Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 26 Nov 2009 01:34:53 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg 2009/11/25 Tim Bunce <perlbug-followup@perl.org>: > perlbug doesn't check the return status of Mail::Send and so reports > "Message sent" even if it h 26 Nov 2009 00:43:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/245612 2009/11/25 David Golden <xdaveg@gmail.com>: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Abigail <abigail@abigail.be> wrote: >> I've written code in past like t 26 Nov 2009 00:37:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/245611 Automated smoke report for 5.11.2 patch 17cc9359ea8ee1b546aa067b91362160e3c1e1ee v5.11.2-78-g17cc935 perl-win2k: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GH 26 Nov 2009 00:20:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/245610 Automated smoke report for 5.11.2 patch 17cc9359ea8ee1b546aa067b91362160e3c1e1ee v5.11.2-78-g17cc935 maldoror.bath.planit.group: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CP 26 Nov 2009 00:20:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/245608 karl williamson <public@khwilliamson.com> writes: > Based on looking at existing code in utf8_heavy.pl, I had presumed > that the Perl optimizer woul 25 Nov 2009 23:27:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/245609 * karl williamson <public@khwilliamson.com> [2009-11-26 06:35]: > As I expected (I had used DProf earlier), the highest usage > subroutine was my pure 25 Nov 2009 21:57:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/245607 Oops, forgot to put the function in. karl williamson wrote: > Nicholas Clark wrote: >>> [...] >> >> Also, you mentioned Encode and the files it genera 25 Nov 2009 21:42:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/245606 Nicholas Clark wrote: >> [...] > > Also, you mentioned Encode and the files it generated. I found a lot of scope > for optimisation within enc2xs, wh 25 Nov 2009 21:33:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/245605 Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 06:47:43PM -0500, Eric Brine wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 4:26 PM, karl williamson <public@khwill 25 Nov 2009 20:34:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/245604 >> perhaps   s///f    should be spelled >>               m/// If we're going to bike-shed it, I vote to add a new *intro* character instead 25 Nov 2009 19:56:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/245603 Automated smoke report for 5.11.2 patch 7c76c2a0d87e7bfac7012fb2b38100addc903e9d v5.11.2-70-g7c76c2a perl-win2k: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GH 25 Nov 2009 18:20:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/245602 Automated smoke report for 5.11.2 patch 789c461534f3eb0346447f8127786b7da3017f6c v5.11.2-69-g789c461 perl-opensolaris: i86pc (2614MHz) (i386/1 cpu) 25 Nov 2009 16:20:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/245597 Automated smoke report for 5.10.1 patch ca8de220718ba91d5a5fdd9779497cd5b0250258 perl-5.10.1-1-gca8de22 maldoror.bath.planit.group: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 25 Nov 2009 16:20:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/245601 Thanks, applied. Tim, How's this do for you? On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:17:52PM +0000, Zefram wrote: > Tim Bunce wrote: > >The primary issue is the 25 Nov 2009 15:04:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/245600 On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 05:29:01PM -0500, Eric Brine wrote: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Abigail <abigail@abigail.be> wrote: > > > I've no sugg 25 Nov 2009 14:43:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/245599 On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Abigail <abigail@abigail.be> wrote: > I've no suggestion to do it differently. I'm just pointing out the patch > com 25 Nov 2009 14:29:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/245598 Tony Cook wrote: >Smokes with -Dmad have been failing during make minitest since the That'll be me again. I'll look into it. -zefram 25 Nov 2009 14:25:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/245596 Tim Bunce wrote: >The primary issue is the off-by-one error in the array indexing. There's a bit more to it than that. The indexing was off-by-one f 25 Nov 2009 14:17:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/245595 2009/11/25 Reini Urban <rurban@x-ray.at>: > 2009/11/17 Jan Dubois <jand@activestate.com>: >> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Steve Hay wrote: >>> >>> The build f 25 Nov 2009 14:16:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/245594 2009/11/21 Craig A. Berry <craig.a.berry@gmail.com>: > These functions don't actually exist unless DEBUGGING is defined, yet > proto.h makes them visi 25 Nov 2009 14:09:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/245593 2009/11/17 Jan Dubois <jand@activestate.com>: > On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Steve Hay wrote: >> >> The build failure in every configuration here is caused by 25 Nov 2009 14:02:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/245592 Hi guys, On Thu, November 26, 2009 3:28 am, Jim Cromie wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:37 PM, <hv@crypt.org> wrote: >> David Caldwell <david@pork 25 Nov 2009 13:30:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/245591 On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Abigail <abigail@abigail.be> wrote: > I've written code in past like this: > >    for (1 .. 3) { >        $_ .= 25 Nov 2009 13:01:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/245590 On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 09:28:45AM -0700, Jim Cromie wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:37 PM, <hv@crypt.org> wrote: > > David Caldwell <david@porkri 25 Nov 2009 12:49:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/245589 On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:17:04AM -0500, Eric Brine wrote: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Abigail <abigail@abigail.be> wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 25 Nov 2009 12:33:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/245588