Mailing List Archive: nsp: juniper

SRX recommended software

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

jtrooney at nexdlevel

Apr 2, 2012, 2:24 PM

Post #1 of 7 (859 views)
Permalink

SRX recommended software

I have a few SRX650's that are running 10.4R9.2 per the Juniper recommended
release page http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB21476
However,
I just have a few more which came with 11.2R4.3 on them. Just curious as to
what everyone is running on these, should I downgrade the new guys? or
upgrade old?

The workload on these boxes is nothing crazy, some IPSEC vpn, OSPF with
about 200 routes, firewalling, no cluster...etc.

Thanks for any input.

Jeff
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

brent at brentrjones

Apr 2, 2012, 2:40 PM

Post #2 of 7 (835 views)
Permalink

Re: SRX recommended software [In reply to]

On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Jeff Rooney <jtrooney [at] nexdlevel> wrote:

> I have a few SRX650's that are running 10.4R9.2 per the Juniper recommended
> release page
> http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB21476
> However,
> I just have a few more which came with 11.2R4.3 on them. Just curious as to
> what everyone is running on these, should I downgrade the new guys? or
> upgrade old?
>
> The workload on these boxes is nothing crazy, some IPSEC vpn, OSPF with
> about 200 routes, firewalling, no cluster...etc.
>
> Thanks for any input.
>
> Jeff
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>

I still run 11.1R3.5 on several sets of SRX1400s.
Then on branch units, I chose to stick with 10.4R6.5

I have to say, no major issues uncovered so far, same stuff as you, IPSec,
VPNs, OSPF...

--
Brent Jones
brent [at] brentrjones
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

paul at paulstewart

Apr 2, 2012, 3:13 PM

Post #3 of 7 (867 views)
Permalink

Re: SRX recommended software [In reply to]

We're pretty much on 10.4R8.5 back to 6.5 on most boxes.. no major issues.
I think we have a couple of boxes on 11.2 code due to features required that
weren't present in 10.4 tree.

-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp-bounces [at] puck
[mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Brent Jones
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 5:41 PM
To: Jeff Rooney
Cc: juniper-nsp [at] puck
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX recommended software

On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Jeff Rooney <jtrooney [at] nexdlevel> wrote:

> I have a few SRX650's that are running 10.4R9.2 per the Juniper
> recommended release page
> http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB21476
> However,
> I just have a few more which came with 11.2R4.3 on them. Just curious
> as to what everyone is running on these, should I downgrade the new
> guys? or upgrade old?
>
> The workload on these boxes is nothing crazy, some IPSEC vpn, OSPF
> with about 200 routes, firewalling, no cluster...etc.
>
> Thanks for any input.
>
> Jeff
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>

I still run 11.1R3.5 on several sets of SRX1400s.
Then on branch units, I chose to stick with 10.4R6.5

I have to say, no major issues uncovered so far, same stuff as you, IPSec,
VPNs, OSPF...

--
Brent Jones
brent [at] brentrjones
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

jtrooney at nexdlevel

Apr 2, 2012, 3:38 PM

Post #4 of 7 (838 views)
Permalink

Re: SRX recommended software [In reply to]

Thanks everyone, since I'm not looking for any features that are not
available in the 10.4r9.2 then I'll stick there for a bit...I'm fairly
conservative as well :)

Thanks for the input.

Jeff

On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Paul Stewart <paul [at] paulstewart> wrote:

> We're pretty much on 10.4R8.5 back to 6.5 on most boxes.. no major issues.
> I think we have a couple of boxes on 11.2 code due to features required
> that
> weren't present in 10.4 tree.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: juniper-nsp-bounces [at] puck
> [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Brent Jones
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 5:41 PM
> To: Jeff Rooney
> Cc: juniper-nsp [at] puck
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX recommended software
>
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Jeff Rooney <jtrooney [at] nexdlevel>
> wrote:
>
> > I have a few SRX650's that are running 10.4R9.2 per the Juniper
> > recommended release page
> > http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB21476
> > However,
> > I just have a few more which came with 11.2R4.3 on them. Just curious
> > as to what everyone is running on these, should I downgrade the new
> > guys? or upgrade old?
> >
> > The workload on these boxes is nothing crazy, some IPSEC vpn, OSPF
> > with about 200 routes, firewalling, no cluster...etc.
> >
> > Thanks for any input.
> >
> > Jeff
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >
>
> I still run 11.1R3.5 on several sets of SRX1400s.
> Then on branch units, I chose to stick with 10.4R6.5
>
> I have to say, no major issues uncovered so far, same stuff as you, IPSec,
> VPNs, OSPF...
>
> --
> Brent Jones
> brent [at] brentrjones
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

lists at kerfuffle

Apr 3, 2012, 12:53 AM

Post #5 of 7 (825 views)
Permalink

Re: SRX recommended software [In reply to]

On 02/04/2012 22:24, Jeff Rooney wrote:
> I have a few SRX650's that are running 10.4R9.2 per the Juniper recommended
> release page http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB21476
>
We are running a bunch of SRX650's on 11.1R3.5. This has thus far
proven to be the most stable, and was at the time of install the
recommended version by our Juniper SE.

--Lee
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

jpaulhamus at iu17

Apr 3, 2012, 9:12 AM

Post #6 of 7 (831 views)
Permalink

Re: SRX recommended software [In reply to]

I have a pair of 650's clustered running 11.4R1.6

In 11.4, the cluster can support GRE interfaces - which I needed. No issues with stability here.

-HTH

-----Original Message-----
From: Lee Hetherington [mailto:lists [at] kerfuffle]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 3:54 AM
To: Jeff Rooney
Cc: juniper-nsp [at] puck
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX recommended software

On 02/04/2012 22:24, Jeff Rooney wrote:
> I have a few SRX650's that are running 10.4R9.2 per the Juniper
> recommended release page
> http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB21476
>
We are running a bunch of SRX650's on 11.1R3.5. This has thus far proven to be the most stable, and was at the time of install the recommended version by our Juniper SE.

--Lee
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

ravi at cow

Apr 14, 2012, 3:51 PM

Post #7 of 7 (771 views)
Permalink

Re: SRX recommended software [In reply to]

On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 08:53:41AM +0100, Lee Hetherington wrote:
> On 02/04/2012 22:24, Jeff Rooney wrote:
> > I have a few SRX650's that are running 10.4R9.2 per the Juniper recommended
> > release page http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB21476
> >
> We are running a bunch of SRX650's on 11.1R3.5. This has thus far
> proven to be the most stable, and was at the time of install the
> recommended version by our Juniper SE.
>
> --Lee

I'm raising my hand for 11.1R3.5 as well.

Now if ISSU only worked in -branch in 11...

...a boy can dream.

-r

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads