<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Perl | porters</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>06 Jul  2008 16:42:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: [perl #56644] PerlIO resource leaks on open() and then :pop in :unix and :stdio</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m sorry. I forgot to attach the files. -- Goro Fuji</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2008 16:04:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230169</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [perl #9385][PATCH] Pod::HTML problem</title>
<description>Renée Bäcker a écrit : &amp;gt; Attached is a small patch for Pod::Html (against Pod::Html 1.09_04). I&amp;#039;ve just discovered this message, as I summarise a for</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2008 14:00:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230168</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Fwd: Perl histories back to 1995 in MarkMail</title>
<description>Moin, On Sunday 06 July 2008 12:43:22 Jesse Vincent wrote: &amp;gt; Just as a heads up, MarkMail has imported a whole lot more Perl list &amp;gt; history into thei</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2008 12:19:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230167</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: 5.10.x Perl_op_clear PM_GETRE_SAFE still in CORE</title>
<description>Reini Urban schrieb: &amp;gt; MAINT34065 5.10.x current, with DEBUGGING fails, because PM_GETRE_SAFE &amp;gt; is still used in CORE, in Perl_op_clear. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; opmini.</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2008 11:47:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230166</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: t/op/exec.t fails on Fedora</title>
<description>On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Amir E. Aharoni &amp;lt;amir.aharoni@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Rafael Garcia-Suarez &amp;gt; &amp;lt;rgarciasuar</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2008 09:08:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230163</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: t/op/exec.t fails on Fedora</title>
<description>On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Rafael Garcia-Suarez &amp;lt;rgarciasuarez@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; 2008/7/6 Amir E. Aharoni &amp;lt;amir.aharoni@gmail.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; That migh</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2008 08:37:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230162</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: my $@ - a proposal</title>
<description>Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: &amp;gt; 2008/7/2 Mark Mielke &amp;lt;mark@mark.mielke.cc&amp;gt;: &amp;gt;  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Johan Vromans wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;   &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;quot;David Golden&amp;quot; &amp;lt;xdaveg@gmail.com&amp;gt; w</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2008 08:29:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230161</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: t/op/exec.t fails on Fedora</title>
<description>On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Rafael Garcia-Suarez &amp;lt;rgarciasuarez@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; 2008/7/6 Amir E. Aharoni &amp;lt;amir.aharoni@gmail.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Fri,</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2008 08:27:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230160</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: t/op/exec.t fails on Fedora</title>
<description>2008/7/6 Amir E. Aharoni &amp;lt;amir.aharoni@gmail.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Rafael Garcia-Suarez &amp;gt; &amp;lt;rgarciasuarez@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; 2008/</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2008 08:08:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230159</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: t/op/exec.t fails on Fedora</title>
<description>On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Rafael Garcia-Suarez &amp;lt;rgarciasuarez@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; 2008/7/3 Amir E. Aharoni &amp;lt;amir.aharoni@gmail.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I am tr</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2008 08:02:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230158</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: my $@ - a proposal</title>
<description>2008/7/2 Mark Mielke &amp;lt;mark@mark.mielke.cc&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; Johan Vromans wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;quot;David Golden&amp;quot; &amp;lt;xdaveg@gmail.com&amp;gt; writes: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; What is the more useful error to c</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2008 07:48:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230157</link>
</item><item>
<title>5.10.x Perl_op_clear PM_GETRE_SAFE still in CORE</title>
<description>MAINT34065 5.10.x current, with DEBUGGING fails, because PM_GETRE_SAFE is still used in CORE, in Perl_op_clear. opmini.c: In function `Perl_op_clear</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2008 07:40:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230156</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PATCH] threads::shared 1.24 (phase 2)</title>
<description>2008/7/3 Jerry D. Hedden &amp;lt;jdhedden@cpan.org&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; Additional changes to threads::shared for UTF-8 hash keys. &amp;gt; (Version not bumped as no CPAN was made.)</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2008 07:12:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230155</link>
