<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>NTop | Misc</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ntop/misc/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>12 Feb  2012 11:25:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>pf_ring quick_mode not being set?</title>
<description>Hi. I can&amp;#039;t get two simultaneous daemons to listen on the same interface. After reading it seems like this is usually due to quick_mode being enabled</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 12:38:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ntop/misc/28461</link>
</item><item>
<title>scanIdleTimedoutSessions message</title>
<description>Luca,  I noticed that in sessions.c the &amp;quot;#ifdef DEBUG&amp;quot; lines that surround the scanIdleTimedoutSessions message have been commented out, was wonder</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 10:58:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ntop/misc/28460</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Ntop-misc Digest, Vol 92, Issue 6</title>
<description>Hi Alfredo, Thank you very much. It turns out that that include was misplaced. For everyone to know, we were able to finally compile the bnx2 driver</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 04:44:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ntop/misc/28459</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Ntop-misc Digest, Vol 92, Issue 6</title>
<description>Josr pfring_ptr is defined in linux/pf_ring.h: #define pfring_ptr ec_ptr make sure you are including it Regards Alfredo On Feb 9, 2012, at 12:16 P</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 03:32:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ntop/misc/28456</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Ntop-misc Digest, Vol 92, Issue 6</title>
<description>Hi Luca, I am aware you don&amp;#039;t have Broadcom NICs, but I was just wondering if some of you had ever encountered this kind of errors: &#039;struct net_devi</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 03:16:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ntop/misc/28455</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Error when compiling bnx2 driver with pf_ring support</title>
<description>Jose we have no Broadcom NICs and this I cannot maintain these drivers. Shall you be willing to fix these issues, please send us a code patch Thanks</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 02:56:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ntop/misc/28454</link>
</item><item>
<title>Error when compiling bnx2 driver with pf_ring support</title>
<description>Hello, I&amp;#039;ve tried to compile the same problems that other person had earlier with bnx2 driver provided by pf_ring, as per: http://listgateway.unipi.i</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 02:00:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ntop/misc/28451</link>
</item><item>
<title>strange kernel oops panics</title>
<description>Hello, I got the following kernel oops panic condition while running urlsnarf and tshark. Both of them has the same error. I have no error with tcpdu</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 07:49:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ntop/misc/28447</link>
</item><item>
<title>newbie (netflow-related) nprobe/ntop problem</title>
<description>hi, I&amp;#039;m trying to use nprobe/ntop as a netflow collector/analyser. I&amp;#039;ve followed this simple howto: http://www.ntop.org/nprobe/using-ntop-as-a-flow-c</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 04:43:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ntop/misc/28446</link>
</item><item>
<title>Another interesting error</title>
<description>Just got another one that I thought you all might want to see and ponder on: Feb 6 18:51:39 ring ntop[21554]:  **ERROR** Buffer too short @ session</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2012 17:00:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ntop/misc/28439</link>
</item><item>
<title>This ought to be interesting...</title>
<description>Installed NTop from svn on Feb 2: &amp;quot;Welcome to ntop v.4.1.2 (64 bit) [Configured on Feb 2 2012 13:28:28, built on Feb 2 2012 13:30:33]&amp;quot; Worked fine</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2012 16:54:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ntop/misc/28438</link>
</item><item>
<title>Capturing first 128 bits of payload in pfring</title>
<description>Dear All,      I would like to capture 128 bits of my packets via pfring. I saw this structure struct pkt_parsing_info but I already used most</description>
<pubDate>05 Feb  2012 19:35:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ntop/misc/28435</link>
</item><item>
<title>Fw: nprobe compilation error</title>
<description>hi you know,  i receive error when i try to compile the nprobe and its plugins source files. I think the package&amp;#039;s been written seperately by differe</description>
<pubDate>05 Feb  2012 12:57:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ntop/misc/28434</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Bloom filtering</title>
<description>Hi Luca, &amp;gt; we removed this code as it was strict so not too many different filter &amp;gt; types could not be accommodated as many people want. If you go ba</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 23:11:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ntop/misc/28413</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Bloom filtering</title>
<description>Jaime we removed this code as it was strict so not too many different filter types could not be accommodated as many people want. If you go back with</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 13:36:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ntop/misc/28412</link>
</item><item>
<title>Bloom filtering</title>
<description>Hi all,   I remember there was some kind of bloom filtering capability included in pf_ring but seems it has been removed.   May I ask why it was</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 04:54:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ntop/misc/28405</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: pfRing delay in capturing TX packets</title>
<description>Thanks Luca,  That did work!   Is there any way we can control this dynamically? i.e make PF_RING poll only when your  application inserts someth</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 06:18:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ntop/misc/28402</link>
</item><item>
<title>nprobe mysql plugin conflics</title>
<description>Dear Sir/Madam I have just run nprobe on my system. without any options. Here&amp;#039;s a sample output: bash-3.1# nprobe 30/Jan/2012 20:38:00 [nprobe.c:258</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2012 08:13:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ntop/misc/28399</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: pfRing delay in capturing TX packets</title>
<description>Daniel PF_RING attempts to reduce the number of polls, by using the watermark that is a minimum number of packets that need to be received before PF</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2012 01:12:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ntop/misc/28398</link>
</item><item>
<title>pfRing delay in capturing TX packets</title>
<description>Hi Luca,  I am using the following config pfRing (on my linux version 2.6.18-194.17.1.el5)  [root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/net/pf_ring/info PF_RIN</description>
<pubDate>29 Jan  2012 19:20:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ntop/misc/28395</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: CentOS 6.2 with PF_Ring?</title>
<description>Alfredo,  &amp;gt;&amp;gt;Actually we are aware that the bnx2 PF_RING-aware driver is an old release   I figured as much. Thanks for the confirmation. I have</description>
<pubDate>28 Jan  2012 06:07:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ntop/misc/28390</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: CentOS 6.2 with PF_Ring?</title>
<description>Sorry guys we don&amp;#039;t have such hardware in our lab to reproduce the issue. Actually we are aware that the bnx2 PF_RING-aware driver is an old release a</description>
<pubDate>28 Jan  2012 01:32:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ntop/misc/28389</link>
</item><item>
<title>Fedora 16 with e1000 PF_Ring aware driver fails to compile</title>
<description>Fresh install + updates of Fedora 16. e1000 PF_Ring Aware driver: make: make -C /lib/modules/3.1.9-1.fc16.i686/build SUBDIRS=/root/PF_RING/drivers/P</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 21:10:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ntop/misc/28388</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: CentOS 6.2 with PF_Ring?</title>
<description>That&amp;#039;s what I&amp;#039;ve come down to also.  I&amp;#039;m searching for hardware that has the e1000e chipset and will give that a try next. I just wanted to make sure</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 13:25:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ntop/misc/28383</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: CentOS 6.2 with PF_Ring?</title>
<description>Richard, You are not alone. I&amp;#039;ve been working on a Dell 2950 with two Broadcom 5708&amp;#039;s on board. I&amp;#039;ve seen the same behavior: pfcount (or tcpdump) o</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 13:22:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ntop/misc/28382</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

