<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Python | Dev</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>22 Nov  2008 11:11:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Redirecting warnings.showwarning to logging</title>
<description>Brett Cannon has suggested [1] that the logging package should provide an implementation of warnings.showwarning which redirects to logging. Here are</description>
<pubDate>22 Nov  2008 03:12:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/695102</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Issue 4195: Can&amp;#039;t execute packages with -m inPython 2.6/3.0</title>
<description>In concur that it is not a regression (esp for Py2.6). OTOH, it would be nice to have -m run as expected. It seems reasonable to me to get this workin</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2008 20:40:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/695046</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Issue 4195: Can&amp;#039;t execute packages with -m in Python 2.6/3.0</title>
<description>I don&amp;#039;t think that removing an unintentional and subtly broken feature is a regression. On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Lisandro Dalcin &amp;lt;dalcinl@gma</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2008 19:16:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/695042</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Issue 4195: Can&amp;#039;t execute packages with -m in Python 2.6/3.0</title>
<description>Unless this is considered a regression... On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Guido van Rossum &amp;lt;guido@python.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; I think it crosses the line.</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2008 19:04:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/695041</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: format specification mini-language docs...</title>
<description>Dino Viehland wrote: &amp;gt; Ok, now I&amp;#039;m implementing __format__ support for IronPython. The format spec mini-language docs say that a presentation type of</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2008 18:03:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/695017</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: RELEASED Python 3.0rc3</title>
<description>On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Barry Warsaw &amp;lt;barry@python.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- &amp;gt; Hash: SHA1 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On behalf of the Python</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2008 17:17:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/695016</link>
</item><item>
<title>format specification mini-language docs...</title>
<description>Ok, now I&amp;#039;m implementing __format__ support for IronPython. The format spec mini-language docs say that a presentation type of None is the same as &amp;#039;g</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2008 16:51:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/695015</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Adding zipfile and directory execution to What&amp;#039;s New for Python 2.6.1?</title>
<description>On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Nick Coghlan &amp;lt;ncoghlan@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; A trick we added to 2.6 that users seem to not notice is that it is now &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2008 16:28:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/695014</link>
</item><item>
<title>Adding zipfile and directory execution to What&amp;#039;s New for Python 2.6.1?</title>
<description>A trick we added to 2.6 that users seem to not notice is that it is now possible to execute zipfiles and directories from the command line by includin</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2008 15:52:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694985</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Python-3000] 2.6.1 and 3.0</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Nov 19, 2008, at 3:19 PM, Terry Reedy wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Let&amp;#039;s try this for 3.0rc4 then. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; The current rel</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2008 12:26:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694936</link>
</item><item>
<title>Summary of Python tracker Issues</title>
<description>ACTIVITY SUMMARY (11/14/08 - 11/21/08) Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/ To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the i</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2008 09:06:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694877</link>
</item><item>
<title>RELEASED Python 3.0rc3</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On behalf of the Python development team and the Python community, I  am happy to announce the third a</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2008 07:06:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694836</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: issue 4336</title>
<description>Kristján Valur Jónsson wrote: &amp;gt; Hello there. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I recently created this issue: http://bugs.python.org/issue4336 3 days ago. &amp;gt; I&#039;ve had no respons</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2008 09:59:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694586</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: CVE tracking</title>
<description>Perl had a few CVE because of its rmtree implementation. Removing  trees is risky business if root runs the function while other users  have access</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2008 09:37:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694585</link>
</item><item>
<title>issue 4336</title>
<description>Hello there. I recently created this issue: http://bugs.python.org/issue4336 I&amp;#039;ve had no response so far. This patch solved a serious performance pr</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2008 07:59:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694553</link>
</item><item>
<title>CVE tracking</title>
<description>Hello! Does someone systematically track the CVE vulnerability list? Ideally, Python security officers would have close collaboration with whoever</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2008 01:37:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694503</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Python-3000] 2.6.1 and 3.0</title>
<description>Barry Warsaw wrote: &amp;gt; -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Let&amp;#039;s try this for 3.0rc4 then. The current release is rc2. Skipping rc3 would confus</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2008 12:19:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694385</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Python-3000] 2.6.1 and 3.0</title>
<description>&amp;gt; I will also try to get up early to do the release before my work day &amp;gt; starts, to better coordinate with Euro time. So expect me on &amp;gt; #python-dev t</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2008 11:50:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694384</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Python-3000] 2.6.1 and 3.0</title>
<description>&amp;gt; In which case why not just hold the release until all installers are &amp;gt; available?  That is how Anthony Baxter handled things, indeed, and I would a</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2008 11:40:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694383</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Python-3000] 2.6.1 and 3.0</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Nov 19, 2008, at 2:18 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Martin, I&amp;#039;m keen on figuring out a way to reduc</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2008 11:37:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694382</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Python-3000] 2.6.1 and 3.0</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Martin, I&amp;#039;m keen on figuring out a way to reduce your workload, and also &amp;gt; to coordinate releases better between us. I /think/ with timed releases</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2008 11:18:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694381</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Python-3000] 2.6.1 and 3.0</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Installer tests can definitely be automated, and there is also a Python &amp;gt; API to the virtualbox VM. I wonder if it would be possible to automate &amp;gt; t</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2008 11:02:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694380</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Python-3000] 2.6.1 and 3.0</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Martin, maybe we can help you with the installers testing. Thanks for the offer. See my other message, though - this is not the point. If everythin</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2008 10:52:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694379</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Python-3000] 2.6.1 and 3.0</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Nov 18, 2008, at 5:17 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; From my point of view bi-monthly release are to</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2008 07:27:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694311</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Python-3000] 2.6.1 and 3.0</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Nov 18, 2008, at 12:46 PM, Georg Brandl wrote: &amp;gt; Barry Warsaw schrieb: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Nov 18, 2008, at 8:07</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2008 07:17:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694310</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: 2.6.1 and 3.0</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Nov 18, 2008, at 9:52 AM, Christian Heimes wrote: &amp;gt; Barry Warsaw wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Actually, I&amp;#039;ve wanted to</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2008 07:11:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694309</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Python-3000] 2.6.1 and 3.0</title>
<description>Michael Foord writes:  &amp;gt; Installer tests can definitely be automated, and there is also a Python  &amp;gt; API to the virtualbox VM. I wonder if it would b</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2008 06:43:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694308</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Python-3000] 2.6.1 and 3.0</title>
<description>Martin v. Löwis wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt; While I&amp;#039;m happy that Barry has automated his part to a high degree, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt; my part is, unfortunately, much less automated.</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2008 03:16:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694256</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Python-3000] 2.6.1 and 3.0</title>
<description>2008/11/18 &amp;quot;Martin v. Löwis&amp;quot; &amp;lt;martin@v.loewis.de&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; While I&amp;#039;m happy that Barry has automated his part to a high degree, &amp;gt; my part is, unfortunately,</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2008 01:53:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694244</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Python-3000] 2.6.1 and 3.0</title>
<description>&amp;quot;Martin v. Löwis&amp;quot; writes:  &amp;gt; That&amp;#039;s not the issue - I don&amp;#039;t mind spending that time. However, it &amp;gt; means that several hours pass between starting th</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 23:32:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694225</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Python-3000] 2.6.1 and 3.0</title>
<description>&amp;gt; &amp;gt; While I&amp;#039;m happy that Barry has automated his part to a high degree, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; my part is, unfortunately, much less automated. I could personally &amp;gt; &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 22:02:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694216</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Python-3000] 2.6.1 and 3.0</title>
<description>On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:55 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull &amp;lt;stephen@xemacs.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Footnotes: &amp;gt; [1] Doesn&amp;#039;t Windows have a way to send synthetic GUI</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 18:27:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694203</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Python-3000] 2.6.1 and 3.0</title>
<description>&amp;quot;Martin v. Löwis&amp;quot; writes:  &amp;gt; While I&amp;#039;m happy that Barry has automated his part to a high degree, &amp;gt; my part is, unfortunately, much less automated. I</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 17:55:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694188</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SSH key for work</title>