</item><item>
<title>[perl #56644] PerlIO resource leaks on open() and then :pop in :unix and :stdio</title>
<description># New Ticket Created by &amp;quot;Goro Fuji&amp;quot; # Please include the string: [perl #56644] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2008 04:44:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230164</link>
</item><item>
<title>Fwd: Perl histories back to 1995 in MarkMail</title>
<description>Just as a heads up, MarkMail has imported a whole lot more Perl list  history into their archive. Begin forwarded message: &amp;gt; From: Jason Hunter &amp;lt;jh</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2008 03:43:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230154</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Dual-life and autodie (Pumpking input appreciated)</title>
<description>G&amp;#039;day Rafael, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: &amp;gt; I tend to agree with those reasons (and I don&amp;#039;t like the current coreish &amp;gt; Fatal.) So yes, I&amp;#039;ll apply a</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2008 03:37:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230153</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Dual-life and autodie (Pumpking input appreciated)</title>
<description>On 2008/7/5 Paul Fenwick said: &amp;gt; Abigail wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; 4) I haven&amp;#039;t looked how autodie is implemented, so I don&amp;#039;t even know &amp;gt;&amp;gt; whether &amp;gt;&amp;gt;  it would f</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2008 00:02:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230152</link>
</item><item>
<title>Smoke [5.11.0] 34101 FAIL(F) MSWin32 WinXP/.Net SP3 (x86/2 cpu)</title>
<description>Automated smoke report for 5.11.0 patch 34101 maldoror.bath.planit.group: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6700 @ 2.66GHz(~2660 MHz) (x86/2 cpu)   on    M</description>
<pubDate>05 Jul  2008 20:20:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230151</link>
</item><item>
<title>[perl #56610] Perl 5.10.0 double-free bug with Regular Expressions</title>
<description>Here&amp;#039;s a simpler test case that uses only core modules. It works fine under 5.8.8, but crashes under 5.10.0 (on Linux, anyway). It should print &amp;quot;o</description>
<pubDate>05 Jul  2008 17:14:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230165</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [perl #18049] [RESOLVED] Storable seg faults under perl 5.8.0 solaris, maximal 64bit</title>
<description>Citeren Drew Schatt &amp;lt;schatt@schatt.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; Under 5.10.0, Solaris, with 64 bit integers, ext Storable still fails badly. &amp;gt; Let me know what other info</description>
<pubDate>05 Jul  2008 12:17:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230150</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [perl #56530] [RESOLVED] &amp;lt;variable&amp;gt; used only once: possible typo</title>
<description>Citeren Toralf Förster &amp;lt;toralf.foerster@gmx.de&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; At Friday 04 July 2008 23:11:53 Bram via RT wrote : &amp;gt;&amp;gt; According to our records, your request rega</description>
<pubDate>05 Jul  2008 11:55:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230149</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>Aristotle Pagaltzis schrieb: &amp;gt; * Rick Delaney &amp;lt;rick@bort.ca&amp;gt; [2008-07-05 17:10]: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; If the warning went in the peephole optimizer instead of the &amp;gt;&amp;gt; to</description>
<pubDate>05 Jul  2008 11:33:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230147</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>* Rick Delaney &amp;lt;rick@bort.ca&amp;gt; [2008-07-05 17:10]: &amp;gt; If the warning went in the peephole optimizer instead of the &amp;gt; tokenizer (which I think would be e</description>
<pubDate>05 Jul  2008 09:18:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230146</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [perl #56530] [RESOLVED] &amp;lt;variable&amp;gt; used only once: possible typo</title>
<description>At Friday 04 July 2008 23:11:53 Bram via RT wrote : &amp;gt; According to our records, your request regarding &amp;gt;  &amp;quot;&amp;lt;variable&amp;gt; used only once: possible typo&amp;quot;</description>
<pubDate>05 Jul  2008 08:36:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230148</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [perl #56608] Math::BigInt gives completely when Math::BigInt::GMP is used</title>
<description>Howdy, I was able to reproduce the original problem on my system and, after making the change suggested by Tels, found that the commands produced the</description>
<pubDate>05 Jul  2008 08:11:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230144</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>On Jul 05 2008, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: &amp;gt; * Jan Dubois &amp;lt;jand@activestate.com&amp;gt; [2008-07-04 17:55]: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I think the &amp;quot;Foo-&amp;gt;method&amp;quot; call should generat</description>
<pubDate>05 Jul  2008 08:05:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230142</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Dual-life and autodie (Pumpking input appreciated)</title>
<description>* Paul Fenwick &amp;lt;pjf@perltraining.com.au&amp;gt; [2008-07-05 12:45]: &amp;gt; It&amp;#039;s much easier to encourage people to do things a better way &amp;gt; if they&amp;#039;re included in</description>
<pubDate>05 Jul  2008 06:06:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230141</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] perltodo</title>
<description>some perltodo.pod changes The most important: Move &amp;quot;Virtualize operating system access&amp;quot; to the 5.12 highlights. Add cygwin-1.7 unicode/utf8 filename</description>
<pubDate>05 Jul  2008 04:40:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230140</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Dual-life and autodie (Pumpking input appreciated)</title>
<description>G&amp;#039;day p5p, Responding to a couple of mails at once to conserve precious electrons. Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: &amp;gt; * Paul Fenwick &amp;lt;pjf@perltraining.com</description>
<pubDate>05 Jul  2008 03:42:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230139</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Dual-life and autodie (Pumpking input appreciated)</title>
<description>G&amp;#039;day Steffen / p5p / modules, Steffen Mueller wrote: &amp;gt; P.S.: I&amp;#039;ll be away for a week starting Saturday, so I can&amp;#039;t just monitor &amp;gt; p5p for an okay f</description>
<pubDate>05 Jul  2008 02:58:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230138</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [perl #56608] Math::BigInt gives completely when Math::BigInt::GMP is used</title>
<description>On Saturday 05 July 2008 10:50:59 you wrote: &amp;gt; On Saturday 05 July 2008 10:28:54 Bram wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Citeren Marc Lehmann &amp;lt;perlbug-followup@perl.org&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>05 Jul  2008 01:57:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230137</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>* Ben Morrow &amp;lt;ben@morrow.me.uk&amp;gt; [2008-07-05 09:20]: &amp;gt; Errm, while aliased.pm is cool, I&amp;#039;m not at all sure I&amp;#039;d call it &amp;gt; &amp;#039;sane&amp;#039;. Think about the alter</description>
<pubDate>05 Jul  2008 01:57:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230136</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [perl #56608] Math::BigInt gives completely when Math::BigInt::GMP is used</title>
<description>On Saturday 05 July 2008 10:28:54 Bram wrote: &amp;gt; Citeren Marc Lehmann &amp;lt;perlbug-followup@perl.org&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; ------------------------------------------------</description>
<pubDate>05 Jul  2008 01:50:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230135</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [perl #56608] Math::BigInt gives completely when Math::BigInt::GMP is used</title>
<description>Citeren Marc Lehmann &amp;lt;perlbug-followup@perl.org&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; ----------------------------------------------------------------- &amp;gt; [Please enter your report her</description>
<pubDate>05 Jul  2008 01:28:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230134</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [perl #18049] [RESOLVED] Storable seg faults under perl 5.8.0 solaris, maximal 64bit</title>
<description>Under 5.10.0, Solaris, with 64 bit integers, ext Storable still fails  badly. Let me know what other information I can include to help get this  res</description>
<pubDate>05 Jul  2008 00:10:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230145</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>Quoth pagaltzis@gmx.de (Aristotle Pagaltzis): &amp;gt; * Jan Dubois &amp;lt;jand@activestate.com&amp;gt; [2008-07-04 17:55]: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I think the &amp;quot;Foo-&amp;gt;method&amp;quot; call should gene</description>
<pubDate>05 Jul  2008 00:05:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230133</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 7:00 AM, Reini Urban &amp;lt;rurban@x-ray.at&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Whow! Everything is an object, is a syntax nightmare. it seems to me that fro</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2008 23:39:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230132</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>* On Sat, Jul 05 2008, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: &amp;gt; * Jan Dubois &amp;lt;jand@activestate.com&amp;gt; [2008-07-04 17:55]: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I think the &amp;quot;Foo-&amp;gt;method&amp;quot; call should g</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2008 22:46:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230131</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>* Jan Dubois &amp;lt;jand@activestate.com&amp;gt; [2008-07-04 17:55]: &amp;gt; I think the &amp;quot;Foo-&amp;gt;method&amp;quot; call should generate a warning that &amp;gt; it is being resolved as &amp;quot;Foo</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2008 22:20:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230130</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Dual-life and autodie (Pumpking input appreciated)</title>
<description>* Paul Fenwick &amp;lt;pjf@perltraining.com.au&amp;gt; [2008-07-04 04:55]: &amp;gt; Unfortunately, I&amp;#039;m still unsure as to whether autodie &amp;gt; will/should be going into the c</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2008 22:12:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230129</link>
</item><item>
<title>[perl #56610] Perl 5.10.0 double-free bug with Regular Expressions</title>
<description># New Ticket Created by Andris Kalnozols # Please include the string: [perl #56610] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this i</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2008 20:16:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230143</link>
</item><item>
<title>[perl #56608] Math::BigInt gives completely when Math::BigInt::GMP is used</title>
<description># New Ticket Created by Marc Lehmann # Please include the string: [perl #56608] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2008 19:40:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230128</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>In-Reply-To: Message from Abigail &amp;lt;abigail@abigail.be&amp;gt;   of &amp;quot;Sat, 05 Jul 2008 00:31:35 +0200.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;20080704223135.GD27175@almanda&amp;gt;  &amp;gt; On Fri, Jul 04,</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2008 18:04:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230127</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 08:50:00AM -0700, Jan Dubois wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; While not indirect object syntax, I wonder if we shouldn&amp;#039;t also do &amp;gt; something about</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2008 15:31:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230126</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>perl5-porters@perl.org Citeren Nicholas Clark &amp;lt;nick@ccl4.org&amp;gt;: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; If so, can we start by removing it from the documentation in core? &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I thought t</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2008 15:17:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230123</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Dual-life and autodie (Pumpking input appreciated)</title>
<description>On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 12:50:48PM +1000, Paul Fenwick wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; * Nobody cares about autodie going in the core for 5.8.9 or 5.10.1, &amp;gt; although sinc</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2008 13:45:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230125</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>On Friday 04 July 2008 06:56:54 Nicholas Clark wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 12:05:12PM +0300, Gabor Szabo wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Do I understand correctly th</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2008 13:34:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230122</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Use F formatting code in perlguts</title>
<description>On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 02:22:37PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: &amp;gt; Some of the filenames in perlguts do not use the F formatting code. &amp;gt; The attached patch</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2008 13:28:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230124</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>On Fri, 04 Jul 2008, Eric Wilhelm wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; # from Jan Dubois &amp;gt; # on Friday 04 July 2008 08:50: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt;  Foo-&amp;gt;method;     # Prints &amp;quot;Bar method&amp;quot; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; </description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2008 10:10:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230120</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description># from Jan Dubois # on Friday 04 July 2008 08:50: &amp;gt;  Foo-&amp;gt;method;     # Prints &amp;quot;Bar method&amp;quot; &amp;gt;  Foo::-&amp;gt;method;   # Prints &amp;quot;Foo method&amp;quot; &amp;gt;  Foo()-&amp;gt;metho</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2008 09:54:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230118</link>
</item><item>
<title>[perl #56606] 5.10.0 crash on serialised v-strings</title>
<description># New Ticket Created by abuse@cabal.org.uk # Please include the string: [perl #56606] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2008 09:26:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230121</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>On Fri, 04 Jul 2008, Gabor Szabo wrote: &amp;gt; Do I understand correctly that you would like to disallow the &amp;gt; following syntax as well? &amp;gt; &amp;gt;  my $obj = n</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2008 08:50:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230114</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>Quoth szabgab@gmail.com (&amp;quot;Gabor Szabo&amp;quot;): &amp;gt; Do I understand correctly that you would like to disallow &amp;gt; the following syntax as well? &amp;gt; &amp;gt;  my $obj =</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2008 07:58:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230113</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Nicholas Clark &amp;lt;nick@ccl4.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 12:05:12PM +0300, Gabor Szabo wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Do I understan</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2008 07:46:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230112</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>Citeren Nicholas Clark &amp;lt;nick@ccl4.org&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 12:05:12PM +0300, Gabor Szabo wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Do I understand correctly that you would li</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2008 07:00:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230111</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 12:05:12PM +0300, Gabor Szabo wrote: &amp;gt; Do I understand correctly that you would like to disallow &amp;gt; the following syntax as wel</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2008 06:56:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230110</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>Quoth p5p@perl.wizbit.be (Bram): &amp;gt; &amp;gt; What about: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; use strict::syntax; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; print $fh &amp;quot;foo&amp;quot;; # error Since &amp;#039;print FH &amp;quot;foo&amp;quot;&amp;#039; was in Perl 4, before</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2008 06:40:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230109</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>Bram schreef: &amp;gt; I remember a similar discussion with use warnings; where use &amp;gt; warnings; wouldn&amp;#039;t mean the same as use warnings &amp;#039;all&amp;#039;; (but I &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2008 05:27:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230108</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>Yuval Kogman schrieb: &amp;gt; On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 08:13:35 +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m prepared to alter all my code for this to &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt;   p</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2008 03:38:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230107</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>Citeren Bram &amp;lt;p5p@perl.wizbit.be&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; Citeren Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes &amp;lt;sthoenna@efn.org&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Thu, July 3, 2008 3:52 am, H.Merijn Brand wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2008 03:23:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230106</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 08:13:35 +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m prepared to alter all my code for this to &amp;gt; &amp;gt;    print { $fh } data; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Whi</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2008 03:03:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230105</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>Citeren Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes &amp;lt;sthoenna@efn.org&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; On Thu, July 3, 2008 3:52 am, H.Merijn Brand wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 11:01:29 +0100, Nicho</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2008 02:26:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230104</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: t/op/exec.t fails on Fedora</title>
<description>2008/7/3 Amir E. Aharoni &amp;lt;amir.aharoni@gmail.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; I am trying to build Perl ( &amp;gt; rsync://public.activestate.com/perl-current/ ) on Fedora 8, &amp;gt; 2.6.2</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2008 02:20:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230103</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>Do I understand correctly that you would like to disallow the following syntax as well?   my $obj = new Car;  If so, can we start by removing it fr</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2008 02:05:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230102</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Dual-life and autodie (Pumpking input appreciated)</title>
<description>Hi Paul, hi p5p, hi modules list, Paul Fenwick wrote: &amp;gt; Presently I&amp;#039;m looking to ping modules@perl.org to see how to remove the &amp;gt; &amp;#039;unauthorized relea</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2008 00:14:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230117</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>* Paul Fenwick &amp;lt;pjf@perltraining.com.au&amp;gt; [2008-07-04 06:50]: &amp;gt;    use strict &amp;#039;methods&amp;#039;; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; No other strict option has more than 4 characters. I th</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2008 00:06:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230101</link>
</item><item>
<title>podlators 2.1.1 released</title>
<description>Includes the test suite previously circulated plus some other test suite improvements and less of the long preamble when UTF-8 output is requested. T</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2008 23:53:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230119</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 13:29:03 -0700, &amp;quot;Jan Dubois&amp;quot; &amp;lt;jand@activestate.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Thu, 03 Jul 2008, Alexandr Ciornii wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; 2008/7/3 Nicholas Cl</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2008 23:13:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230100</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>Glenn Linderman wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; We could have a fabulous bike-shedding (it&amp;#039;s been verbed, I saw recently) &amp;gt;&amp;gt; about what to call it...I offer use strict &amp;quot;me</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2008 21:49:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230099</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [perl #56524] empty list elements in list context</title>
<description>On Jul 03 2008, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: &amp;gt; On Thu, July 3, 2008 1:57 am, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; 2008/7/2 sicking@liacs.nl (via RT) &amp;lt;per</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2008 21:35:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230098</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Dual-life and autodie (Pumpking input appreciated)</title>
<description>G&amp;#039;day Aristotle, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: &amp;gt; I care, but Iâ€™m also Iâ€™m in no position to decide, so Iâ€™m not &amp;gt; sure knowing I care helps you in</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2008 21:32:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230097</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Dual-life and autodie (Pumpking input appreciated)</title>
<description>* Paul Fenwick &amp;lt;pjf@perltraining.com.au&amp;gt; [2008-07-04 04:55]: &amp;gt; Nobody cares about autodie going in the core for 5.8.9 or &amp;gt; 5.10.1, although since it&amp;#039;s</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2008 21:15:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230096</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>On Thu, July 3, 2008 3:52 am, H.Merijn Brand wrote: &amp;gt; On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 11:01:29 +0100, Nicholas Clark &amp;lt;nick@ccl4.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; karuda has to be bett</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2008 21:05:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230094</link>
</item><item>
<title>The latest on autodie</title>
<description>As an additional act of shameless self-promotion, the latest on autodie can be found at:     http://pjf.id.au/blog/ As well as other locations</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2008 21:05:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230095</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [perl #56524] empty list elements in list context</title>
<description>On Thu, July 3, 2008 1:57 am, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: &amp;gt; 2008/7/2 sicking@liacs.nl (via RT) &amp;lt;perlbug-followup@perl.org&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; my @rl = []-&amp;gt;[0]; # @</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2008 21:00:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230093</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Dual-life and autodie (Pumpking input appreciated)</title>
<description>G&amp;#039;day Everyone, I&amp;#039;ve received a huge amount of feedback on autodie (a much improved lexical version of Fatal) from various sources during the time t</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2008 19:50:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230092</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [RFC] common test code for timed bail out</title>
<description>Hi Eirik, * Eirik Berg Hanssen &amp;lt;Eirik-Berg.Hanssen@allverden.no&amp;gt; [2008-06-27 01:30]: &amp;gt; Aristotle Pagaltzis &amp;lt;pagaltzis@gmx.de&amp;gt; writes: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; No. That wil</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2008 17:09:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230091</link>
</item><item>
<title>Use F formatting code in perlguts</title>
<description>Howdy, Some of the filenames in perlguts do not use the F formatting code. The attached patch makes them do so. -- Matt</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2008 14:22:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230115</link>
</item><item>
<title>Use ordinary paragraph for sv.h reference in perlguts</title>
<description>Howdy, perlguts uses a verbatim paragraph for the following paragraph: &amp;gt; See the sv.h header file for more details. The attached patch makes it use</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2008 14:21:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230116</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>On Thu, 03 Jul 2008, Alexandr Ciornii wrote: &amp;gt; 2008/7/3 Nicholas Clark &amp;lt;nick@ccl4.org&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Would it be viable to add a feature to the parser to outla</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2008 13:29:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230088</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 10:55:00PM +0300, Alexandr Ciornii wrote: &amp;gt; Hello. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; 2008/7/3 Nicholas Clark &amp;lt;nick@ccl4.org&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Would it be viable to add</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2008 13:11:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230089</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [perl #56490] %+ still untaints data when &amp;#039;use re qw(taint)&amp;#039; is in scope</title>
<description>On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 03:16:46PM +0200, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: &amp;gt; 2008/7/1 via RT Paul Fenwick &amp;lt;perlbug-followup@perl.org&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Under Perl 5.10,</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2008 12:56:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230090</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>Hello. 2008/7/3 Nicholas Clark &amp;lt;nick@ccl4.org&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; Would it be viable to add a feature to the parser to outlaw invalid object &amp;gt; syntax? I&amp;#039;m not convin</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2008 12:55:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230086</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [perl #56490] %+ still untaints data when &amp;#039;use re qw(taint)&amp;#039; is in scope</title>
<description>On Jun 30 2008, Paul Fenwick wrote: &amp;gt; Below is an example program that demonstrates the issue. I also &amp;gt; have a patch to t/op/taint.t which I&amp;#039;ll be po</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2008 12:17:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230083</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [rt.cpan.org #37251] File::Spec-&amp;gt;case_tolerant works only on systems where one filesystem type is installed</title>
<description>Craig A. Berry wrote: &amp;gt; On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 2:26 AM, Reini Urban &amp;lt;rurban@x-ray.at&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; The problem is: What is the first arg and the defau</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2008 12:07:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230082</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [rt.cpan.org #37251] File::Spec-&amp;gt;case_tolerant works only on systems where one filesystem type is installed</title>
<description>On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 2:26 AM, Reini Urban &amp;lt;rurban@x-ray.at&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; The problem is: What is the first arg and the default arg for &amp;gt; case_tolerant</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2008 11:21:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230080</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH - revised^2] test.pl update</title>
