john+quagga at sackheads
Jan 2, 2004, 11:23 AM
Post #3 of 3
(151 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: why not use only one integrated configuration port?
[In reply to]
|
|
--On Friday, January 2, 2004 4:05 AM +0000 Paul Jakma <paul [at] clubi> wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Pan Zhen Yu wrote:
>
>> I think one deamon one telnet configuration port is crazy. In fact
>> only one port is enough, just like vtysh, we use one telnet port,
>> such as 2666, to configure all the deamon. It is very easy, I
>> think.
>
> maybe one day, possibly, hopefully. indeed, I think i probably will
> configure the telnet port disabled altogether in my RPM builds ->
> make vtysh the default access method.
Some of us *only* run bgpd. I have no interest in running another daemon
just to get access to one that is already running.
|
