<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Qmail | users</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>12 Feb  2012 17:07:16 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: How to: qmail-smtpd for roaming users.</title>
<description>Hi, well, I can&amp;#039;t tell about the Submission port; but my other qmail-instance running SMTPS service has less then 1% the spam hits w.r.t. standard po</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 10:24:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138128</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: How to: qmail-smtpd for roaming users.</title>
<description>I was wanting to do this on my qmail server but I was wondering if the spambots hit port 587 like they do on port 25? ----- Original Message ----- F</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 09:50:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138127</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: How to: qmail-smtpd for roaming users.</title>
<description>&amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Feb 10, 2012, at 6:13 AM, FC Mario Patty wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Guys, I think I&amp;#039;ve made it. I installed the second qmail-delivery and &amp;gt;&amp;gt; qmail-smtpd to an</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 07:27:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138126</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: How to: qmail-smtpd for roaming users.</title>
<description>On Feb 10, 2012, at 6:13 AM, FC Mario Patty wrote: &amp;gt; Guys, I think I&amp;#039;ve made it. I installed the second qmail-delivery and &amp;gt; qmail-smtpd to another d</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 05:15:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138124</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: QMail Under OpenSUSE 12.1</title>
<description>Thanks :) Will fire up the OpenSuSE VM later today and play with it some more then.   My next question regards blocking emails from certain TLDs li</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 21:10:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138125</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: QMail Under OpenSUSE 12.1</title>
<description>On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 17:32 +0100, Erwin Hoffmann wrote: &amp;gt; Hi Robert, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Am 09.02.2012 um 16:47 schrieb Robert Wolfe: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Ok, but was not able</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 17:58:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138123</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: [WNYLUG-Users] QMail Under OpenSUSE 12.1</title>
<description>Well, it seems I got it working, granted I had to start daemontools manually and have it fork to the background as such: /bin/sh /command/svscanboot</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 12:18:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138122</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: [WNYLUG-Users] QMail Under OpenSUSE 12.1</title>
<description>In this case, that would be the correct assumption. Now, my question is is how to make daemontools behave and act normally in opensuse 12.1? -----Or</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 11:55:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138121</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [WNYLUG-Users] QMail Under OpenSUSE 12.1</title>
<description>Hi  Am 09.02.2012 um 20:33 schrieb Darin Perusich: &amp;gt; You can still use SysV init script on OpenSUSE 12.1 even though &amp;gt; systemd is the new facility</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 11:52:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138120</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ampersand &amp;quot;&amp;amp;&amp;quot; in email address</title>
<description>On 9 Feb 2012, at 16:56, Robert Wolfe wrote: &amp;gt; I am sure there is, however, AFAIK, this would break the RFC compliance &amp;gt; qmail has. Which RFC? All o</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 11:32:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138119</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ampersand &amp;quot;&amp;amp;&amp;quot; in email address</title>
<description>Hi Roger,   Am 09.02.2012 um 16:10 schrieb Roger Walker: &amp;gt;    I&amp;#039;m seeing the following problem in the log files (minor changes &amp;gt; to protect the</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 09:12:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138117</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: QMail Under OpenSUSE 12.1</title>
<description>Hi Robert,  Am 09.02.2012 um 16:47 schrieb Robert Wolfe: &amp;gt; Ok, but was not able to locate either of these files L Here is my version of OpenSUSE 12</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 08:32:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138116</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: qmail giving up on postgrey graylisting (reply code 450)</title>
<description>Hello, Am 09.02.2012 um 16:23 schrieb Maurice Lucas - TAOS-IT: &amp;gt; I never had this problem with qmail but did you change your qmailqueue &amp;gt; lifetime?</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 08:28:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138115</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: ampersand &amp;quot;&amp;amp;&amp;quot; in email address</title>
