Mailing List Archive: Qmail: users

webmail

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

kai at 1stchina

Oct 25, 1999, 5:59 PM

Post #1 of 23 (7148 views)
Permalink

webmail

Hi all:
Has anyone performanced a webmail powered by qmail?
Now I want to programme a webmail system with qmail,
which supports virtuldoamins.
anyone have some ready-mode examples for me?
or give some advice about the interface of web to Maildir.
thanks

Akai
--
Song Kaicheng
http://www.1stChina.com/
ICQ:16229085

mikev at ultracom

Oct 25, 1999, 6:22 PM

Post #2 of 23 (7051 views)
Permalink

RE: webmail [In reply to]

We are currently migrating a Windows NT based webmail system, to use with
software.com's WebEdge product to interact with qmail-pop3d under a Solaris
enviroment. Only draw back WebEdge was built with an IMAP accounting
structure, so with POP3 you lose some functionality.

Mike Ventimiglia
Ultracom Internet Technologies

-----Original Message-----
From: kai [at] 1stchina [mailto:kai [at] 1stchina]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 1999 9:00 PM
To: qmail [at] list
Subject: webmail

Hi all:
Has anyone performanced a webmail powered by qmail?
Now I want to programme a webmail system with qmail,
which supports virtuldoamins.
anyone have some ready-mode examples for me?
or give some advice about the interface of web to Maildir.
thanks

Akai
--
Song Kaicheng
http://www.1stChina.com/
ICQ:16229085

carvalho at ecb

Oct 26, 1999, 9:06 AM

Post #3 of 23 (7048 views)
Permalink

Re: webmail [In reply to]

On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, kai [at] 1stchina wrote:
> Hi all:
> Has anyone performanced a webmail powered by qmail?
> Now I want to programme a webmail system with qmail,
> which supports virtuldoamins.
> anyone have some ready-mode examples for me?
> or give some advice about the interface of web to Maildir.
> thanks

Kai, there is already a Open Source project in course to build an
web-based mail system (that is totally independent from qmail).
Maybe you'll find something useful there.

Try http://www.horde.org/

You're searching for a program called "IMP".

Good Luck.

[]'z

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Luis Campos de Carvalho
System Administrator at ECB -- Escola Paulista de Medicina

"MAN + BEER = MORE MAN"
-- Collected from the Slashdot discussion list.
http://www.have-a-brew.com
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

vev at michvhf

Oct 26, 1999, 9:12 AM

Post #4 of 23 (7028 views)
Permalink

Re: webmail [In reply to]

On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, Luis Campos de Carvalho wrote:

> On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, kai [at] 1stchina wrote:
> > Hi all:
> > Has anyone performanced a webmail powered by qmail?
> > Now I want to programme a webmail system with qmail,
> > which supports virtuldoamins.
> > anyone have some ready-mode examples for me?
> > or give some advice about the interface of web to Maildir.
> > thanks
>
> Kai, there is already a Open Source project in course to build an
> web-based mail system (that is totally independent from qmail).
> Maybe you'll find something useful there.
>
> Try http://www.horde.org/
>
> You're searching for a program called "IMP".

Or take a look at twig (http://www.screwdriver.net/twig) It doesn't
use any javascript so it's compatible with older browsers. It also
does news, has a calender and some other stuff. I'm looking at it now
but haven't done much yet.

Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev [at] michvhf flame-mail: /dev/null
# include <std/disclaimers.h> Have you seen http://www.pop4.net?
Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com
Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================

niggemyer at msgerber

Oct 26, 1999, 10:27 AM

Post #5 of 23 (7009 views)
Permalink

Re: webmail [In reply to]

We like to use sqwebmail, from inter7.com

http://www.inter7.com/sqwebmail/

Seamless support for Qmail/maildir, and the vchkpw virtual domain package.

> On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, kai [at] 1stchina wrote:
> > Hi all:
> > Has anyone performanced a webmail powered by qmail?
> > Now I want to programme a webmail system with qmail,
> > which supports virtuldoamins.
> > anyone have some ready-mode examples for me?
> > or give some advice about the interface of web to Maildir.
> > thanks

chee at Instinet

May 16, 2000, 3:43 PM

Post #6 of 23 (7020 views)
Permalink

Re: webmail [In reply to]

Hi,

Does anyone know if there is a webmail package that uses smtp instead of reading/writing from/to Maildir or mailbox? Thanks in advance.

qmail at orion

May 16, 2000, 3:51 PM

Post #7 of 23 (7020 views)
Permalink

Re: webmail [In reply to]

On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 06:43:25PM -0400, Chester Chee wrote:
> Does anyone know if there is a webmail package that uses smtp instead of reading/writing from/to Maildir or mailbox? Thanks in advance.

smtp ? I'm afraid it could only be used to _send_ mails.
To read them, you have to choose between direct disk access (like omail),
pop3 (like cwmail) or imap (like imp).

Regards,
Olivier

chee at Instinet

May 16, 2000, 4:02 PM

Post #8 of 23 (7017 views)
Permalink

Re: webmail [In reply to]

Ok, let me rephrase my question. Thanks Olivier....
Does anyone know if there is a webmail package that uses smtp to send mail,
and imap/disk access for reading mail? Thanks in advance.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Olivier M." <qmail [at] orion>
To: "Chester Chee" <chee [at] instinet>
Cc: <qmail [at] list>
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2000 6:51 PM
Subject: Re: webmail

> On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 06:43:25PM -0400, Chester Chee wrote:
> > Does anyone know if there is a webmail package that uses smtp instead
of reading/writing from/to Maildir or mailbox? Thanks in advance.
>
> smtp ? I'm afraid it could only be used to _send_ mails.
> To read them, you have to choose between direct disk access (like omail),
> pop3 (like cwmail) or imap (like imp).
>
> Regards,
> Olivier
>

bmatzelle at yahoo

May 18, 2000, 1:35 PM

Post #9 of 23 (7043 views)
Permalink

Re: webmail [In reply to]

You could try IMP: http://www.horde.org/imp or TWIG:
http://twig.screwdriver.net. There are a bunch more. I found them all at
Freshmeat in the appindex -> web -> applications directory.

On Tue, 16 May 2000, Chester Chee wrote:
> Ok, let me rephrase my question. Thanks Olivier....
> Does anyone know if there is a webmail package that uses smtp to send mail,
> and imap/disk access for reading mail? Thanks in advance.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Olivier M." <qmail [at] orion>
> To: "Chester Chee" <chee [at] instinet>
> Cc: <qmail [at] list>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2000 6:51 PM
> Subject: Re: webmail
>
>
> > On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 06:43:25PM -0400, Chester Chee wrote:
> > > Does anyone know if there is a webmail package that uses smtp instead
> of reading/writing from/to Maildir or mailbox? Thanks in advance.
> >
> > smtp ? I'm afraid it could only be used to _send_ mails.
> > To read them, you have to choose between direct disk access (like omail),
> > pop3 (like cwmail) or imap (like imp).
> >
> > Regards,
> > Olivier
> >
--
http://www.matzelle.net

dereklist at cdbaby

Apr 24, 2002, 1:07 AM

Post #10 of 23 (7071 views)
Permalink

Re: Webmail [In reply to]

> I would like to know which is the best (and free) webmail software to work
> with qmail.

After trying a few different ones, we're most happiest with this:

http://www.squirrelmail.org/

It's VERY good.

robin-dated-1019895617.a6eaff at socha

Apr 24, 2002, 1:22 AM

Post #11 of 23 (7045 views)
Permalink

Re: Webmail [In reply to]

* Derek at <dereklist [at] cdbaby> writes:

>> I would like to know which is the best (and free) webmail software to
>> work with qmail.
>
> After trying a few different ones, we're most happiest with this:
> http://www.squirrelmail.org/
> It's VERY good.

If the ability to suck donkey dick is a criterion, it's really VERY
good. http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&q=squirrelmail+exploit

If not, http://www.inter7.com/sqwebmail/ shuold fit your bill.

ron at firelan

Apr 24, 2002, 4:49 AM

Post #12 of 23 (7039 views)
Permalink

RE: Webmail [In reply to]

I like Jawmail http://jawmail.sourceforge.net

-----Original Message-----
From: harish.k [at] lntinfotech [mailto:harish.k [at] lntinfotech]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 3:38 AM
To: qmail [at] list
Subject: Webmail

Hi,
I would like to know which is the best (and free) webmail software to
work with qmail.

Thanks in advance,

Harish

**************************************************************************************************
The Firelan(tm) Virus Scanning Service has scanned this email for viruses, vandals
and malicious content.
http://www.firelan.net
**************************************************************************************************

jason at netops

Apr 24, 2002, 7:49 AM

Post #13 of 23 (7042 views)
Permalink

RE: Webmail [In reply to]

We are using IMP from the Horde Project.

