<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>OpenSSH | Dev</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/openssh/dev/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>25 Nov  2009 21:07:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: Connection type variable</title>
<description>Luiz Casey wrote: &amp;gt; Hello, I would like to know how would I go about in using a &amp;gt; connection type variable with the sshd_config. [...] &amp;gt; Where &amp;quot;sftp/</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 15:30:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/openssh/dev/47350</link>
</item><item>
<title>Connection type variable</title>
<description>Hello, I would like to know how would I go about in using a connection type variable with the sshd_config. What would be the consequences,security,pro</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 06:40:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/openssh/dev/47349</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] Bluetooth support.</title>
<description>This is just the first part -- it adds support for correctly reporting incoming connections when there&amp;#039;s an external dÃ¦mon accepting the connections</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 01:58:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/openssh/dev/47348</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: I need help</title>
<description>The entire bar is offering replies: &amp;#039;yes you do.&amp;#039; &amp;#039;yes we can.&amp;#039; &amp;#039;that IS what your mom said.&amp;#039; :) Seriously, what&amp;#039;s up?  On Nov 21, 2009, at 10:17</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2009 19:43:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/openssh/dev/47345</link>
</item><item>
<title>I need help</title>
<description>Sent from my iPod     __________________________________________________________________ The new Internet Explorer® 8 - Faster, safer, easier. Op</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2009 19:17:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/openssh/dev/47344</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: internal-sftp atomic file operations?</title>
<description>Paul Surgeon wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve been testing internal-sftp with chroot on OpenSSH_5.3p1 and it &amp;gt; seems that internal-sftp does not support POSIX atomic ren</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2009 02:59:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/openssh/dev/47281</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: local DNSSEC validation for 5.3p1</title>
<description>On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Robert Story wrote: &amp;gt; On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:03:34 -0500 Robert wrote: &amp;gt; RS&amp;gt; Attached is a patch that adds local DNSSEC validati</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 07:49:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/openssh/dev/47277</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: local DNSSEC validation for 5.3p1</title>
<description>On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:03:34 -0500 Robert wrote: RS&amp;gt; Attached is a patch that adds local DNSSEC validation to OpenSSH. See RS&amp;gt; the readme for more det</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 06:10:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/openssh/dev/47276</link>
</item><item>
<title>local DNSSEC validation for 5.3p1</title>
<description>Attached is a patch that adds local DNSSEC validation to OpenSSH. See the readme for more detail. Please direct any questions or comments to users@dn</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 06:03:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/openssh/dev/47275</link>
</item><item>
<title>internal-sftp atomic file operations?</title>
<description>Hi I&amp;#039;ve been testing internal-sftp with chroot on OpenSSH_5.3p1 and it seems that internal-sftp does not support POSIX atomic rename() operations. Ca</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 04:29:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/openssh/dev/47274</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SFTP Chroot</title>
<description>On 2009-11-18 02:30, lattera wrote: &amp;gt; Why should all the directory tree be root-owned and have that set of &amp;gt; permissions? This is preventing me from s</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2009 18:42:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/openssh/dev/47266</link>
</item><item>
<title>SFTP Chroot</title>
<description>Hi all, Today, I was tasked at work with setting up a chroot SFTP server on a 64bit Arch Linux server. I naturally turned to Arch Linux&amp;#039;s wiki articl</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2009 18:30:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/openssh/dev/47265</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Alternate Install Location Patch Proposal</title>
<description>Doug Kehn wrote: &amp;gt; Hi All, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Below (and attached) is a patch that will allow openssh to be &amp;gt; installed in an alternate location. This is essential</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2009 14:12:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/openssh/dev/47259</link>
</item><item>
<title>Alternate Install Location Patch Proposal</title>
<description>Hi All, Below (and attached) is a patch that will allow openssh to be installed in an alternate location. This is essential when cross-compiling. T</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2009 07:00:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/openssh/dev/47258</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Cygwin OpenSSH 5.1 login session per user</title>
<description>On Nov 10 00:09, petesea@bigfoot.com wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m using Cygwin OpenSSH 5.1 on a Windows XP SP3 system. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Is sshd supposed to create a new &amp;quot;login se</description>
<pubDate>10 Nov  2009 01:52:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/openssh/dev/47240</link>
</item><item>
<title>Cygwin OpenSSH 5.1 login session per user</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m using Cygwin OpenSSH 5.1 on a Windows XP SP3 system. Is sshd supposed to create a new &amp;quot;login session&amp;quot; for each user that logs in? Or, is there</description>
<pubDate>10 Nov  2009 00:09:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/openssh/dev/47239</link>
</item><item>
<title>SSL vulnerability and SSH</title>
<description>Hi, This is just a quick note to state that the recently reported SSL/TLS MITM attack[1] *does not* affect SSH. Like SSL/TLS, SSH supports key and pa</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 17:09:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/openssh/dev/47221</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: sshd_config ChrootDirectory ambiguity...</title>
<description>Ah ha! I got ya. Makes perfect sense now. I had showed it to an admin and also an old school linux kernel hacker and both were confused as well. Thank</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 12:22:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/openssh/dev/47218</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: sshd_config ChrootDirectory ambiguity...</title>
<description>all components of the pathname On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 02:38:05PM -0500, Robert Waite wrote: &amp;gt; Under &amp;quot;ChrootDirectory&amp;quot; there is a line that says, &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 11:53:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/openssh/dev/47217</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: sshd_config ChrootDirectory ambiguity...</title>
<description>Quoth Robert Waite: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Under &amp;quot;ChrootDirectory&amp;quot; there is a line that says, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;quot;This path, and all its components, must be root-owned directories &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 11:48:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/openssh/dev/47216</link>
</item><item>
<title>Limiting simultaneous sftp downloads..</title>
<description>When I use Filezilla... the default setup will download two files in the queue at the same time. What I would notice is sometimes I could really hear</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 11:39:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/openssh/dev/47215</link>
</item><item>
<title>sshd_config ChrootDirectory ambiguity...</title>
<description>Under &amp;quot;ChrootDirectory&amp;quot; there is a line that says, &amp;quot;This path, and all its components, must be root-owned directories that are not writable by any ot</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 11:38:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/openssh/dev/47214</link>
</item><item>
<title>Chroot a cifs home directory for sftp</title>
<description>Using OpenSSH 5.1 on Ubuntu Linux If you setup a home directory as a cifs share you cannot chroot and connect through sftp. If you turn off the cifs</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 11:04:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/openssh/dev/47205</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: ssh_fxp_name</title>
<description>ok basically my FXP_READDIR loop consumed the entire channel window and the partial sftp packet was probably the last channel data server could send.</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 03:25:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/openssh/dev/47203</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Match vs. ChallengeResponseAuthentication?</title>
<description>Damien Miller wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, Darren Tucker wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; ChallengeResponseAuthentication no &amp;gt;&amp;gt; KbdInteractiveAuthentication no &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Match</description>
<pubDate>02 Nov  2009 14:14:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/openssh/dev/47202</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