<description>I am sure there is, however, AFAIK, this would break the RFC compliance qmail has. You might just want to try changing the address to food_bev@remote</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 07:56:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138118</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: QMail Under OpenSUSE 12.1</title>
<description>Ok, but was not able to locate either of these files L Here is my version of OpenSUSE 12.1&amp;#039;s kernel:  Linux mailout 3.1.9-1.4-desktop #1 SMP PREEMP</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 07:47:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138114</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: qmail giving up on postgrey graylisting (reply code 450)</title>
<description>Hi Mirko,  Am 09.02.2012 um 15:39 schrieb Mirko Steiner: &amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; i got the following problem, when my qmail mailserver tries to deliver e-mail</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 07:32:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138113</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: qmail giving up on postgrey graylisting (reply code 450)</title>
<description>I never had this problem with qmail but did you change your qmailqueue lifetime? 450 means try again later. Stolen from http://www.emailquestions.co</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 07:23:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138110</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: QMail Under OpenSUSE 12.1</title>
<description>I had the same problem today on Ubuntu. The solution there was to use this file. Another location for this file could be /etc/event/svscan.conf   ~$</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 07:20:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138111</link>
</item><item>
<title>ampersand &amp;quot;&amp;amp;&amp;quot; in email address</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m seeing the following problem in the log files (minor changes to protect the innocent and guilty): info msg 1966555: bytes 468716 from &amp;lt;Food&amp;amp;Bev@r</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 07:10:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138112</link>
</item><item>
<title>QMail Under OpenSUSE 12.1</title>
<description>Hi all!  I am having an issue where I am trying to install netqmail/qmail under OpenSuSE 12.1 and I am able to get everything to build, however, it</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 06:43:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138109</link>
</item><item>
<title>qmail giving up on postgrey graylisting (reply code 450)</title>
<description>Hello, i got the following problem, when my qmail mailserver tries to deliver e-mails to a customer: Feb 2 08:26:53 server03 qmail: 1328189213.76759</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 06:39:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138108</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: How to: qmail-smtpd for roaming users.</title>
<description>Or you could always set up a VPN for your users so that they can connect to your network via a secure connection outside your LAN. Then they should n</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 07:24:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138107</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: How to: qmail-smtpd for roaming users.</title>
<description>On Feb 7, 2012, at 4:12 AM, FC Mario Patty wrote: &amp;gt; Now we want to let roaming users to be able to use qmail-smtpd from &amp;gt; anywhere outside from local</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 05:21:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138106</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: How to: qmail-smtpd for roaming users.</title>
<description>Hi Am 07.02.2012 um 10:12 schrieb FC Mario Patty: &amp;gt; Hi guys, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I hope this is the right place to ask. We use qmail-ldap (qmailrocks installation)</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 02:14:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138105</link>
</item><item>
<title>How to: qmail-smtpd for roaming users.</title>
<description>Hi guys, I hope this is the right place to ask. We use qmail-ldap (qmailrocks installation) for our mail server for some time. To give people access</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 01:12:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138104</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: POP3 dictionary attacks -- change of bot strategy</title>
<description>Hello Erwin, Thus said Erwin Hoffmann on Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:26:37 +0100: &amp;gt; I need to add, that I use the DNS &amp;#039;paranoid&amp;#039; verification in sslserver &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>04 Feb  2012 10:54:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138102</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: POP3 dictionary attacks -- change of bot strategy</title>
<description>Hi Andy  Am 04.02.2012 um 18:45 schrieb Andy Bradford: &amp;gt; Thus said Erwin Hoffmann on Sat, 04 Feb 2012 13:51:02 +0100: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; a) Greetdelay&amp;#039;ing the S</description>
