Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: nsp: juniper

EX3200 vs. EX4200 MPLS

 

 

nsp juniper RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


skeeve+junipernsp at eintellego

Apr 29, 2012, 8:06 PM

Post #1 of 11 (2333 views)
Permalink
EX3200 vs. EX4200 MPLS

Hey guys,

I've tried googling and my foo is weak today.

I am trying to confirm that the EX3200 and EX4200 have the same MPLS
capabilities.

Specifically around pseudo-wires (I think the term is).

*Skeeve Stevens, CEO*
eintellego Pty Ltd
skeeve [at] eintellego ; www.eintellego.net <http://www.eintellego.net.au>

Phone: 1300 753 383 ; Fax: (+612) 8572 9954

Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve

facebook.com/eintellego

twitter.com/networkceoau ; www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve

PO Box 7726, Baulkham Hills, NSW 1755 Australia

The Experts Who The Experts Call
Juniper - Cisco – Brocade - IBM
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


bdale at comlinx

Apr 29, 2012, 8:29 PM

Post #2 of 11 (2251 views)
Permalink
Re: EX3200 vs. EX4200 MPLS [In reply to]

Yes they do, but it requires an Advanced Feature License. They provide - CCC only (not EoMPLS/L2Circuit).

On 30/04/2012, at 1:06 PM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:

> Hey guys,
>
> I've tried googling and my foo is weak today.
>
> I am trying to confirm that the EX3200 and EX4200 have the same MPLS
> capabilities.
>
> Specifically around pseudo-wires (I think the term is).
>
> *Skeeve Stevens, CEO*
> eintellego Pty Ltd
> skeeve [at] eintellego ; www.eintellego.net <http://www.eintellego.net.au>
>
> Phone: 1300 753 383 ; Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
>
> Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
>
> facebook.com/eintellego
>
> twitter.com/networkceoau ; www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve
>
> PO Box 7726, Baulkham Hills, NSW 1755 Australia
>
> The Experts Who The Experts Call
> Juniper - Cisco – Brocade - IBM
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>


_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


juniperdude at gmail

Apr 29, 2012, 8:29 PM

Post #3 of 11 (2260 views)
Permalink
Re: EX3200 vs. EX4200 MPLS [In reply to]

Yup.

The EX3200 is basically an EX4200 minus the VC capability (and one less PFE from what I remember for the uplink ports/expansion thingy).

Same single-label RSVP-style CCC's w/Optional QoS/Pbit inspection and EXP remarking. (Kompella style). No Martini/LDP though.

*Officially Requires the Advanced Feat Licence (MPLS, BGP, IPv6, etc.)

- CK.


On 2012-04-30, at 1:06 PM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:

> Hey guys,
>
> I've tried googling and my foo is weak today.
>
> I am trying to confirm that the EX3200 and EX4200 have the same MPLS
> capabilities.
>
> Specifically around pseudo-wires (I think the term is).


_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


skeeve+junipernsp at eintellego

Apr 29, 2012, 8:33 PM

Post #4 of 11 (2254 views)
Permalink
Re: EX3200 vs. EX4200 MPLS [In reply to]

Chris/Ben,

How would I go about finding how how many CCC the EX3200/4200 can support?

...Skeeve

*Skeeve Stevens, CEO*
eintellego Pty Ltd
skeeve [at] eintellego ; www.eintellego.net <http://www.eintellego.net.au>

Phone: 1300 753 383 ; Fax: (+612) 8572 9954

Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve

facebook.com/eintellego

twitter.com/networkceoau ; www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve

PO Box 7726, Baulkham Hills, NSW 1755 Australia

The Experts Who The Experts Call
Juniper - Cisco – Brocade - IBM



On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 13:29, Chris Kawchuk <juniperdude [at] gmail> wrote:

> Yup.
>
> The EX3200 is basically an EX4200 minus the VC capability (and one less
> PFE from what I remember for the uplink ports/expansion thingy).
>
> Same single-label RSVP-style CCC's w/Optional QoS/Pbit inspection and EXP
> remarking. (Kompella style). No Martini/LDP though.
>
> *Officially Requires the Advanced Feat Licence (MPLS, BGP, IPv6, etc.)
>
> - CK.
>
>
> On 2012-04-30, at 1:06 PM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
>
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > I've tried googling and my foo is weak today.
> >
> > I am trying to confirm that the EX3200 and EX4200 have the same MPLS
> > capabilities.
> >
> > Specifically around pseudo-wires (I think the term is).
>
>
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


juniperdude at gmail

Apr 29, 2012, 8:39 PM

Post #5 of 11 (2241 views)
Permalink
Re: EX3200 vs. EX4200 MPLS [In reply to]

I have yet to run into any limit. There probably is one, but would need to Lab it up and try to max it out.

