juan.cerezo at bt
Feb 14, 2012, 3:10 AM
RE: Requested RIPE database object changes
[In reply to]
It was a mistake of our ops people trying to create a replica of the 2002::/16 with origin AS8903 to pass the filter of the ipv6 transit provider.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pim [at] hosted [mailto:pim [at] hosted] On Behalf Of Pim
> van Pelt
> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 11:59 AM
> To: ipv6-ops [at] lists; Cerezo Martin,JP,Juan,DMK2 R
> Subject: Re: Requested RIPE database object changes
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:03 AM, RIPE Database Notifications
> <unread [at] ripe> wrote:
> > This is to notify you that some objects in which you are referenced
> > as a maintainer were requested to be changed, but *failed* the
> > proper authorisation for any of the referenced maintainers.
> Hoi Juan!
> The 2002::/16 object is currently maintained by the people in
> TOSE1-RIPE. May I ask what were you trying to accomplish by re-owning
> the object to BTTEL-MNT ?
> Pim van Pelt <pim [at] ipng>
> PBVP1-RIPE - http://www.ipng.nl/