<pubDate>04 Feb  2012 10:26:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138103</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: POP3 dictionary attacks -- change of bot strategy</title>
<description>Thus said Erwin Hoffmann on Sat, 04 Feb 2012 13:51:02 +0100: &amp;gt; a) Greetdelay&amp;#039;ing the SMTP sessions -- working great for years -- is &amp;gt; almost useles</description>
<pubDate>04 Feb  2012 09:45:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138101</link>
</item><item>
<title>POP3 dictionary attacks -- change of bot strategy</title>
<description>Hi everybody,  since roughly December 13th last year I see a significant change in the bots activities: a) Greetdelay&amp;#039;ing the SMTP sessions -- worki</description>
<pubDate>04 Feb  2012 04:51:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138100</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Using Smarthost to relay email from qmail</title>
<description>On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 08:25:34 +0200, Shepherd Nhongo wrote: &amp;gt; as a root user# vi /var/qmail/control/*smtproutes* &amp;gt; add the following entry below in</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 22:59:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138099</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Using Smarthost to relay email from qmail</title>
<description>On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Robert Wolfe &amp;lt;rwolfe@fpsoft.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hi all! Crossposting this on the local LUG mailing list as well to see if</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 22:25:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138098</link>
</item><item>
<title>Using Smarthost to relay email from qmail</title>
<description>Hi all! Crossposting this on the local LUG mailing list as well to see if anyone locally can help, too J   I have an account set up at JangoMail to</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 22:05:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138097</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: tcpserver: status: 120/120</title>
<description>do a #netstat -an and see where all those connections are coming from.  ________________________________________ From: Jason Haar [Jason_Haar@trimbl</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 21:46:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138096</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: tcpserver: status: 120/120</title>
<description>If you a running Linux, &amp;quot;pstree&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;ps -ejH&amp;quot; can show you all the processes on your system in a tree structure - really useful for showing where road</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 20:04:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138095</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: tcpserver: status: 120/120</title>
<description>On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Andy Bradford &amp;lt;amb-sendok-1330911659.fbmioobiocpoaipnkikb@bradfords.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Thus said Asif Iqbal on Fri, 03 Feb</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 18:44:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138094</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: tcpserver: status: 120/120</title>
<description>Thus said Asif Iqbal on Fri, 03 Feb 2012 02:56:56 EST: &amp;gt; I am seeing all 120 incoming connections are staying filled up. Why are they staying filled</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 17:40:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138093</link>
</item><item>
<title>tcpserver: status: 120/120</title>
<description>qmail smtpd was was working fine and most of the time in few years it was usually 1/120 to 5/120 I am seeing all 120 incoming connections are staying</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 23:56:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138092</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: missing sender in send log</title>
<description>Paspao &amp;lt;paspao@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I see some bounces in my send log with from set to &amp;lt;#@[]&amp;gt; . I can I &amp;gt; avoid this playing with qmail configurati</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 05:55:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138091</link>
</item><item>
<title>missing sender in send log</title>
<description>Hello , I see some bounces in my send log with from set to &amp;lt;#@[]&amp;gt; . I can I avoid this playing with qmail configuration? 2012-01-20 09:50:14.896769</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 04:49:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138090</link>
</item><item>
<title>badmailfrom - sa-blacklist.current weird problem</title>
<description>Hello, I apologize if this not exactly qmail only related. Im using badmailfrom extension to qmail. and I found out that on random basis i get 2 diff</description>
<pubDate>25 Jan  2012 04:46:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138089</link>
</item><item>
<title>Rumelis Güzellik Merkezinde Bölgesel İncelme ve Sıkılaştırma Uygulamaları 49 TL!</title>
<description>Eposta alıcınız bu epostayı okuyamıyor. Online görmek için, lütfen buraya gidiniz: http://maildoruk.net/display.php?M=2894390&amp;amp;C=ac5d353c6f5537</description>
<pubDate>14 Jan  2012 01:52:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138088</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Firsatalin</title>
