Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 24 Nov 2009 10:03:13 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg > I'm not sure concealing the differences between 2.x and 3.x behind such a > wrapper is a good idea. It would be better if people became aware of / l 23 Nov 2009 12:12:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789578 M.-A. Lemburg <mal <at> egenix.com> writes: > > We could then also have a py2compat.c to hold corresponding > C code, e.g. to provide compatibility w 23 Nov 2009 10:47:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789577 Mark Dickinson wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:44 AM, M.-A. Lemburg <mal@egenix.com> wrote: >> Thanks for pointing me to the that ticket. >> >> Lo 23 Nov 2009 10:27:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789576 On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:44 AM, M.-A. Lemburg <mal@egenix.com> wrote: > Thanks for pointing me to the that ticket. > > Looks like Guido already comm 23 Nov 2009 09:12:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789537 > In an ideal world, developers would add that code to their > extensions right away. In the real world, where developers only > have limited resource 23 Nov 2009 04:46:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789485 > I built something very similar for my company last year, and it’s been running > flawlessly in production at a few customer sites since, with avg. 23 Nov 2009 03:25:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789461 "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: >> IMHO, that's not really a good way to encourage people to try to provide >> a smooth upgrade to the 3.x branch. Much to th 23 Nov 2009 03:05:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789460 Eric Smith wrote: > M.-A. Lemburg wrote: >> Since package developers are just starting to port things to 3.x and >> many appear to be considering supp 23 Nov 2009 02:44:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789459 Stefan Ring wrote: > [2] http://www.bestinclass.dk/index.php/2009/10/python-vs-clojure-evolving/ > [3] www.dabeaz.com/python/GIL.pdf > > PS On a slig 23 Nov 2009 02:29:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789458 Hello, I built something very similar for my company last year, and it’s been running flawlessly in production at a few customer sites since, with 23 Nov 2009 00:54:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789439 On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 11:05 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin@v.loewis.de> wrote: >> IMHO, that's not really a good way to encourage people to try to pr 21 Nov 2009 12:00:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789269 > IMHO, that's not really a good way to encourage people to try to provide > a smooth upgrade to the 3.x branch. Much to the contrary. 3.x should make 21 Nov 2009 11:05:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789268 Is there anything holding up fixing issue 1488943? The bug was found and a patch submitted 3 1/2 years ago. The patch is just a single line of code 21 Nov 2009 10:31:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789267 M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > Since package developers are just starting to port things to 3.x and > many appear to be considering supporting both 2.7 and 3. 21 Nov 2009 08:37:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789260 The wiki page for porting to 3.x says: http://wiki.python.org/moin/PortingExtensionModulesToPy3k """ long/int Unification In Python 3.0, there is on 21 Nov 2009 07:06:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789253 On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 09:59, Sriram Srinivasan <naughtysriram@gmail.com> wrote: > you were thinking wrong. If suppose this feature is introduced it 21 Nov 2009 04:40:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789233 Glenn Linderman <glenn@nevcal.com> writes: > On approximately 11/14/2009 7:29 AM, came the following characters > from the keyboard of Floris Bruynoo 20 Nov 2009 15:06:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789201 On approximately 11/14/2009 7:29 AM, came the following characters from the keyboard of Floris Bruynooghe: > Having a "Repository-URL", "Repository-B 20 Nov 2009 12:31:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789183 ACTIVITY SUMMARY (11/13/09 - 11/20/09) Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/ To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the i 20 Nov 2009 09:07:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/789132 I'm pleased to announce that Georg has (naively) volunteered to shepherd the 3.2 release. -- Regards, Benjamin _____________________________________ 19 Nov 2009 15:43:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788963 On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:04 PM, M.-A. Lemburg <mal@egenix.com> wrote: [..] > BTW: There's already a Tools/scripts/h2py.py we could use for > convert 19 Nov 2009 08:19:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788925 On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net> wrote: > Tarek Ziadé <ziade.tarek <at> gmail.com> writes: >> >> So what I am pr 19 Nov 2009 08:14:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788894 Tarek Ziadé wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@gmail.com> wrote: > [..] >> I've brought the issue of Makefile and pyc 19 Nov 2009 03:04:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788868 Tarek Ziadé <ziade.tarek <at> gmail.com> writes: > > So what I am proposing is to inject those values in a private dict in > the new sysconfig.py mo 19 Nov 2009 02:04:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788863 Tarek Ziadé wrote: > Now for the format problem, I agree that it seems more robust to > pre-process the variables > and inject them in the stdlib when 19 Nov 2009 01:55:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788862 On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:09 