> 1532b02384c37b4fb40ff1244bca3ec5 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.gz
>> c2d80477b20b571b591eae11993dcf03 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.zip
>> 3cb55fc1bd84bc93013638f9f8fa88c0 Mail-SpamAssassin-rules-3.3.0-alpha1.tgz
>>
>> sha1sum of archive files:
>>
>> f8b5236c0ef1de82699b4bf8e29cd3e0f0b18bfd
>> Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.bz2
>> de65e1d5f29b954b2c60d58f10a6dc710a8a3629
>> Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.gz
>> cc0c7531f666e48e1593054cfa2bb70336ca2f13
>> Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.zip
>> 83b0559399a1849063cfcf209be9d23eab1f8267
>> Mail-SpamAssassin-rules-3.3.0-alpha1.tgz
>>
>>
>> The release files also have a .asc accompanying them. The file serves
>> as an external GPG signature for the given release file. The signing
>> key is available via the wwwkeys.pgp.net key server, as well as
>> http://spamassassin.apache.org/released/GPG-SIGNING-KEY
>>
>> The key information is:
>>
>> pub 1024D/265FA05B 2003-06-09 SpamAssassin Signing Key
>> <release[at]spamassassin.org>
>> Key fingerprint = 26C9 00A4 6DD4 0CD5 AD24 F6D7 DEE0 1987 265F A05B
>>
>> See the INSTALL and UPGRADE files in the distribution for important
>> installation notes.
>>
>> Summary of major changes since 3.2.6
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> Changes to the core code:
>>
>> [TODO: write changes list]

kmcgrail at pccc

Jul 2, 2009, 6:01 AM

Post #8 of 12 (448 views)
Permalink

Re: [vote] proposed 3.3.0-alpha1 release [In reply to]

And/or edit the Mail::SpamAssassin::Util::DependencyInfo as well.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin A. McGrail" <kmcgrail[at]pccc.com>
To: "Justin Mason" <jm[at]jmason.org>; <dev[at]spamassassin.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 8:57 AM
Subject: Re: [vote] proposed 3.3.0-alpha1 release

> I'll vote +1 so he can talk about it. With sa-update now we required, we
> should add Archive::Tar as a requirement to the Makefile.PL, yes?
>
> # also see CURRENT_PM below
> 'PREREQ_PM' => {
> 'Digest::SHA1' => 0, # 2.0 is oldest tested version
> 'File::Spec' => 0.8, # older versions lack some
> routines we need
> 'File::Copy' => 2.02, # this version is shipped with
> 5.005_03, the oldest version known to work
> 'Pod::Usage' => 1.10, # all versions prior to this do
> seem to be buggy
> 'HTML::Parser' => 3.43, # the HTML code is based on this
> parser, older versions have utf-8 bugs
> 'Net::DNS' => (RUNNING_ON_WINDOWS ? 0.46 : 0.34), # bugs in
> older revs
> 'NetAddr::IP' => 0,
> 'Sys::Hostname' => 0,
> 'Time::HiRes' => 0,
> 'Time::Local' => 0,
> 'Errno' => 0,
> },
> Regards,
> KAM
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Justin Mason" <jm[at]jmason.org>
> To: <dev[at]spamassassin.apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 5:40 AM
> Subject: Re: [vote] proposed 3.3.0-alpha1 release
>
>
>> BTW, don't forget. If you "make install" this, you need to either run
>> "sa-update" immediately, or download the rules .tgz and "sa-update
>> --install" it, as 3.3.0 doesn't come with any rules bundled by
>> default.
>>
>> Anyone planning to give another +1 so Mark can talk about it tomorrow? ;)
>>
>> --j.
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 22:34, Justin Mason<jm[at]jmason.org> wrote:
>>> Hi guys -- I've cut tarballs for the alpha. Here goes! Please give me a
>>> few
>>> votes for a public release of these (my vote: +1 of course). Here's the
>>> proposed announcement...
>>>
>>>
>>> To: users, dev, announce
>>> Subject: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.0-alpha1 available
>>>
>>> Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.0-alpha1 is now available for testing.
>>>
>>> Downloads are available from:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/
>>>
>>> md5sum of archive files:
>>>
>>> 04141392e1f20ea4a91bb63937351c65 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.bz2
>>> 1532b02384c37b4fb40ff1244bca3ec5 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.gz
>>> c2d80477b20b571b591eae11993dcf03 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.zip
>>> 3cb55fc1bd84bc93013638f9f8fa88c0
>>> Mail-SpamAssassin-rules-3.3.0-alpha1.tgz
>>>
>>> sha1sum of archive files:
>>>
>>> f8b5236c0ef1de82699b4bf8e29cd3e0f0b18bfd
>>> Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.bz2
>>> de65e1d5f29b954b2c60d58f10a6dc710a8a3629
>>> Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.gz
>>> cc0c7531f666e48e1593054cfa2bb70336ca2f13
>>> Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.zip
>>> 83b0559399a1849063cfcf209be9d23eab1f8267
>>> Mail-SpamAssassin-rules-3.3.0-alpha1.tgz
>>>
>>>
>>> The release files also have a .asc accompanying them. The file serves
>>> as an external GPG signature for the given release file. The signing
>>> key is available via the wwwkeys.pgp.net key server, as well as
>>> http://spamassassin.apache.org/released/GPG-SIGNING-KEY
>>>
>>> The key information is:
>>>
>>> pub 1024D/265FA05B 2003-06-09 SpamAssassin Signing Key
>>> <release[at]spamassassin.org>
>>> Key fingerprint = 26C9 00A4 6DD4 0CD5 AD24 F6D7 DEE0 1987 265F A05B
>>>
>>> See the INSTALL and UPGRADE files in the distribution for important
>>> installation notes.
>>>
>>> Summary of major changes since 3.2.6
>>> ------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Changes to the core code:
>>>
>>> [TODO: write changes list]
>