Jason

> -----Original Message-----
> From: harish.k [at] lntinfotech [mailto:harish.k [at] lntinfotech]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 3:38 AM
> To: qmail [at] list
> Subject: Webmail
>
>
> Hi,
> I would like to know which is the best (and free) webmail software to
> work with qmail.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Harish
>
>
>
**************************************************************************************************
> The Firelan(tm) Virus Scanning Service has scanned this email for viruses,
> vandals
> and malicious content.
> http://www.firelan.net
>
**************************************************************************************************
>
>

nithinhr at vxl

Jul 11, 2002, 6:43 AM

Post #14 of 23 (7115 views)
Permalink

Re: webmail [In reply to]

hi harish,

i have expect and hence was able to succesfully create the
sqwebmail-3.3.5.rpm from the gzip tar file.
without expect the rpm wouldn't be build.
anymore suggestions...?

--Nithin
harish.k [at] lntinfotech wrote:

> Hmm... What authentication are you using?
> You need to install a package called 'expect' for this to work.
>
> Rgds
> --
> Harish K
> Systems Engineer
> L&T Infotech Ltd
>
> +91-22-6948065 - Voice
> +91-22-8581615 - Fax
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> Before you open your mouth to speak, please make
> sure it's an improvement upon the silence.
> ------------------------------------------------

tech-mail at prupref

Jul 1, 2003, 6:30 AM

Post #15 of 23 (7076 views)
Permalink

RE: webmail [In reply to]

you may also want to lok at http://webbasedemail.com
<http://webbasedemail.com>
I find that it is a bit more polished, but it all depends on your targeted
end-users

-----Original Message-----
From: Asad Javid [mailto:ajavid [at] duc]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 7:15 AM
To: 'qmail [at] list'
Subject: webmail

Hi all

I am planning to install qmail with web support. Just wanted to inquire that
which one is better and y?? sqwebmail, squirrelmail, or anyother

Regards,

de5 at sws5

Jul 2, 2003, 8:03 AM

Post #16 of 23 (7031 views)
Permalink

RE: webmail [In reply to]

"Patrick de Ruiter" <patruit [at] chello> wrote:

>In the life with qmail documentation one of the recommended programs is
>openwebmail, looks pretty and also reasonable fast too

LWQ doesn't mention openwebmail.

-Dave

patruit at chello

Jul 2, 2003, 6:16 PM

Post #17 of 23 (7035 views)
Permalink

RE: webmail [In reply to]

Hi David,

You can find a little how-to document on the following link:
http://www.edoceo.com/liberum/default.php?doc=qmail-courier-imap

And for any one else, why does every body always say ohw don't use that
program, but use the program I use.
I think this is nonsense, I use qmail-ldap and I don't go screaming around
that you should use it too.
Why not try to help the person, instead of telling him that he must use
another program just because you think that the program he wants to use is
bad or lame.
If he or she wants advice on what apps to use, they will ask

Cheers
Patrick
-----Original Message-----
From: Brad Dameron [mailto:bdameron [at] tscnet]
Sent: woensdag 2 juli 2003 22:06
To: qmail [at] list

----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Tzoc" <qmail [at] amigo>

> Exactly, de LWQ doesn`t mention Openwebmail. So, is there somebody who
> installed qmail+openwebmail?
> If there's somebody, please help me with that, because I would like to use
> qmail+openwebmail.
>
> David

Openwebmail is probably not used by many Qmail admin as it only would
support MBOX format in it's current state. Maildir is definately the format
of choice in my opinion.

Brad

bdameron at tscnet

Jul 2, 2003, 8:35 PM

Post #18 of 23 (7038 views)
Permalink

Re: webmail [In reply to]

----- Original Message -----
>From: "Patrick de Ruiter" <patruit [at] chello>
>
>Hi David,
>
>You can find a little how-to document on the following link:
>http://www.edoceo.com/liberum/default.php?doc=qmail-courier-imap
>
>And for any one else, why does every body always say ohw don't use that
>program, but use the program I use.
>I think this is nonsense, I use qmail-ldap and I don't go screaming around
>that you should use it too.
>Why not try to help the person, instead of telling him that he must use
>another program just because you think that the program he wants to use is
>bad or lame.
>If he or she wants advice on what apps to use, they will ask
>
>Cheers
>Patrick

I didn't see anyone say specifically to not use this or that program and to
use this other one instead.

Brad

edavis at insanum

Mar 29, 2005, 3:39 PM

Post #19 of 23 (7012 views)
Permalink

Re: webmail [In reply to]

I use dovecot.

