Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 12 Feb 2012 15:48:00 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg * Sebastian Wiesinger <juniper-nsp@ml.karotte.org> [2012-01-24 22:23]: > Hi, > > has anyone working QinQ between Cisco and Juniper running over VPLS 10 Feb 2012 06:39:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33375 Hi! I've been troubleshooting today MTU issues on my new MX80 router (actually MX5) with Junos 11.4R1.14. I have noticed that MTU of interfaces diffe 09 Feb 2012 16:29:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33374 Just wanted to update my posting - upgraded to 11.2R5.4 and this issue seems to have disappeared. I am hopeful this release doesn't introduce a serie 09 Feb 2012 12:15:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33373 Has anyone got caught by this PR? We just deployed a pair of MX10's for a customer. One of them (with the greater amount of traffic so far) is showi 09 Feb 2012 11:42:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33372 Yep, seemed to work fine in the SRX... I didn't do a lot of testing, but LLDP neighbors came up, and there was input/output traffic... so I would ca 09 Feb 2012 08:02:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33370 On Feb 9, 2012, at 7:51 PM, bruno wrote: > i have search juniper RTBH on internet. i can't find it. is there anyone have rtbh doc ? You'd be better 09 Feb 2012 04:54:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33366 hello guys, i have search juniper RTBH on internet. i can't find it. is there anyone have rtbh doc ? ------------------ Best Regards, Bruno ______ 09 Feb 2012 04:51:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33365 LinkedIn ------------ Delian Delchev ha solicitado añadirte como contacto en LinkedIn: ------------------------------------------ Me gus 09 Feb 2012 04:05:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33360 Hi, My situation is IPv6 on SRX platform in flow mode. Documentation on Selective Stateless Packet-Based Services suggests support for both IPv4 an 08 Feb 2012 18:51:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33357 Ido, Sorry for the delay in getting back to this… I think I understand what you're trying to accomplish, but just a couple more questions… I'm assu 08 Feb 2012 18:16:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33356 I can test that.... probably in a few days. On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Jerry Jones <jjones@danrj.com> wrote: > I would be inerested if anyone 08 Feb 2012 15:37:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33354 I would be inerested if anyone has used these in an SRX also. On Feb 8, 2012, at 2:14 PM, Dave hartzell wrote: Hello, I have been trying to get a 08 Feb 2012 15:33:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33355 On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 07:44:10AM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote: > > So as far as things stand, SCB-E not deployable before mid 2012 > earliest if (an 08 Feb 2012 15:14:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33353 Hello, I have been trying to get a RAD Data Communications Mirici-155 SFP to work in an MX-series box. The Mirici-155 is an SFP-compatible OC-3 plug 08 Feb 2012 13:14:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33352 Hi, Same results on my side... Just a precision to be sure that there is no mis-understanding : it's not triggered by SCB-E, it is a software issue 08 Feb 2012 03:10:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33343 On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 01:23:11AM +0000, OBrien, Will wrote: > Anyone running the SCB-E? I've got a stack of them with a set of fresh > MX480s ready 07 Feb 2012 22:44:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33333 Anyone running the SCB-E? I've got a stack of them with a set of fresh MX480s ready to roll out. I'm curious what code your running. These will be pai 07 Feb 2012 17:23:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33332 [Apologies if you've already seen this announcement in other forums.] We've just posted the 2011 Worldwide Infrastructure Security Report for downloa 07 Feb 2012 17:00:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33331 Proxy ARP can be useful while sorting out a broken (misconfigured) network, but can also cause you a lot of grief. If the network is configured correc 07 Feb 2012 16:10:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33330 Hello Forgot to post the config (was using a very simple setup). The setup CORE1,2,3 are juniper routers while PE1 & PE2 are cisco. Topology: (PE1 07 Feb 2012 14:05:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33328 On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:23 AM, Alex Arseniev <alex.arseniev@gmail.com> wrote: > Did you check what MACs are used in 1st, 2nd and 3rd time? Specifical 07 Feb 2012 02:38:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33320 Did you check what MACs are used in 1st, 2nd and 3rd time? Specifically MAC OUIs. I suspect this is a side effect of having C-J in the same broadcast 07 Feb 2012 02:23:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33319 On Tuesday, February 07, 2012 03:57:55 AM biwa net wrote: > Forgot to add we are running MX80 on Junos 11.2 Can you send a sample topology and your 07 Feb 2012 02:18:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33318 Dear List, we are currently evaluating different switch vendors for our network. I am mainly interested in IPv6 "Security Features" like DHCPv6 Snoo 07 Feb 2012 01:12:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33317 Try the command: no-gratuitous-arp-request > > Basically we migrate from a Cisco to a Juniper MX80, and since there > > has been some issues, mainly 06 Feb 2012 23:20:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33316 Hi, Please share the configuration... BR// On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:32 AM, Victor Lyapunov <victor.lyapunov@gmail.com>wrote: > Hello All > > I hav 06 Feb 2012 19:18:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33315 Hello All I have been trying to perform a simple to test for RSVP-TE testing according to RFC4206. Specifically my test topology is the following PE 06 Feb 2012 14:02:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33314 Forgot to add we are running MX80 on Junos 11.2 On 6 February 2012 19:56, biwa net <biwa2go@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Guys > We are experiencing some i 06 Feb 2012 11:57:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33313 Hi Guys We are experiencing some issues in one of our client sites, Basically we migrate from a Cisco to a Juniper MX80, and since there has been som 06 Feb 2012 11:56:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33312 Hello. I could be wrong, but I think that on M-series router you can't configure DHCP server. In datasheets is only information about DHCP relay opti 05 Feb 2012 12:30:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33309 Hello Again, Just came across a KB article on Juniper KB (as per the highlighted part I think its not do able except if you create separate roles and 05 Feb 2012 04:28:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33307 On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 12:55:06PM +0100, Farid Bouzemarene wrote: > Hi , > Not directly but using microsoft IAS or NPS service ( acting as a radius s 05 Feb 2012 04:15:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33306 On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 02:53:02PM +0300, Rehan Rafi Khan wrote: Hello, > Are you looking this for network connect session? For network connect you 05 Feb 2012 04:15:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33305 Hi , Not directly but using microsoft IAS or NPS service ( acting as a radius server ) , it is possible !!! Regards ----- Message d'origine ----- 05 Feb 2012 03:55:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33308 Hello Maciej, Are you looking this for network connect session? For network connect you need to define pool of addresses, else I believe it will be n 05 Feb 2012 03:53:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33304 On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 07:11:25PM -0800, Jonathan Lassoff wrote: > On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Barny Sanchez <barnys@juniper.net> wrote: > > the 05 Feb 2012 03:39:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33303 Yes, connectivity across the lt (pings from one side to the other) is working, Ido -----Original Message----- From: juniper-nsp-bounces@puck.nether. 05 Feb 2012 02:16:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33301 Hi Stacy, Our topology is LNS --- MX vrf A --- logical tunnel --- MX vrf B --- logical tunnel --- MX inet.0 What we're trying to accomplish is pre 05 Feb 2012 02:16:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33302 On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Barny Sanchez <barnys@juniper.net> wrote: > the suggestion from Jof is clever but it doesn't scale. I am afraid that y 04 Feb 2012 19:11:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33300 the suggestion from Jof is clever but it doesn't scale. I am afraid that you would require of an external device to help you accomplish this, such as 04 Feb 2012 18:42:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33299 On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Maciej Jan Broniarz <gausus@gausus.net> wrote: > I have a bunch of users using SSL VPN to Juniper SA box. Is there a w 04 Feb 2012 17:21:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33298 Have you verified connectivity across the lt? Will O'Brien On Feb 4, 2012, at 2:21 PM, "Amos Rosenboim" <amos@oasis-tech.net> wrote: > Hi All, > > 04 Feb 2012 17:11:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33297 Hi, I have a bunch of users using SSL VPN to Juniper SA box. Is there a way to "give" each user the same static ip that will always be given to that 04 Feb 2012 15:46:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33296 Hi Amos, I'm not sure I completely understand what you're trying to accomplish. Could you give us an example topology diagram? Thanks, --Stacy On F 04 Feb 2012 13:28:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33295 Hi All, I have a router with two VRFs. I need to apply FBF on traffic flowing between the two VRFs so I created a logical tunnel that connects the tw 04 Feb 2012 12:20:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33294 My environment is unique as I have a financial customer and there should be 0 packet loss. The number of pps at peak times goes up to 80 000 and the s 04 Feb 2012 05:43:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33290 We are running a J2320 with NAT/Firewall and serve about 90-150 clients without breaking a sweat, mind this is an converted SSG320M with 1G CF / 2GB R 04 Feb 2012 02:56:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33289 Hi everyone, I was wondering if any of you could give me any real world stats on stateless NAT performance (IMIX traffic) on the J2320s. Since state 03 Feb 2012 07:58:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33281 hi, don't know too much about M series, in E320 configuration should like: ip dhcp-local unique-client-ids ip dhcp-local pool wlanpool network 10.1 03 Feb 2012 00:45:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33280 Hi, We are trying to configure JUNIPER M-Series with dhcp-local-server without any good results. Basically we are configuring: set system services 02 Feb 2012 17:15:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33279 Thanks to Stacy and Hendri, I got this to work perfectly! This really helped. Since it does not hurt to have more examples (as they are non-existe 02 Feb 2012 14:54:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33278 Srx's, assuming you're running in flow mode will not load balance as of today. The forwarding table will show two routes, but it will only pick one. 02 Feb 2012 09:11:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33277 It's working just the like documentation says. It's per-prefix load-balancing. If you want per-flow you need to modify the FIB via an export policy. 02 Feb 2012 09:08:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33276 I have connected a switch juniper EX4500 with switch cisco 3550 by Giga Link in mode trunk but the mac-addresses in switch juniper are not known by t 02 Feb 2012 09:06:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33275 Hello: I'm looking for some insight on the load balancing behavior that Junos uses by default. We are certifying our Junos platform CE routers (S 02 Feb 2012 09:01:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33274 > > However, I also need to accept OSPF and BGP. > > > > I dont want to allow BGP on ge-1/0/0. This should be done at lo0. > > > > But If I accept BGP 01 Feb 2012 23:55:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33273 > However, I also need to accept OSPF and BGP. > > I dont want to allow BGP on ge-1/0/0. This should be done at lo0. > > But If I accept BGP on ge-1 01 Feb 2012 23:38:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33272 On (2012-02-01 20:07 +0100), Jonas Björklund wrote: > Is it possible to have different rules for incomning interface and lo0? In FW filter match 'in 01 Feb 2012 11:26:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33271 >> [edit firewall family inet filter admin-access] >> user@host# show >> term ssh-access { >> from { >> source-address { >> 10.1. 01 Feb 2012 11:07:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33270 Hi Clarke , I believe it will work if you just slightly configured interface-routes on the vrf itself and combine it with fbf using rib-group on the 01 Feb 2012 10:45:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33269 Hi Clarke, 1) The rib group must be defined under the main instance [edit routing-options rib-groups] . 2) The import-rib line in the rib group defin 01 Feb 2012 10:23:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33268 On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Paul Stewart <paul@paulstewart.org> wrote: > Has anyone seen these errors before and can shed some light on whether t 01 Feb 2012 09:19:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33267 I've never seen those particular errors but they look like fabric errors. Have you checked your pfe counters and such? 2012/2/1 Paul Stewart <paul@p 01 Feb 2012 09:14:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33266 Has anyone seen these errors before and can shed some light on whether they are serious or not? Feb 1 06:29:19 dis1.bridgenorth1 tfeb0 MQ(0): pi 01 Feb 2012 08:53:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33265 Den 01.02.2012 08:26, skrev sthaug@nethelp.no: >>> Yup.. our hindsight would have been to continue deploying >>> E/ERX ;) >> While we don't use those, 01 Feb 2012 06:55:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33264 Good point re: software downgrade - I had to do one on an ERX late last year and what a horrific experience that was.... -----Original Message----- F 01 Feb 2012 04:44:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33263 On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Pierre-Yves Maunier <j-nsp@maunier.org> wrote: > 2012/1/23 pkc mls <pkc_mls@yahoo.fr> > You can activate packet based 31 Jan 2012 23:41:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33262 > > Yup.. our hindsight would have been to continue deploying > > E/ERX ;) > > While we don't use those, I certainly agree that they sound > like a 31 Jan 2012 23:26:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33261 I am still trying to wrap my head around FBF, and I am stuck on how to achieve a Cisco-like PBR forcing a packet that matches a set of conditions to 31 Jan 2012 15:16:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33259 On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 06:52:19 PM Paul Stewart wrote: > Yup.. our hindsight would have been to continue deploying > E/ERX ;) While we don't u 31 Jan 2012 07:26:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33260 Yup.. our hindsight would have been to continue deploying E/ERX ;) Paul -----Original Message----- From: Mark Tinka [mailto:mtinka@globaltransit.net 31 Jan 2012 02:52:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33257 On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 06:26:44 PM Mark Tinka wrote: > The MX is nowhere near ready to run as BRAS. But like > you, we decided to migrate to it 31 Jan 2012 02:27:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33256 On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 06:12:02 PM Paul Stewart wrote: > One incredible frustration we're going through lately on > the MX boxes is the BRAS fu 31 Jan 2012 02:26:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33255 Pls refer the below appnote   http://www.juniper.net/us/en/local/pdf/app-notes/3500192-en.pdf   see the section  ________________________________ 31 Jan 2012 02:16:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33254 One incredible frustration we're going through lately on the MX boxes is the BRAS function as Mark mentioned briefly ..... we're up to "bleeding edge" 31 Jan 2012 02:12:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33253 On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 12:32:26 AM James Jones wrote: > I am just curious what issues you guys are having with > the junos releases? Run throu 31 Jan 2012 00:04:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33252 Hi Lukasz, J-Series only needs a license to download signature updates for IDP - in order to stop fragmentation, all you need to do is create a secur 30 Jan 2012 15:58:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33251 that only took...about 5 years ? sweet, juniperdude. Chris Kawchuk [juniperdude@gmail.com] wrote: > Just noticed this today - Seems JNPR has filled o 30 Jan 2012 14:56:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33250 Hello Jonas, You should use the new template for securing your router, use this book. http://www.juniper.net/us/en/community/junos/training-certif 30 Jan 2012 12:11:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33249 Hi Daniel, just an update on this. The PR now has a workaround outlined and it can be implemented via a script. You mentioned our "beta" PR search, 30 Jan 2012 10:45:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33248 On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, Stacy W. Smith wrote: > > On Jan 30, 2012, at 1:05 AM, Per Granath wrote: > >>> Im trying a basic filer to deny traffic to lo0. 30 Jan 2012 09:59:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33247 I am just curious what issues you guys are having with the junos releases? I am currently not having issues with any of my Juniper kit. It would be in 30 Jan 2012 08:32:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33246 On Jan 30, 2012, at 1:05 AM, Per Granath wrote: >> Im trying a basic filer to deny traffic to lo0. >> SSH, OSPF and ICMP is allowed. >> >> It doesnt 30 Jan 2012 06:34:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33245 On Monday, January 30, 2012 07:31:39 PM Derick Winkworth wrote: > R9 will be good... we hope. That's what we always say starting from R4, and yet h 30 Jan 2012 03:39:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33244 10.4R9?  This makes me very happy...  I thought they were going to stop at R8.  I think they really need/want a golden release for the MX and R8 was s 30 Jan 2012 03:31:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33243 Hey Chris.... yeah, that just showed up about 2 weeks ago (at least that's when I noticed it). Since JTAC isn't supposed to provide you with recommen 30 Jan 2012 03:12:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33242 Just noticed this today - Seems JNPR has filled out the recommended release JunOS matrix for all the products now (incl M, T, MX, QFX) http://kb.juni 30 Jan 2012 00:53:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33241 LinkedIn ------------ Maurice Gil Cruz ha solicitado añadirte como contacto en LinkedIn: ------------------------------------------ Me g 30 Jan 2012 00:34:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33240 > Im trying a basic filer to deny traffic to lo0. > SSH, OSPF and ICMP is allowed. > > It doesnt work, it allows all traffic. > > Same filter work o 30 Jan 2012 00:05:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33239 Hello, Im trying a basic filer to deny traffic to lo0. SSH, OSPF and ICMP is allowed. It doesnt work, it allows all traffic. Same filter work on a 29 Jan 2012 21:50:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33238 We use RSVP exclusively in our business access and core networks due to markets wanting the 50ms protection for services like cell backhaul and CES. 27 Jan 2012 20:06:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33236 Hi Chuck Thanks for your help and answers. Yes I had two different questions: 1. Do I need to create L2 VLANs for L3-dot1q interfaces in Junos-EX45 27 Jan 2012 19:34:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33235 On Saturday, January 28, 2012 07:59:36 AM Keegan Holley wrote: > Makes sense. I'm still straddling the line between large > enterprise and small se 27 Jan 2012 18:56:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33234 Correcting myself, now that I look at your config more closely, it is not a L2 VLAN but rather a L3 VLAN config. I don't think you can run MSTP with 27 Jan 2012 16:58:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33233 are there any limitations with older REs and 10.4 or 11.x ? newer 10.4 images seem to suggest some limitations but I don't have a screenshot anymore, 27 Jan 2012 16:57:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33232 2012/1/26 Mark Tinka <mtinka@globaltransit.net>: > On Friday, January 27, 2012 02:30:35 AM Keegan Holley wrote: > >> I agree... I think. MPLS has a be 27 Jan 2012 15:59:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33231 On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Shane Short <shane@short.id.au> wrote: > I'm currently trying to figure out how I can deploy either PLVAN or some ki 27 Jan 2012 15:34:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33230 Hi There, Currently I'm trying to configure private vlans on EX 4200. Requirement to configure private vlans accross switches is to have junos 10.4R1, 27 Jan 2012 11:24:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33229 Hi Guys, I'm currently trying to figure out how I can deploy either PLVAN or some kind of local ethernet isolation on my network. I currently have a b 27 Jan 2012 09:37:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33228 Hi all, Does anyone use jumbo frames on srx branch ? Is the NAT still available when jumbo frames are configured ? thanks. ________________________ 27 Jan 2012 08:51:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/33227