
report at bugs
May 28, 2012, 1:51 PM
Post #2 of 3
(41 views)
Permalink
|
|
[issue11783] email parseaddr and formataddr should be IDNA aware
[In reply to]
|
|
R. David Murray <rdmurray [at] bitdance> added the comment: I'm finally getting back around to this. Torsten, could you submit a contributor agreement, please? (http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/) And to answer the question you had about the 'still failing' test, parseaddr isn't currently doing the encoded-word decode. Either it should do that too, or it shouldn't do the IDNA decode. I think it should do the decode, because parseaddr and formataddr are supposed to be inverses. And decoding when decoding didn't used to be done seems like a backward compatible change: a program doing its own decoding just won't find anything that needs decoding. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <report [at] bugs> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11783> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/list-python-bugs%40lists.gossamer-threads.com
|