
frnkblk at iname
Mar 2, 2012, 10:03 PM
Post #4 of 4
(536 views)
Permalink
|
It's been mostly broken since December 5 and my notes to my contact at their NOC go unanswered. Here's this year's stats: Frank -----Original Message----- From: ipv6-ops-bounces+frnkblk=iname.com [at] lists [mailto:ipv6-ops-bounces+frnkblk=iname.com [at] lists] On Behalf Of Mark Kamichoff Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 8:21 AM To: Ryan Rawdon Cc: ipv6-ops [at] lists Subject: Re: ipv6.cnn.com serving 0B response On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:32:07AM -0500, Ryan Rawdon wrote: > <http://ipv6.cnn.com> http://ipv6.cnn.com > > Currently serving a 0B response to any request it looks like - anyone > know if they are abandoning ipv6.cnn.com or if this is transient > brokenness (that they may not be aware of)? I haven't even been able to connect to port 80 at all since early December, 2011 from some locations. I figured they had some IPv6 project that fizzled and nobody cares anymore. % traceroute6 -I -q1 ipv6.cnn.com. [...] 12 vl-80.car2.washington1.level3.net (2001:1900:15:7::4) 260.305 ms 13 vl-4040.car1.atlanta2.level3.net (2001:1900:4:1::b1) 27.387 ms 14 vl-51.car1.atlanta1.level3.net (2001:1900:1c:1::5) 27.419 ms 15 * 16 * 17 * 18 * There have been a few companies that this has happened to in the past, Netflix being one that stands out in my mind. It's unfortunate. - Mark -- Mark Kamichoff <mailto:prox [at] prolixium> prox [at] prolixium <http://www.prolixium.com/> http://www.prolixium.com/
|