Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 23 Nov 2009 16:46:28 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg > I'm not sure concealing the differences between 2.x and 3.x behind such a > wrapper is a good idea. It would be better if people became aware of / l 23 Nov 2009 12:12:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789578 M.-A. Lemburg <mal <at> egenix.com> writes: > > We could then also have a py2compat.c to hold corresponding > C code, e.g. to provide compatibility w 23 Nov 2009 10:47:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789577 Mark Dickinson wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:44 AM, M.-A. Lemburg <mal@egenix.com> wrote: >> Thanks for pointing me to the that ticket. >> >> Lo 23 Nov 2009 10:27:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789576 On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:44 AM, M.-A. Lemburg <mal@egenix.com> wrote: > Thanks for pointing me to the that ticket. > > Looks like Guido already comm 23 Nov 2009 09:12:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789537 > In an ideal world, developers would add that code to their > extensions right away. In the real world, where developers only > have limited resource 23 Nov 2009 04:46:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789485 > I built something very similar for my company last year, and it’s been running > flawlessly in production at a few customer sites since, with avg. 23 Nov 2009 03:25:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789461 "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: >> IMHO, that's not really a good way to encourage people to try to provide >> a smooth upgrade to the 3.x branch. Much to th 23 Nov 2009 03:05:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789460 Eric Smith wrote: > M.-A. Lemburg wrote: >> Since package developers are just starting to port things to 3.x and >> many appear to be considering supp 23 Nov 2009 02:44:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789459 Stefan Ring wrote: > [2] http://www.bestinclass.dk/index.php/2009/10/python-vs-clojure-evolving/ > [3] www.dabeaz.com/python/GIL.pdf > > PS On a slig 23 Nov 2009 02:29:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789458 Hello, I built something very similar for my company last year, and it’s been running flawlessly in production at a few customer sites since, with 23 Nov 2009 00:54:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789439 On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 11:05 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin@v.loewis.de> wrote: >> IMHO, that's not really a good way to encourage people to try to pr 21 Nov 2009 12:00:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789269 > IMHO, that's not really a good way to encourage people to try to provide > a smooth upgrade to the 3.x branch. Much to the contrary. 3.x should make 21 Nov 2009 11:05:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789268 Is there anything holding up fixing issue 1488943? The bug was found and a patch submitted 3 1/2 years ago. The patch is just a single line of code 21 Nov 2009 10:31:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789267 M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > Since package developers are just starting to port things to 3.x and > many appear to be considering supporting both 2.7 and 3. 21 Nov 2009 08:37:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789260 The wiki page for porting to 3.x says: http://wiki.python.org/moin/PortingExtensionModulesToPy3k """ long/int Unification In Python 3.0, there is on 21 Nov 2009 07:06:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789253 On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 09:59, Sriram Srinivasan <naughtysriram@gmail.com> wrote: > you were thinking wrong. If suppose this feature is introduced it 21 Nov 2009 04:40:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789233 Glenn Linderman <glenn@nevcal.com> writes: > On approximately 11/14/2009 7:29 AM, came the following characters > from the keyboard of Floris Bruynoo 20 Nov 2009 15:06:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789201 On approximately 11/14/2009 7:29 AM, came the following characters from the keyboard of Floris Bruynooghe: > Having a "Repository-URL", "Repository-B 20 Nov 2009 12:31:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789183 ACTIVITY SUMMARY (11/13/09 - 11/20/09) Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/ To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the i 20 Nov 2009 09:07:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789132 I'm pleased to announce that Georg has (naively) volunteered to shepherd the 3.2 release. -- Regards, Benjamin _____________________________________ 19 Nov 2009 15:43:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788963 On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:04 PM, M.-A. Lemburg <mal@egenix.com> wrote: [..] > BTW: There's already a Tools/scripts/h2py.py we could use for > convert 19 Nov 2009 08:19:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788925 On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net> wrote: > Tarek Ziadé <ziade.tarek <at> gmail.com> writes: >> >> So what I am pr 19 Nov 2009 08:14:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788894 Tarek Ziadé wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@gmail.com> wrote: > [..] >> I've brought the issue of Makefile and pyc 19 Nov 2009 03:04:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788868 Tarek Ziadé <ziade.tarek <at> gmail.com> writes: > > So what I am proposing is to inject those values in a private dict in > the new sysconfig.py mo 19 Nov 2009 02:04:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788863 Tarek Ziadé wrote: > Now for the format problem, I agree that it seems more robust to > pre-process the variables > and inject them in the stdlib when 19 Nov 2009 01:55:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788862