Mailing List Archive: Re: OpenStack immaturity

Mailing List Archive: OpenStack: Dev
Re: OpenStack immaturity

Index | Next | Previous | View Flat

diego.parrilla.santamaria at gmail

Apr 4, 2012, 3:42 AM

Views: 124
Permalink

Re: OpenStack immaturity [In reply to]

Immaturity of a platform is something you can easily fix paying the right
fee to your favorite analyst firm.

Seriously, Openstack is an open platform and an open community. This means
problems and issues are open to discuss to everyone. Propietary platforms
issues are rarely disclosed, and they look more mature. And believe me, I
have used most of them and Openstack is not more unstable (or stable) than
others.

Anyway, it's time to move the stack from 'devs' to 'ops'. When somebody
says 'you have to install the development version to fix this' instead of
'you have to follow this procedure on the stable version', you cannot
imagine the damage made to Openstack Nova. It's painful, but it's the only
way to have a robust platform. Let's forget about 'you will have it in the
next release': we are not Microsoft. This is real, not vapourware.

My two cents
Diego

--
Diego Parrilla
<http://www.stackops.com/>*CEO*
*www.stackops.com | * diego.parrilla [at] stackops** | +34 649 94 43 29 |
skype:diegoparrilla*
* <http://www.stackops.com/>
**

On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Sébastien Han <han.sebastien [at] gmail>wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> According to the statement of this article from Gartner group
> http://blogs.gartner.com/lydia_leong/2012/04/03/citrix-cloudstack-openstack-and-the-war-for-open-source-clouds/ Openstack is a
> highly immature platform.
> But why? What's make Openstack so immature?
>
> Any comments on that?
>
> Thank you in advance :)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to : openstack [at] lists
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>

Subject	User	Time
OpenStack immaturity	han.sebastien at gmail	Apr 4, 2012, 3:24 AM
Re: OpenStack immaturity	diego.parrilla.santamaria at gmail	Apr 4, 2012, 3:42 AM
Re: OpenStack immaturity	frans at meruvian	Apr 4, 2012, 4:27 AM
Re: OpenStack immaturity	jacek at artymiak	Apr 4, 2012, 5:48 AM
Re: OpenStack immaturity	letterj at gmail	Apr 4, 2012, 5:48 AM
Re: OpenStack immaturity	razique.mahroua at gmail	Apr 4, 2012, 6:14 AM
Re: OpenStack immaturity	jan_drake at hotmail	Apr 4, 2012, 7:37 AM
Re: OpenStack immaturity	Tim.Bell at cern	Apr 4, 2012, 11:30 AM
Re: OpenStack immaturity	letterj at gmail	Apr 4, 2012, 8:18 AM
Re: OpenStack immaturity	rlane at wikimedia	Apr 4, 2012, 11:25 AM
Re: OpenStack immaturity	letterj at gmail	Apr 4, 2012, 1:05 PM
Re: OpenStack immaturity	david.kranz at qrclab	Apr 4, 2012, 1:20 PM
Re: OpenStack immaturity	jaypipes at gmail	Apr 5, 2012, 9:43 AM
Re: OpenStack immaturity	harlowja at yahoo-inc	Apr 5, 2012, 11:10 AM
Re: OpenStack immaturity	mmarch at gmail	Apr 5, 2012, 5:28 PM
Re: OpenStack immaturity	harlowja at yahoo-inc	Apr 4, 2012, 1:48 PM
Re: OpenStack immaturity	amigliaccio at internap	Apr 4, 2012, 2:43 PM
Re: OpenStack immaturity	michael.vandeborne at cetic	Apr 6, 2012, 2:47 AM
Re: OpenStack immaturity	saurabh at safewlabs	Apr 6, 2012, 3:59 AM
Re: OpenStack immaturity	mark.collier at rackspace	Apr 6, 2012, 4:24 AM
Re: OpenStack immaturity	raja.meena at wipro	Apr 6, 2012, 4:43 AM
Re: OpenStack immaturity	jim.curry at rackspace	Apr 6, 2012, 8:56 AM
Re: OpenStack immaturity	thomas at goirand	Apr 6, 2012, 9:22 AM
Re: OpenStack immaturity	mark.collier at rackspace	Apr 6, 2012, 10:00 AM
Re: OpenStack immaturity	stefano at openstack	Apr 6, 2012, 12:28 PM
Re: OpenStack immaturity	jim.curry at rackspace	Apr 6, 2012, 1:10 PM
Re: OpenStack immaturity	leandro.reox at gmail	Apr 6, 2012, 2:19 PM

Index | Next | Previous | View Flat

Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads