eliben at gmail
Aug 4, 2013, 4:06 PM
Post #11 of 11
(60 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: Allowing to run certain regression tests in subprocesses
[In reply to]
|
|
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan [at] gmail> wrote:
> On 4 August 2013 23:40, Eli Bendersky <eliben [at] gmail> wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan [at] gmail> wrote:
>>> Sure, it's just unusual to have a case where "importing is blocked by adding
>>> None to sys.modules" differs from "not actually available", so I'd like to
>>> understand the situation better.
>>
>> I must admit I'm confused by the behavior of import_fresh_module too.
>>
>> Snippet #1 raises the expected ImportError:
>>
>> sys.modules['pyexpat'] = None
>> import _elementtree
>>
>> However, snippet #2 succeeds importing:
>>
>> ET = import_fresh_module('_elementtree', blocked=['pyexpat'])
>> print(ET)
>
> /me goes and looks
>
> That function was much simpler when it was first created :P
>
> Still, I'm fairly confident the complexity of that dance isn't
> relevant to the problem you're seeing.
>
>> I believe this happens because import_fresh_module does an import of
>> the 'name' it's given before even looking at the blocked list. Then,
>> it assigns None to sys.modules for the blocked names and re-imports
>> the module. So in essence, this is somewhat equivalent to snippet #3:
>>
>> modname = '_elementtree'
>> __import__(modname)
>> del sys.modules[modname]
>> for m in sys.modules:
>> if modname == m or m.startswith(modname + '.'):
>> del sys.modules[m]
>> sys.modules['pyexpat'] = None
>> ET = importlib.import_module(modname)
>> print(ET)
>>
>> Which also succeeds.
>>
>> I fear I'm not familiar enough with the logic of importing to
>> understand what's going on, but it has been my impression that this
>> problem is occasionally encountered with import_fresh_module and C
>> code that imports stuff (the import of pyexpat is done by C code in
>> this case).
>
> I had missed it was a C module doing the import. Looking into the
> _elementtree.c source, the problem in this case is the fact that a
> shared library that doesn't use PEP 3121 style per-module state is
> only loaded and initialised once, so reimporting it gets the same
> module back (from the extension loading cache), even if the Python
> level reference has been removed from sys.modules. Non PEP 3121 C
> extension modules thus don't work properly with
> test.support.import_fresh_module (as there's an extra level of caching
> involved that *can't* be cleared from Python, because it would break
> things).
>
> To fix this, _elementree would need to move the pyexpat C API pointer
> to per-module state, rather than using a static variable (see
> http://docs.python.org/3/c-api/module.html#initializing-c-modules).
> With per-module state defined, the import machine should rerun the
> init function when the fresh import happens, thus creating a new copy
> of the module. However, this isn't an entirely trivial change for
> _elementree, since:
>
> 1. Getting from the XMLParser instance back to the module where it was
> defined in order to retrieve the capsule pointer via
> PyModule_GetState() isn't entirely trivial in C. You'd likely do it
> once in the init method, store the result in an XMLParser attribute,
> and then tweak the EXPAT() using functions to include an appropriate
> local variable definition at the start of the method implementation.
>
> 2. expat_set_error would need to be updated to accept the pyexpat
> capsule pointer as a function parameter
>
Thanks Nick; I suspected something of the sort is going on here, but
you provide some interesting leads to look at. I'll probably open an
issue to track this at some point.
Eli
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev [at] python
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/list-python-dev%40lists.gossamer-threads.com
|
