Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Python: Dev
Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives 		 

Index | Next | Previous | View Flat


solipsis at pitrou

Mar 14, 2012, 2:39 AM


Views: 256
Permalink
Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives [In reply to]
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:31:34 +0800
Matt Joiner <anacrolix [at] gmail> wrote:
>
> Rather than indicating apathy on the party of third party developers, this
> might be a sign that core Python is unapproachable or not worth the effort.
>
> For instance I have several one line patches languishing, I can't imagine
> how disappointing it would be to have significantly larger patches ignored,
> but it happens.

Can you give a pointer to these one-liners?
Once a patch gets a month old or older, it tends to disappear from
everyone's radar unless you somehow "ping" on the tracker, or post a
message to the mailing-list.

(of course, you shouldn't spam the list with open issues either)

Thanks

Antoine.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev [at] python
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/list-python-dev%40lists.gossamer-threads.com

Subject User Time
Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives shazow at gmail Mar 12, 2012, 7:23 PM
    Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives rdmurray at bitdance Mar 12, 2012, 8:07 PM
        Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives eliben at gmail Mar 12, 2012, 8:22 PM
    Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives brian at python Mar 12, 2012, 8:58 PM
    Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives shazow at gmail Mar 12, 2012, 9:14 PM
    Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives tjreedy at udel Mar 12, 2012, 9:22 PM
        Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives guido at python Mar 12, 2012, 9:40 PM
    Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives brian at python Mar 12, 2012, 9:23 PM
    Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives guido at python Mar 12, 2012, 9:43 PM
    Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives eliben at gmail Mar 12, 2012, 9:48 PM
    Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives anacrolix at gmail Mar 12, 2012, 10:10 PM
    Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives senthil at uthcode Mar 12, 2012, 10:10 PM
        Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives shazow at gmail Mar 12, 2012, 10:48 PM
        Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives guido at python Mar 13, 2012, 7:52 AM
    Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives senthil at uthcode Mar 12, 2012, 11:12 PM
    Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives donald.stufft at gmail Mar 13, 2012, 6:34 AM
        Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives p.f.moore at gmail Mar 13, 2012, 7:52 AM
    Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives v+python at g Mar 13, 2012, 11:58 AM
    Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives me at kennethreitz Mar 13, 2012, 12:13 PM
        Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives brian at python Mar 13, 2012, 12:38 PM
    Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives tjreedy at udel Mar 13, 2012, 12:49 PM
        Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives guido at python Mar 13, 2012, 2:16 PM
    Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives thomas at python Mar 13, 2012, 12:50 PM
    Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives solipsis at pitrou Mar 13, 2012, 2:21 PM
        Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives guido at python Mar 13, 2012, 2:38 PM
        Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives anacrolix at gmail Mar 13, 2012, 8:31 PM
    Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives steve at pearwood Mar 13, 2012, 4:55 PM
        Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives solipsis at pitrou Mar 14, 2012, 2:07 AM
    Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives eliben at gmail Mar 13, 2012, 9:03 PM
    Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives anacrolix at gmail Mar 13, 2012, 10:49 PM
    Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives solipsis at pitrou Mar 14, 2012, 2:39 AM
        Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives stefan at bytereef Mar 14, 2012, 2:58 AM
            Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives solipsis at pitrou Mar 14, 2012, 3:00 AM
                Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives stefan at bytereef Mar 14, 2012, 3:20 AM
            Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives mark at hotpy Mar 14, 2012, 3:05 AM
                Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives rdmurray at bitdance Mar 14, 2012, 9:00 AM
                Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives tjreedy at udel Mar 14, 2012, 9:47 AM
        Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives anacrolix at gmail Mar 14, 2012, 9:26 AM
    Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives julien at tayon Mar 14, 2012, 9:16 AM
    Re: Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives solipsis at pitrou Mar 14, 2012, 9:40 AM
    Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives jimjjewett at gmail Mar 19, 2012, 12:12 PM

  Index | Next | Previous | View Flat
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.