PM, David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com> wrote: [..] >> >> $ dpkg -S /usr/lib/python2.5/config/Makefile >> python2.5: /us 19 Nov 2009 01:32:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788861 On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@gmail.com> wrote: [..] > I've brought the issue of Makefile and pyconfig.h being needed for 19 Nov 2009 01:30:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788860 Hello, > > I've submitted a patch (*) to add an optional timeout to locking > > operations (Lock.acquire() etc.). Since it's a pretty basic > > funct 18 Nov 2009 14:20:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788767 Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net> writes: > I've submitted a patch (*) to add an optional timeout to locking > operations (Lock.acquire() etc.). S 18 Nov 2009 13:28:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788747 On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 19:45 -0500, Terry Reedy wrote: > A.M. Kuchling wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 03:27:53PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote: > >> H 18 Nov 2009 11:26:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788707 On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 13:03 -0800, Brett Cannon wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:27, David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com> wrote: > > Has anyone else 18 Nov 2009 11:09:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788706 On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net> wrote: > Jesse Noller <jnoller <at> gmail.com> writes: >> >> Nick is right, many 18 Nov 2009 06:27:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788650 Jesse Noller <jnoller <at> gmail.com> writes: > > Nick is right, many of the BSDs and FreeBSD up until fairly recently > did not have named shared 18 Nov 2009 05:50:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788638 On Nov 18, 2009, at 5:38 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote: > Antoine Pitrou wrote: >> Guido van Rossum <guido <at> python.org> writes: >>> 18 Nov 2009 04:45:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788637 Antoine Pitrou wrote: > Guido van Rossum <guido <at> python.org> writes: >> Will locks be interruptible with ^C? That is an oft-requested feature >> w 18 Nov 2009 02:38:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788619 A.M. Kuchling wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 03:27:53PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote: >> Has anyone else looked at using Coccinelle/spatch[1] on CPyth 17 Nov 2009 16:45:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788532 Barry Warsaw <barry <at> python.org> writes: > > > If no one else wants to try and ruin Python 3, I'll do it <wink>. > > Ha ha ha^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^HG 17 Nov 2009 16:09:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788513 On Nov 17, 2009, at 4:55 PM, Georg Brandl wrote: > Benjamin Peterson schrieb: >> After more thought, I think that separating the 2.7 and 3.2 releases 17 Nov 2009 15:12:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788512 Benjamin Peterson schrieb: > After more thought, I think that separating the 2.7 and 3.2 releases > is not as big of an issue as I once thought. There 17 Nov 2009 14:55:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788511 On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 03:27:53PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote: > Has anyone else looked at using Coccinelle/spatch[1] on CPython source > code? For a 17 Nov 2009 13:41:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788491 On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:27, David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com> wrote: > Has anyone else looked at using Coccinelle/spatch[1] on CPython source > c 17 Nov 2009 13:03:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788490 On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 08:40:37AM -0500, R. David Murray wrote: > I think you want to take a look at PEP 3134. And then please file a doc > bug to h 17 Nov 2009 10:14:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788434 Guido van Rossum <guido <at> python.org> writes: > > I think the number of platforms > has dwindled to two or three (Posix, Windows, and maybe one mi 17 Nov 2009 08:21:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788433 I think I can answer the "why" question: thread.c is *very* old code, in fact it predates the posix threads standard. When we (actually Sjoerd Mullend 17 Nov 2009 08:01:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788405 On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 at 10:31, Greg Hewgill wrote: > I've constructed an example program that does not leak memory in Python > 2.x, but causes unbounde 17 Nov 2009 05:40:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788400 Hello, I've submitted a patch (*) to add an optional timeout to locking operations (Lock.acquire() etc.). Since it's a pretty basic functionality, I 17 Nov 2009 03:46:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788388 I've constructed an example program that does not leak memory in Python 2.x, but causes unbounded memory allocation in Python 3.1. Here is the code: 17 Nov 2009 02:31:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788387 After more thought, I think that separating the 2.7 and 3.2 releases is not as big of an issue as I once thought. Therefore, I'd like to adopt the sch 16 Nov 2009 15:11:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788296 On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 12:42 +0000, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > Tarek Ziadé <ziade.tarek <at> gmail.com> writes: > > > > This cannot work on all platform 16 Nov 2009 13:09:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788275 2009/11/16 Tres Seaver <tseaver@palladion.com>: >> Which is bizarre, since Paul belongs to the group of people you say >> you care most about - i.e., 16 Nov 2009 12:39:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788272 Has anyone else looked at using Coccinelle/spatch[1] on CPython source code? It's a GPL-licensed tool for matching semantic patterns in C source code 16 Nov 2009 12:27:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788274 On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 03:35:00AM +0100, Christian Heimes wrote: > > Do we really want to change distutils to solve a problem of a third > party pac 16 Nov 2009 12:10:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788273 On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 11:27:29PM -0500, Tres Seaver wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Tarek Ziadé wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 16 Nov 2009 11:35:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788255 Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Michael Foord wrote: > >> Martin v. Löwis wrote: >> >>>> Would it be possible to detect a change of provider and then 16 Nov 2009 11:18:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788254 On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 02:31:45PM +0100, Georg Brandl wrote: > Antoine Pitrou schrieb: > > Tarek Ziadé <ziade.tarek <at> gmail.com> writes: > >> > > 16 Nov 2009 11:15:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788253 Michael Foord wrote: > Martin v. Löwis wrote: >>> Would it be possible to detect a change of provider and then offer the >>> option to migrate the acc 16 Nov 2009 11:13:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788252 Martin v. Löwis wrote: >> Would it be possible to detect a change of provider and then offer the >> option to migrate the account to the new provider 16 Nov 2009 11:01:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788251 > Would it be possible to detect a change of provider and then offer the > option to migrate the account to the new provider (so long as it does > not 16 Nov 2009 10:46:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788250 Martin v. Löwis wrote: >> Even not having provider changes supported would still allow me to use >> my openid with PyPI which would be great. The only 16 Nov 2009 05:41:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788176 On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Arc Riley <arcriley@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Having a "Repository-URL", "Repository-Browse-URL" and a >> "Bug- 16 Nov 2009 01:38:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788151 Tres Seaver wrote: > Tarek Ziadé wrote: >> I didn't know the split story went like this. I took it like the >> "natural" split everyone >> agreed on, 15 Nov 2009 20:43:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788119 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tarek Ziadé wrote: > On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 3:35 AM, Christian Heimes <lists@cheimes.de> wrote: > [..] 15 Nov 2009 20:27:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788118 On Nov 13, 2009, at 6:23 PM, Greg Ewing wrote: > Martin v. Löwis wrote: > > > Some of the Python maintainers have recently started objecting to > t 15 Nov 2009 20:19:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788117 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 P.J. Eby wrote: > At 09:45 AM 11/14/2009 +0100, Martin v. Löwis wrote: >> Paul Moore wrote: >>> 2009/11 15 Nov 2009 20:14:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788107 Martin> It's far from obvious. It's called "provider-driven identifier Martin> selection". PyPI redirects your browser to Google. Google looks 15 Nov 2009 18:20:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788106 > Even not having provider changes supported would still allow me to use > my openid with PyPI which would be great. The only problem with changing > 15 Nov 2009 14:26:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788080 Martin v. Löwis wrote: > [snip...] >> Why not allow users to login with their own openid, but >> only allow one account to refer back to the same dele 15 Nov 2009 14:20:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788079 skip@pobox.com wrote: > Martin> That's indeed what PyPI attempts to do. At the "claim openid" > Martin> place, follow the Launchpad link. It s 15 Nov 2009 14:11:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788056 There are non-stable buildbots that are failing consistently, but this message is about something else. Now that the biggest stability issues have be 15 Nov 2009 14:09:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788055 Michael Foord <fuzzyman@voidspace.org.uk> writes: > myopenid *does* the validation, but my registered openid is > www.voidspace.org.uk and I *should* 15 Nov 2009 13:58:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788054 > This doesn't seem to be a problem for all the other sites I use my > openid with. Perhaps they don't care about fake accounts at all? That would, i 15 Nov 2009 13:58:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788053 Martin> That's indeed what PyPI attempts to do. At the "claim openid" Martin> place, follow the Launchpad link. It should guide you through 15 Nov 2009 13:34:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788052 Martin v. Löwis wrote: >>> Can't you then produce hundreds of IDs, all delegating to the same >>> identity? >>> >> Yes. >> > > But then, u 15 Nov 2009 13:27:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788051 On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 2:44 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin@v.loewis.de>wrote: > But then, users can easily create as many fake accounts as they want 15 Nov 2009 13:25:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788050 On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 05:31, Georg Brandl <g.brandl@gmx.net> wrote: > Antoine Pitrou schrieb: >> Tarek Ziadé <ziade.tarek <at> gmail.com> writes: > 15 Nov 