Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 12 Feb 2012 11:30:44 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg * Sebastian Wiesinger <juniper-nsp@ml.karotte.org> [2012-01-24 22:23]: > Hi, > > has anyone working QinQ between Cisco and Juniper running over VPLS 10 Feb 2012 06:39:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33375 Hi! I've been troubleshooting today MTU issues on my new MX80 router (actually MX5) with Junos 11.4R1.14. I have noticed that MTU of interfaces diffe 09 Feb 2012 16:29:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33374 Just wanted to update my posting - upgraded to 11.2R5.4 and this issue seems to have disappeared. I am hopeful this release doesn't introduce a serie 09 Feb 2012 12:15:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33373 Has anyone got caught by this PR? We just deployed a pair of MX10's for a customer. One of them (with the greater amount of traffic so far) is showi 09 Feb 2012 11:42:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33372 Yep, seemed to work fine in the SRX... I didn't do a lot of testing, but LLDP neighbors came up, and there was input/output traffic... so I would ca 09 Feb 2012 08:02:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33370 On Feb 9, 2012, at 7:51 PM, bruno wrote: > i have search juniper RTBH on internet. i can't find it. is there anyone have rtbh doc ? You'd be better 09 Feb 2012 04:54:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33366 hello guys, i have search juniper RTBH on internet. i can't find it. is there anyone have rtbh doc ? ------------------ Best Regards, Bruno ______ 09 Feb 2012 04:51:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33365 LinkedIn ------------ Delian Delchev ha solicitado añadirte como contacto en LinkedIn: ------------------------------------------ Me gus 09 Feb 2012 04:05:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33360 Hi, My situation is IPv6 on SRX platform in flow mode. Documentation on Selective Stateless Packet-Based Services suggests support for both IPv4 an 08 Feb 2012 18:51:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33357 Ido, Sorry for the delay in getting back to this… I think I understand what you're trying to accomplish, but just a couple more questions… I'm assu 08 Feb 2012 18:16:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33356 I can test that.... probably in a few days. On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Jerry Jones <jjones@danrj.com> wrote: > I would be inerested if anyone 08 Feb 2012 15:37:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33354 I would be inerested if anyone has used these in an SRX also. On Feb 8, 2012, at 2:14 PM, Dave hartzell wrote: Hello, I have been trying to get a 08 Feb 2012 15:33:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33355 On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 07:44:10AM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote: > > So as far as things stand, SCB-E not deployable before mid 2012 > earliest if (an 08 Feb 2012 15:14:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33353 Hello, I have been trying to get a RAD Data Communications Mirici-155 SFP to work in an MX-series box. The Mirici-155 is an SFP-compatible OC-3 plug 08 Feb 2012 13:14:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33352 Hi, Same results on my side... Just a precision to be sure that there is no mis-understanding : it's not triggered by SCB-E, it is a software issue 08 Feb 2012 03:10:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33343 On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 01:23:11AM +0000, OBrien, Will wrote: > Anyone running the SCB-E? I've got a stack of them with a set of fresh > MX480s ready 07 Feb 2012 22:44:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33333 Anyone running the SCB-E? I've got a stack of them with a set of fresh MX480s ready to roll out. I'm curious what code your running. These will be pai 07 Feb 2012 17:23:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33332 [Apologies if you've already seen this announcement in other forums.] We've just posted the 2011 Worldwide Infrastructure Security Report for downloa 07 Feb 2012 17:00:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33331 Proxy ARP can be useful while sorting out a broken (misconfigured) network, but can also cause you a lot of grief. If the network is configured correc 07 Feb 2012 16:10:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33330 Hello Forgot to post the config (was using a very simple setup). The setup CORE1,2,3 are juniper routers while PE1 & PE2 are cisco. Topology: (PE1 07 Feb 2012 14:05:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33328 On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:23 AM, Alex Arseniev <alex.arseniev@gmail.com> wrote: > Did you check what MACs are used in 1st, 2nd and 3rd time? Specifical 07 Feb 2012 02:38:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33320 Did you check what MACs are used in 1st, 2nd and 3rd time? Specifically MAC OUIs. I suspect this is a side effect of having C-J in the same broadcast 07 Feb 2012 02:23:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33319 On Tuesday, February 07, 2012 03:57:55 AM biwa net wrote: > Forgot to add we are running MX80 on Junos 11.2 Can you send a sample topology and your 07 Feb 2012 02:18:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33318 Dear List, we are currently evaluating different switch vendors for our network. I am mainly interested in IPv6 "Security Features" like DHCPv6 Snoo 07 Feb 2012 01:12:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33317 Try the command: no-gratuitous-arp-request > > Basically we migrate from a Cisco to a Juniper MX80, and since there > > has been some issues, mainly 06 Feb 2012 23:20:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33316