kmcgrail at pccc

Jul 2, 2009, 6:09 AM

Post #9 of 12 (448 views)
Permalink

Re: [vote] proposed 3.3.0-alpha1 release [In reply to]

Hi Mark,

First, your requested CLI yields:
perl -MMail::DKIM::Verifier -ne '
BEGIN{$dkim=Mail::DKIM::Verifier->new_object}; s/\r?\n\z/\015\012/;
$dkim->PRINT($_); END{$dkim->CLOSE; printf("%s\n",$_->result_detail) for
$dkim->signatures}' < t/data/dkim/test-pass-19.msg
pass

Second, I'm not sure if the plugin is "enabled". I'm working with an
untarred version and running make test. I then enabled long tests and net
tests in t/config.dist. I've edited nothing else.

However, 0.36 yields similar issues:

t/debug.........................ok
t/desc_wrap.....................ok
t/dkim..........................skipped
all skipped: no reason given
t/dkim2......................... Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 1 in t/SATest.pm at line 707
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 2 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #2
t/dkim2.........................NOK 1Output can be examined in: log/d.dkim/1
# Failed test 3 in t/dkim2.t at line 50
# t/dkim2.t line 50 is: ok ok_all_patterns();
t/dkim2.........................NOK 3 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 4 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #3
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 5 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #4
t/dkim2.........................NOK 4Output can be examined in: log/d.dkim/4
# Failed test 6 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #2
t/dkim2.........................NOK 6 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 7 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #5
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 8 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #6
t/dkim2.........................NOK 7Output can be examined in: log/d.dkim/7
# Failed test 9 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #3
t/dkim2.........................NOK 9 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 10 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #7
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 11 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #8
t/dkim2.........................NOK 10Output can be examined in:
log/d.dkim/10
# Failed test 12 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #4
t/dkim2.........................NOK 12 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 13 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #9
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 14 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #10
t/dkim2.........................NOK 13Output can be examined in:
log/d.dkim/13
# Failed test 15 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #5
t/dkim2.........................NOK 15 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 16 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #11
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 17 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #12
t/dkim2.........................NOK 16Output can be examined in:
log/d.dkim/16
# Failed test 18 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #6
t/dkim2.........................NOK 18 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 19 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #13
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 20 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #14
t/dkim2.........................NOK 19Output can be examined in:
log/d.dkim/19
# Failed test 21 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #7
t/dkim2.........................NOK 21 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 22 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #15
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 23 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #16
t/dkim2.........................NOK 22Output can be examined in:
log/d.dkim/22
# Failed test 24 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #8
t/dkim2.........................NOK 24 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 25 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #17
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 26 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #18
t/dkim2.........................NOK 25Output can be examined in:
log/d.dkim/25
# Failed test 27 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #9
t/dkim2.........................NOK 27 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 28 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #19
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 29 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #20
t/dkim2.........................NOK 28Output can be examined in:
log/d.dkim/28
# Failed test 30 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #10
t/dkim2.........................NOK 30 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 31 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #21
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 32 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #22
t/dkim2.........................NOK 31Output can be examined in:
log/d.dkim/31
# Failed test 33 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #11
t/dkim2.........................NOK 33 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 34 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #23
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 35 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #24
t/dkim2.........................NOK 34Output can be examined in:
log/d.dkim/34