<description>...and to be very off-topic but precise, the negotiations are frozen at the moment, see also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accession_of_Turkey_to_th</description>
<pubDate>09 Jan  2012 12:20:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138087</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Firsatalin</title>
<description>Hi, Hmm, you seem to be right. :&amp;amp; -Blast. I got confused about it when I searched. It seems that they&amp;#039;re still &amp;quot;in the process&amp;quot;. Source: &amp;lt;http://ec.e</description>
<pubDate>09 Jan  2012 08:25:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138086</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Firsatalin</title>
<description>Did Turkey eventually make it into the EU? I seem to remember it didn&amp;#039;t. On Jan 9, 2012, at 10:39 AM, Jens Bauer &amp;lt;jens@bruger.mine.nu&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hi</description>
<pubDate>09 Jan  2012 07:46:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138085</link>
</item><item>
<title>Firsatalin</title>
<description>Hi all, This guy seems to be located in Turkey, which is in EU. And sending spam is not legal in EU. Is he going to pay me $250 for each mail he&amp;#039;s se</description>
<pubDate>09 Jan  2012 07:39:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138084</link>
</item><item>
<title>Firsatalin 09 Ocak Kampanyası</title>
<description>Eposta alıcınız bu epostayı okuyamıyor. Online görmek için, lütfen buraya gidiniz: http://maildoruk.net/display.php?M=2894390&amp;amp;C=ac5d353c6f5537</description>
<pubDate>09 Jan  2012 04:57:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138083</link>
</item><item>
<title>DIALOGUE’ta İngilizce ya da Almanca eğitimi - Uludağ&amp;#039;da Kayak ve Doğa Yürüyüşü 34,90 TL.</title>
<description>Eposta alıcınız bu epostayı okuyamıyor. Online görmek için, lütfen buraya gidiniz: http://maildoruk.net/display.php?M=1977981&amp;amp;C=871fa3828fb90f</description>
<pubDate>06 Jan  2012 23:27:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138082</link>
</item><item>
<title>TELL ME MORE Programıyla Bir Yıllık Online Eğitim Fırsatı 59 TL - Dünyanın Sekizinci Harikası Kapadokya Sizi Bekliyor! sadece 129 TL&amp;#039;ye...</title>
<description>Eposta alıcınız bu epostayı okuyamıyor. Online görmek için, lütfen buraya gidiniz: http://maildoruk.net/display.php?M=1751011&amp;amp;C=3ab14218d93797</description>
<pubDate>06 Jan  2012 03:37:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138081</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: .qmail forwarding problem</title>
<description>Andrew, On 4 January 2012 13:31, Andrew Richards - ar-djblists@acrconsulting.co.uk &amp;lt;+roseyq+ftumsh+4e4e1ffb85.ar-djblists#acrconsulting.co.uk@spamgou</description>
<pubDate>04 Jan  2012 07:36:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138080</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: .qmail forwarding problem</title>
<description>On Wednesday 04 January 2012 11:24:23 roseyq.20.ftumsh@xoxy.net wrote: &amp;gt; This one has me stumped. The setup works and has done for years. You have a</description>
<pubDate>04 Jan  2012 05:31:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138079</link>
</item><item>
<title>.qmail forwarding problem</title>
<description>Lo, This one has me stumped. The setup works and has done for years. The domains firstb2b.net and sf.firstb2b.net are both handled by the same .qmai</description>
<pubDate>04 Jan  2012 03:24:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138078</link>
</item><item>
<title>Accumulating &amp;quot;Auth_imap&amp;quot; Processes in D state</title>
<description>Hi,  I&amp;#039;m having a problem with auth_imap. Seems there&amp;#039;s a bunch of accumulating auth_imap processes that are getting stuck in the D state. When I</description>
<pubDate>03 Jan  2012 10:03:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138077</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: How to reduce Iowait?</title>
<description>On 12/30/2011 11:28 AM, David Enrique Espejo Rodriguez wrote: &amp;gt; We have a mail server running with SATA disks and is been &amp;gt; experiencing a high (over</description>
<pubDate>31 Dec  2011 08:07:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138076</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: How to reduce Iowait?</title>
<description>On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 11:28:54AM -0500, David Enrique Espejo Rodriguez wrote: &amp;gt; Good morning &amp;gt; &amp;gt; We have a mail server running with SATA disks and</description>
<pubDate>31 Dec  2011 04:48:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138075</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: How to reduce Iowait?</title>
<description>There&amp;#039;s a couple of things you can do. If your queues are large, try changing conf split to a higher value like 97 (keep it prime) rather than the de</description>
<pubDate>30 Dec  2011 08:41:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138074</link>
</item><item>
<title>How to reduce Iowait?</title>
<description>Good morning We have a mail server running with SATA disks and is been experiencing a high (over 70%) IOWAIT on outgoing SMTP and also outgoing and i</description>
<pubDate>30 Dec  2011 08:28:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138073</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name._(#5.1.1)</title>