--
Eric Davis
http://www.insanum.com

On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 06:31:08PM -0500, David T. Ashley wrote:
> Today I reviewed the Squirrel Mail description.
>
> What is the recommended (by the list) IMAP server for this product?
>
> Any other advice?
>
> Thanks, Dave.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Max Andersen [mailto:max [at] militant]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 1:50 AM
> > To: Rob
> > Cc: qmail [at] list
> > Subject: Re: webmail
> >
> >
> > Rob wrote:
> > > Quick question for qmail users.
> > >
> > > which webmail do you prefer. I currently use sqwebmail, I was
> > wondering
> > > what you thought of squirrelmail.
> > >
> >
> > I like the look&feel of squirrelmail, with a few addons.
> >
> > Sincerely
> > Max
> >
>

remo at italy1

Mar 29, 2005, 3:44 PM

Post #20 of 23 (7029 views)
Permalink

Re: webmail [In reply to]

I use courier-imap works really well.

Remo

----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Davis" <edavis [at] insanum>
To: "David T. Ashley" <dashley [at] abi-consulting>
Cc: "Max Andersen" <max [at] militant>; "Rob" <rbailleu [at] kewanee>;
<qmail [at] list>
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: webmail

>
> I use dovecot.
>
>
> --
> Eric Davis
> http://www.insanum.com
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 06:31:08PM -0500, David T. Ashley wrote:
>> Today I reviewed the Squirrel Mail description.
>>
>> What is the recommended (by the list) IMAP server for this product?
>>
>> Any other advice?
>>
>> Thanks, Dave.
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Max Andersen [mailto:max [at] militant]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 1:50 AM
>> > To: Rob
>> > Cc: qmail [at] list
>> > Subject: Re: webmail
>> >
>> >

broland at gmail

Mar 29, 2005, 5:16 PM

Post #21 of 23 (7007 views)
Permalink

Re: webmail [In reply to]

I personally use courier-IMAP. Getting it configured correctly took a
few minutes, but a quick google search turned up some good step by
step instructions. I haven't had any issues with it yet, though I
haven't really been stress testing it.

--- Brent Roland

On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:39:48 -0800, Eric Davis <edavis [at] insanum> wrote:
>
> I use dovecot.
>
> --
> Eric Davis
> http://www.insanum.com
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 06:31:08PM -0500, David T. Ashley wrote:
> > Today I reviewed the Squirrel Mail description.
> >
> > What is the recommended (by the list) IMAP server for this product?
> >
> > Any other advice?
> >
> > Thanks, Dave.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Max Andersen [mailto:max [at] militant]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 1:50 AM
> > > To: Rob
> > > Cc: qmail [at] list
> > > Subject: Re: webmail
> > >
> > >
> > > Rob wrote:
> > > > Quick question for qmail users.
> > > >
> > > > which webmail do you prefer. I currently use sqwebmail, I was
> > > wondering
> > > > what you thought of squirrelmail.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I like the look&feel of squirrelmail, with a few addons.
> > >
> > > Sincerely
> > > Max
> > >
> >
>
>

kyle-qmail at memoryhole

Mar 29, 2005, 10:09 PM

Post #22 of 23 (7024 views)
Permalink

Re: webmail [In reply to]

On Tuesday, March 29 at 06:31 PM, quoth David T. Ashley:
> Today I reviewed the Squirrel Mail description.
>
> What is the recommended (by the list) IMAP server for this product?

I used courier-imap until I discovered BincIMAP (Binc is written to be
used similarly to qmail-pop3d).

> Any other advice?

Install it all by hand. That will give you a much better idea of how it
works, and what you can do if something breaks.

~Kyle
--
Liberty is the only thing you cannot have unless you are willing to give it
to others.
-- William Allen White

Attachments:

signature.asc (0.19 KB)

list-qmail at augensalat

Mar 6, 2009, 2:03 AM

Post #23 of 23 (4680 views)
Permalink

Re: webmail [In reply to]

Shibashish wrote:

> Even i use RoundCube, nice clean interface!

> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Byung-Hee HWANG <bh [at] izb> wrote:

> > Personally i would like to give +1 to RoundCube, which offers
> > UTF-8. That's why i use Google Apps!

I don't use it, but it *must* be good, because it is written in the best
(= most widely used) programming language and - consulting my webserver
access logs - even a lot of bots like it:

195.242.98.150 "GET /roundcubemail-0.1-beta/bin/html2text.php HTTP/1.1" 500 369 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)"
195.242.98.150 "GET /roundcubemail-0.1.1/bin/html2text.php HTTP/1.1" 500 369 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)"
217.174.240.137 "GET /roundcube/bin/html2text.php HTTP/1.1" 500 369 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)"
91.198.32.106 "GET /roundcube//bin/msgimport HTTP/1.1" 500 11248 "-" "Toata dragostea mea pentru diavola"
196.200.138.134 "GET //roundcube/ HTTP/1.1" 500 11240 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.5) Gecko/2008120122 Firefox/3.0.5"

Obviously the adequate companion for the most secure MTA.
--
Bernhard Graf

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads