tjc at ecs
Aug 9, 2011, 2:30 AM
Post #3 of 5
(595 views)
Permalink
|
On 9 Aug 2011, at 08:15, Andrew Yourtchenko wrote:
> hi Fernando,
>
> curious - why not use this forum ?
>
> IMO these topics (and especially any mitigations/workarounds) would
> have a direct operational impact, so the discussions would very much
> benefit of early involvement of the ops folks…
I agree. I was only yesterday trying to cut down on the number of lists I'm on. I think this one (ipv6-ops) is very good and an ideal place to raise such security issues. If there's protocol issues to be fixed, then the IETF 6man list is appropriate too.
Tim
> cheers,
> andrew
>
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Fernando Gont <fernando [at] gont> wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> We have created the "IPv6 Hackers" mailing-list for discussion of IPv6
>> security issues and low-level issues. The charter of the list is:
>>
>> ---- cut here ----
>> This list was created for the discussion of IPv6 security issues and
>> low/packet-level issues related to the IPv6 protocols. It is meant to
>> provide forum for IPv6 security researchers and IPv6 networking
>> professionals to discuss low-level IPv6 networking and security issues
>> that could eventually lead to advances and improvements in the area of
>> IPv6 security and IPv6 networking. Discussion of unrelated networking or
>> security topics are considered "off topic". Subscription to the list is
>> open to the community.
>> ---- cut here ----
>>
>> You can subscribe to the mailing-list here:
>> http://lists.si6networks.com/listinfo/ipv6hackers/
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Best regards,
>> --
>> Fernando Gont
>> e-mail: fernando [at] gont || fgont [at] acm
>> PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1
>>
>>
>>
>>
|