<description>Hi Nishi, Did you remember to run /var/qmail/bin/qmail-newu after adding the user to &amp;#039;assign&amp;#039; ?  Love, Jens On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 14:19:23 +0000, nka</description>
<pubDate>28 Dec  2011 08:32:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138072</link>
</item><item>
<title>Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name._(#5.1.1)</title>
<description>I recently created another domain (D02.com) on my VPS...just identical to the one I had before (D01.com) However, all the emails to admin@D01 are/wer</description>
<pubDate>26 Dec  2011 06:19:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138071</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: HELO/EHLO not required ?</title>
<description>Hi Charles, You&amp;#039;re right. I confused that qmail required &amp;#039;mail from&amp;#039; before &amp;#039;rcpt to&amp;#039; for being &amp;#039;helo&amp;#039; before anything else, so sorry for the noise..</description>
<pubDate>08 Dec  2011 02:38:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138070</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: HELO/EHLO not required ?</title>
<description>Jens Bauer &amp;lt;jens@bruger.mine.nu&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; And I noticed that ehlo/helo is &amp;#039;not required anymore&amp;#039; after applying the &amp;gt; AUTH patch. I&amp;#039;ve just verifi</description>
<pubDate>07 Dec  2011 10:07:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138069</link>
</item><item>
<title>HELO/EHLO not required ?</title>
<description>Hi, I just came across this site... &amp;lt;http://notes.sagredo.eu/node/22#chkuser&amp;gt; And I noticed that ehlo/helo is &amp;#039;not required anymore&amp;#039; after applying</description>
<pubDate>07 Dec  2011 09:42:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138068</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: How to remove an email address from black list?</title>
<description>On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 08:46 -0500, DAVID ENRIQUE ESPEJO RODRIGUEZ wrote: &amp;gt; Good morning &amp;gt; &amp;gt;  &amp;gt; &amp;gt; One of our customer’s email address has entered</description>
<pubDate>02 Dec  2011 06:40:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138067</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: How to remove an email address from black list?</title>
<description>DAVID ENRIQUE ESPEJO RODRIGUEZ &amp;lt;despejo@ifxcorp.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; One of our customer&amp;#039;s email address has entered into the badmailfrom list, &amp;gt; we reall</description>
<pubDate>02 Dec  2011 06:11:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138066</link>
</item><item>
<title>How to remove an email address from black list?</title>
<description>Good morning One of our customer&amp;#039;s email address has entered into the badmailfrom list, we really don&amp;#039;t know why cause he only sent three different m</description>
<pubDate>02 Dec  2011 05:46:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138065</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Bulk] Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Marcus Bointon &amp;lt;marcus@synchromedia.co.uk&amp;gt;wrote: &amp;gt; We do the same. In that situation, we drop the from address from</description>
<pubDate>26 Nov  2011 07:04:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138063</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Bulk] Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>On 25 Nov 2011, at 20:26, Vahid Moghaddasi wrote: &amp;gt; The only problem is that, we send e-mail on behalf of our costumers to (their) &amp;gt; costumers so we</description>
<pubDate>25 Nov  2011 13:47:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138062</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Bulk] Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>After adding a few debug lines in the script, I found qmailr is running it but somewhere in the instruction it said the owner of the file domainkeys/d</description>
<pubDate>25 Nov  2011 11:26:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138061</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Bulk] Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Kevin Chadwick &amp;lt;ma1l1ists@yahoo.co.uk&amp;gt;wrote: &amp;gt; . &amp;gt; have you compared the section following &amp;gt; #First, figure out who</description>
<pubDate>25 Nov  2011 07:47:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138060</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Bulk] Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Niamh Holding &amp;lt;niamh@fullbore.co.uk&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; VM&amp;gt; AOL claims that if we implement DKIM, we will have no problem send</description>
<pubDate>25 Nov  2011 06:50:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138059</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Bulk] Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>Hello Vahid, Thursday, November 24, 2011, 7:04:21 PM, you wrote: VM&amp;gt; AOL claims that if we implement DKIM, we will have no problem sending them e-ma</description>
<pubDate>25 Nov  2011 04:56:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138058</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Bulk] Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:36:31 -0500 Vahid Moghaddasi wrote: &amp;gt; still don&amp;#039;t see anything in the header of the mail going out. In fact, the &amp;gt; script is n</description>