<description>The attached patch makes the following updates to test.pl: 1. Don&amp;#039;t executing the END block (installed by test.pl) in the watchdog process. 2. The</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2008 07:03:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230077</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] threads::shared 1.24 (phase 2)</title>
<description>Additional changes to threads::shared for UTF-8 hash keys. (Version not bumped as no CPAN was made.)</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2008 07:02:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230079</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [perl #56490] %+ still untaints data when &amp;#039;use re qw(taint)&amp;#039; is in scope</title>
<description>2008/7/1 via RT Paul Fenwick &amp;lt;perlbug-followup@perl.org&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; Under Perl 5.10, the contents of %+ are always considered to be &amp;gt; untainted, even if &amp;#039;use</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2008 06:16:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230076</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 07:10:59 -0400, David Golden wrote: &amp;gt; On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Nicholas Clark &amp;lt;nick@ccl4.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Would it be vi</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2008 05:48:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230078</link>
</item><item>
<title>t/op/exec.t fails on Fedora</title>
<description>I am trying to build Perl ( rsync://public.activestate.com/perl-current/ ) on Fedora 8, 2.6.24.7-92.fc8. The test t/op/exec.t is failing on line 97.</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2008 05:32:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230085</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>Nicholas Clark schrieb: &amp;gt; This morning I committed this bit of code: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;   confess &amp;quot;Invalid server tier &amp;#039;$tier&amp;#039;&amp;quot; unless defiend $file; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; It&amp;#039;s va</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2008 05:00:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230084</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Nicholas Clark &amp;lt;nick@ccl4.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Would it be viable to add a feature to the parser to outlaw invalid object &amp;gt; s</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2008 04:10:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230074</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 11:01:29 +0100, Nicholas Clark &amp;lt;nick@ccl4.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; This morning I committed this bit of code: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;   confess &amp;quot;Invalid serve</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2008 03:52:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230081</link>
</item><item>
<title>strictly no indirect object syntax?</title>
<description>This morning I committed this bit of code:   confess &amp;quot;Invalid server tier &amp;#039;$tier&amp;#039;&amp;quot; unless defiend $file; It&amp;#039;s valid under use strict, and we know</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2008 03:01:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230073</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] Silence some C++ warnings with PERL_POISON</title>
<description>sv.c throws a few C++ cast warnings when building with PERL_POISON. I&amp;#039;m not sure that patch is really useful since the testsuite currently fails whe</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2008 02:45:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230075</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [perl #56524] empty list elements in list context</title>
<description>2008/7/2 sicking@liacs.nl (via RT) &amp;lt;perlbug-followup@perl.org&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; my @rl = []-&amp;gt;[0]; &amp;gt; # @rl is a list containing a single &amp;#039;undef&amp;#039;, no problem. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; my</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2008 01:57:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230087</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [rt.cpan.org #37251] File::Spec-&amp;gt;case_tolerant works only on systems where one filesystem type is installed</title>
<description>2008/7/3 John E. Malmberg &amp;lt;wb8tyw@qsl.net&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; Jeff Holt via RT wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt;    Queue: PathTools &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Ticket &amp;lt;URL: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2008 00:26:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230072</link>
</item><item>
<title>Smoke [5.11.0] 34098 FAIL(F) MSWin32 WinXP/.Net SP3 (x86/2 cpu)</title>
<description>Automated smoke report for 5.11.0 patch 34098 maldoror.bath.planit.group: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6700 @ 2.66GHz(~2660 MHz) (x86/2 cpu)   on    M</description>
<pubDate>02 Jul  2008 20:20:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230071</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [rt.cpan.org #37251] File::Spec-&amp;gt;case_tolerant works only on systems where one filesystem type is installed</title>
<description>Jeff Holt via RT wrote: &amp;gt;    Queue: PathTools &amp;gt; Ticket &amp;lt;URL: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=37251 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ll give it a try. That&amp;#039;s wh</description>
<pubDate>02 Jul  2008 17:56:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/230070</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