# Failed test 36 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #12
t/dkim2.........................NOK 36 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 37 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #25
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 38 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #26
t/dkim2.........................NOK 37Output can be examined in:
log/d.dkim/37
# Failed test 39 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #13
t/dkim2.........................NOK 39 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 40 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #27
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 41 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #28
t/dkim2.........................NOK 40Output can be examined in:
log/d.dkim/40
# Failed test 42 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #14
t/dkim2.........................NOK 42 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 43 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #29
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 44 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #30
t/dkim2.........................NOK 43Output can be examined in:
log/d.dkim/43
# Failed test 45 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #15
t/dkim2.........................NOK 45 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 46 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #31
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 47 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #32
t/dkim2.........................NOK 46Output can be examined in:
log/d.dkim/46
# Failed test 48 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #16
t/dkim2.........................NOK 48 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 49 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #33
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 50 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #34
t/dkim2.........................NOK 49Output can be examined in:
log/d.dkim/49
# Failed test 51 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #17
t/dkim2.........................NOK 51 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 52 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #35
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 53 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #36
t/dkim2.........................NOK 52Output can be examined in:
log/d.dkim/52
# Failed test 54 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #18
t/dkim2.........................NOK 54 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 55 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #37
Not found: DKIM_VALID = DKIM_VALID at t/dkim2.t line 50.
# Failed test 56 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #38
t/dkim2.........................NOK 55Output can be examined in:
log/d.dkim/55
# Failed test 57 in t/dkim2.t at line 50 fail #19
t/dkim2.........................ok 58/80 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 72.
# Failed test 60 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #39
Output can be examined in: log/d.dkim/60
t/dkim2.........................NOK 60# Failed test 62 in t/dkim2.t at line
72
# t/dkim2.t line 72 is: ok ok_all_patterns();
t/dkim2.........................NOK 62 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 72.
# Failed test 63 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #40
Output can be examined in: log/d.dkim/63
t/dkim2.........................NOK 63# Failed test 65 in t/dkim2.t at line
72 fail #2
t/dkim2.........................NOK 65 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 72.
# Failed test 66 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #41
Output can be examined in: log/d.dkim/66
t/dkim2.........................NOK 66# Failed test 68 in t/dkim2.t at line
72 fail #3
t/dkim2.........................NOK 68 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 72.
# Failed test 69 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #42
Output can be examined in: log/d.dkim/69
t/dkim2.........................NOK 69# Failed test 71 in t/dkim2.t at line
72 fail #4
t/dkim2.........................NOK 71 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 72.
# Failed test 72 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #43
Output can be examined in: log/d.dkim/72
t/dkim2.........................NOK 72# Failed test 74 in t/dkim2.t at line
72 fail #5
t/dkim2.........................NOK 74 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 72.
# Failed test 75 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #44
Output can be examined in: log/d.dkim/75
t/dkim2.........................NOK 75# Failed test 77 in t/dkim2.t at line
72 fail #6
t/dkim2.........................NOK 77 Not found: DKIM_SIGNED =
DKIM_SIGNED at t/dkim2.t line 72.
# Failed test 78 in t/SATest.pm at line 707 fail #45
Output can be examined in: log/d.dkim/78
t/dkim2.........................NOK 78# Failed test 80 in t/dkim2.t at line
72 fail #7
t/dkim2.........................FAILED tests 1-57, 60, 62-63, 65-66, 68-69,
71-72, 74-75, 77-78, 80
Failed 71/80 tests, 11.25% okay
t/dnsbl.........................ok
t/dnsbl_sc_meta.................ok
t/duplicates....................ok
t/get_all_headers...............ok
t/get_headers...................ok
t/gtube.........................ok
t/hashcash......................ok
t/html_colors...................ok

Regards,
KAM
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Martinec" <Mark.Martinec+sa[at]ijs.si>
To: <dev[at]spamassassin.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 6:53 AM
Subject: Re: [vote] proposed 3.3.0-alpha1 release

