
b2gills at gmail
Aug 5, 2012, 9:33 AM
Post #2 of 2
(37 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: An aside on GPL vs Aristic and the courts [was: Is PERLIO operational or still 'experimental'?]
[In reply to]
|
|
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Aristotle Pagaltzis <pagaltzis [at] gmx> wrote: > * Nicholas Clark <nick [at] ccl4> [2012-07-26 15:15]: >> (And the irony is that in the US, the Artistic License has stood up to >> attack in court, whereas the GPL has yet to be tested. IIRC) > > The FSF’s answer on this point, of course, is that the GPL has been > tested countless times *before* court and every would-be violator has > chosen to settle without a trial. Which presumably demonstrates that the > GPL is so watertight and compliance with it so relatively non-onerous > that no would-be perpetrator is interested in letting the matter go to > the courts. > > It could then be argued that the fact that the Artistic License has > stood up in court – read: has had to stand up in court, i.e. it has been > part of a dispute that managed to last long enough for a court to have > to rule on it, means that it is the weaker licence. Except in that case, the person that was arguing against it would have probably fought **any and all** licenses. http://jmri.sourceforge.net/k/History.shtml http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacobsen_v._Katzer
|