<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Python | Dev</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>12 Feb  2012 16:58:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: Adding a maximum element count to parse_qs?</title>
<description>On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:32:07 +0100 martin@v.loewis.de wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; No, you are missing my point. I assume you proposed (even though you &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; didn&amp;#039;t say</description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2012 15:39:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/967179</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Adding a maximum element count to parse_qs?</title>
<description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt; No, you are missing my point. I assume you proposed (even though you &amp;gt;&amp;gt; didn&amp;#039;t say so explicitly) that parse_qs gets an opt-in API change to &amp;gt;&amp;gt; lim</description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2012 15:32:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/967178</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Adding a maximum element count to parse_qs?</title>
<description>On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:08:45 +0100 martin@v.loewis.de wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; b) of limited use for existing installations which won&amp;#039;t use the API. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Obv</description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2012 15:19:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/967177</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Adding a maximum element count to parse_qs?</title>
<description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt; It&amp;#039;s an API change, so it is &amp;gt;&amp;gt; a) in violation with current practice for bug fix releases, and &amp;gt; &amp;gt; We are already violating a lot of things in ord</description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2012 15:08:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/967176</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: peps: Update with bugfix releases.</title>
<description>On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Ned Deily &amp;lt;nad@acm.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; In article &amp;lt;E1Ru7G3-0007Mb-3R@dinsdale.python.org&amp;gt;, &amp;gt;  georg.brandl &amp;lt;python-checkins</description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2012 14:53:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/967175</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Adding a maximum element count to parse_qs?</title>
<description>On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:44:22 +0100 &amp;quot;Martin v. Löwis&amp;quot; &amp;lt;martin@v.loewis.de&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Given the randomization fix will ship disabled, I thought it woul</description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2012 13:55:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/967151</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Adding a maximum element count to parse_qs?</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Given the randomization fix will ship disabled, I thought it would be &amp;gt; nice to add a maximum element count argument to urlparse.parse_qs, with &amp;gt; a</description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2012 12:44:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/967150</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PEP 394 request for pronouncement (python2 symlink in *nix systems)</title>
<description>&amp;gt; IMO a symlink is far and away the better choice in this situation. Please wait with that judgment until you see the rationale of the PEP author. T</description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2012 12:42:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/967149</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PEP 394 request for pronouncement (python2 symlink in *nix systems)</title>
<description>On 12Feb2012 18:57, &amp;quot;Martin v. LĂ¶wis&amp;quot; &amp;lt;martin@v.loewis.de&amp;gt; wrote: | Am 12.02.2012 17:04, schrieb Antoine Pitrou: | &amp;gt; Le dimanche 12 fĂ©vrier 2012 Ă </description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2012 12:30:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/967148</link>
</item><item>
<title>Adding a maximum element count to parse_qs?</title>
<description>Hello, Given the randomization fix will ship disabled, I thought it would be nice to add a maximum element count argument to urlparse.parse_qs, with</description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2012 12:17:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/967147</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PEP 394 request for pronouncement (python2 symlink in *nix systems)</title>
<description>Am 12.02.2012 17:04, schrieb Antoine Pitrou: &amp;gt; Le dimanche 12 fĂ©vrier 2012 Ă  16:52 +0100, &amp;quot;Martin v. LĂ¶wis&amp;quot; a Ă©crit : &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Why hard links? Symlinks</description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2012 09:57:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/967110</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PEP 394 request for pronouncement (python2 symlink in *nix systems)</title>
<description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt; There actually *is* an easy way, in regular ls: look at the link count. &amp;gt;&amp;gt; It comes out of ls -l by default, and if it&amp;#039;s &amp;gt;1, there will be an &amp;gt;&amp;gt; id</description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2012 08:35:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/967109</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PEP 394 request for pronouncement (python2 symlink in *nix systems)</title>
<description>In article &amp;lt;CADiSq7cfuZ=22zcGkvcT4TH+GjjTaHHAh9XK6jUBwZv=aLuiKQ@mail.gmail.com&amp;gt;, Nick Coghlan &amp;lt;ncoghlan@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; PEP 394 [1] aims to doc</description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2012 08:17:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/967108</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PEP 394 request for pronouncement (python2 symlink in *nix systems)</title>
<description>Le dimanche 12 fĂ©vrier 2012 Ă  16:52 +0100, &amp;quot;Martin v. LĂ¶wis&amp;quot; a Ă©crit : &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Why hard links? Symlinks are much more introspectable. When looking at</description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2012 08:04:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/967093</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PEP 394 request for pronouncement (python2 symlink in *nix systems)</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Why hard links? Symlinks are much more introspectable. When looking at &amp;gt; a hard link I have no easy way to know it&amp;#039;s the same as whatever other &amp;gt; fi</description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2012 07:52:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/967092</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PEP 394 request for pronouncement (python2 symlink in *nix systems)</title>
<description>On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:04:30 +1000 Nick Coghlan &amp;lt;ncoghlan@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; PEP 394 [1] aims to document our collective recommendation for &amp;gt; allowin</description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2012 07:21:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/967091</link>
</item><item>
<title>PEP 394 request for pronouncement (python2 symlink in *nix systems)</title>
<description>PEP 394 [1] aims to document our collective recommendation for allowing shebang lines to specifically request some version of 2.x, without requiring t</description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2012 01:04:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/967052</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: requirements for moving __import__ over to	importlib?</title>
<description>Le 07/02/2012 23:21, Brett Cannon a Ă©crit : &amp;gt; On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 15:28, Dirkjan Ochtman &amp;lt;dirkjan@ochtman.nl&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Yeah, startup performance</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 22:51:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/967033</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PEP 411: Provisional packages in the Python standard library</title>
<description>On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 2:45 AM, Isaac Morland &amp;lt;ijmorlan@uwaterloo.ca&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Could the documentation generator simply insert the boilerplate if and</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 20:07:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966985</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PEP 411: Provisional packages in the Python standard library</title>
<description>On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Antoine Pitrou &amp;lt;solipsis@pitrou.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:06:15 +0200 &amp;gt; Eli Bendersky &amp;lt;eliben@gmail.com&amp;gt; w</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 19:59:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966984</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PEP for new dictionary implementation</title>
<description>Antoine Pitrou wrote: &amp;gt; Hello Mark, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I think the PEP should explain what happens when a keys table needs &amp;gt; resizing when setting an object&amp;#039;s attri</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 13:22:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966945</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PEP 411: Provisional packages in the Python standard library</title>
<description>On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Nick Coghlan &amp;lt;ncoghlan@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Eric Snow &amp;lt;ericsnowcurrently@gmail.com&amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 13:14:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966944</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PEP for new dictionary implementation</title>
<description>Hello Mark, I think the PEP should explain what happens when a keys table needs resizing when setting an object&amp;#039;s attribute. Reading the implementati</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 12:17:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966943</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PEP 411: Provisional packages in the Python standard library</title>
<description>On Sat, 11 Feb 2012, Steven D&amp;#039;Aprano wrote: &amp;gt; Arguably, the canonical test for whether a package is provisional or not &amp;gt; should be the existence of</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 08:45:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966917</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PEP 411: Provisional packages in the Python standard library</title>
<description>On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 04:32:56PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; This would then be seen by pydoc and help(), as well as being amenable &amp;gt; to program</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 08:22:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966916</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PEP 411: Provisional packages in the Python standard library</title>
<description>On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:06:15 +0200 Eli Bendersky &amp;lt;eliben@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Following the intensive and fruitful discussion of the (now rejected)</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 07:20:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966912</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: http://pythonmentors.com/</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Eli, quite frankly no :( &amp;gt; &amp;gt; The stock answer &amp;quot;put it on the main page at python.org&amp;quot; if actually &amp;gt; followed up in all cases would result in somethi</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 03:00:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966895</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: http://pythonmentors.com/</title>
<description>On 11/02/2012 03:14, Eli Bendersky wrote: &amp;gt; On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 03:38, Jesse Noller&amp;lt;jnoller@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve been trying to publicize it</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 02:55:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966894</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: http://pythonmentors.com/</title>
<description>On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 08:27, Nick Coghlan &amp;lt;ncoghlan@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Eli Bendersky &amp;lt;eliben@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 23:31:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966872</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PEP 411: Provisional packages in the Python	standard library</title>
<description>Eric Snow wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Eli Bendersky &amp;lt;eliben@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 22:13, Jim J. Jewett &amp;lt;jimjjewet</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 23:29:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966871</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PEP 411: Provisional packages in the Python standard library</title>
<description>On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Eric Snow &amp;lt;ericsnowcurrently@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Is there more to it than having a simple __provisional__ attribute o</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 22:32:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966870</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: http://pythonmentors.com/</title>
<description>On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Eli Bendersky &amp;lt;eliben@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Mark, do you have a concrete idea of how it can be made more prominent? Ma</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 22:27:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966869</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PEP 411: Provisional packages in the Python standard library</title>
<description>On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Eli Bendersky &amp;lt;eliben@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 22:13, Jim J. Jewett &amp;lt;jimjjewett@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote:</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 19:39:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966838</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: http://pythonmentors.com/</title>
<description>On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 03:38, Jesse Noller &amp;lt;jnoller@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve been trying to publicize it on twitter, my blog, google plus and elsewhe</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 19:14:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966837</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PEP 411: Provisional packages in the Python standard library</title>
<description>On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 23:56, Terry Reedy &amp;lt;tjreedy@udel.edu&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On 2/10/2012 9:06 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Whenever the Python core develo</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 19:12:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966836</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PEP 411: Provisional packages in the Python standard library</title>
<description>On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 22:13, Jim J. Jewett &amp;lt;jimjjewett@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Eli Bendersky wrote (in &amp;gt; http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 19:10:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966835</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PEP 411: Provisional packages in the Python standard library</title>
<description>On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 20:33, Brett Cannon &amp;lt;brett@python.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Other than the misspelling of &amp;quot;maintenante&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;maintenance&amp;quot;, LGTM. &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 19:04:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966834</link>
</item><item>
<title>Fwd: maintenance of the ElementTree / cElementTree packages in the Python standard library</title>
<description>A protagonist writes:  &amp;gt; ---------- Forwarded message ---------- &amp;gt; From: Fredrik Lundh &amp;lt;fredrik@pythonware.com&amp;gt; As a not-directly-concerned third p</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 18:44:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966833</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PEP 411: Provisional packages in the Python standard library</title>
<description>Jim J. Jewett wrote: &amp;gt; Eli Bendersky wrote (in &amp;gt; http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/116393.html ): &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; A package will be mark</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 18:00:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966823</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: http://pythonmentors.com/</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve been trying to publicize it on twitter, my blog, google plus and elsewhere.  help welcome.  On Friday, February 10, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Mark Law</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 17:38:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966822</link>
</item><item>
<title>http://pythonmentors.com/</title>
<description>Hi all, I&amp;#039;d never heard of this until some Dutch geezer whose name I&amp;#039;m now forgotten pointed me to it. Had I known about it a couple of years ago</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 17:27:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966821</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: requirements for moving __import__ over to importlib?</title>
<description>On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 11:23 AM, PJ Eby &amp;lt;pje@telecommunity.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; What&amp;#039;s the downside in that case?  You&amp;#039;re trying to import something that &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 16:49:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966820</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: requirements for moving __import__ over to importlib?</title>
