Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 12 Feb 2012 11:52:32 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg On Fri Feb 10 15:13:19 2012, demerphq wrote: > On 10 February 2012 17:14, Karl Williamson via RT > <perlbug-followup@perl.org> wrote: > > On Thu Feb 0 12 Feb 2012 09:03:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275152 I have mostly implemented what I last proposed, but attached is a doc patch for comment on how it actually plays out, to verify that this seems like 12 Feb 2012 08:47:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275151 On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 16:31, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> wrote: > I obviously much prefer #1, and I don't think it would harm kFre 12 Feb 2012 07:51:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275150 On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 15:16, Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org> wrote: > El 12 de febrer de 2012 12:42, Niko Tyni <ntyni@debian.org> ha escrit: >> [.cro 12 Feb 2012 07:31:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275149 "Father Chrysostomos via RT" <perlbug-followup@perl.org> wrote on Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:15:42 PST: >>>> It's been that way since time immemorial, 12 Feb 2012 07:18:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275148 On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Niko Tyni <ntyni@debian.org> wrote: > I have no idea whether it's really LinuxThreads based or something > else, but 12 Feb 2012 07:05:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275147 [.crossposted to the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD development list debian-bsd and the Perl 5 development list perl5-porters ] On Sat, 12 Feb 2012 04:42:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275146 perlbug.dttn@manchmal.in-ulm.de wrote: > $ perl -MDigest::SHA -E '$a = "\x0" x $ARGV[0]; say STDERR Digest::SHA->new->add ($a)->hexdigest; print $a'  12 Feb 2012 04:22:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275145 On Thu Feb 09 06:13:44 2012, nicholas wrote: > 0: !AvREAL() && !AvREIFY() just the stacks? [.and @DB::args > currently] > 1: !AvREAL() && AvREIFY( 12 Feb 2012 00:19:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275144 On Mon Feb 06 03:49:30 2012, tom christiansen wrote: > Paul Johnson <paul@pjcj.net> wrote > on Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:42:42 +0100: > >On Mon, Feb 06, 12 Feb 2012 00:15:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275143 Automated smoke report for 5.15.7 patch 9b11155f22b79ab694ba82561603ecc1bb9969c0 v5.15.7-368-g9b11155 ALMA: HP rx2600 (1.50GHz/6.0MB) (IA64/2 cpu) 11 Feb 2012 22:07:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275142 Smoke logs available at http://m-l.org/~perl/smoke/perl/ Automated smoke report for 5.15.7 patch ce712c886b5979bd55a7bc9aa9140b5aa62f8f82 v5.15.7-337 11 Feb 2012 16:20:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275139 Smoke logs available at http://m-l.org/~perl/smoke/perl/ Automated smoke report for 5.15.7 patch 0e582130ad8fc3afc6514f60b7a513c550379b7d v5.15.7-367 11 Feb 2012 16:20:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275140 On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 11:56:16PM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > I looked over it, thought it was sane and pushed it to blead. > > We can p 11 Feb 2012 16:06:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275141 On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 17:49, Nicholas Clark <nick@ccl4.org> wrote: > I'd really like it if someone *else*, who is keen on this feature going in > (I 11 Feb 2012 14:56:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275138 On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:54 PM, perlbug.dttn@manchmal.in-ulm.de <perlbug-followup@perl.org> wrote: > # How to repeat > > $ perl -MDigest::SHA -E '$a 11 Feb 2012 14:52:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275137 On 11 February 2012 20:57, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avar@cpan.org> wrote: > [.This is a patch I've just committed to > avar/remove-linuxthreads-pid-ca 11 Feb 2012 13:55:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275132 On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> wrote: > I very much like where this patch is going, but IMO it needs s 11 Feb 2012 13:53:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275131 Since no one has responded, I split the patch into two and have applied them. Thanks -- Karl Williamson --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: ope 11 Feb 2012 13:28:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275130 On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 20:45, Leon Timmermans <fawaka@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Leon Timmermans <fawaka@gmail.com> wrote: 11 Feb 2012 12:42:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275129 Smoke logs available at http://m-l.org/~perl/smoke/perl/ Automated smoke report for 5.15.7 patch bb0d02ab7b92c63044b4ee5631217dc06cb2e2ca v5.15.7-335 11 Feb 2012 12:20:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275127 [.This is a patch I've just committed to avar/remove-linuxthreads-pid-caching) I'll be pushing it to blead unless there are any sound objections to it 11 Feb 2012 11:57:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275128 On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Leon Timmermans <fawaka@gmail.com> wrote: > Third attempt. I really should stop coding for tonight. Fix attached. I 11 Feb 2012 11:45:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275126 On Sat Feb 11 10:22:53 2012, LeonT wrote: > > > If this is really a problem in R::XS, let me know and I'll open that > > defect instead. > > He's kn 11 Feb 2012 11:23:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275125 2012/2/10 Torsten Förtsch <torsten.foertsch@gmx.net>: > as far as I can see PL_modglobal and the MY_CXT stuff aim at the same target. > Namely, to ma 11 Feb 2012 10:45:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275124 On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:40 AM, dmcbride@naboo.to.org <perlbug-followup@perl.org> wrote: > I'm using Readonly::XS, but I don't think this has anythin 11 Feb 2012 10:21:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275123 I am trying to figure out what is the fastest non-hack way to set values to existing SVs (specifically perl stack params and the XS TARG) outside of u 11 Feb 2012 09:42:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275122 See <http://perl5.git.perl.org:8080/job/perl5/768/changes> 11 Feb 2012 09:25:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275121 I figured it out. The problem is that PL_check_mutex only exists in threading builds, so it needs to be excluded from the export lists in non-threadi 11 Feb 2012 09:17:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275120 On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Steffen Mueller <smueller@cpan.org> wrote: > On 02/11/2012 11:42 AM, Zefram wrote: >> >> Steffen Mueller wrote: >>> > 11 Feb 2012 09:02:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275119 On Mon Feb 06 15:40:39 2012, dmcbride@naboo.to.org wrote: > > This is a bug report for perl from dmcbride@cpan.org, > generated with the help of perl 11 Feb 2012 08:54:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275118 Hi all, this patchlet clarifies the documentation of newSVpvn to make it clear that it operates on a buffer (that may contain NUL characters and othe 11 Feb 2012 08:40:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275117 On Wed Feb 08 21:48:57 2012, jtbraun@CPAN.org wrote: > This is a bug report for perl from jtbraun@CPAN.org, > generated with the help of perlbug 1.39 11 Feb 2012 08:26:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275116 Smoke logs available at http://m-l.org/~perl/smoke/perl/ Automated smoke report for 5.15.7 patch e8570548af49b057631f1011e4b19c8c4a1342dd v5.15.7-334 11 Feb 2012 06:20:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275112 Smoke logs available at http://m-l.org/~perl/smoke/perl/ Automated smoke report for 5.15.7 patch e8570548af49b057631f1011e4b19c8c4a1342dd v5.15.7-334 11 Feb 2012 06:20:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275115 On 02/11/2012 11:42 AM, Zefram wrote: > Steffen Mueller wrote: >> If somebody supplies me with two commits to run a CPAN smoke for, >> then I can do t 11 Feb 2012 05:30:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275114 On za, 2012-02-11 at 11:54 +0000, Zefram wrote: > dennis.kaarsemaker@booking.com wrote: > >[zefram] add wrap_op_checker() API function > ... > >portin 11 Feb 2012 04:32:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275113 Smoke logs available at http://m-l.org/~perl/smoke/perl/ Automated smoke report for 5.15.7 patch 96a6e6fa4fb95146d6ef6deb911128ac757e1550 v5.15.7-333 11 Feb 2012 04:22:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275110 On 11 February 2012 13:13, Steffen Mueller <smueller@cpan.org> wrote: > On 02/11/2012 12:25 PM, demerphq wrote: >>> >>> b) If I understand it correctl 11 Feb 2012 04:19:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275111 On 02/11/2012 12:25 PM, demerphq wrote: >> b) If I understand it correctly, if the data in the XS module is correctly >> marked as static, then it 11 Feb 2012 04:13:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275109 dennis.kaarsemaker@booking.com wrote: >[zefram] add wrap_op_checker() API function ... >porting/globvar.t 11 Feb 2012 03:54:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275108 See <http://perl5.git.perl.org:8080/job/perl5/767/changes> Changes: [zefram] add wrap_op_checker() API function ----------------------------------- 11 Feb 2012 03:45:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275107 I wrote: >furthermore that the core in future should provide an equivalent function >with exactly this API (but, of course, using a purpose-specific m 11 Feb 2012 03:38:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275106 On 11 February 2012 11:15, <hv@crypt.org> wrote: > "Todd Rinaldo via RT" <perlbug-followup@perl.org> wrote: > :On Thu Feb 02 09:17:06 2012, LeonT wro 11 Feb 2012 03:28:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275105 On 11 February 2012 10:16, Nicholas Clark <nick@ccl4.org> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 12:21:55AM +0100, demerphq wrote: >> On 10 February 2012 18 11 Feb 2012 03:25:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275104 Steffen Mueller wrote: >If somebody supplies me with two commits to run a CPAN smoke for, >then I can do that within a few days to get a more complete 11 Feb 2012 02:42:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275103 On 02/10/2012 05:01 PM, Zefram wrote: > Todd Rinaldo via RT wrote: >> So far, I've found needed test fixes in: autodie, Error, Log4perl and counting. 11 Feb 2012 02:40:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275102 "Todd Rinaldo via RT" <perlbug-followup@perl.org> wrote: :On Thu Feb 02 09:17:06 2012, LeonT wrote: :> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Zefram <zefram@ 11 Feb 2012 02:15:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275100 On 02/11/2012 01:31 AM, Zefram wrote: > Steffen Mueller wrote: >> please apply to blead and I'll port to >> CPAN. > > No 11 Feb 2012 02:13:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275099 On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 12:21:55AM +0100, demerphq wrote: > On 10 February 2012 18:27, David Golden <xdaveg@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 11 Feb 2012 01:16:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275098 Smoke logs available at http://m-l.org/~perl/smoke/perl/ Automated smoke report for 5.15.7 patch 7f131b96f078425a8403b0da78cb529e2d812074 v5.15.7-331 10 Feb 2012 20:20:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275097 Smoke logs available at http://m-l.org/~perl/smoke/perl/ Automated smoke report for 5.15.7 patch 4f143a729773018c42dbe31ef4414f1d7fd9f9e9 v5.15.7-329 10 Feb 2012 18:20:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275096 Perl 5 commit summary, activity since Wednesday Current branch blead 41 commits. 7 unique authors. 6 unique committers. 43 files changed, 2304 inse 10 Feb 2012 18:08:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275101 Steffen Mueller wrote: > please apply to blead and I'll port to >CPAN. Not that simple. Modifying the code in blead als 10 Feb 2012 16:31:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275095 On 10 February 2012 18:27, David Golden <xdaveg@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Karl Williamson > <public@khwilliamson.com> wrot 10 Feb 2012 15:21:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275094 On 10 February 2012 17:14, Karl Williamson via RT <perlbug-followup@perl.org> wrote: > On Thu Feb 09 08:44:19 2012, ed wrote: >> I still feel that thi 10 Feb 2012 15:12:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275093 # New Ticket Created by perlbug.dttn@manchmal.in-ulm.de # Please include the string: [perl #110402] # in the subject line of all future corresponde 10 Feb 2012 13:54:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275136 On 02/10/2012 08:34 PM, David Golden wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Steffen Mueller<smueller@cpan.org> wrote: >> I saw that you had a patc 10 Feb 2012 12:35:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275092 Smoke logs available at http://m-l.org/~perl/smoke/perl/ Automated smoke report for 5.15.7 patch e645f6f85b37f489934a5d203a215f35fd765ed6 v5.15.7-325 10 Feb 2012 12:21:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275091 