<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>nsp | ipv6</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>12 Feb  2012 16:48:59 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>(Loose) uRPF vs. non-announced IXP space</title>
<description>Hi, this problem is based on a local configuration, but I think the problem is generic enough to mandate a discussion. None of the parties shown here</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 03:36:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33338</link>
</item><item>
<title>IPv6 Matrix results for Dec 2011</title>
<description>(apologies for cross-posting) Dear all, please find below my latest presentations for the IPv6 Matrix project. The latest one is the one I was going</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 03:12:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33337</link>
</item><item>
<title>Skype &amp;amp; IPv6</title>
<description>When searching for &amp;quot;skype ipv6&amp;quot; on Google, the first hit is: http://ipv6.com/articles/voip/VOIP-IPV6.htm That page displays basically says: VoIP is</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 01:39:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33334</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ipv6-ops Digest, Vol 82, Issue 17</title>
<description>K C, first of all, I&amp;#039;m glad you&amp;#039;re doing this, and am looking forward to your data and findings. I agree with you that --from my view, anyway--most v6</description>
<pubDate>22 Jan  2012 05:17:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33109</link>
</item><item>
<title>IPv6 survey from CAIDA</title>
<description>hello kind 6ops-folk,                               we&amp;#039;re trying to do some quantitative modeling of</description>
<pubDate>21 Jan  2012 15:37:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33105</link>
</item><item>
<title>ip6tables and multiple possible source addresses</title>
<description>Someone must have already figured this out; I&amp;#039;m feeling &amp;quot;virtual Monday&amp;quot; pretty bad right now :-( With IPv6 a host can have &amp;quot;lots&amp;quot; (more than 1) of</description>
<pubDate>17 Jan  2012 17:04:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33032</link>
</item><item>
<title>World IPv6 Launch, June 6th 2012</title>
<description>FYI, http://www.worldipv6launch.org/press/20120117-2/  World IPv6 Launch Solidifies Global Support for New Internet Protocol Top websites, Internet</description>
<pubDate>17 Jan  2012 06:42:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33017</link>
</item><item>
<title>Netgroup support of ipv6 in Solaris/Linux</title>
<description>So far, it appears that ipv6 breaks netgroups in both Solaris and Linux. Has anyone run into this or have a solution? Basically if two machines both</description>
<pubDate>15 Jan  2012 13:50:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32984</link>
</item><item>
<title>Linux Temporary Address - Premature expiry</title>
<description>Hello, I don&amp;#039;t know if anyone (except me) tries to use IPv6 temporary addresses (Privacy Extensions) on Linux. I tried to use them but noticed that</description>
<pubDate>13 Jan  2012 07:04:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32963</link>
</item><item>
<title>problem with Deutsche Telekom</title>
<description>Hi, since the 8 in morning (gmt+1) a lot of telekom-services are not reachable via ipv6. e.g. www.t-online.de hast AAAA records, I can ping them, b</description>
<pubDate>11 Jan  2012 05:37:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32933</link>
</item><item>
<title>Small cisco boxes doing IPv6?</title>
<description>Hi Guys, If somebody from Cisco reads this, feel free to contact me off list, but maybe somebody else has something running and can confirm this as w</description>
<pubDate>10 Jan  2012 07:19:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32921</link>
</item><item>
<title>Android IPv6-only Functionality -- Call for help</title>
<description>Hi, Now that IPv6 is a supported 3G interface protocol for the Google Nexus S phone, i have begun the process of finding broken apps and trying to ge</description>
<pubDate>09 Jan  2012 21:57:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32908</link>
</item><item>
<title>[FIXED] http://www.amis.net/ vs. 6to4</title>
<description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;quot;IS&amp;quot; == Ivan Shmakov &amp;lt;oneingray@gmail.com&amp;gt; writes: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Jeroen Massar &amp;lt;jeroen@unfix.org&amp;gt; writes: [â€¦]  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; A traceroute (see http://www.sixxs</description>
<pubDate>03 Jan  2012 22:26:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32831</link>
</item><item>
<title>http://www.amis.net/ vs. 6to4</title>
<description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Brian E Carpenter &amp;lt;brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com&amp;gt; writes: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; On 2011-12-31 16:47, Ivan Shmakov wrote: [â€¦]  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; As the traceroutes above star</description>