<description>On Feb 10, 2012 3:38 PM, &amp;quot;Brett Cannon&amp;quot; &amp;lt;brett@python.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 15:07, PJ Eby &amp;lt;pje@telecommunity.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Fri, Fe</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 16:23:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966819</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PEP 411: Provisional packages in the Python standard library</title>
<description>On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Jim J. Jewett &amp;lt;jimjjewett@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Eli Bendersky wrote (in &amp;gt; http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 14:38:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966803</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Add a new &amp;quot;locale&amp;quot; codec?</title>
<description>2012/2/10 &amp;quot;Martin v. LĂ¶wis&amp;quot; &amp;lt;martin@v.loewis.de&amp;gt;: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; As And pointed out, this is already the behaviour of the &amp;quot;mbcs&amp;quot; codec &amp;gt;&amp;gt; under Windows. &amp;quot;locale&amp;quot;</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 14:22:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966802</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PEP 411: Provisional packages in the Python standard library</title>
<description>On 2/10/2012 9:06 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote: &amp;gt; Whenever the Python core development team decides that a new package should be &amp;gt; included into the stand</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 13:56:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966782</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: requirements for moving __import__ over to importlib?</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/10/2012 04:42 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 16:29, Tres Seaver &amp;lt;tseaver@palla</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 13:46:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966780</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: requirements for moving __import__ over to importlib?</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/10/2012 04:42 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 16:29, Tres Seaver &amp;lt;tseaver@palla</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 13:46:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966781</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: requirements for moving __import__ over to importlib?</title>
<description>On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 16:29, Tres Seaver &amp;lt;tseaver@palladion.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- &amp;gt; Hash: SHA1 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On 02/10/2012 03:38 P</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 13:42:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966779</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: requirements for moving __import__ over to importlib?</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/10/2012 03:38 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: &amp;gt; Changes in any fashion to the directory. Do filesystems a</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 13:29:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966778</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: requirements for moving __import__ over to importlib?</title>
<description>On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 15:07, PJ Eby &amp;lt;pje@telecommunity.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Brett Cannon &amp;lt;brett@python.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 12:38:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966777</link>
</item><item>
<title>PEP 411: Provisional packages in the Python standard library</title>
<description>Eli Bendersky wrote (in http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/116393.html ): &amp;gt; A package will be marked provisional by including</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 12:13:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966769</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: requirements for moving __import__ over to importlib?</title>
<description>On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Brett Cannon &amp;lt;brett@python.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 17:00, PJ Eby &amp;lt;pje@telecommunity.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 12:07:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966768</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PEP 411: Provisional packages in the Python standard library</title>
<description>Other than the misspelling of &amp;quot;maintenante&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;maintenance&amp;quot;, LGTM. On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 09:06, Eli Bendersky &amp;lt;eliben@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 10:33:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966767</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: requirements for moving __import__ over to importlib?</title>
<description>On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 17:00, PJ Eby &amp;lt;pje@telecommunity.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Mike Meyer &amp;lt;mwm@mired.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; For thos</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 10:05:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966752</link>
</item><item>
<title>Summary of Python tracker Issues</title>
<description>ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2012-02-03 - 2012-02-10) Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/ To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on t</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 09:07:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966751</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: folding cElementTree behind ElementTree in 3.3</title>
<description>&amp;lt;snip&amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;quot;&amp;quot;&amp;quot;A common pattern in Python 2.x is to have one version of a module &amp;gt; implemented in pure Python, with an optional accelerated version &amp;gt; imp</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 06:59:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966730</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Fwd: maintenance of the ElementTree / cElementTree packages in the Python standard library</title>
<description>On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Eli Bendersky &amp;lt;eliben@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; ---------- Forwarded message ---------- &amp;gt; From: Fredrik Lundh &amp;lt;fredrik@pyth</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 06:35:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966729</link>
</item><item>
<title>PEP 411: Provisional packages in the Python standard library</title>
<description>Hi all, Following the intensive and fruitful discussion of the (now rejected) PEP 408 (http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-January/11585</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 06:06:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966704</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: folding cElementTree behind ElementTree in 3.3</title>
<description>2012/2/10 Nick Coghlan &amp;lt;ncoghlan@gmail.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Most orphan modules in the stdlib aren&amp;#039;t like that - yes, their APIs &amp;gt; stagnate (because nobody feels</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 05:03:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966703</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: folding cElementTree behind ElementTree in 3.3</title>
<description>On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 7:37 PM, &amp;quot;Martin v. Löwis&amp;quot; &amp;lt;martin@v.loewis.de&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Notice that the last time something like this came up (bsddb), it &amp;gt; a</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 04:44:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966702</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: peps: Update with bugfix releases.</title>
<description>In article &amp;lt;nad-734070.22132908022012@news.gmane.org&amp;gt;, Ned Deily &amp;lt;nad@acm.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; However, this may all be a moot point now as I&amp;#039;ve subsequentl</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 04:39:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966701</link>
</item><item>
<title>Fwd: maintenance of the ElementTree / cElementTree packages in the Python standard library</title>
<description>---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Fredrik Lundh &amp;lt;fredrik@pythonware.com&amp;gt; Date: Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 13:16 Subject: Re: maintenance of the</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 03:26:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966678</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: folding cElementTree behind ElementTree in 3.3</title>
<description>&amp;quot;Martin v. LĂ¶wis&amp;quot;, 10.02.2012 11:32: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; What happens now? Do we give up on touching it until Fredrik Lundh &amp;gt;&amp;gt; decides on a come-back or some person w</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 03:10:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966677</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: folding cElementTree behind ElementTree in 3.3</title>
<description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt; What happens now? Do we give up on touching it until Fredrik Lundh &amp;gt;&amp;gt; decides on a come-back or some person who is willing to commit 5 years &amp;gt;&amp;gt; is</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 02:45:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966676</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: folding cElementTree behind ElementTree in 3.3</title>
<description>&amp;quot;Martin v. LĂ¶wis&amp;quot;, 10.02.2012 10:37: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Given that it was two months ago that I started the &amp;quot;Fixing the XML &amp;gt;&amp;gt; batteries&amp;quot; thread (and years since I b</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 02:44:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966675</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: folding cElementTree behind ElementTree in 3.3</title>
<description>&amp;gt; How does this differ from any other module in stdlib that may not have &amp;gt; a single designated owner, but which at the same time *is* being &amp;gt; maintain</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 02:32:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966674</link>
</item><item>
<title>maintenance of the ElementTree / cElementTree packages in the Python standard library</title>
<description>Hello Fredrik, Recently a discussion came up on the python-dev mailing list regarding continued maintenance of the ElementTree &amp;amp; cElementTree package</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 02:32:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966673</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: folding cElementTree behind ElementTree in 3.3</title>
<description>On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:43, &amp;quot;Martin v. Löwis&amp;quot; &amp;lt;martin@v.loewis.de&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; IMHO it&amp;#039;s no longer a question of &amp;quot;wanting&amp;quot; to take ownership. &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Acco</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 01:57:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966659</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: folding cElementTree behind ElementTree in 3.3</title>
<description>Eli Bendersky, 10.02.2012 10:06: &amp;gt; On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:32, Florent wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; 2012/2/10 Eli Bendersky &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Thanks for the input, Florent</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 01:50:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966657</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Add a new &amp;quot;locale&amp;quot; codec?</title>
<description>&amp;gt; As And pointed out, this is already the behaviour of the &amp;quot;mbcs&amp;quot; codec &amp;gt; under Windows. &amp;quot;locale&amp;quot; would be the moral (*) equivalent of that under &amp;gt; Un</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 01:50:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966658</link>
</item><item>
<title>PyPy 1.8 released</title>
<description>============================ PyPy 1.8 - business as usual ============================ We&amp;#039;re pleased to announce the 1.8 release of PyPy. As habitual</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 01:44:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966655</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: folding cElementTree behind ElementTree in 3.3</title>
<description>&amp;gt; IMHO it&amp;#039;s no longer a question of &amp;quot;wanting&amp;quot; to take ownership. &amp;gt; According to Florent, this has already happened to some extent. &amp;quot;Ownership to some</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 01:43:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966656</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: folding cElementTree behind ElementTree in 3.3</title>
<description>&amp;gt; That makes me consider it the reality that &amp;quot;today, ET is only being &amp;gt; maintained in the stdlib&amp;quot;. I think different people will have different perce</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 01:37:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966654</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: folding cElementTree behind ElementTree in 3.3</title>
<description>On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:32, Florent &amp;lt;florent.xicluna@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; 2012/2/10 Eli Bendersky &amp;lt;eliben@gmail.com&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Thanks for the input</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 01:06:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966653</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Add a new &amp;quot;locale&amp;quot; codec?</title>
<description>Victor Stinner writes:  &amp;gt; &amp;gt; If this is needed, it should be spelled &amp;quot;os.getlocaleencoding()&amp;quot; (or &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;quot;sys.getlocaleencoding()&amp;quot;?) &amp;gt;  &amp;gt; There is alr</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 00:54:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966651</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: folding cElementTree behind ElementTree in 3.3</title>
<description>2012/2/10 Eli Bendersky &amp;lt;eliben@gmail.com&amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Thanks for the input, Florent. So, to paraphrase, there already are &amp;gt; code changes in the stdlib ve</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 00:32:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966650</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: folding cElementTree behind ElementTree in 3.3</title>
<description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt; That said, I think that the particular change discussed in this thread &amp;gt;&amp;gt; can be made anyway, since it doesn&amp;#039;t really modify ET&amp;#039;s APIs or &amp;gt;&amp;gt; functi</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 19:58:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966604</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: folding cElementTree behind ElementTree in 3.3</title>
<description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Antoine Pitrou &amp;lt;solipsis@pitrou.net&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; wrote:&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt; It&amp;#039;s not frozen, it&amp;#039;s actually maintained. &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Indeed, it s</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 19:51:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966603</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: requirements for moving __import__ over to importlib?</title>
<description>On 2/9/2012 7:19 PM, PJ Eby wrote: &amp;gt; Right. It was the part of the post that mentioned that all they sped up &amp;gt; was knowing which directory the files</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 19:14:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966602</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: requirements for moving __import__ over to importlib?</title>
<description>On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Brett Cannon &amp;lt;brett@python.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; This would then be similar to the way main.c already works when it &amp;gt;&amp;gt; inter</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 16:22:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966564</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: requirements for moving __import__ over to importlib?</title>
<description>On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Robert Kern &amp;lt;robert.kern@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On 2/9/12 10:15 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 17:00:</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 16:19:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966563</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: A new dictionary implementation</title>
<description>francis wrote: &amp;gt; Hi Mark, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Bah... typo in assert statement. &amp;gt;&amp;gt; My fault for not testing the debug build (release build worked fine). &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Both builds</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 14:45:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966552</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: requirements for moving __import__ over to importlib?</title>
<description>On 2/9/12 10:15 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: &amp;gt; On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 17:00:04 -0500 &amp;gt; PJ Eby&amp;lt;pje@telecommunity.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:53 P</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 14:34:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966551</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: requirements for moving __import__ over to importlib?</title>
<description>On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 17:00:04 -0500 PJ Eby &amp;lt;pje@telecommunity.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Mike Meyer &amp;lt;mwm@mired.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; For</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 14:15:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966520</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: requirements for moving __import__ over to importlib?</title>
<description>On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Mike Meyer &amp;lt;mwm@mired.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; For those of you not watching -ideas, or ignoring the &amp;quot;Python TIOBE &amp;gt; -3%&amp;quot; discus</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 14:00:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966519</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Add a new &amp;quot;locale&amp;quot; codec?</title>
<description>&amp;gt; If this is needed, it should be spelled &amp;quot;os.getlocaleencoding()&amp;quot; (or &amp;gt; &amp;quot;sys.getlocaleencoding()&amp;quot;?) There is already a locale.getpreferredencoding(F</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 13:47:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966518</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: peps: Update with bugfix releases.</title>
<description>In article &amp;lt;rowen-BA4FCF.11522909022012@news.gmane.org&amp;gt;, &amp;quot;Russell E. Owen&amp;quot; &amp;lt;rowen@uw.edu&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; One problem I&amp;#039;ve run into is that the 64-bit Mac p</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 13:07:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966517</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: requirements for moving __import__ over to importlib?</title>
<description>On 2/9/2012 3:27 PM, Glenn Linderman wrote: &amp;gt; On 2/9/2012 11:53 AM, Mike Meyer wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:19:59 -0500 &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Brett Cannon&amp;lt;brett@pytho</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 12:56:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966516</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Add a new &amp;quot;locale&amp;quot; codec?</title>
<description>On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull &amp;lt;stephen@xemacs.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; If this is needed, it should be spelled &amp;quot;os.getlocaleencoding()&amp;quot; (</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 12:43:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966515</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: requirements for moving __import__ over to importlib?</title>
<description>On 2/9/2012 11:53 AM, Mike Meyer wrote: &amp;gt; On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:19:59 -0500 &amp;gt; Brett Cannon&amp;lt;brett@python.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 13:43,</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 12:27:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966514</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: requirements for moving __import__ over to importlib?</title>
<description>On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:19:59 -0500 Brett Cannon &amp;lt;brett@python.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 13:43, PJ Eby &amp;lt;pje@telecommunity.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Aga</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 11:53:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966485</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: peps: Update with bugfix releases.</title>
<description>In article &amp;lt;4F32DF1E.40205@v.loewis.de&amp;gt;, &amp;quot;Martin v. Lowis&amp;quot; &amp;lt;martin@v.loewis.de&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Am 05.02.2012 21:34, schrieb Ned Deily: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; In article &amp;gt; &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 11:52:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966484</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: A new dictionary implementation</title>
<description>Hi Mark, &amp;gt; Bah... typo in assert statement. &amp;gt; My fault for not testing the debug build (release build worked fine). &amp;gt; Both builds working now. Yeah, n</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 11:47:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966483</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: requirements for moving __import__ over to importlib?</title>
<description>On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 13:43, PJ Eby &amp;lt;pje@telecommunity.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Feb 9, 2012 9:58 AM, &amp;quot;Brett Cannon&amp;quot; &amp;lt;brett@python.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; This act</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 11:19:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966482</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: folding cElementTree behind ElementTree in 3.3</title>
<description>2012/2/8 Nick Coghlan &amp;lt;ncoghlan@gmail.com&amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Antoine Pitrou &amp;lt;solipsis@pitrou.net&amp;gt; &amp;gt; wrote:&amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; It&amp;#039;s not frozen, it&amp;#039;</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 10:49:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966481</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: requirements for moving __import__ over to importlib?</title>
<description>On Feb 9, 2012 9:58 AM, &amp;quot;Brett Cannon&amp;quot; &amp;lt;brett@python.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; This actually depends on the type of ImportError. My current solution actually woul</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 10:43:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966480</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: requirements for moving __import__ over to importlib?</title>
<description>On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 20:26, Nick Coghlan &amp;lt;ncoghlan@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Antoine Pitrou &amp;lt;solipsis@pitrou.net&amp;gt; &amp;gt; wrote</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 07:05:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966439</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Add a new &amp;quot;locale&amp;quot; codec?</title>
<description>Victor Stinner writes:  &amp;gt; There is the same problem [.that encode-decode with the &amp;#039;locale&amp;#039; &amp;gt; codec doesn&amp;#039;t roundtrip reliably] with the filesystem e</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 06:59:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966438</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: requirements for moving __import__ over to importlib?</title>
<description>On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 20:28, PJ Eby &amp;lt;pje@telecommunity.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Brett Cannon &amp;lt;brett@python.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 06:58:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/966437</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

