jrhett at netconsonance
Apr 19, 2012, 3:17 PM
Post #2 of 2
FWIW with 5.8 the OM prefix is required and those examples are wrong.
Re: omudpspoof configuration directives need OM prefix or not?
[In reply to]
On Apr 19, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Jo Rhett wrote:
> The page documenting omudpspoof is inconsistent. The configuration directives suggest to use OM prefix for everything except the port, while the examples don't use the prefix at all.
> If this changed in a given version, it would be good to indicate this.
> Jo Rhett
> Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and other randomness
> rsyslog mailing list
> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and other randomness
rsyslog mailing list
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards