Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: RANCID: Users
Problem backing up HP switches on RHEL 6.2 (x86_64) -- patch included
 

Index | Next | Previous | View Flat


david.byers at liu

Feb 8, 2012, 3:52 AM


Views: 748
Permalink
Problem backing up HP switches on RHEL 6.2 (x86_64) -- patch included

On 2010-06-25 a change was checked in to GNU libc that changes how
memcpy works on certain architectures. Previously it copied overlapping
memory regions correctly; now it doesn't.

The net result for rancid is that backups of HP switches don't work on
e.g. RedHat Enterprise Linux with glibc-2.12-1.47 (x86_64). The output
gets garbled, and rancid fails to complete the backup process in many
cases. The cause appears to be memcpy calls in hpuifilter.

The patch below appears to solve the problem (at least our backups look
OK again); I've simply replaced all memcpy calls with calls to memmove;
probably some of them don't need to be replaced, but I don't see any
harm in doing so -- memmove may be a little slower, but I doubt that
this is a bottleneck in rancid.

Unified diff follows below.

David Byers
Linköping University



--- hpuifilter.c 2012-02-08 09:45:18.427498055 +0100
+++ hpuifilter_org.c 2012-02-08 08:30:28.856503169 +0100
@@ -367,7 +367,7 @@
break;
} else if (bytes > 0) {
hlen -= bytes;
- memmove(hbuf, hbuf + bytes, hlen + 1);
+ memcpy(hbuf, hbuf + bytes, hlen + 1);
if (hlen < 1)
pfds[2].events &= ~POLLOUT;
}
@@ -423,7 +423,7 @@
break;
} else if (bytes > 0) {
tlen -= bytes;
- memmove(tbuf, tbuf + bytes, tlen + 1);
+ memcpy(tbuf, tbuf + bytes, tlen + 1);
if (tlen < 1)
pfds[1].events &= ~POLLOUT;
}
@@ -593,7 +593,7 @@
if (len - pmatch[0].rm_eo <= 0) {
buf[pmatch[0].rm_so] = '\0';
} else {
- memmove(buf + pmatch[0].rm_so, buf + pmatch[0].rm_eo,
+ memcpy(buf + pmatch[0].rm_so, buf + pmatch[0].rm_eo,
len - pmatch[0].rm_eo + 1);
}
len -= pmatch[0].rm_eo - pmatch[0].rm_so;
@@ -616,7 +616,7 @@
if (len - pmatch[0].rm_eo == 0) {
buf[pmatch[0].rm_so] = '\0';
} else {
- memmove(buf + pmatch[0].rm_so, buf + pmatch[0].rm_eo,
+ memcpy(buf + pmatch[0].rm_so, buf + pmatch[0].rm_eo,
len - pmatch[0].rm_eo + 1);
}
len -= pmatch[0].rm_eo - pmatch[0].rm_so;
_______________________________________________
Rancid-discuss mailing list
Rancid-discuss [at] shrubbery
http://www.shrubbery.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rancid-discuss

Subject User Time
Problem backing up HP switches on RHEL 6.2 (x86_64) -- patch included david.byers at liu Feb 8, 2012, 3:52 AM
    Re: Problem backing up HP switches on RHEL 6.2 (x86_64) -- patch included heas at shrubbery Feb 8, 2012, 10:05 AM
    Re: Problem backing up HP switches on RHEL 6.2 (x86_64) -- patch included phalenor at gmail Feb 8, 2012, 4:27 PM
    Re: Problem backing up HP switches on RHEL 6.2 (x86_64) -- patch included david.byers at liu Feb 8, 2012, 9:54 PM

  Index | Next | Previous | View Flat
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.