
collinw at gmail
Nov 4, 2009, 7:09 PM
Post #5 of 7
(304 views)
Permalink
|
Hi Ben, On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Ben Finney <ben+python [at] benfinney> wrote: > "Martin v. Lwis" <martin [at] v> writes: > >> Ben Finney wrote: >> > "Martin v. Lwis" <martin [at] v> writes: >> > >> >> Well, 3to2 would then be an option for you: use Python 3 as the >> >> source language. >> > >> > I was under the impression that 2to3 was officially supported as >> > part of Python, but 3to2 was a third-party tool. [] Is it an >> > official part of Python? >> >> No, the status is exactly as you describe it. > > Okay. It's probably best for anyone with their Python developer hat on > (which, in this forum, is all the time for any Python developer) to make > the status of 3to2 clear when recommending it to people concerned about > future plans. Are you implying that we shouldn't recommend 3to2 to people wanting to develop in Py3k and back-translate to 2.x? Thanks, Collin Winter _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev [at] python http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/list-python-dev%40lists.gossamer-threads.com
|