Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Request Tracker: Commit

CVS commit: rt

 

 

Request Tracker commit RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


tobiasb at fsck

May 3, 2000, 10:15 AM

Post #1 of 3 (115 views)
Permalink
CVS commit: rt

Module Name: rt
Committed By: tobiasb
Date: Wed May 3 17:15:49 UTC 2000

Modified Files:
rt/etc: schema.mysql

Log Message:
Added a table AutoReplies to avoid sending the same autoreply template
more than once to each requestor.

Eventually entries should be removed (i.e. after a week) through the
(upcoming?) timer system (eventually through the good, old crontab(5))


To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.1.2.73 -r1.1.2.74 rt/etc/schema.mysql


jesse at fsck

May 3, 2000, 10:18 AM

Post #2 of 3 (115 views)
Permalink
Re: CVS commit: rt [In reply to]

Can you please pull this for now? I'd really prefer that this _NOT_ be in 2.0

On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 01:15:49PM -0400, tobiasb [at] fsck wrote:
>
> Module Name: rt
> Committed By: tobiasb
> Date: Wed May 3 17:15:49 UTC 2000
>
> Modified Files:
> rt/etc: schema.mysql
>
> Log Message:
> Added a table AutoReplies to avoid sending the same autoreply template
> more than once to each requestor.
>
> Eventually entries should be removed (i.e. after a week) through the
> (upcoming?) timer system (eventually through the good, old crontab(5))
>
>
> To generate a diff of this commit:
> cvs rdiff -u -r1.1.2.73 -r1.1.2.74 rt/etc/schema.mysql
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rt-commit mailing list
> Rt-commit [at] lists
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-commit
>

--
jesse reed vincent -- jrvincent [at] wesleyan -- jesse [at] fsck
pgp keyprint: 50 41 9C 03 D0 BC BC C8 2C B9 77 26 6F E1 EB 91
--------------------------------------------------------------
. . . when not in doubt, get in doubt. -- Old Discordian Proveb


tobiasb at tobiasb

May 3, 2000, 10:23 AM

Post #3 of 3 (115 views)
Permalink
Re: CVS commit: rt [In reply to]

> Can you please pull this for now? I'd really prefer that this _NOT_ be in 2.0

I'll postpone working on this until after 2.0 (it's really only some
ten-fifteen minutes work), but I absolutely this is a Good Idea. I don't
think it matters that the table isn't used yet.

--
Tobias Brox
aka TobiX
+47 22 925 871

Request Tracker commit RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.