Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Qmail: users

Re: reject, don't bounce

 

 

Qmail users RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


johnl at iecc

Apr 20, 2009, 8:16 AM

Post #1 of 1 (670 views)
Permalink
Re: reject, don't bounce

>Giving rejections during an SMTP session provides a means for a
>spammer to determine legitimate addresses.

Um, spammers haven't bothered doing address testing since about 1999.
When you're blasting out spam with botnets, you just send the mail and
ignore the return codes. I have a spam trap that gives a 55x response
to every message, and they just hammer on the same old addresses.

Inline rejects are absolutely best practice these days. See, for
example, the OECD's antispam kit at
http://www.oecd-antispam.org/article.php3?id_article=232

>I think a greater problem is differentiating which bounces are as a
>result of spam and which ones aren't.

That's why you reject, so you don't have to.

R's,
John

Qmail users RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.