Mailing List Archive: Quagga: Dev

[PATCH 0/4] IPv6 transport class suppport

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

shemminger at vyatta

Sep 26, 2011, 1:23 PM

Post #1 of 3 (283 views)
Permalink

[PATCH 0/4] IPv6 transport class suppport

IPv6 supports the same concept of differentiated service for routing protocols
as IPv4, but like too many things, the standards committee decided that having
two names for the same thing wasn't good enough and introduced a third more
generic term transport class.

The socket option to set transport class works the same as IPv4, but the arguments
are different.

I have validated that these patches compile and send the proper values
(according to wireshark), but have not tested interoperabilty with other
equipment.

_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
Quagga-dev [at] lists
http://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev

infrastation at yandex

Sep 28, 2011, 3:28 AM

Post #2 of 3 (275 views)
Permalink

Re: [PATCH 0/4] IPv6 transport class suppport [In reply to]

> I have validated that these patches compile and send the proper values
> (according to wireshark), but have not tested interoperabilty with other
> equipment.

This part will be done against the hardware shop I've got. Thank you (commit 933791 in RE-testing-0.99).

--
Denis Ovsienko
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
Quagga-dev [at] lists
http://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev

infrastation at yandex

Oct 27, 2011, 7:15 AM

Post #3 of 3 (194 views)
Permalink

Re: [PATCH 0/4] IPv6 transport class suppport [In reply to]

27.09.2011, 00:23, "Stephen Hemminger" <shemminger [at] vyatta>:
> IPv6 supports the same concept of differentiated service for routing protocols
> as IPv4, but like too many things, the standards committee decided that having
> two names for the same thing wasn't good enough and introduced a third more
> generic term transport class.
>
> The socket option to set transport class works the same as IPv4, but the arguments
> are different.
>
> I have validated that these patches compile and send the proper values
> (according to wireshark), but have not tested interoperabilty with other
> equipment.

Testing on my side did not reveal any problems besides missing #define on particular systems. Both your commits and the fix are in RE-stable-0.99 and master branches.

--
Denis Ovsienko
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
Quagga-dev [at] lists
http://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads