b2gills at gmail
Aug 5, 2012, 9:33 AM
Post #2 of 2
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Aristotle Pagaltzis <pagaltzis [at] gmx> wrote:
Re: An aside on GPL vs Aristic and the courts [was: Is PERLIO operational or still 'experimental'?]
[In reply to]
> * Nicholas Clark <nick [at] ccl4> [2012-07-26 15:15]:
>> (And the irony is that in the US, the Artistic License has stood up to
>> attack in court, whereas the GPL has yet to be tested. IIRC)
> The FSF’s answer on this point, of course, is that the GPL has been
> tested countless times *before* court and every would-be violator has
> chosen to settle without a trial. Which presumably demonstrates that the
> GPL is so watertight and compliance with it so relatively non-onerous
> that no would-be perpetrator is interested in letting the matter go to
> the courts.
> It could then be argued that the fact that the Artistic License has
> stood up in court – read: has had to stand up in court, i.e. it has been
> part of a dispute that managed to last long enough for a court to have
> to rule on it, means that it is the weaker licence.
Except in that case, the person that was arguing against it would have
probably fought **any and all** licenses.