<pubDate>01 Jan  2012 10:34:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32798</link>
</item><item>
<title>SixXS vs. 6to4</title>
<description>It looks like there&amp;#039;s a connectivity problem in between the     SixXS.net and 6to4 worlds. Please consider, e. g.: $ traceroute6 -s 2002:bc78:XX</description>
<pubDate>30 Dec  2011 19:47:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32792</link>
</item><item>
<title>AUTO: Ramesh Yr1 is out of the office (returning 12/30/2011)</title>
<description>I am out of the office until 12/30/2011. I would be on vacation from Dec26,2011 to Dec30,2011.I will be back to office on 2nd Jan 2012.I will be avai</description>
<pubDate>27 Dec  2011 03:01:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32739</link>
</item><item>
<title>yum IPv6 repos</title>
<description>I thought I&amp;#039;d try to setup an IPv6 only network this weekend and noticed many/most yum repos and mirrors are not IPv6-enabled. Just wondering what</description>
<pubDate>26 Dec  2011 15:32:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32722</link>
</item><item>
<title>IPv6 Source Address Selection on Mac OS X Lion</title>
<description>Hi there, I like to share with you an interesting problem. Maybe someone on this mailinglist has already found a solution to this. I googled for hour</description>
<pubDate>14 Dec  2011 06:00:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32585</link>
</item><item>
<title>cox business</title>
<description>Is there anyone here from COX Business I could chat with briefly about turning up IPv6 with 22773? - Jared</description>
<pubDate>13 Dec  2011 13:47:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32582</link>
</item><item>
<title>IPv6-capable load balancers</title>
<description>Anyone have any experience with Kemp Networks or A10 Networks&amp;#039; load balancers, specifically their IPv6-capabilities? I&amp;#039;ve been waiting for Coyote Poi</description>
<pubDate>06 Dec  2011 17:41:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32554</link>
</item><item>
<title>Broken clients performing neigh-adv DoS</title>
<description>All, We&amp;#039;ve seen this several times before, and just had a recurrence. It pegged the CPU of our router to 100% until I blocked it. The machines seem</description>
<pubDate>05 Dec  2011 11:36:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32540</link>
</item><item>
<title>Enterprise/governmental IPv6 deployment experiences?</title>
<description>Hi all. We&amp;#039;ve begun planning the 3rd IPv6 Forum Norway conference, which will be held the 24th and 25th of April next year in Oslo. In order to not o</description>
<pubDate>28 Nov  2011 07:17:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32480</link>
</item><item>
<title>mapping public to private IPv6 networks when firewalling</title>
<description>The SOP for firewalling in IPv4 is to use private (RFC 1918) networks and map external public networks 1:1 to them. The idea is that defaults to unrea</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2011 13:23:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32448</link>
</item><item>
<title>Transferring /8 networks between the RIRs</title>
<description>Hi, New here, be kind please. I was wondering if there has been any thoughts or consideration to transfer unassigned /8 networks between the Regiona</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2011 04:14:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32442</link>
</item><item>
<title>Internet transparency (Re: Geoff on IPv4 Exhaustion)</title>
<description>On 2011-11-21 20:22, Doug Barton wrote: &amp;gt; On 11/20/2011 23:13, Matija Grabnar wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Well &amp;quot;the users don&amp;#039;t want end-to-end&amp;quot; is an appeal to authori</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2011 12:27:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32430</link>
</item><item>
<title>Fwd: Re: Geoff on IPv4 Exhaustion</title>
<description>-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Geoff on IPv4 Exhaustion Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 19:27:51 -0800 From: Ted Mittelstaedt &amp;lt;tedm@ipinc.net&amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2011 19:28:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32410</link>
</item><item>
<title>uses for VPN?</title>
<description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Geoff Huston &amp;lt;gih@apnic.net&amp;gt; writes: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; On 17/11/2011, at 2:07 AM, John Payne wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Nov 16, 2011, at 4:26 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt &amp;lt;ted</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2011 09:02:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32397</link>
</item><item>
<title>Why not RIO? (Re: Geoff on IPv4 Exhaustion)</title>
<description>Jussi, On 2011-11-20 15:52, Jussi Peltola wrote: &amp;gt; On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 02:20:56AM +0000, Olipro wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; In order to receive DHCPv6 configuratio</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2011 20:23:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32390</link>