> On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:13:52 +0200, Kevin A. McGrail <kmcgrail[at]pccc.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm running long tests and net tests and getting a lot of failures in
>> the DKIM area. I'm running 0.28.
>>
>> Is this a known issue? Should I upgrade DKIM and try again which would
>> like make me suggest a higher version requirement for the makefile.
>
> Don't know, it passes all tests for me.
> Does it happen to others too?
>
> Is the plugin enabled at all?
> I would expect at least the tests for a presence of a signature
> (the DKIM_SIGNED) should work regardless of the version of Mail::DKIM.
>
> The DKIM_VALID would probably fail in some tests with older
> version on Mail::DKIM, but most of them should still pass.
>
> Please do try with Mail::DKIM 0.36, to see if that helps.
>
> Btw, you could run the following one-liner, giving it on stdin
> each of the 'pass' sample messages int/data/dkim/ :
>
>
> perl -MMail::DKIM::Verifier -ne '
> BEGIN{$dkim=Mail::DKIM::Verifier->new_object};
> s/\r?\n\z/\015\012/; $dkim->PRINT($_); END{$dkim->CLOSE;
> printf("%s\n",$_->result_detail) for $dkim->signatures}'
> < t/data/dkim/test-pass-19.msg
>

jm at jmason

Jul 2, 2009, 6:44 AM

Post #10 of 12 (445 views)
Permalink

Re: [vote] proposed 3.3.0-alpha1 release [In reply to]

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 13:57, Kevin A. McGrail<kmcgrail[at]pccc.com> wrote:
> I'll vote +1 so he can talk about it. With sa-update now we required, we
> should add Archive::Tar as a requirement to the Makefile.PL, yes?

yes, good catch. https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6145

--j.

> # also see CURRENT_PM below
> 'PREREQ_PM' => {
> 'Digest::SHA1' => 0, # 2.0 is oldest tested version
> 'File::Spec' => 0.8, # older versions lack some routines
> we need
> 'File::Copy' => 2.02, # this version is shipped with
> 5.005_03, the oldest version known to work
> 'Pod::Usage' => 1.10, # all versions prior to this do seem
> to be buggy
> 'HTML::Parser' => 3.43, # the HTML code is based on this
> parser, older versions have utf-8 bugs
> 'Net::DNS' => (RUNNING_ON_WINDOWS ? 0.46 : 0.34), # bugs in older
> revs
> 'NetAddr::IP' => 0,
> 'Sys::Hostname' => 0,
> 'Time::HiRes' => 0,
> 'Time::Local' => 0,
> 'Errno' => 0,
> },
> Regards,
> KAM
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Justin Mason" <jm[at]jmason.org>
> To: <dev[at]spamassassin.apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 5:40 AM
> Subject: Re: [vote] proposed 3.3.0-alpha1 release
>
>
>> BTW, don't forget. If you "make install" this, you need to either run
>> "sa-update" immediately, or download the rules .tgz and "sa-update
>> --install" it, as 3.3.0 doesn't come with any rules bundled by
>> default.
>>
>> Anyone planning to give another +1 so Mark can talk about it tomorrow? ;)
>>
>> --j.
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 22:34, Justin Mason<jm[at]jmason.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi guys -- I've cut tarballs for the alpha. Here goes! Please give me a
>>> few
>>> votes for a public release of these (my vote: +1 of course). Here's the
>>> proposed announcement...
>>>
>>>
>>> To: users, dev, announce
>>> Subject: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.0-alpha1 available
>>>
>>> Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.0-alpha1 is now available for testing.
>>>
>>> Downloads are available from:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/
>>>
>>> md5sum of archive files:
>>>
>>> 04141392e1f20ea4a91bb63937351c65 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.bz2
>>> 1532b02384c37b4fb40ff1244bca3ec5 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.gz
>>> c2d80477b20b571b591eae11993dcf03 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.zip
>>> 3cb55fc1bd84bc93013638f9f8fa88c0 Mail-SpamAssassin-rules-3.3.0-alpha1.tgz
>>>
>>> sha1sum of archive files:
>>>
>>> f8b5236c0ef1de82699b4bf8e29cd3e0f0b18bfd
>>> Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.bz2
>>> de65e1d5f29b954b2c60d58f10a6dc710a8a3629
>>> Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.gz
>>> cc0c7531f666e48e1593054cfa2bb70336ca2f13
>>> Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.zip
>>> 83b0559399a1849063cfcf209be9d23eab1f8267
>>> Mail-SpamAssassin-rules-3.3.0-alpha1.tgz
>>>
>>>
>>> The release files also have a .asc accompanying them. The file serves
>>> as an external GPG signature for the given release file. The signing
>>> key is available via the wwwkeys.pgp.net key server, as well as
>>> http://spamassassin.apache.org/released/GPG-SIGNING-KEY
>>>
>>> The key information is:
>>>
>>> pub 1024D/265FA05B 2003-06-09 SpamAssassin Signing Key
>>> <release[at]spamassassin.org>
>>> Key fingerprint = 26C9 00A4 6DD4 0CD5 AD24 F6D7 DEE0 1987 265F A05B
>>>
>>> See the INSTALL and UPGRADE files in the distribution for important
>>> installation notes.
>>>
>>> Summary of major changes since 3.2.6
>>> ------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Changes to the core code:
>>>
>>> [TODO: write changes list]
>
>

jm at jmason

Jul 2, 2009, 6:51 AM

Post #11 of 12 (446 views)
Permalink

Re: [vote] proposed 3.3.0-alpha1 release [In reply to]

ok, that's 4 +1's -- Mark, go ahead and mention those tarballs if you like!
(I'll leave them on /~jm/devel/ ).

--j.

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:49, Yet Another Ninja<sa-list[at]alexb.ch> wrote:
> On 7/2/2009 11:40 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
>>
>> BTW, don't forget. If you "make install" this, you need to either run
>> "sa-update" immediately, or download the rules .tgz and "sa-update
>> --install" it, as 3.3.0 doesn't come with any rules bundled by
>> default.
>>
>> Anyone planning to give another +1 so Mark can talk about it tomorrow? ;)
>
>
> AXB sez +1
> (booting a VM to install <blush>)
>
>
>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 22:34, Justin Mason<jm[at]jmason.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi guys -- I've cut tarballs for the alpha. Here goes! Please give me a
>>> few
>>> votes for a public release of these (my vote: +1 of course). Here's the
>>> proposed announcement...
>>>
>>>
>>> To: users, dev, announce
>>> Subject: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.0-alpha1 available
>>>
>>> Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.0-alpha1 is now available for testing.
>>>
>>> Downloads are available from:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/
>>>
>>> md5sum of archive files:
>>>
>>> 04141392e1f20ea4a91bb63937351c65 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.bz2
>>> 1532b02384c37b4fb40ff1244bca3ec5 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.gz
>>> c2d80477b20b571b591eae11993dcf03 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.zip
>>> 3cb55fc1bd84bc93013638f9f8fa88c0
>>> Mail-SpamAssassin-rules-3.3.0-alpha1.tgz
>>>
>>> sha1sum of archive files:
>>>
>>> f8b5236c0ef1de82699b4bf8e29cd3e0f0b18bfd
>>> Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.bz2
>>> de65e1d5f29b954b2c60d58f10a6dc710a8a3629
>>> Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.tar.gz
>>> cc0c7531f666e48e1593054cfa2bb70336ca2f13
>>> Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-alpha1.zip
>>> 83b0559399a1849063cfcf209be9d23eab1f8267
>>> Mail-SpamAssassin-rules-3.3.0-alpha1.tgz
>>>
>>>
>>> The release files also have a .asc accompanying them. The file serves
>>> as an external GPG signature for the given release file. The signing
>>> key is available via the wwwkeys.pgp.net key server, as well as
>>> http://spamassassin.apache.org/released/GPG-SIGNING-KEY
>>>
>>> The key information is:
>>>
>>> pub 1024D/265FA05B 2003-06-09 SpamAssassin Signing Key
>>> <release[at]spamassassin.org>
>>> Key fingerprint = 26C9 00A4 6DD4 0CD5 AD24 F6D7 DEE0 1987 265F A05B
>>>
>>> See the INSTALL and UPGRADE files in the distribution for important
>>> installation notes.
>>>
>>> Summary of major changes since 3.2.6
>>> ------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Changes to the core code:
>>>
>>> [TODO: write changes list]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>

Mark.Martinec+sa at ijs

Jul 3, 2009, 8:19 AM

Post #12 of 12 (397 views)
Permalink

Re: [vote] proposed 3.3.0-alpha1 release [In reply to]

> ok, that's 4 +1's -- Mark, go ahead and mention those tarballs if you like! (I'll leave them on /~jm/devel/ ).

Thank you guys, and to Justin especially!

My presentation on Amavis went well, many people attended,
and I spent a couple of minutes on SpamAssassin 3.3,
after making an official announcement of the availability
of 3.3 alpha!

Mark

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

Interested in having your list archived? Contact lists@gossamer-threads.com