gkotton at redhat
Apr 18, 2012, 8:24 AM
Post #3 of 3
(180 views)
Permalink
|
On 04/18/2012 05:31 PM, Dan Wendlandt wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> Yes, that is expected behavior.
>
> Since the UUID is the unique ID, a tenant can choose to name networks
> using the same string.
>
> Its a bit tricky, but I think the convention we follow in the API docs
> (http://docs.openstack.org/incubation/openstack-network/developer/quantum-api-1.0/content/index.html)
> is that any value that must be unique is explicitly described as such,
> and all other fields are not expected to be unique.
Thanks for the clarification.
>
> Dan
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Gary Kotton <gkotton [at] redhat
> <mailto:gkotton [at] redhat>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Is it intended that a network with the same name can be created
> more than once? Or is this a bug?
> For example:
> [root [at] localhos ~]quantum create_net default XXX
> Created a new Virtual Network with ID:
> 1acf8fe7-5d53-4b55-beaa-1ca603f4c175
> for Tenant: default
> [root [at] localhos ~]# quantum create_net default XXX
> Created a new Virtual Network with ID:
> e5d97af5-4362-43f9-a665-00a65bbd0c1a
> for Tenant: default
> Thanks
> Gary
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~netstack
> <https://launchpad.net/%7Enetstack>
> Post to : netstack [at] lists
> <mailto:netstack [at] lists>
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~netstack
> <https://launchpad.net/%7Enetstack>
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
>
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Dan Wendlandt
> Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com <http://www.nicira.com>
> twitter: danwendlandt
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
|