I've heard of people using EX3200/4200s as a pure MPLS CCC endpoint device (i.e. 1 LSP per physical port) as some kind of wacky olde-style "M13 Mux" like we used to do in the TDM days; so at least as many CCC's as there are physical ports on the box would be a minimum at my guess. You can do CCC per-VLAN as well, so your can get many more LSPs than just the # of physical IFDs.

- CK.

On 2012-04-30, at 1:33 PM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:

> Chris/Ben,
>
> How would I go about finding how how many CCC the EX3200/4200 can support?
>
> ...Skeeve

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


chip.gwyn at gmail

Apr 30, 2012, 7:08 AM

Post #6 of 11 (2238 views)
Permalink
Re: EX3200 vs. EX4200 MPLS [In reply to]

I seem to recall a 4200 could do around 120ish CCC's, with some
updated (hardware?) software that number should almost double.

--chip

On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Chris Kawchuk <juniperdude [at] gmail> wrote:
> I have yet to run into any limit. There probably is one, but would need to Lab it up and try to max it out.
>
> I've heard of people using EX3200/4200s as a pure MPLS CCC endpoint device (i.e. 1 LSP per physical port) as some kind of wacky olde-style "M13 Mux" like we used to do in the TDM days; so at least as many CCC's as there are physical ports on the box would be a minimum at my guess. You can do CCC per-VLAN as well, so your can get many more LSPs than just the # of physical IFDs.
>
> - CK.
>
> On 2012-04-30, at 1:33 PM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
>
>> Chris/Ben,
>>
>> How would I go about finding how how many CCC the EX3200/4200 can support?
>>
>> ...Skeeve
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp



--
Just my $.02, your mileage may vary,  batteries not included, etc....

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


chip.gwyn at gmail

Apr 30, 2012, 7:10 AM

Post #7 of 11 (2240 views)
Permalink
Re: EX3200 vs. EX4200 MPLS [In reply to]

Ok, now that I've said that, I realize that's for the 4500, not sure
on the 4200's. Also, its not clear on whether that number scales if
you start clustering things.

--chip

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:08 AM, chip <chip.gwyn [at] gmail> wrote:
> I seem to recall a 4200 could do around 120ish CCC's, with some
> updated (hardware?) software that number should almost double.
>
> --chip
>
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Chris Kawchuk <juniperdude [at] gmail> wrote:
>> I have yet to run into any limit. There probably is one, but would need to Lab it up and try to max it out.
>>
>> I've heard of people using EX3200/4200s as a pure MPLS CCC endpoint device (i.e. 1 LSP per physical port) as some kind of wacky olde-style "M13 Mux" like we used to do in the TDM days; so at least as many CCC's as there are physical ports on the box would be a minimum at my guess. You can do CCC per-VLAN as well, so your can get many more LSPs than just the # of physical IFDs.
>>
>> - CK.
>>
>> On 2012-04-30, at 1:33 PM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
>>
>>> Chris/Ben,
>>>
>>> How would I go about finding how how many CCC the EX3200/4200 can support?
>>>
>>> ...Skeeve
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>
>
> --
> Just my $.02, your mileage may vary,  batteries not included, etc....



--
Just my $.02, your mileage may vary,  batteries not included, etc....

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


skeeve+junipernsp at eintellego

Apr 30, 2012, 7:11 AM

Post #8 of 11 (2239 views)
Permalink
Re: EX3200 vs. EX4200 MPLS [In reply to]

Thanks Chip!

Any docs or anything like that around on the limits on these sorts of
things?

*Skeeve Stevens, CEO*
eintellego Pty Ltd
skeeve [at] eintellego ; www.eintellego.net <http://www.eintellego.net.au>

Phone: 1300 753 383 ; Fax: (+612) 8572 9954

Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve

facebook.com/eintellego

twitter.com/networkceoau ; www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve

PO Box 7726, Baulkham Hills, NSW 1755 Australia

The Experts Who The Experts Call
Juniper - Cisco – IBM



On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 00:10, chip <chip.gwyn [at] gmail> wrote:

> Ok, now that I've said that, I realize that's for the 4500, not sure
> on the 4200's. Also, its not clear on whether that number scales if
> you start clustering things.
>
> --chip
>
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:08 AM, chip <chip.gwyn [at] gmail> wrote:
> > I seem to recall a 4200 could do around 120ish CCC's, with some
> > updated (hardware?) software that number should almost double.
> >
> > --chip
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Chris Kawchuk <juniperdude [at] gmail>
> wrote:
> >> I have yet to run into any limit. There probably is one, but would need
> to Lab it up and try to max it out.
> >>
> >> I've heard of people using EX3200/4200s as a pure MPLS CCC endpoint
> device (i.e. 1 LSP per physical port) as some kind of wacky olde-style "M13
> Mux" like we used to do in the TDM days; so at least as many CCC's as there
> are physical ports on the box would be a minimum at my guess. You can do
> CCC per-VLAN as well, so your can get many more LSPs than just the # of
> physical IFDs.
> >>
> >> - CK.
> >>
> >> On 2012-04-30, at 1:33 PM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
> >>
> >>> Chris/Ben,
> >>>
> >>> How would I go about finding how how many CCC the EX3200/4200 can
> support?
> >>>
> >>> ...Skeeve
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Just my $.02, your mileage may vary, batteries not included, etc....
>
>
>
> --
> Just my $.02, your mileage may vary, batteries not included, etc....
>
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


tmikolajek at gmail

Apr 30, 2012, 2:37 PM

Post #9 of 11 (2264 views)
Permalink
Re: EX3200 vs. EX4200 MPLS [In reply to]

Hello.
ON this site you have list of software features:
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/release-independent/junos/topics/concept/ex-series-software-features-overview.html#mpls-features-by-platform-table

2012/4/30 Skeeve Stevens <skeeve+junipernsp [at] eintellego>

> Thanks Chip!
>
> Any docs or anything like that around on the limits on these sorts of
> things?
>
> *Skeeve Stevens, CEO*
> eintellego Pty Ltd
> skeeve [at] eintellego ; www.eintellego.net <http://www.eintellego.net.au>
>
> Phone: 1300 753 383 ; Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
>
> Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
>
> facebook.com/eintellego
>
> twitter.com/networkceoau ; www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve
>
> PO Box 7726, Baulkham Hills, NSW 1755 Australia
>
> The Experts Who The Experts Call
> Juniper - Cisco – IBM
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 00:10, chip <chip.gwyn [at] gmail> wrote:
>
> > Ok, now that I've said that, I realize that's for the 4500, not sure
> > on the 4200's. Also, its not clear on whether that number scales if
> > you start clustering things.
> >
> > --chip
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:08 AM, chip <chip.gwyn [at] gmail> wrote:
> > > I seem to recall a 4200 could do around 120ish CCC's, with some
> > > updated (hardware?) software that number should almost double.
> > >
> > > --chip
> > >
> > > On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Chris Kawchuk <juniperdude [at] gmail
> >
> > wrote:
> > >> I have yet to run into any limit. There probably is one, but would
> need
> > to Lab it up and try to max it out.
> > >>
> > >> I've heard of people using EX3200/4200s as a pure MPLS CCC endpoint
> > device (i.e. 1 LSP per physical port) as some kind of wacky olde-style
> "M13
> > Mux" like we used to do in the TDM days; so at least as many CCC's as
> there
> > are physical ports on the box would be a minimum at my guess. You can do
> > CCC per-VLAN as well, so your can get many more LSPs than just the # of
> > physical IFDs.
> > >>
> > >> - CK.
> > >>
> > >> On 2012-04-30, at 1:33 PM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Chris/Ben,
> > >>>
> > >>> How would I go about finding how how many CCC the EX3200/4200 can
> > support?
> > >>>
> > >>> ...Skeeve
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
> > >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Just my $.02, your mileage may vary, batteries not included, etc....
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Just my $.02, your mileage may vary, batteries not included, etc....
> >
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


chip.gwyn at gmail

Apr 30, 2012, 3:01 PM

Post #10 of 11 (2241 views)
Permalink
Re: EX3200 vs. EX4200 MPLS [In reply to]

Tomasz,

Thanks for the link, I was going to post that earlier, but got
sidetracked. Anyway, after looking through it, apparently almost none
of the EX's support CCC. Unless I'm reading in the wrong place.
However:

{master:1}
lab [at] edge1> show configuration interfaces ge-0/0/9
unit 0 {
family ccc;
}

{master:1}
lab [at] edge1>

Hostname: edge1.lab001
Model: ex4500-40f
JUNOS Base OS boot [11.4R1.6]
JUNOS Base OS Software Suite [11.4R1.6]
JUNOS Kernel Software Suite [11.4R1.6]

I haven't actually tried to set one up, but the commit works....



