
jon at jonproulx
Aug 8, 2013, 7:26 AM
Post #3 of 3
(23 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: nova-compute won't restart (on some nodes) after Grizzly upgrade
[In reply to]
|
|
Thank you Devendran. That did it -Jon On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Devendran Jagadisan < devendran.jagadisan [at] gmail> wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > You could try to run virsh list --all on the node and check if there are > deleted instances defined. > > Had the same error message during grizzly update and running virsh undefine > the deleted instances solved the issue. > > Devendran > > > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 2:36 AM, Jonathan Proulx <jon [at] jonproulx> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I'm almost through my grizzly upgrade. I'd upgraded everything except >> nova-compute before upgrading that (ubuntu 12.04 cloud archieve pkgs). >> >> On most nodes the nova-compute service upgraded and restarted properly, >> but on some it imediately exits with: >> >> CRITICAL nova [-] 'instance_type_memory_mb' >> >> It would seem like this is https://code.launchpad.net/bugs/1161022 but >> the fix for that was released in March and I've verified is in the packaged >> version I'm using. >> >> The referenced bug involves the DB migration only updating non-deleted >> instances in the instance-system-metatata table and the patch skips the >> lookups that are broken (and irrelevant) for deleted instances. >> >> Tracing the DB calls from the host shows it is trying to do lookups for >> instances that were deleted last October, which is a bit surprising as it's >> run thousands of instances since & it's not looking those up. >> >> It is note worthy that that is around the time I upgraded from Essex -> >> Folsom so it's possible their state is weirder than most having run >> through that update. >> >> There were directories for the instances in question in >> /var/lib/nova/instances, so I thought "Aha!" and moved them, but on restart >> I still get the same failure and same DB query for the old instances. Where >> is nova getting the idea it should look these up & how can I stop it? >> >> Suggestions for other solutions welcome as well. >> >> Thanks, >> -Jon >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-operators mailing list >> OpenStack-operators [at] lists >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >> >> >
|