jtrooney at nexdlevel
Apr 2, 2012, 3:38 PM
Post #4 of 7
Thanks everyone, since I'm not looking for any features that are not
available in the 10.4r9.2 then I'll stick there for a bit...I'm fairly
conservative as well :)
Thanks for the input.
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Paul Stewart <paul [at] paulstewart> wrote:
> We're pretty much on 10.4R8.5 back to 6.5 on most boxes.. no major issues.
> I think we have a couple of boxes on 11.2 code due to features required
> weren't present in 10.4 tree.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: juniper-nsp-bounces [at] puck
> [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Brent Jones
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 5:41 PM
> To: Jeff Rooney
> Cc: juniper-nsp [at] puck
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX recommended software
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Jeff Rooney <jtrooney [at] nexdlevel>
> > I have a few SRX650's that are running 10.4R9.2 per the Juniper
> > recommended release page
> > http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB21476
> > However,
> > I just have a few more which came with 11.2R4.3 on them. Just curious
> > as to what everyone is running on these, should I downgrade the new
> > guys? or upgrade old?
> > The workload on these boxes is nothing crazy, some IPSEC vpn, OSPF
> > with about 200 routes, firewalling, no cluster...etc.
> > Thanks for any input.
> > Jeff
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> I still run 11.1R3.5 on several sets of SRX1400s.
> Then on branch units, I chose to stick with 10.4R6.5
> I have to say, no major issues uncovered so far, same stuff as you, IPSec,
> VPNs, OSPF...
> Brent Jones
> brent [at] brentrjones
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp [at] puck