<pubDate>25 Nov  2011 03:46:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138057</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Kevin Chadwick &amp;lt;ma1l1ists@yahoo.co.uk&amp;gt;wrote: &amp;gt; if [ -r &amp;quot;$DKSIGN&amp;quot; ] ; then &amp;gt; Thanks Kevin, I placed this script (cop</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2011 17:04:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138064</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 14:17:12 -0500 Vahid Moghaddasi wrote: &amp;gt; Well, Solaris 10 comes with bash and perl 5.8.4. I thought regex or shopt &amp;gt; are standard</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2011 11:42:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138056</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Kevin Chadwick &amp;lt;ma1l1ists@yahoo.co.uk&amp;gt;wrote: &amp;gt; On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:04:18 -0500 &amp;gt; Vahid Moghaddasi &amp;lt;vahid.moghadda</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2011 11:17:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138055</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:04:18 -0500 Vahid Moghaddasi &amp;lt;vahid.moghaddasi@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; if [[. $DOMAIN == !(+([.a-zA-Z0-9\!\#$%*/?|^{}\`~&amp;amp;\&amp;#039;+=_.-])</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2011 11:05:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138053</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Bulk] Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Andy Bradford &amp;lt; amb-sendok-1324752518.lcddbdjmacehgebkdlib@bradfords.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Yes, the URL is actually valid,</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2011 11:04:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138054</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Bulk] Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>Thus said Vahid Moghaddasi on Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:25:10 EST: &amp;gt; We get this error in the log. The URL is not valid but the error &amp;gt; DYN:T1 implie</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2011 10:48:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138052</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Bulk] Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Andy Bradford &amp;lt; amb-sendok-1324750544.flcjdejbhocphnmgbidh@bradfords.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; This smells of speculation to</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2011 10:25:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138051</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Bulk] Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>Thus said Vahid Moghaddasi on Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:47:48 EST: &amp;gt; AOL only accepts maybe the first 10-20 e-mails then it stops. Maybe they just don&amp;#039;t</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2011 10:19:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138050</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Bulk] Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>Thus said Vahid Moghaddasi on Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:47:48 EST: &amp;gt; AOL only accepts maybe the first 10-20 e-mails then it stops. The logs &amp;gt; have postmast</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2011 10:15:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138049</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Bulk] Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Kevin Chadwick &amp;lt;ma1l1ists@yahoo.co.uk&amp;gt;wrote: &amp;gt; On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 11:15:50 -0500 &amp;gt; Vahid Moghaddasi wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2011 10:04:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138048</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Bulk] Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Andy Bradford &amp;lt; amb-sendok-1324745977.imnhnoonijgicppgjcii@bradfords.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Thus said Vahid Moghaddasi on Th</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2011 09:47:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138047</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: [Bulk] Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>I have some domains that send with DKIM, some without, and have no issues at all sending to AOL    -----Original Message----- From: Andy Bradford [</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2011 09:06:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138046</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Bulk] Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>Thus said Vahid Moghaddasi on Thu, 24 Nov 2011 11:15:50 EST: &amp;gt; At this time, we are only concerned about AOL as they are they only &amp;gt; one requiring</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2011 08:59:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138045</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Bulk] Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Kevin Chadwick &amp;lt;ma1l1ists@yahoo.co.uk&amp;gt;wrote: &amp;gt; On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:18:01 -0500 &amp;gt; Vahid Moghaddasi wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2011 