<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>nsp | ipv6</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>12 Feb  2012 10:57:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>(Loose) uRPF vs. non-announced IXP space</title>
<description>Hi, this problem is based on a local configuration, but I think the problem is generic enough to mandate a discussion. None of the parties shown here</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 03:36:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33338</link>
</item><item>
<title>IPv6 Matrix results for Dec 2011</title>
<description>(apologies for cross-posting) Dear all, please find below my latest presentations for the IPv6 Matrix project. The latest one is the one I was going</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 03:12:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33337</link>
</item><item>
<title>Skype &amp;amp; IPv6</title>
<description>When searching for &amp;quot;skype ipv6&amp;quot; on Google, the first hit is: http://ipv6.com/articles/voip/VOIP-IPV6.htm That page displays basically says: VoIP is</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 01:39:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33334</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ipv6-ops Digest, Vol 82, Issue 17</title>
<description>K C, first of all, I&amp;#039;m glad you&amp;#039;re doing this, and am looking forward to your data and findings. I agree with you that --from my view, anyway--most v6</description>
<pubDate>22 Jan  2012 05:17:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33109</link>
</item><item>
<title>IPv6 survey from CAIDA</title>
<description>hello kind 6ops-folk,                               we&amp;#039;re trying to do some quantitative modeling of</description>
<pubDate>21 Jan  2012 15:37:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33105</link>
</item><item>
<title>ip6tables and multiple possible source addresses</title>
<description>Someone must have already figured this out; I&amp;#039;m feeling &amp;quot;virtual Monday&amp;quot; pretty bad right now :-( With IPv6 a host can have &amp;quot;lots&amp;quot; (more than 1) of</description>
<pubDate>17 Jan  2012 17:04:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33032</link>
</item><item>
<title>World IPv6 Launch, June 6th 2012</title>
<description>FYI, http://www.worldipv6launch.org/press/20120117-2/  World IPv6 Launch Solidifies Global Support for New Internet Protocol Top websites, Internet</description>
<pubDate>17 Jan  2012 06:42:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33017</link>
</item><item>
<title>Netgroup support of ipv6 in Solaris/Linux</title>
<description>So far, it appears that ipv6 breaks netgroups in both Solaris and Linux. Has anyone run into this or have a solution? Basically if two machines both</description>
<pubDate>15 Jan  2012 13:50:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32984</link>
</item><item>
<title>Linux Temporary Address - Premature expiry</title>
<description>Hello, I don&amp;#039;t know if anyone (except me) tries to use IPv6 temporary addresses (Privacy Extensions) on Linux. I tried to use them but noticed that</description>
<pubDate>13 Jan  2012 07:04:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32963</link>
</item><item>
<title>problem with Deutsche Telekom</title>
<description>Hi, since the 8 in morning (gmt+1) a lot of telekom-services are not reachable via ipv6. e.g. www.t-online.de hast AAAA records, I can ping them, b</description>
<pubDate>11 Jan  2012 05:37:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32933</link>
</item><item>
<title>Small cisco boxes doing IPv6?</title>
<description>Hi Guys, If somebody from Cisco reads this, feel free to contact me off list, but maybe somebody else has something running and can confirm this as w</description>
<pubDate>10 Jan  2012 07:19:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32921</link>
</item><item>
<title>Android IPv6-only Functionality -- Call for help</title>
<description>Hi, Now that IPv6 is a supported 3G interface protocol for the Google Nexus S phone, i have begun the process of finding broken apps and trying to ge</description>
<pubDate>09 Jan  2012 21:57:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32908</link>
</item><item>
<title>[FIXED] http://www.amis.net/ vs. 6to4</title>
<description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;quot;IS&amp;quot; == Ivan Shmakov &amp;lt;oneingray@gmail.com&amp;gt; writes: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Jeroen Massar &amp;lt;jeroen@unfix.org&amp;gt; writes: […]  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; A traceroute (see http://www.sixxs</description>
<pubDate>03 Jan  2012 22:26:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32831</link>
</item><item>
<title>http://www.amis.net/ vs. 6to4</title>
<description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Brian E Carpenter &amp;lt;brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com&amp;gt; writes: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; On 2011-12-31 16:47, Ivan Shmakov wrote: […]  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; As the traceroutes above star</description>
<pubDate>01 Jan  2012 10:34:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32798</link>
</item><item>
<title>SixXS vs. 6to4</title>
<description>It looks like there&amp;#039;s a connectivity problem in between the     SixXS.net and 6to4 worlds. Please consider, e. g.: $ traceroute6 -s 2002:bc78:XX</description>
<pubDate>30 Dec  2011 19:47:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32792</link>
</item><item>
<title>AUTO: Ramesh Yr1 is out of the office (returning 12/30/2011)</title>
<description>I am out of the office until 12/30/2011. I would be on vacation from Dec26,2011 to Dec30,2011.I will be back to office on 2nd Jan 2012.I will be avai</description>
<pubDate>27 Dec  2011 03:01:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32739</link>
</item><item>
<title>yum IPv6 repos</title>
<description>I thought I&amp;#039;d try to setup an IPv6 only network this weekend and noticed many/most yum repos and mirrors are not IPv6-enabled. Just wondering what</description>
<pubDate>26 Dec  2011 15:32:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32722</link>
</item><item>
<title>IPv6 Source Address Selection on Mac OS X Lion</title>
<description>Hi there, I like to share with you an interesting problem. Maybe someone on this mailinglist has already found a solution to this. I googled for hour</description>
<pubDate>14 Dec  2011 06:00:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32585</link>
</item><item>
<title>cox business</title>
<description>Is there anyone here from COX Business I could chat with briefly about turning up IPv6 with 22773? - Jared</description>
<pubDate>13 Dec  2011 13:47:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32582</link>
</item><item>
<title>IPv6-capable load balancers</title>
<description>Anyone have any experience with Kemp Networks or A10 Networks&amp;#039; load balancers, specifically their IPv6-capabilities? I&amp;#039;ve been waiting for Coyote Poi</description>
<pubDate>06 Dec  2011 17:41:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32554</link>
</item><item>
<title>Broken clients performing neigh-adv DoS</title>
<description>All, We&amp;#039;ve seen this several times before, and just had a recurrence. It pegged the CPU of our router to 100% until I blocked it. The machines seem</description>
<pubDate>05 Dec  2011 11:36:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32540</link>
</item><item>
<title>Enterprise/governmental IPv6 deployment experiences?</title>
<description>Hi all. We&amp;#039;ve begun planning the 3rd IPv6 Forum Norway conference, which will be held the 24th and 25th of April next year in Oslo. In order to not o</description>
<pubDate>28 Nov  2011 07:17:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32480</link>
</item><item>
<title>mapping public to private IPv6 networks when firewalling</title>
<description>The SOP for firewalling in IPv4 is to use private (RFC 1918) networks and map external public networks 1:1 to them. The idea is that defaults to unrea</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2011 13:23:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32448</link>
</item><item>
<title>Transferring /8 networks between the RIRs</title>
<description>Hi, New here, be kind please. I was wondering if there has been any thoughts or consideration to transfer unassigned /8 networks between the Regiona</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2011 04:14:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32442</link>
</item><item>
<title>Internet transparency (Re: Geoff on IPv4 Exhaustion)</title>
<description>On 2011-11-21 20:22, Doug Barton wrote: &amp;gt; On 11/20/2011 23:13, Matija Grabnar wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Well &amp;quot;the users don&amp;#039;t want end-to-end&amp;quot; is an appeal to authori</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2011 12:27:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32430</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

