
dtoman at fortech
Oct 12, 2010, 10:33 AM
Post #3 of 4
(1607 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: Redistrubiting of static routes versus kernel routes
[In reply to]
|
|
On Thursday, October 07, 2010 9:29 PM , Craig Miskell <craig.miskell [at] opus> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Dalibor Toman wrote: >> Hi, >> But on one server I have a situation where the static route and the >> kernel one have equal bitmask. OSPF in this case doesn't announce >> the >> subnet to OSPF neighbor. >> >> For example: >> sh ip route 10.0.0.0 >> Routing entry for 10.0.0.0/22 >> Known via "static", distance 1, metric 0, blackhole >> directly connected, Null0 >> >> Routing entry for 10.0.0.0/22 >> Known via "kernel", distance 0, metric 0, best >> * x.y.x.y, via eth1 >> >> Is there an easy way how to configure quagga to redistribute >> 10.0.0.0/22 in such a case? > Is there any reason you can't tell OSPF to redistribute the kernel > routes: router ospf > redistribute kernel > > on the server that needs it. It's not a great solution, but it > might > be what you're after in this case. > there is more than 1100 /30 and /29 (and there are larger subnets too) routes on the Linux box and I don't want to export them to OSPF ouside this area. And I saw several notes on WWW that redistributing kernel routes in quagga is a bad idea.. Regars Dalibor Toman _______________________________________________ Quagga-users mailing list Quagga-users [at] lists http://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-users
|