report at bugs
Mar 19, 2012, 1:49 AM
Post #7 of 16
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <tshepang [at] gmail> added the comment:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:34, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <tshepang [at] gmail> wrote:
>> Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan [at] gmail> added the comment:
>> A couple of thoughts on the draft HOWTO:
>> I like the "verbosity" example, but I'd also like to see it continue on into introducing the "action='count'" alternative that allows "-vv" to set the verbosity level to 2, etc.
> I wonder if this usage is common enough to get an entry in this
> introductory text.
>> I also find the idea of having higher verbosity levels that aren't supersets of lower verbosity levels to be an anti-pattern, so I'd prefer not to see it in an official HOWTO. To my mind, verbosity levels should be checked with ">=", never "==".
> I don't really understand this paragraph. Do you have an example to
> compare with any of the examples in the attached patch?
After playing a bit more with this and thinking about it a bit, I do
get your point. It makes a lot of sense. I will attach a patch soon,
which will also include the count keyword. Thanks for the review.
Python tracker <report [at] bugs>
Python-bugs-list mailing list