Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: nsp: juniper

Multi-proxy IDS on route based VPN (SRX)

 

 

nsp juniper RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


eng_mahmood48 at yahoo

Aug 29, 2012, 1:33 AM

Post #1 of 2 (466 views)
Permalink
Multi-proxy IDS on route based VPN (SRX)

Hi
 
I have SRX and want to setup Site-Site VPN with another vendor (Cisco), but i have the following conditions;
 
-  I have more than one site to create VPN with it.
- There are multible subnets on each VPN tunnel.
- The private Subnets are overlapping (so i have to use NAT over the VPN).
 
based on this i think that i have to go with route based VPN (due to the required NATing), am i right?
 
if so then i have to create multi proxy IDs for each tunnel, but its not supported.
 
is there ane idea about this case??
 
Regards
Mahmoud
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


dickeypjeep at yahoo

Aug 29, 2012, 10:22 AM

Post #2 of 2 (452 views)
Permalink
Re: Multi-proxy IDS on route based VPN (SRX) [In reply to]

I can think of two options: Use GRE so you don't have to worry about the
multiple proxy IDs. Not sure this would work for you with multi-site though.

You can create multiple proxy-ids using different/several phase 2 tunnels
with the same/single phase 1 gateway. This is a bit tedious, but I'd think
it could work for you.

Patrick

-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp-bounces [at] puck
[mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of mahmoud yasin
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 2:34 AM
To: juniper-nsp [at] puck
Subject: [j-nsp] Multi-proxy IDS on route based VPN (SRX)

Hi
 
I have SRX and want to setup Site-Site VPN with another vendor (Cisco), but
i have the following conditions;
 
-  I have more than one site to create VPN with it.
- There are multible subnets on each VPN tunnel.
- The private Subnets are overlapping (so i have to use NAT over the VPN).
 
based on this i think that i have to go with route based VPN (due to the
required NATing), am i right?
 
if so then i have to create multi proxy IDs for each tunnel, but its not
supported.
 
is there ane idea about this case??
 
Regards
Mahmoud
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

nsp juniper RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.