aaronh at bind
Aug 8, 2012, 8:27 AM
Post #5 of 6
Just to clear the dead air...
Re: Re: Any experience with OSPFv3 for IPv4?
[In reply to]
I am using OSFPv2 for IPv4 uni and OSPFv3 for IPv6 uni.
I have found that all implementations which I have seen/been a part of/consulted for/advised, if using OSPF for their IGP in any way, do this.
On top of that, in most cases, this is in combination with iBGP.. e.g. Loopbacks and connecteds in OSPF(v2/3-4/6) and iBGP loop to loop full mesh + RRs. This is the common and best of both worlds that I see.
While I know this is not the answer to your question, I imagine you are going to see a bunch of +1s and a few 'why not use ISIS's which may essentially answer the question as "no". :)
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 05:20:29PM +0200, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
> Are there any working implementations?
> Best Regards,
> Janos Mohacsi
> Head of HBONE+ project
> Network Engineer, Director Network and Multimedia
> NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY
> Co-chair of Hungarian IPv6 Forum
> Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F 4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2012, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> >RFC5838, Support of Address Families in OSPFv3, defines how OSPFv3
> >can support IPv4 as well as IPv6.
> >Does anybody have practical experience with this?
> >If so, is it something to recommend?
> >[Context: draft-ietf-v6ops-icp-guidance]
> > Brian Carpenter
aaronh [at] bind
Key fingerprint = AD 67 37 60 7D 73 C5 B7 33 18 3F 36 C3 1C C6 B8