<description>On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 15:40, &amp;quot;Martin v. LÃ¶wis&amp;quot; &amp;lt;martin@v.loewis.de&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Adding a second key is similar to changing the keys. That said, I don</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 17:13:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694187</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SSH key for work</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Adding a second key is similar to changing the keys. That said, I don&amp;#039;t &amp;gt; think python-committers existed when that FAQ entry was written. It&amp;#039;s &amp;gt; re</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 15:40:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694166</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PyPI Submission Failing</title>
<description>Sidnei da Silva wrote: &amp;gt; I haven&amp;#039;t seen anyone mention it on this list, and there was one &amp;gt; message on distutils-sig but it seems to have gone ignored</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 15:35:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694165</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Python-3000] 2.6.1 and 3.0</title>
<description>&amp;gt; From my point of view bi-monthly release are too much. For a ?.?.1 &amp;gt; release two months are fine because several issues are found by 3rd &amp;gt; party aut</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 14:17:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694136</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SSH key for work</title>
<description>Brett Cannon wrote: &amp;gt; On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 13:47, Benjamin Peterson &amp;gt; &amp;lt;musiccomposition@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Brett</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 14:16:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694135</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Python-3000] 2.6.1 and 3.0</title>
<description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Should we release 2.6.1rc1, too? &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Do we need rc&amp;#039;s for point releases? We have been doing them in the past, a week before the release. In this</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 14:14:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694134</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SSH key for work</title>
<description>On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 13:47, Benjamin Peterson &amp;lt;musiccomposition@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Brett Cannon &amp;lt;brett@python.org</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 14:00:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694133</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SSH key for work</title>
<description>On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Brett Cannon &amp;lt;brett@python.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 13:23, Benjamin Peterson &amp;gt; &amp;lt;musiccomposition@gmail.c</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 13:47:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694132</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SSH key for work</title>
<description>Brett Cannon wrote: &amp;gt; On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 13:23, Benjamin Peterson &amp;gt; &amp;lt;musiccomposition@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Brett</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 13:46:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694131</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SSH key for work</title>
<description>On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 13:23, Benjamin Peterson &amp;lt;musiccomposition@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Brett Cannon &amp;lt;brett@python.org</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 13:40:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694130</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: bytearray methods returning self...</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Nov 18, 2008, at 4:14 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: &amp;gt; Good catch, this is a bug IMO and we should fix</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 13:36:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694129</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: bytearray methods returning self...</title>
<description>Sure, it&amp;#039;s now bug 4348 - http://bugs.python.org/issue4348 -----Original Message----- From: gvanrossum@gmail.com [mailto:gvanrossum@gmail.com] On Beh</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 13:30:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694128</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SSH key for work</title>
<description>On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Brett Cannon &amp;lt;brett@python.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Can someone please add the attached SSH 2 DSA key for me? I want to be &amp;gt; abl</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 13:23:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694127</link>
</item><item>
<title>SSH key for work</title>
<description>Can someone please add the attached SSH 2 DSA key for me? I want to be able to help out with the rc tomorrow while I am at work. -Brett</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 13:17:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694126</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: bytearray methods returning self...</title>
<description>Good catch, this is a bug IMO and we should fix it in 2.6.1 and 3.0rc3. Mind filing a bug so we can keep track of it? --Guido On Tue, Nov 18, 2008</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 13:14:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694125</link>
</item><item>
<title>bytearray methods returning self...</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve been implementing bytearray for IronPython and I noticed a couple of spots where the non-mutating methods of bytearray return self. In 2.6 but n</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 13:01:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694124</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Python-3000] 2.6.1 and 3.0</title>
<description>Barry Warsaw schrieb: &amp;gt; On Nov 18, 2008, at 8:07 AM, Christian Heimes wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Barry Warsaw wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hash</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 09:46:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694088</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PyPI Submission Failing</title>
<description>Sidnei&amp;gt; I haven&amp;#039;t seen anyone mention it on this list, and there was one   Sidnei&amp;gt; message on distutils-sig but it seems to have gone ignored [1</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 08:20:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694087</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Issue 4195: Can&amp;#039;t execute packages with -m in Python 2.6/3.0</title>
<description>I think it crosses the line. On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:55 AM, Nick Coghlan &amp;lt;ncoghlan@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; I need a release manager call on whether or</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 07:51:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694083</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: 2.6.1 and 3.0</title>
<description>Barry Warsaw wrote: &amp;gt; Actually, I&amp;#039;ve wanted to do timed releases, though I think monthly is &amp;gt; unrealistic. Maybe every two months is about the right</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 06:52:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694082</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Python-3000] 2.6.1 and 3.0</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Nov 18, 2008, at 8:07 AM, Christian Heimes wrote: &amp;gt; Barry Warsaw wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED ME</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 06:35:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694081</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Python-3000] 2.6.1 and 3.0</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Nov 18, 2008, at 5:03 AM, Facundo Batista wrote: &amp;gt; 2008/11/17 Barry Warsaw &amp;lt;barry@python.org&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 06:34:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694080</link>
</item><item>
<title>PyPI Submission Failing</title>
<description>I haven&amp;#039;t seen anyone mention it on this list, and there was one message on distutils-sig but it seems to have gone ignored [1]. Uploading packages t</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 05:23:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694073</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Python-3000] 2.6.1 and 3.0</title>
<description>Le Tuesday 18 November 2008 11:03:02 Facundo Batista, vous avez écrit : &amp;gt; 2008/11/17 Barry Warsaw &amp;lt;barry@python.org&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Martin suggests, and I agree</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 04:14:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694072</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Python-3000] 2.6.1 and 3.0</title>
<description>Facundo Batista wrote: &amp;gt; 2008/11/17 Barry Warsaw &amp;lt;barry@python.org&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Martin suggests, and I agree, that we should release Python 3.0 final and &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 02:57:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694047</link>
</item><item>
<title>Issue 4195: Can&amp;#039;t execute packages with -m in Python 2.6/3.0</title>
<description>I need a release manager call on whether or not the proposed resolution of this issue goes beyond what is acceptable for a bug fix in 2.6.1. Short ve</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 02:55:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694046</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Python-3000] 2.6.1 and 3.0</title>
<description>2008/11/17 Barry Warsaw &amp;lt;barry@python.org&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; Martin suggests, and I agree, that we should release Python 3.0 final and &amp;gt; 2.6.1 at the same time. Ma</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 02:03:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/694032</link>
</item><item>
<title>2.6.1 and 3.0</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Martin suggests, and I agree, that we should release Python 3.0 final  and 2.6.1 at the same time. Ma</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2008 17:56:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693970</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: datetime and timedelta enhancement</title>
<description>On 2008-11-16 02:14, Nick Coghlan wrote: &amp;gt; M.-A. Lemburg wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Guess I could add a .weeks attribute to mxDateTime, but no one ever &amp;gt;&amp;gt; asked for th</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2008 03:37:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693785</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: How to read fonts in python</title>
<description>Hello, Thanks for guiding me. Ginovation On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Nick Coghlan &amp;lt;ncoghlan@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; ganesh gajre wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hello</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2008 02:01:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693769</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: How to read fonts in python</title>
<description>ganesh gajre wrote: &amp;gt; Hello to all, &amp;gt; I am writing a program in python to convert Indic true type fonts in &amp;gt; Unicode. I like to know is there any way</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2008 01:19:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693768</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: How to read fonts in python</title>
<description>Hello, On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 08:17, ganesh gajre &amp;lt;ginovation@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hello to all, &amp;gt; I am writing a program in python to convert Indic</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2008 01:18:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693767</link>
</item><item>
<title>How to read fonts in python</title>
<description>Hello to all, I am writing a program in python to convert Indic true type fonts in Unicode. I like to know is there any way to read the fonts and on t</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2008 23:17:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693747</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: datetime.date.today() raises &amp;quot;AttributeError: time&amp;quot;</title>
<description>On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Tal Einat &amp;lt;taleinat@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Steve Holden wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Tal Einat wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; It this desired behavior? &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2008 08:43:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693642</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Summaries for Number 2008, First Half</title>
<description>Thanks for getting back to this! On Sun, Nov 16, 2008, Calvin Spealman wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; --------------------------------------------------- &amp;gt; Optionally us</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2008 07:19:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693619</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: datetime.date.today() raises &amp;quot;AttributeError: time&amp;quot;</title>
<description>Steve Holden wrote: &amp;gt; Tal Einat wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; It this desired behavior? &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; At the very least the exception should be more detailed, perhaps to &amp;gt;&amp;gt; the p</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2008 05:55:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693604</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: datetime.date.today() raises &amp;quot;AttributeError: time&amp;quot;</title>
<description>Tal Einat wrote: &amp;gt; For an unknown reason, datetime.date.today() began throwing a cryptic &amp;gt; &amp;quot;AttributeError: time&amp;quot; exception. It took me a while to fig</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2008 05:21:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693603</link>
</item><item>
<title>datetime.date.today() raises &amp;quot;AttributeError: time&amp;quot;</title>
<description>For an unknown reason, datetime.date.today() began throwing a cryptic &amp;quot;AttributeError: time&amp;quot; exception. It took me a while to figure out that this was</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2008 05:00:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693602</link>
</item><item>
<title>Summaries for Number 2008, First Half</title>
<description>Wow, how long has this been? OK, so these aren&amp;#039;t really the summaries. It is half-done summaries, which I&amp;#039;ve posted to the wiki for community collabor</description>
<pubDate>15 Nov  2008 22:39:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693559</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: datetime and timedelta enhancement</title>
<description>M.-A. Lemburg wrote: &amp;gt; Guess I could add a .weeks attribute to mxDateTime, but no one ever &amp;gt; asked for that so far. Given that there are at least 3 d</description>
<pubDate>15 Nov  2008 17:14:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693524</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Optionally using GMP to implement long if available</title>
<description>On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Tim Peters &amp;lt;tim.peters@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; 2. On platforms that support it, this is at least 64x64-&amp;gt;64 multiplicati</description>
<pubDate>15 Nov  2008 15:17:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693517</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: datetime and timedelta enhancement</title>
<description>On 2008-11-14 23:59, Victor Stinner wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; There are some interresting tickets about the datetime module: &amp;gt; #1673409: datetime module missi</description>
<pubDate>15 Nov  2008 05:24:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693475</link>
</item><item>
<title>Getting Set Up doc now online</title>
<description>The Setup doc I sent to the list a little while back has now been put online at http://www.python.org/dev/setup/ . I also fleshed out the dev FAQ so t</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2008 23:35:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693439</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: datetime and timedelta enhancement</title>
<description>Le Saturday 15 November 2008 02:01:42 Victor Stinner, vous avez écrit : &amp;gt; &amp;gt; 1- convert a datetime object to an epoch value (numbers of seconds since &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2008 17:10:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693402</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: datetime and timedelta enhancement</title>
<description>&amp;gt; 1- convert a datetime object to an epoch value (numbers of seconds since &amp;gt;  the 1st january 1970), eg. with a new totimestamp() method &amp;gt; 2- conver</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2008 17:01:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693401</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: datetime and timedelta enhancement</title>
<description>&amp;gt; datetime.totimestamp() can be implemented to produce a float in range &amp;gt; [-2**31; 2**31-1] An implementation of this method is proposed as a patch i</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2008 16:41:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693400</link>
</item><item>
<title>datetime and timedelta enhancement</title>
<description>Hi, There are some interresting tickets about the datetime module: #1673409: datetime module missing some important methods #1083: Confusing error me</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2008 14:59:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693374</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: compiler optimizations: collecting ideas</title>
<description>&amp;quot;Daniel Furrer&amp;quot; &amp;lt;daniel.furrer@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; As part of an advanced compiler design course at our university (ETH &amp;gt; Zurich), we have to implemen</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2008 14:07:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693352</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: compiler optimizations: collecting ideas</title>
<description>Daniel Furrer wrote: &amp;gt; As part of an advanced compiler design course at our university (ETH &amp;gt; Zurich), we have to implement an optimization (or variou</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2008 10:59:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693321</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: compiler optimizations: collecting ideas</title>
<description>Steven D&amp;#039;Aprano wrote: &amp;gt; On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 01:27:54 am Daniel Furrer wrote: &amp;gt; [snip] &amp;gt;&amp;gt; We&amp;#039;re looking for: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; - Hints as to which python compiler wo</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2008 10:24:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693320</link>
</item><item>
<title>Summary of Python tracker Issues</title>
<description>ACTIVITY SUMMARY (11/07/08 - 11/14/08) Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/ To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the i</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2008 09:07:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693301</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: compiler optimizations: collecting ideas</title>
<description>Daniel Furrer wrote: &amp;gt; Hello everybody, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; As part of an advanced compiler design course at our university (ETH &amp;gt; Zurich), we have to implement an o</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2008 08:42:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693300</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: compiler optimizations: collecting ideas</title>
<description>On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 01:27:54 am Daniel Furrer wrote: [snip] &amp;gt; We&amp;#039;re looking for: &amp;gt; - Hints as to which python compiler would be best to work on. (The</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2008 07:06:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693266</link>
</item><item>
<title>compiler optimizations: collecting ideas</title>
<description>Hello everybody, As part of an advanced compiler design course at our university (ETH Zurich), we have to implement an optimization (or various there</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2008 06:27:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693265</link>
</item><item>
<title>test message - spam work...</title>
<description>Working on the spam filters... hit &amp;#039;d&amp;#039; now... S _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http:/</description>
<pubDate>13 Nov  2008 20:50:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693196</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Upgrade SVN server to 1.5.4</title>
<description>&amp;gt; I use new sparse checkouts feature added in SVN 1.5 a lot to save some &amp;gt; traffic when working with Python code. However, when server is older &amp;gt; tha</description>
<pubDate>13 Nov  2008 11:22:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693075</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: My patches</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Nov 13, 2008, at 9:01 AM, anatoly techtonik wrote: &amp;gt; On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Eric Smith &amp;lt;e</description>
<pubDate>13 Nov  2008 07:18:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693046</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Optimize Python long integers</title>
<description>On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Thomas Wouters &amp;lt;thomas@python.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 14:25, Victor Stinner &amp;lt;victor.stinner@haypoc</description>
<pubDate>13 Nov  2008 06:53:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693045</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: My patches</title>
<description>On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Eric Smith &amp;lt;eric@trueblade.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Bazaar. Take a look at the developers&amp;#039; pages on python.org, they mention &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>13 Nov  2008 06:01:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693026</link>
</item><item>
<title>Upgrade SVN server to 1.5.4</title>
<description>I use new sparse checkouts feature added in SVN 1.5 a lot to save some traffic when working with Python code. However, when server is older than 1.5,</description>
<pubDate>13 Nov  2008 04:49:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/693025</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: How does one build Python25.chm on Windows?</title>
<description>&amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m not really a Windows guru so I&amp;#039;m at a loss of even where to begin as &amp;gt; the Doc\README file doesn&amp;#039;t mention how to build .chm files at all.  Yo</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2008 16:30:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/692956</link>
</item><item>
<title>How does one build Python25.chm on Windows?</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m trying to build a Python25.chm file using the source in the Python 2.5.2 tarball.  I&amp;#039;m not really a Windows guru so I&amp;#039;m at a loss of even where</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2008 16:12:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/692950</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Python 2.5.3: call for patches</title>
<description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt; In principle, this is fine with me, so go ahead. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Done. Thanks for looking into these! Martin _______________________________________________</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2008 13:50:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/692927</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: n.numbits: method or property?</title>
<description>Aahz wrote: &amp;gt; What do you call Decimal? ;-) If you&amp;#039;re working with decimal numbers, you&amp;#039;re more likely to want a numdigits() method. -- Greg ____</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2008 13:07:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/692926</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: n.numbits: method or property?</title>
<description>Antoine Pitrou wrote: &amp;gt; As for numbits, I think it should be a method It feels more method-like to me too, because it&amp;#039;s something derived from the i</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2008 12:54:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/692925</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: n.numbits: method or property?</title>
<description>[Antoine Pitrou] &amp;gt; No, but Python is duck-typed and alternate integer classes could adopt such an &amp;gt; implementation while trying to respect the Python-</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2008 10:19:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/692896</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: n.numbits: method or property?</title>
<description>Mark Dickinson &amp;lt;dickinsm &amp;lt;at&amp;gt; gmail.com&amp;gt; writes: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Right: numbits is only a natural property of a *binary* integer. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On the other hand, I can&amp;#039;</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2008 08:11:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/692868</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