--chip

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Tomasz Mikołajek <tmikolajek [at] gmail> wrote:
> Hello.
> ON this site you have list of software features:
> http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/release-independent/junos/topics/concept/ex-series-software-features-overview.html#mpls-features-by-platform-table
>
> 2012/4/30 Skeeve Stevens <skeeve+junipernsp [at] eintellego>
>>
>> Thanks Chip!
>>
>> Any docs or anything like that around on the limits on these sorts of
>> things?
>>
>> *Skeeve Stevens, CEO*
>> eintellego Pty Ltd
>> skeeve [at] eintellego ; www.eintellego.net <http://www.eintellego.net.au>
>>
>>
>> Phone: 1300 753 383 ; Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
>>
>> Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
>>
>> facebook.com/eintellego
>>
>> twitter.com/networkceoau ; www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve
>>
>> PO Box 7726, Baulkham Hills, NSW 1755 Australia
>>
>> The Experts Who The Experts Call
>> Juniper - Cisco – IBM
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 00:10, chip <chip.gwyn [at] gmail> wrote:
>>
>> > Ok, now that I've said that, I realize that's for the 4500, not sure
>> > on the 4200's.  Also, its not clear on whether that number scales if
>> > you start clustering things.
>> >
>> > --chip
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:08 AM, chip <chip.gwyn [at] gmail> wrote:
>> > > I seem to recall a 4200 could do around 120ish CCC's, with some
>> > > updated (hardware?) software that number should almost double.
>> > >
>> > > --chip
>> > >
>> > > On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Chris Kawchuk
>> > > <juniperdude [at] gmail>
>> > wrote:
>> > >> I have yet to run into any limit. There probably is one, but would
>> > >> need
>> > to Lab it up and try to max it out.
>> > >>
>> > >> I've heard of people using EX3200/4200s as a pure MPLS CCC endpoint
>> > device (i.e. 1 LSP per physical port) as some kind of wacky olde-style
>> > "M13
>> > Mux" like we used to do in the TDM days; so at least as many CCC's as
>> > there
>> > are physical ports on the box would be a minimum at my guess. You can do
>> > CCC per-VLAN as well, so your can get many more LSPs than just the # of
>> > physical IFDs.
>> > >>
>> > >> - CK.
>> > >>
>> > >> On 2012-04-30, at 1:33 PM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> Chris/Ben,
>> > >>>
>> > >>> How would I go about finding how how many CCC the EX3200/4200 can
>> > support?
>> > >>>
>> > >>> ...Skeeve
>> > >>
>> > >> _______________________________________________
>> > >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
>> > >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Just my $.02, your mileage may vary,  batteries not included, etc....
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Just my $.02, your mileage may vary,  batteries not included, etc....
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>



--
Just my $.02, your mileage may vary,  batteries not included, etc....

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


matthew at corp

Apr 30, 2012, 3:49 PM

Post #11 of 11 (2280 views)
Permalink
Re: EX3200 vs. EX4200 MPLS [In reply to]

EX4200 definitely support ethernet-ccc between each other and MX80s

fpc0:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hostname: EX4200-1
Model: ex4200-24f
JUNOS Base OS boot [11.1R3.5]
JUNOS Base OS Software Suite [11.1R3.5]
JUNOS Kernel Software Suite [11.1R3.5]
JUNOS Crypto Software Suite [11.1R3.5]
JUNOS Online Documentation [11.1R3.5]
JUNOS Enterprise Software Suite [11.1R3.5]
JUNOS Packet Forwarding Engine Enterprise Software Suite [11.1R3.5]
JUNOS Routing Software Suite [11.1R3.5]
JUNOS Web Management [11.1R3.5]


show mpls lsp terse
Ingress LSP: 2 sessions
Total 2 displayed, Up 2, Down 0

Egress LSP: 2 sessions
Total 2 displayed, Up 2, Down 0

Transit LSP: 2 sessions
Total 2 displayed, Up 2, Down 0

{master:0}


ge-1/0/0 {
mtu 9192;
unit 0 {
description "Cross Connect to EX4200 GFLDMA ge-0/0/1";
family ccc;
}

mpls {
label-switched-path lsp_to_gfld_ge-0/0/1 {
to 1.2.3.131;
}
label-switched-path lsp_to_spfld_ge-1/1/3 {
to 1.2.3.129;
}

connections {
remote-interface-switch ge-1/0/0_to_gfld {
interface ge-1/0/0.0;
transmit-lsp lsp_to_gfld_ge-0/0/1;
receive-lsp lsp_to_noho_ge-1/0/0;
}
remote-interface-switch ge-0/0/0_to_spfld {
interface ge-0/0/0.0;
transmit-lsp lsp_to_spfld_ge-1/1/3;
receive-lsp lsp_to_noho_ge-0/0/0;


----- Original Message -----
> From: "chip" <chip.gwyn [at] gmail>
> To: "Tomasz Mikołajek" <tmikolajek [at] gmail>
> Cc: juniper-nsp [at] puck
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 6:01:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] EX3200 vs. EX4200 MPLS
>
> Tomasz,
>
> Thanks for the link, I was going to post that earlier, but got
> sidetracked. Anyway, after looking through it, apparently almost
> none
> of the EX's support CCC. Unless I'm reading in the wrong place.
> However:
>
> {master:1}
> lab [at] edge1> show configuration interfaces ge-0/0/9
> unit 0 {
> family ccc;
> }
>
> {master:1}
> lab [at] edge1>
>
> Hostname: edge1.lab001
> Model: ex4500-40f
> JUNOS Base OS boot [11.4R1.6]
> JUNOS Base OS Software Suite [11.4R1.6]
> JUNOS Kernel Software Suite [11.4R1.6]
>
> I haven't actually tried to set one up, but the commit works....
>
>
>
> --chip
>
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Tomasz Mikołajek
> <tmikolajek [at] gmail> wrote:
> > Hello.
> > ON this site you have list of software features:
> > http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/release-independent/junos/topics/concept/ex-series-software-features-overview.html#mpls-features-by-platform-table
> >
> > 2012/4/30 Skeeve Stevens <skeeve+junipernsp [at] eintellego>
> >>
> >> Thanks Chip!
> >>
> >> Any docs or anything like that around on the limits on these sorts
> >> of
> >> things?
> >>
> >> *Skeeve Stevens, CEO*
> >> eintellego Pty Ltd
> >> skeeve [at] eintellego ; www.eintellego.net
> >> <http://www.eintellego.net.au>
> >>
> >>
> >> Phone: 1300 753 383 ; Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
> >>
> >> Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
> >>
> >> facebook.com/eintellego
> >>
> >> twitter.com/networkceoau ; www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve
> >>
> >> PO Box 7726, Baulkham Hills, NSW 1755 Australia
> >>
> >> The Experts Who The Experts Call
> >> Juniper - Cisco – IBM
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 00:10, chip <chip.gwyn [at] gmail> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Ok, now that I've said that, I realize that's for the 4500, not
> >> > sure
> >> > on the 4200's.  Also, its not clear on whether that number
> >> > scales if
> >> > you start clustering things.
> >> >
> >> > --chip
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:08 AM, chip <chip.gwyn [at] gmail>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > I seem to recall a 4200 could do around 120ish CCC's, with
> >> > > some
> >> > > updated (hardware?) software that number should almost double.
> >> > >
> >> > > --chip
> >> > >
> >> > > On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Chris Kawchuk
> >> > > <juniperdude [at] gmail>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >> I have yet to run into any limit. There probably is one, but
> >> > >> would
> >> > >> need
> >> > to Lab it up and try to max it out.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> I've heard of people using EX3200/4200s as a pure MPLS CCC
> >> > >> endpoint
> >> > device (i.e. 1 LSP per physical port) as some kind of wacky
> >> > olde-style
> >> > "M13
> >> > Mux" like we used to do in the TDM days; so at least as many
> >> > CCC's as
> >> > there
> >> > are physical ports on the box would be a minimum at my guess.
> >> > You can do
> >> > CCC per-VLAN as well, so your can get many more LSPs than just
> >> > the # of
> >> > physical IFDs.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> - CK.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On 2012-04-30, at 1:33 PM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >>> Chris/Ben,
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> How would I go about finding how how many CCC the
> >> > >>> EX3200/4200 can
> >> > support?
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> ...Skeeve
> >> > >>
> >> > >> _______________________________________________
> >> > >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
> >> > >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Just my $.02, your mileage may vary,  batteries not included,
> >> > > etc....
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Just my $.02, your mileage may vary,  batteries not included,
> >> > etc....
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Just my $.02, your mileage may vary,  batteries not included, etc....
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

nsp juniper RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.