nick at ccl4
May 22, 2008, 1:14 AM
Post #3 of 7
(124 views)
Permalink
|
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:10:43AM +0200, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
> 2008/5/22 Robin Barker <Robin.Barker[at]npl.co.uk>:
> >> 33906 <http://public.activestate.com/cgi-bin/perlbrowse/p/33906> on 2008/05/22 by nicholas[at]nicholas-saigo
> >>
> >> Following a conversation on IRC, Artur thinks it best if we consider
> >> the core version of Attribute::Handlers official from now on, and
> >> hence remove it from Porting/Maintainers.pl
> >
> > I think it is more usual that non-dual modules are marked
> > MAINTAINER => p5p,
> > CPAN => 0,
> >
> > Or is there a special reason for deleting this entry?
I got the strong impression that "we" are taking it over, and assumed that
this was consistent with it not being dual life any more
08:21 <@Tux32> sky, do you still `maintain' Attribute::Handlers?
08:21 <@sky> not really
08:21 <@sky> it is in core
08:22 <@Tux32> that's why I ask. I submitted a typo patch, but you're in
maintainers as owner of this module
08:22 <@Tux32> so I cc'd you
08:25 <@kane> it's dual lifed though, no?
08:35 <@kane> yeah, it does appear to be dual lifed
08:39 <@Nicholas> sky: should we start considering the core version as offial,
and remove it from the dual life list in
Porting/Maintainers.pl ?
08:40 <@sky> i would think so
08:40 <@Nicholas> OK.
> I think I volunteered in the past to maintain the dual life module.
In which case it should go back as MAINTAINER => 'rgarcia', CPAN => 0 ?
(And you and Artur sort out the PAUSE permissions?)
Nicholas Clark
|
