<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Python | Dev</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>11 Oct  2008 08:37:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>backporting tests [was: [Python-checkins] r66863 - python/trunk/Modules/posixmodule.c]</title>
<description>In http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-October/082994.html Martin v. Löwis wrote: &amp;gt; So 2.6.0 will contain a lot of tests that have never</description>
<pubDate>10 Oct  2008 09:11:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/686088</link>
</item><item>
<title>syntax change justification</title>
<description>Nick Coghlan&amp;#039;s explanation of what justifies a syntax change (most of message http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-October/082831.html ) s</description>
<pubDate>10 Oct  2008 08:51:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/686086</link>
</item><item>
<title>another test message - please ignore</title>
<description>still working on spam filter... Skip _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python</description>
<pubDate>09 Oct  2008 20:10:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/685985</link>
</item><item>
<title>test message - please ignore</title>
<description>(messing with the python.org spam filter - please ignore) Skip _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@pyt</description>
<pubDate>09 Oct  2008 20:06:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/685979</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Python-checkins] r66863 -	python/trunk/Modules/posixmodule.c</title>
<description>&amp;gt; It seems to me that Skip was asking whether the &amp;quot;memory leak&amp;quot; impacted &amp;gt; the 2.6 branch, and the answer should have been &amp;quot;No&amp;quot;: the change that &amp;gt; int</description>
<pubDate>09 Oct  2008 16:12:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/685934</link>
</item><item>
<title>Documentation idea</title>
<description>Background ---------- In the itertools module docs, I included pure python equivalents for each of the C functions. Necessarily, some of those equiv</description>
<pubDate>09 Oct  2008 16:12:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/685933</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Python-checkins] r66863 - python/trunk/Modules/posixmodule.c</title>
<description>[switching to python-dev] Georg Brandl wrote: &amp;gt; Martin v. Löwis schrieb: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Raymond Hettinger wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Merges should be handled by the original co</description>
<pubDate>09 Oct  2008 14:08:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/685902</link>
</item><item>
<title>Distutils/packaging sprint this weekend</title>
<description>Tarek Zidae&amp;#039; is organizing a sprint on general distutils/setuptools/packaging this weekend. Physically it&amp;#039;s in Arlington VA, but participants will be</description>
<pubDate>09 Oct  2008 13:24:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/685901</link>
</item><item>
<title>Subversion access down?</title>
<description>Hi! Is it only me or does it fail for other people, too? I&amp;#039;m getting | Server sent unexpected return value (503 Service | Unavailable) in response t</description>
<pubDate>09 Oct  2008 01:50:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/685701</link>
</item><item>
<title>__getattr__ and new style classes</title>
<description>Hello there. I&amp;#039;ve just noticed what I consider a performance problem: Using new style classes to provide attribute-like access using __getattr__ is co</description>
<pubDate>08 Oct  2008 12:27:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/685583</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