2009 12:51:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788049 > I've never found OpenID at all intuitive to use. Are there instructions on > pypi.python.org which detail the steps necessary to use OpenID to logi 15 Nov 2009 12:46:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788047 On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote: > Ezio Melotti wrote: >> >> Python currently accepts global statements at the 15 Nov 2009 12:46:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788048 >> Can't you then produce hundreds of IDs, all delegating to the same >> identity? > > Yes. But then, users can easily create as many fake accounts 15 Nov 2009 12:44:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788046 2009/11/15 Brett Cannon <brett@python.org>: > On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 20:01, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@python.org> wrote: >> 2009/11/14 Nick Coghlan 15 Nov 2009 12:43:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788045 On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 20:01, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@python.org> wrote: > 2009/11/14 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com>: >> This does constrain w 15 Nov 2009 12:40:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788044 Ezio Melotti wrote: > Python currently accepts global statements at the top level: > > I opened an issue on the tracker (http://bugs.python.org/issue7 15 Nov 2009 12:38:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788043 Benjamin Peterson wrote: > 2009/11/15 Michael Foord <fuzzyman@voidspace.org.uk>: >> Well, personally I think it would be a good thing if this raised a 15 Nov 2009 12:31:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788042 Martin> Then I recommend that you get a google account for your email Martin> address, and register to PyPI using OpenID. I've never found Op 15 Nov 2009 12:27:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788041 Benjamin Peterson <benjamin <at> python.org> writes: > > 2009/11/15 Michael Foord <fuzzyman <at> voidspace.org.uk>: > > Well, personally I think it w 15 Nov 2009 12:23:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788040 On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 11:31 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin@v.loewis.de> wrote: > > > Well, when I login my registered ID is www.voidspace.org.uk and 15 Nov 2009 12:20:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788039 2009/11/15 Michael Foord <fuzzyman@voidspace.org.uk>: > Well, personally I think it would be a good thing if this raised an > exception during bytecod 15 Nov 2009 12:08:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788009 Ezio Melotti wrote: > Python currently accepts global statements at the top level: >>>> global foo >>>> > > Beside being a meaningless operation, this 15 Nov 2009 11:59:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788008 Python currently accepts global statements at the top level: >>> global foo >>> Beside being a meaningless operation, this might lead unexperienced u 15 Nov 2009 11:55:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788007 > Well, when I login my registered ID is www.voidspace.org.uk and *not* > fuzzyman.myopenid.com - so I believe you are incorrect (and in fact this > v 15 Nov 2009 11:31:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788006 Martin v. Löwis wrote: >>> So the only thing users gain with delegation is that they don't need >>> to remember the tedious URL that their provider a 15 Nov 2009 11:18:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788005 >> So the only thing users gain with delegation is that they don't need >> to remember the tedious URL that their provider assigns them. When they >> 15 Nov 2009 10:57:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/788004 On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Tarek Ziadé <ziade.tarek@gmail.com> wrote: > > Ok. Fair enough, I'll work with them this way. Although packagers 15 Nov 2009 05:38:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/787954 Martin v. Löwis schrieb: >> Yes, I think this just started happening. I'm guessing that the main >> site proxies the buildbot URL requests to the buil 15 Nov 2009 05:33:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/787953 On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 4:02 AM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote: > Christian Heimes wrote: >> >> Tarek Ziadé wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> http: 15 Nov 2009 05:32:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/787952 Antoine Pitrou schrieb: > Tarek Ziadé <ziade.tarek <at> gmail.com> writes: >> >> This cannot work on all platforms, when our Makefile is not shipped 15 Nov 2009 05:31:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/787951 On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 3:35 AM, Christian Heimes <lists@cheimes.de> wrote: [..] > Do we really want to change distutils to solve a problem of a third 15 Nov 2009 05:30:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/787950 Tarek Ziadé <ziade.tarek <at> gmail.com> writes: > > This cannot work on all platforms, when our Makefile is not shipped > with python but python-de 15 Nov 2009 04:42:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/787949 Martin v. Löwis wrote: >> Fred can use his own OpenID ‘fred.example.org’, initially set up behind >> the scenes to delegate to ‘bigcorp.example 15 Nov 2009 03:41:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/787920 Robert Kern wrote: > Nick Coghlan wrote: > >> For that second part: >> 1. Is it even worth doing at this stage? I'm not sure to what degree the >> ne 14 Nov 2009 23:02:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/787880 Nick Coghlan wrote: > For that second part: > 1. Is it even worth doing at this stage? I'm not sure to what degree the > new command line flexibility 14 Nov 2009 22:37:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/787879