Mailing List Archive: NTop: Misc

Last svn patch.

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

bbehrens at cyberserious

Jan 16, 2012, 5:09 AM

Post #1 of 7 (380 views)
Permalink

Last svn patch.

Luca,

I noticed you changed my u_int back to int in prefs.c. I had to change this because I could not get the max sessions, max hash above 65535. Did you find somewhere else that fixes this issue?

--Brian

deri at ntop

Jan 16, 2012, 5:22 AM

Post #2 of 7 (353 views)
Permalink

Re: Last svn patch. [In reply to]

Brian
I did that change because the compiler (it was right) was complaining. Is this causing side effects? If so let's address them: I didn't want to break your code at all

Luca

On Jan 16, 2012, at 2:09 PM, Brian Behrens wrote:

> Luca,
>
> I noticed you changed my u_int back to int in prefs.c. I had to change this because I could not get the max sessions, max hash above 65535. Did you find somewhere else that fixes this issue?
>
> --Brian
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop-misc mailing list
> Ntop-misc [at] listgateway
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

bbehrens at cyberserious

Jan 16, 2012, 5:33 AM

Post #3 of 7 (356 views)
Permalink

Re: Last svn patch. [In reply to]

I understand, guess sometimes the compiles go by so fast on my machine I miss stuff. I will keep an eye on it, I just re-built it and on the config status screen it shows the correct values for -x and -X. I have it running on the high traffic network now, its only seen a max of 52495 active sessions. Will let you know if it tops out and cannot get passed 65535.

--Brian

________________________________
From: ntop-misc-bounces [at] listgateway [ntop-misc-bounces [at] listgateway] on behalf of Luca Deri [deri [at] ntop]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 7:22 AM
To: ntop-misc [at] listgateway
Subject: Re: [Ntop-misc] Last svn patch.

Brian
I did that change because the compiler (it was right) was complaining. Is this causing side effects? If so let's address them: I didn't want to break your code at all

Luca

On Jan 16, 2012, at 2:09 PM, Brian Behrens wrote:

Luca,

I noticed you changed my u_int back to int in prefs.c. I had to change this because I could not get the max sessions, max hash above 65535. Did you find somewhere else that fixes this issue?

--Brian
_______________________________________________
Ntop-misc mailing list
Ntop-misc [at] listgateway<mailto:Ntop-misc [at] listgateway>
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

bbehrens at cyberserious

Jan 17, 2012, 4:14 AM

Post #4 of 7 (352 views)
Permalink

Re: Last svn patch. [In reply to]

Luca,

As of this morning, my one instance passed 65535 sessions, and ntop would not see more than that even though the command line is set. I will try to look through and see why this is...

--Brian

________________________________
From: ntop-misc-bounces [at] listgateway [ntop-misc-bounces [at] listgateway] on behalf of Luca Deri [deri [at] ntop]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 7:22 AM
To: ntop-misc [at] listgateway
Subject: Re: [Ntop-misc] Last svn patch.

Brian
I did that change because the compiler (it was right) was complaining. Is this causing side effects? If so let's address them: I didn't want to break your code at all

Luca

On Jan 16, 2012, at 2:09 PM, Brian Behrens wrote:

Luca,

I noticed you changed my u_int back to int in prefs.c. I had to change this because I could not get the max sessions, max hash above 65535. Did you find somewhere else that fixes this issue?

--Brian
_______________________________________________
Ntop-misc mailing list
Ntop-misc [at] listgateway<mailto:Ntop-misc [at] listgateway>
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

deri at ntop

Jan 17, 2012, 5:04 AM

Post #5 of 7 (349 views)
Permalink

Re: Last svn patch. [In reply to]

Brian
thanks for the update. Please let me know if you need support from my side

Cheers Luca

On 01/17/2012 01:14 PM, Brian Behrens wrote:
>
> Luca,
>
> As of this morning, my one instance passed 65535 sessions, and ntop
> would not see more than that even though the command line is set. I
> will try to look through and see why this is...
>
> --Brian
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* ntop-misc-bounces [at] listgateway
> [ntop-misc-bounces [at] listgateway] on behalf of Luca Deri
> [deri [at] ntop]
> *Sent:* Monday, January 16, 2012 7:22 AM
> *To:* ntop-misc [at] listgateway
> *Subject:* Re: [Ntop-misc] Last svn patch.
>
> Brian
> I did that change because the compiler (it was right) was complaining.
> Is this causing side effects? If so let's address them: I didn't want
> to break your code at all
>
> Luca
>
> On Jan 16, 2012, at 2:09 PM, Brian Behrens wrote:
>
>> Luca,
>>
>> I noticed you changed my u_int back to int in prefs.c. I had to
>> change this because I could not get the max sessions, max hash above
>> 65535. Did you find somewhere else that fixes this issue?
>>
>> --Brian
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>> Ntop-misc [at] listgateway <mailto:Ntop-misc [at] listgateway>
>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop-misc mailing list
> Ntop-misc [at] listgateway
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

bbehrens at cyberserious

Jan 17, 2012, 5:10 AM

Post #6 of 7 (349 views)
Permalink

Re: Last svn patch. [In reply to]

Luca,

Thanks, I have found the issue. I am correcting it now, working on a patch and will submit it to you, probably within the hour...

--Brian

________________________________
From: ntop-misc-bounces [at] listgateway [ntop-misc-bounces [at] listgateway] on behalf of Luca Deri [deri [at] ntop]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 7:04 AM
To: ntop-misc [at] listgateway
Subject: Re: [Ntop-misc] Last svn patch.

Brian
thanks for the update. Please let me know if you need support from my side

Cheers Luca

On 01/17/2012 01:14 PM, Brian Behrens wrote:

Luca,

As of this morning, my one instance passed 65535 sessions, and ntop would not see more than that even though the command line is set. I will try to look through and see why this is...

--Brian

________________________________
From: ntop-misc-bounces [at] listgateway<mailto:ntop-misc-bounces [at] listgateway> [ntop-misc-bounces [at] listgateway<mailto:ntop-misc-bounces [at] listgateway>] on behalf of Luca Deri [deri [at] ntop<mailto:deri [at] ntop>]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 7:22 AM
To: ntop-misc [at] listgateway<mailto:ntop-misc [at] listgateway>
Subject: Re: [Ntop-misc] Last svn patch.

Brian
I did that change because the compiler (it was right) was complaining. Is this causing side effects? If so let's address them: I didn't want to break your code at all

Luca

On Jan 16, 2012, at 2:09 PM, Brian Behrens wrote:

Luca,

I noticed you changed my u_int back to int in prefs.c. I had to change this because I could not get the max sessions, max hash above 65535. Did you find somewhere else that fixes this issue?

--Brian
_______________________________________________
Ntop-misc mailing list
Ntop-misc [at] listgateway<mailto:Ntop-misc [at] listgateway>
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

_______________________________________________
Ntop-misc mailing list
Ntop-misc [at] listgateway<mailto:Ntop-misc [at] listgateway>
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

deri at ntop

Jan 17, 2012, 5:12 AM

Post #7 of 7 (349 views)
Permalink

Re: Last svn patch. [In reply to]

Great!

Luca

On 01/17/2012 02:10 PM, Brian Behrens wrote:
>
> Luca,
>
> Thanks, I have found the issue. I am correcting it now, working on a
> patch and will submit it to you, probably within the hour...
>
> --Brian
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* ntop-misc-bounces [at] listgateway
> [ntop-misc-bounces [at] listgateway] on behalf of Luca Deri
> [deri [at] ntop]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 17, 2012 7:04 AM
> *To:* ntop-misc [at] listgateway
> *Subject:* Re: [Ntop-misc] Last svn patch.
>
> Brian
> thanks for the update. Please let me know if you need support from my side
>
> Cheers Luca
>
> On 01/17/2012 01:14 PM, Brian Behrens wrote:
>>
>> Luca,
>>
>> As of this morning, my one instance passed 65535 sessions, and ntop
>> would not see more than that even though the command line is set. I
>> will try to look through and see why this is...
>>
>> --Brian
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* ntop-misc-bounces [at] listgateway
>> [ntop-misc-bounces [at] listgateway] on behalf of Luca Deri
>> [deri [at] ntop]
>> *Sent:* Monday, January 16, 2012 7:22 AM
>> *To:* ntop-misc [at] listgateway
>> *Subject:* Re: [Ntop-misc] Last svn patch.
>>
>> Brian
>> I did that change because the compiler (it was right) was
>> complaining. Is this causing side effects? If so let's address them:
>> I didn't want to break your code at all
>>
>> Luca
>>
>> On Jan 16, 2012, at 2:09 PM, Brian Behrens wrote:
>>
>>> Luca,
>>>
>>> I noticed you changed my u_int back to int in prefs.c. I had to
>>> change this because I could not get the max sessions, max hash above
>>> 65535. Did you find somewhere else that fixes this issue?
>>>
>>> --Brian
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>>> Ntop-misc [at] listgateway <mailto:Ntop-misc [at] listgateway>
>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>> Ntop-misc [at] listgateway
>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop-misc mailing list
> Ntop-misc [at] listgateway
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads