bmannella at teraswitch
Apr 3, 2012, 5:27 PM
Views: 503
Permalink
|
I could be completely wrong, but shouldn't the second 4200 be the
backup RE and not forced to be a line card?
Could have something to do with it.
On Apr 3, 2012, at 8:24 PM, Dave Peters <dave [at] terabitsystems> wrote:
> Hi all--
>
> Trying to test a VC with two EX4200s running 10.4R9.2. Very simple. I just can't get the backup (or line card) chassis to pass traffic. Pinging the gateway out of the routing engine or master works fine. Trying to ping through the backup/line card gives me nothing. The VC is recognized (per the below). Something simple I'm doing wrong, I know. Here's some output (and thanks for any help you might provide):
>
> root> show virtual-chassis
>
> Preprovisioned Virtual Chassis
> Virtual Chassis ID: a8ab.cf0b.66d6
> Mastership Neighbor List
> Member ID Status Serial No Model priority Role ID Interface
> 0 (FPC 0) Prsnt BP0209472119 ex4200-48t 129 Master* 1 vcp-0
> 1 vcp-1
> 1 (FPC 1) Prsnt FV0211137957 ex4200-48t 0 Linecard 0 vcp-0
> 0 vcp-1
>
>
> root> show virtual-chassis vc-port member 0
> fpc0:
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Interface Type Trunk Status Speed Neighbor
> or ID (mbps) ID Interface
> PIC / Port
> vcp-0 Dedicated 1 Up 32000 1 vcp-0
> vcp-1 Dedicated 2 Up 32000 1 vcp-1
>
> {master:0}
> root> show virtual-chassis vc-port member 1
> fpc1:
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Interface Type Trunk Status Speed Neighbor
> or ID (mbps) ID Interface
> PIC / Port
> vcp-0 Dedicated 1 Up 32000 0 vcp-0
> vcp-1 Dedicated 2 Up 32000 0 vcp-1
>
> {master:0}
>
>
>
>
>
> root> show configuration
> ## Last commit: 2012-02-02 09:38:58 UTC by root
> version 10.4R9.2;
> system {
> root-authentication {
> encrypted-password bJ/GddyoJuiU2; ## SECRET-DATA
> }
> services {
> web-management {
> http;
> }
> }
> syslog {
> user * {
> any emergency;
> }
> file messages {
> any notice;
> authorization info;
> }
> file interactive-commands {
> interactive-commands any;
> }
> }
> }
> interfaces {
> ge-0/0/0 {
> unit 0 {
> family ethernet-switching;
> }
> }
> ge-0/0/1 {
> unit 0 {
> family ethernet-switching;
> }
> }
> ge-0/0/2 {
> unit 0 {
> family ethernet-switching;
>
> *!truncated!*
>
> vlan {
> unit 0 {
> family inet {
> address 192.168.10.188/24;
> }
> }
> }
> }
> routing-options {
> static {
> route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 192.168.10.77;
> }
> }
> protocols {
> igmp-snooping {
> vlan all;
> }
> lldp {
> interface all;
> }
> lldp-med {
> interface all;
> }
> }
> ethernet-switching-options {
> storm-control {
> interface all;
> }
> }
> vlans {
> default {
> l3-interface vlan.0;
> }
> }
> poe {
> interface all;
> }
> virtual-chassis {
> preprovisioned;
> no-split-detection;
> member 1 {
> role line-card;
> serial-number FV0211137957;
> }
> member 0 {
> role routing-engine;
> serial-number BP0209472119;
> }
> }
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
|
Re: EX4200 VC Pity Me