jesse at fsck
Mar 27, 2000, 8:43 AM
Post #5 of 6
(705 views)
Permalink
|
Well, I think what's going to happen is that I'm going to have to generalize the whole thing
and do token replacemenmt in the templates to get this is flexible as everyone wants.
Now to figure out how to get all our mailer methods to deliver to the addresses
in a scalar rather than the addresses in the To: Cc: and Bcc: headers.
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 05:23:53PM +0200, Tobias Brox wrote:
> > If you can't do that, I'd do one message and bcc them, for large numbers of
> > recipients it is more efficient. Individual To lists would be next.
>
> Individual To lists are (unfortunately) the only thing that is good enough
> when dealing with external support, IMO.
>
> Bcc's and/or Cc's are usually best when it comes to internal support and
> sending mails to people which are familiar with the system.
>
> --
> Tobias Brox (alias TobiX) - +4722925871 - _urgent_ emails to
> sms [at] tobiasb Check our upcoming MMORPG at
> http://www.anarchy-online.com/ (Qt) and play multiplayer Spades,
> Backgammon, Poker etc for free at http://www.funcom.com/ (Java)
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rt-devel mailing list
> Rt-devel [at] lists
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-devel
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- jrvincent [at] wesleyan -- jesse [at] fsck
pgp keyprint: 50 41 9C 03 D0 BC BC C8 2C B9 77 26 6F E1 EB 91
--------------------------------------------------------------
A REAL sysadmin challenge is "resurrect five dead mailserver while so ripped
to the gills on mdma that you can't focus on any given line of text for more
than 10 seconds continuously."
-Nathan Mehl
|
