
benjamin at python
Oct 8, 2009, 7:21 AM
Post #2 of 3
(682 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: locals() different behaviour when tracing?
[In reply to]
|
|
2009/10/8 Anders Waldenborg <anders [at] 0x63>: > > Is it intentional that locals() returns a copy/snapshot of the local > variables sometimes, and sometimes a reference? Like when enabling tracing, > such as in the code pasted below. The documentation ("Update and return a > dictionary containing the current scope's local variables.") is pretty > unclear. Yes, it does, and that's why the documentation says changing it is undefined. :) -- Regards, Benjamin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev [at] python http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/list-python-dev%40lists.gossamer-threads.com
|