08:15:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138044</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Bulk] Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:18:01 -0500 Vahid Moghaddasi wrote: &amp;gt; I replaced the line where hostname -f is call to this: &amp;gt; [ -z &amp;quot;$sender&amp;quot; ] &amp;amp;&amp;amp; sender=@`ho</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2011 03:25:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138043</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Vahid Moghaddasi &amp;lt; vahid.moghaddasi@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; I couldn&amp;#039;t find a streight forward instruction to get</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2011 13:18:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138042</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: local delivery only to some users</title>
<description>Thus said Nelson Serafica on Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:52:49 +0800: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m using qmail with smtp auth on my system. This might help as long as whatever a</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2011 20:28:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138041</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>Hi, I couldn&amp;#039;t find a streight forward instruction to get DKIM operational so I came up with this high level steps to install Kyle&amp;#039;s script. Any input</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2011 18:36:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138040</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>Hello, Sunday, November 20, 2011, 8:40:38 AM, wrote: NH&amp;gt; Just testing this and whilst I&amp;#039;m getting good DKIM signatures the NH&amp;gt; DomainKeys signature</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2011 10:45:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138039</link>
</item><item>
<title>local delivery only to some users</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m using qmail with smtp auth on my system. I&amp;#039;m planning to limit some of my users to send emails outside my domain abc.com. Is there a patch or qmai</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2011 23:52:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138038</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Niamh Holding &amp;lt;niamh@fullbore.co.uk&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Sunday, November 20, 2011, 8:40:38 AM, I wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; NH&amp;gt; Dom</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2011 11:31:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138037</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>Hello, Sunday, November 20, 2011, 8:40:38 AM, I wrote: NH&amp;gt; DomainKeys signature is reported BAD However just to add to the confusion the tester at</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2011 10:59:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138036</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 3:40 AM, Niamh Holding &amp;lt;niamh@fullbore.co.uk&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hello Manvendra, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Wednesday, November 16, 2011, 3:27:31 AM, you wro</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2011 08:42:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138035</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>Hello Manvendra, Wednesday, November 16, 2011, 3:27:31 AM, you wrote: MB&amp;gt; I believe Kyle Wheeler has a solution which is quite popular. It MB&amp;gt; will</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2011 00:40:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138034</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Kinglok, Fong &amp;lt;busywater@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; I have tried Kyle&amp;#039;s method in one of my maintained server which sends &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2011 19:15:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138033</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Kyle Wheeler &amp;lt;kyle-qmail@memoryhole.net&amp;gt;wrote: &amp;gt; -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- &amp;gt; Hash: SHA256 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Thursday,</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2011 12:19:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138032</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On Thursday, November 17 at 11:08 AM, quoth Vahid Moghaddasi: &amp;gt; Thank you all for the suggestions. I</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2011 08:58:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138031</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>Thank you all for the suggestions. I think I will try Kyle&amp;#039;s solution unless he recommends otherwise. Also, I need to figure out if his solution suppo</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2011 08:08:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138030</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: DKIM for AOL</title>
<description>Hello Manvendra, Wednesday, November 16, 2011, 3:27:31 AM, you wrote: MB&amp;gt; I believe Kyle Wheeler has a solution which is quite popular. It MB&amp;gt; will</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2011 08:19:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/138029</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

