nick at inex
Jul 25, 2012, 1:26 AM
Post #2 of 3
On 25/07/2012 09:06, Dietmar Hartmann wrote:
Re: Large Prefix-list Performance on Quagga
[In reply to]
> However, to my surprise, now peering establishment nearly takes 3 times
> more time than ever (80sec vs 29sec) for exchanging 0.1% of previous table
> (600 vs 390K). To me it is inefficient, spending more time on exchanging a
> miniscule subset of prefixes although there must be some cost of
> introducing filters.
Yes, prefix-lists are handled in mainline quagga as linked lists. This is
FWIW, this problem is fixed on the euro_ix_b quagga branch, which
implements prefix-lists as a trie.
Quagga-dev mailing list
Quagga-dev [at] lists