On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Steffen Mueller <smueller@cpan.org> wrote: > I saw that you had a patch to the Makefile.PL as well. So that goes to C 10 Feb 2012 11:34:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275090 On 02/10/2012 01:08 PM, Zefram wrote: > Blead is nominally upstream for ExtUtils::ParseXS, but currently it's > behind CPAN (version 3.14 vs 3.15). I 10 Feb 2012 11:12:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275089 On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Karl Williamson <public@khwilliamson.com> wrote: > Having compiled-in properties means that we don't have to go out 10 Feb 2012 09:27:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275088 You should use U32 instead of UV. U32 is always big enough for all Unicode codepoints, and can be smaller than UV. -zefram 10 Feb 2012 09:18:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275087 blead now contains some pre-compiled Unicode properties. This is done by making them arrays of UVs in a .h header file, with a light-weight runtime 10 Feb 2012 09:13:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275086 Hi, as far as I can see PL_modglobal and the MY_CXT stuff aim at the same target. Namely, to make a certain value interpreter-specific. The differe 10 Feb 2012 08:36:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275085 (I meant to say this was a regression in 5.12, since it breaks code which used to work in 5.10.) --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https:// 10 Feb 2012 08:17:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275135 On Thu Feb 09 08:44:19 2012, ed wrote: > I still feel that this was a bug in perl 5.10, not a mere wishlist item. > (Unintentionally breaking compatib 10 Feb 2012 08:14:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275084 Todd Rinaldo via RT wrote: >So far, I've found needed test fixes in: autodie, Error, Log4perl and counting. Not very many, then. This is looking via 10 Feb 2012 08:01:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275083 On Thu Feb 02 09:17:06 2012, LeonT wrote: > On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Zefram <zefram@fysh.org> wrote: > > There presumably will be a few. �It' 10 Feb 2012 07:59:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275082 On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Nicholas Clark <nick@ccl4.org> wrote: > > I *think* that the answer implied by the commit messages above is that > th 10 Feb 2012 07:11:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275081 Hello, FYI, I'm seeing the same problem, also with the sympa software, on a NetBSD 5.1/i386 host running perl 5.14.2. So it looks really like a perl b 10 Feb 2012 07:04:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275133 2012/2/10 Torsten Förtsch <torsten.foertsch@gmx.net>: > Hi, > > when perl_clone() returns can I assume that the current context is the fresh > clone? 10 Feb 2012 07:01:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275080 Hi, when perl_clone() returns can I assume that the current context is the fresh clone? My copy of perlapi (5.12.3) lacks this piece of information. 10 Feb 2012 05:58:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275079 You still need z/OS domain knowledge? I'll step up to the plate. Dan Phipps Infrastructure Management Consultant ITO Global Service Delivery ACS, 10 Feb 2012 05:30:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275134 Blead is nominally upstream for ExtUtils::ParseXS, but currently it's behind CPAN (version 3.14 vs 3.15). I just submitted a patch for it to rt.cpan. 10 Feb 2012 04:08:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275075 On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 11:08:03PM -0500, Marc Green wrote: > Hello Porters, > > I have a question regarding the --htmldir flag of Pod::Html; specifi 10 Feb 2012 03:25:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275074 <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=56875 > Finally I fixed the remaining Filter bugs. The problems were caused by using the SvIV for th 09 Feb 2012 20:57:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275073 Hello Porters, I have a question regarding the --htmldir flag of Pod::Html; specifically, how it is used in conjunction with --htmlroot. Pod::Html's 09 Feb 2012 20:08:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275072 Automated smoke report for 5.10.1 patch ca8de220718ba91d5a5fdd9779497cd5b0250258 perl-5.10.1-1-gca8de22 gateway: AMD Athlon(tm) Dual Core Processor 48 09 Feb 2012 19:16:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275071 Automated smoke report for 5.8.9 patch 7d6ecb1f6c7eabec011b66526161fcf678919c99 maint-5.8-4-g7d6ecb1 gateway: AMD Athlon(tm) Dual Core Processor 4850e 09 Feb 2012 18:30:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275070 On 02/08/2012 10:23 AM, Karl Williamson wrote: > On 02/08/2012 04:36 AM, Nicholas Clark wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 12:22:30PM -0700, Karl Willi 09 Feb 2012 18:09:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275069 Automated smoke report for 5.6.2 patch 2bce2321552345ccb985b6a4b87542c3eaefbac5 maint-5.6-3-g2bce232 philips.bandsman.co.uk: Intel Pentium M (Yonah) ( 09 Feb 2012 17:16:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275068 On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 16:50 -0500, Marc Green wrote: > The only objection I have to this patch is that '--verbose' should not > be removed in t/featur 09 Feb 2012 15:20:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275067 The only objection I have to this patch is that '--verbose' should not be removed in t/feature2.t. It is there as a sanity check, to make sure nothing 09 Feb 2012 13:50:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275066 I finally got time to address the weak reference global destruction "panic" described in November's report. Now understanding the problem, the interim 09 Feb 2012 12:39:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275065 [Hours] [Activity] 2012/01/30 Monday 3.50 Pod::Functions 1.50 reading/responding to list mail ===== 5.00 2 09 Feb 2012 12:17:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275064 [Hours] [Activity] 2012/01/23 Monday 8.00 Pod::Functions 1.25 reading/responding to list mail ===== 9.25 2 09 Feb 2012 12:08:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275063 # New Ticket Created by Nicholas Clark # Please include the string: [perl #110318] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this is 09 Feb 2012 10:59:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275062 Patch attached, oops! 09 Feb 2012 10:34:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275061 I'm trying to figure out why some of the PL_utf8_foo interpreter variables are explicitly ref count decemented and set to NULL in perl_destruct(), w 09 Feb 2012 10:17:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275060 On 02/08/2012 09:57 PM, Eric Brine wrote: > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Karl Williamson > <public@khwilliamson.com <mailto:public@khwilliamson.co 09 Feb 2012 09:35:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275059 Hi perl porters-- There appears to be a flaw in IO::Socket where some IO::Socket objects are unable to properly report their socktype, sockdomain, or 09 Feb 2012 09:04:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275076 [Hours] [Activity] 2012/01/16 Monday 0.75 better panics 1.00 g++ smoke failure 1.75 mymalloc 0.5 09 Feb 2012 08:52:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275058 I still feel that this was a bug in perl 5.10, not a mere wishlist item. (Unintentionally breaking compatibility with existing code must be a bug; if 09 Feb 2012 08:44:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275078 Double checking these - the quantisation of minutes to billed quarter-hours is manual, and I got two wrong. On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 09:12:53PM +0000, 09 Feb 2012 08:40:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275057 I've been thinking about this for a bit. I've just remembered an important part. Right now, PL_sv_placeholder is in perlvars.h, *not* intrpvar.h: /* 09 Feb 2012 06:13:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275056 # New Ticket Created by Vincent Lefevre # Please include the string: [perl #110292] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this i 09 Feb 2012 06:08:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275077 [Hours] [Activity] 2012/01/09 Monday 0.75 %POSIX::SIGRT 0.50 RT #107000 0.50 RT #37033 4.00 09 Feb 2012 05:31:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275055 On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 02:34:41PM +0000, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2012-02-07, Dominic Hargreaves <dom@earth.li> wrote: > > The version currently in Deb 09 Feb 2012 02:47:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275054 On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 01:05:09PM -0700, Karl Williamson wrote: > One of the first things that Perl does at initialization is to call this > functio 09 Feb 2012 02:45:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/275053