matthew at corp
Apr 30, 2012, 3:49 PM
Post #11 of 11
(1139 views)
Permalink
|
EX4200 definitely support ethernet-ccc between each other and MX80s
fpc0:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hostname: EX4200-1
Model: ex4200-24f
JUNOS Base OS boot [11.1R3.5]
JUNOS Base OS Software Suite [11.1R3.5]
JUNOS Kernel Software Suite [11.1R3.5]
JUNOS Crypto Software Suite [11.1R3.5]
JUNOS Online Documentation [11.1R3.5]
JUNOS Enterprise Software Suite [11.1R3.5]
JUNOS Packet Forwarding Engine Enterprise Software Suite [11.1R3.5]
JUNOS Routing Software Suite [11.1R3.5]
JUNOS Web Management [11.1R3.5]
show mpls lsp terse
Ingress LSP: 2 sessions
Total 2 displayed, Up 2, Down 0
Egress LSP: 2 sessions
Total 2 displayed, Up 2, Down 0
Transit LSP: 2 sessions
Total 2 displayed, Up 2, Down 0
{master:0}
ge-1/0/0 {
mtu 9192;
unit 0 {
description "Cross Connect to EX4200 GFLDMA ge-0/0/1";
family ccc;
}
mpls {
label-switched-path lsp_to_gfld_ge-0/0/1 {
to 1.2.3.131;
}
label-switched-path lsp_to_spfld_ge-1/1/3 {
to 1.2.3.129;
}
connections {
remote-interface-switch ge-1/0/0_to_gfld {
interface ge-1/0/0.0;
transmit-lsp lsp_to_gfld_ge-0/0/1;
receive-lsp lsp_to_noho_ge-1/0/0;
}
remote-interface-switch ge-0/0/0_to_spfld {
interface ge-0/0/0.0;
transmit-lsp lsp_to_spfld_ge-1/1/3;
receive-lsp lsp_to_noho_ge-0/0/0;
----- Original Message -----
> From: "chip" <chip.gwyn [at] gmail>
> To: "Tomasz Mikołajek" <tmikolajek [at] gmail>
> Cc: juniper-nsp [at] puck
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 6:01:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] EX3200 vs. EX4200 MPLS
>
> Tomasz,
>
> Thanks for the link, I was going to post that earlier, but got
> sidetracked. Anyway, after looking through it, apparently almost
> none
> of the EX's support CCC. Unless I'm reading in the wrong place.
> However:
>
> {master:1}
> lab [at] edge1> show configuration interfaces ge-0/0/9
> unit 0 {
> family ccc;
> }
>
> {master:1}
> lab [at] edge1>
>
> Hostname: edge1.lab001
> Model: ex4500-40f
> JUNOS Base OS boot [11.4R1.6]
> JUNOS Base OS Software Suite [11.4R1.6]
> JUNOS Kernel Software Suite [11.4R1.6]
>
> I haven't actually tried to set one up, but the commit works....
>
>
>
> --chip
>
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Tomasz Mikołajek
> <tmikolajek [at] gmail> wrote:
> > Hello.
> > ON this site you have list of software features:
> > http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/release-independent/junos/topics/concept/ex-series-software-features-overview.html#mpls-features-by-platform-table
> >
> > 2012/4/30 Skeeve Stevens <skeeve+junipernsp [at] eintellego>
> >>
> >> Thanks Chip!
> >>
> >> Any docs or anything like that around on the limits on these sorts
> >> of
> >> things?
> >>
> >> *Skeeve Stevens, CEO*
> >> eintellego Pty Ltd
> >> skeeve [at] eintellego ; www.eintellego.net
> >> <http://www.eintellego.net.au>
> >>
> >>
> >> Phone: 1300 753 383 ; Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
> >>
> >> Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
> >>
> >> facebook.com/eintellego
> >>
> >> twitter.com/networkceoau ; www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve
> >>
> >> PO Box 7726, Baulkham Hills, NSW 1755 Australia
> >>
> >> The Experts Who The Experts Call
> >> Juniper - Cisco – IBM
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 00:10, chip <chip.gwyn [at] gmail> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Ok, now that I've said that, I realize that's for the 4500, not
> >> > sure
> >> > on the 4200's. Â Also, its not clear on whether that number
> >> > scales if
> >> > you start clustering things.
> >> >
> >> > --chip
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:08 AM, chip <chip.gwyn [at] gmail>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > I seem to recall a 4200 could do around 120ish CCC's, with
> >> > > some
> >> > > updated (hardware?) software that number should almost double.
> >> > >
> >> > > --chip
> >> > >
> >> > > On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Chris Kawchuk
> >> > > <juniperdude [at] gmail>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >> I have yet to run into any limit. There probably is one, but
> >> > >> would
> >> > >> need
> >> > to Lab it up and try to max it out.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> I've heard of people using EX3200/4200s as a pure MPLS CCC
> >> > >> endpoint
> >> > device (i.e. 1 LSP per physical port) as some kind of wacky
> >> > olde-style
> >> > "M13
> >> > Mux" like we used to do in the TDM days; so at least as many
> >> > CCC's as
> >> > there
> >> > are physical ports on the box would be a minimum at my guess.
> >> > You can do
> >> > CCC per-VLAN as well, so your can get many more LSPs than just
> >> > the # of
> >> > physical IFDs.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> - CK.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On 2012-04-30, at 1:33 PM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >>> Chris/Ben,
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> How would I go about finding how how many CCC the
> >> > >>> EX3200/4200 can
> >> > support?
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> ...Skeeve
> >> > >>
> >> > >> _______________________________________________
> >> > >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
> >> > >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Just my $.02, your mileage may vary, Â batteries not included,
> >> > > etc....
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Just my $.02, your mileage may vary, Â batteries not included,
> >> > etc....
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Just my $.02, your mileage may vary, batteries not included, etc....
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
|
