<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Request Tracker | Devel</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/rt/devel/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>26 Nov  2009 04:07:46 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: LDAP Authentication module does not place users under &amp;quot;Everyone&amp;quot;</title>
<description>On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 04:20:08PM +0000, Nikolas Chrysandreas wrote: &amp;gt; My problem is not having any autocreated account to be privileged. I am aware</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2009 08:25:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/rt/devel/90223</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: LDAP Authentication module does not place users under &amp;quot;Everyone&amp;quot;</title>
<description>On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 08:48:08AM +0000, n.chrysandreas@albourne.com wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt;That is called the SelfService interface, which is where Unprivileg</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2009 08:23:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/rt/devel/90222</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: LDAP Authentication module does not place users under &amp;quot;Everyone&amp;quot;</title>
<description>Hi Rob, Thanks for the reply. My problem is not having any autocreated account to be privileged. I am aware of the RT_SiteConfig.pm parameter and I w</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2009 08:20:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/rt/devel/90221</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: LDAP Authentication module does not place users under &amp;quot;Everyone&amp;quot;</title>
<description>I think hacking the autohandler might not be the kosher way to accomplish what you want. Even though you are authenticating against LDAP, RT is &amp;quot;cach</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2009 07:41:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/rt/devel/90220</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: LDAP Authentication module does not place users under &amp;quot;Everyone&amp;quot;</title>
<description>Hi everyone, &amp;gt;&amp;gt;That is called the SelfService interface, which is where Unprivileged &amp;gt;&amp;gt;users are directed when logging in to RT. You may want to rea</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2009 07:13:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/rt/devel/90219</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: LDAP Authentication module does not place users under &amp;quot;Everyone&amp;quot;</title>
<description>&amp;gt;That is called the SelfService interface, which is where Unprivileged &amp;gt;users are directed when logging in to RT. You may want to read in the &amp;gt;wiki a</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2009 00:48:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/rt/devel/90208</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: LDAP Authentication module does not place users under &amp;quot;Everyone&amp;quot;</title>
<description>On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 04:24:42PM +0000, n.chrysandreas@albourne.com wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;With your configuration, users will be placed in the Unprivileged &amp;gt; &amp;gt;g</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 14:01:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/rt/devel/90179</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: LDAP Authentication module does not place users under &amp;quot;Everyone&amp;quot;</title>
<description>Unprivileged users get a different interface to that of privileged users. What rights are you trying to give to &amp;#039;Everyone&amp;#039;?  -----Original Message---</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 08:37:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/rt/devel/90169</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: LDAP Authentication module does not place users under &amp;quot;Everyone&amp;quot;</title>
<description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve configured RT (3.8.5) to authenticate users using LDAP by adding the plugin RT::Authen::ExternalAuth. &amp;gt;&amp;gt; My problem is that no use</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 08:24:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/rt/devel/90168</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: LDAP Authentication module does not place users under &amp;quot;Everyone&amp;quot;</title>
<description>On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:00:50AM +0000, n.chrysandreas@albourne.com wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve configured RT (3.8.5) to authenticate users using LDAP b</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 07:28:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/rt/devel/90166</link>
</item><item>
<title>LDAP Authentication module does not place users under &amp;quot;Everyone&amp;quot;</title>
<description>Hi,  I&amp;#039;ve configured RT (3.8.5) to authenticate users using LDAP by adding the plugin RT::Authen::ExternalAuth. My problem is that no user is under t</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 02:00:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/rt/devel/90162</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Rt-announce] 2010 RT Training Sessions</title>
<description>Best Practical Solutions provides unparalleled instruction in how to get the most out of RT. We&amp;#039;ve been teaching users and administrators how to get t</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2009 14:31:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/rt/devel/90171</link>
</item><item>
<title>missing table in upgrade-mysql-schema.pl</title>
<description>Hi, I just made the upgrade from 3.6.3 to 3.8.6. After running etc/upgrade/upgrade-mysql-schema.pl I noticed that the CachedGroupMember table coll</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 06:20:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/rt/devel/90089</link>
</item><item>
<title>Need help with adding Information from a e-mail to RT</title>
<description>Hey guys, I am very new with RT and I need help. I recieve E-mails and in the Subject Line is e.g. the RT #1234 number. Based on this number I would</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 05:07:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/rt/devel/90088</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Bug? in hierachical CFs</title>
<description>On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 14:26 +0200, Joop wrote: &amp;gt; [snip] &amp;gt; Hope this makes sense, if not please let me know. I might have done &amp;gt; something wrong when</description>
<pubDate>13 Nov  2009 13:37:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/rt/devel/89970</link>
</item><item>
<title>Resolved: Question for Ticket Actions (in Ticket/Elements/Tabs)</title>
<description>OK, some times i&amp;#039;m too lazy to check it out, but it is much better to do this. yes it is working.                    $actions-&amp;gt;{&amp;#039;BB</description>
<pubDate>13 Nov  2009 05:05:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/rt/devel/89949</link>
</item><item>
<title>Question for Ticket Actions (in Ticket/Elements/Tabs)</title>
<description>HI, i&amp;#039;m searching for a simple way for our Operating to simply move tickets from Operating Queue to several 2nd level queues. The way via basics-&amp;gt;Chan</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2009 03:06:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/rt/devel/89931</link>
</item><item>
<title>On Create Merge Scrip</title>
<description>Hello, I hoping someone can help me understand why a scrip I&amp;#039;m trying to create is not working correctly. Description: MergeBasedOnContent Condition:</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2009 12:07:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/rt/devel/89853</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Help with Module::Install(::RTx)</title>
<description>&amp;gt;DESCRIPTION &amp;gt; If you work a lot with ticket links, it is hard to keep an overview &amp;gt; of all tickets and related ticket status. Normally you have to</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2009 10:54:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/rt/devel/89852</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Help with Module::Install(::RTx)</title>
<description>OK, finally done, if anybody likes to test: http://github.com/tbrumm/RT-Extension-ShowRelations Torsten  -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: rt-d</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2009 08:32:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/rt/devel/89841</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Help with Module::Install(::RTx)</title>
<description>Thanks to all for this hints, now i will go and create my first RTx :-)) Torsten  Kuehne + Nagel (AG &amp;amp; Co.) KG, Geschaeftsleitung: Hans-Georg Brink</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2009 07:35:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/rt/devel/89834</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Help with Module::Install(::RTx)</title>
<description>On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 04:05:15PM +0100, Brumm, Torsten / Kuehne + Nagel / Ham MI-ID wrote: &amp;gt; Hi RT Developers, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I have a tiny RTx, one Callback,</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2009 07:17:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/rt/devel/89832</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Help with Module::Install(::RTx)</title>
<description>Use an existing extension for comparison. -- Cambridge Energy Alliance: Save money. Save the planet. _______________________________________________</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2009 07:10:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/rt/devel/89833</link>
</item><item>
<title>Help with Module::Install(::RTx)</title>
<description>Hi RT Developers, i need some help with Module::Install::RTx, i&amp;#039;m trying to create my first RTx, read the whole day the web and came to a point, Modul</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2009 07:05:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/rt/devel/89831</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: REST issue when Text field and carriage return</title>
<description>Hi, i already tried, and it work without problem, unfortunately for production purpose, we need to use version 3.6.9 :-( Any way, i continue to sear</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2009 06:52:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/rt/devel/89830</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