</item><item>
<title>2012 North American IPv6 Summit</title>
<description>Hello All, The 2012 North American IPv6 Summit event taking place at the Grand Hyatt Denver, Colorado on April 9-11, 2012. This event is being coordi</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2011 09:30:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32370</link>
</item><item>
<title>Hampering Eyeballs - Observations on Two &amp;quot;Happy Eyeballs&amp;quot; Implementations (New on RIPE Labs)</title>
<description>Hi, In case you have not seen this yet: Emile Aben published an interesting article on RIPE Labs earlier this week: Hampering Eyeballs - Observatio</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2011 05:44:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32367</link>
</item><item>
<title>one small update to linux and privacy extensions</title>
<description>Hi, for some admins it could be good to know: ubuntu 11.10: privacy extensions off by default opensuse 12.1: privacy extensions on by default (te</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2011 01:10:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32366</link>
</item><item>
<title>need for DHCPv6 [Re: Geoff on IPv4 Exhaustion]</title>
<description>Excuse top posting but I want to single out one statement: &amp;gt; These assignments MUST be controlled by a server and not by the router because the route</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2011 14:56:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32353</link>
</item><item>
<title>RA+DHCPv6+DDNS in DCs</title>
<description>Hi -  What do folks think about using RAs+DHCPv6+DDNS for IPv6 addressing in enterprise data centers vs traditional static addressing? Throughout th</description>
<pubDate>15 Nov  2011 08:46:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32325</link>
</item><item>
<title>Geoff on IPv4 Exhaustion</title>
<description>Hi guys, It&amp;#039;s been quiet on the list for a while. Time to get a discussion going!  Geoff Huston spoke about IPv4 depletion at Ripe63. Some of you mi</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2011 14:54:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32322</link>
</item><item>
<title>VoIPv6 provider?</title>
<description>Hi guys Our office phone set-up is up for replacement. We&amp;#039;ve been running asterisk since 2006 but don&amp;#039;t want to run that in-house any more. So I&amp;#039;m lo</description>
<pubDate>11 Nov  2011 05:33:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32306</link>
</item><item>
<title>Interesting A10 GSLB interop problem</title>
<description>I ran across an interesting problem when using an A10 for GSLB with IPv4 only resources. So assume the following configuration: gslb zone example.co</description>
<pubDate>23 Oct  2011 17:48:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32162</link>
</item><item>
<title>IPv6 Guidance for Internet Content and Application Service Providers</title>
<description>The authors would be happy to receive comments on this draft. It should be discussed over on v6ops@ietf.org. -------- Original Message -------- Subje</description>
<pubDate>21 Oct  2011 14:47:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32144</link>
</item><item>
<title>192.88.99.1 (6to4 anycast) in Russia</title>
<description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Ivan Shmakov &amp;lt;ivan@gray.siamics.net&amp;gt; writes: [â€¦]  &amp;gt; The IPv4 network I&amp;#039;m connected to drops the outgoing packets to the &amp;gt; 6to4 anycast addr</description>
<pubDate>21 Oct  2011 01:20:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32123</link>
</item><item>
<title>HE.net public 6to4 routing service?</title>
<description>I wonder if HE.net have discontinued their public 6to4 routing     service?     The IPv4 network I&amp;#039;m connected to drops the outgoing packets</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2011 22:13:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32118</link>
</item><item>
<title>FW: Configuring Prefix delegation with lifetimes</title>
<description>*From:* Vikram Agrawal [mailto:vikram.agrawal@ipinfusion.com] *Sent:* 13 October 2011 11:20 *To:* &amp;#039;dhcp-users@lists.isc.org&amp;#039; *Subject:* RE: Configurin</description>
<pubDate>19 Oct  2011 01:45:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32046</link>
</item><item>
<title>gogoNET LIVE! 2 IPv6 Conference: Discount</title>
<description>Hello I&amp;#039;d like to invite members of this forum to our IPv6 conference in San Jose in two weeks. Below is a text and HTML invitation. Regards, Bruce</description>
<pubDate>18 Oct  2011 18:06:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32036</link>
</item><item>
<title>Switches Juniper</title>
<description>Hi,     I was going to to buy some juniper switches (ERX3200) but Juniper sales representative told to my local distributor that IPv6 requires a</description>
<pubDate>18 Oct  2011 06:38:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32019</link>
</item><item>
<title>Software licensing using IPv6 addresses?</title>
<description>Hi, I remember that some software licenses used to be enforced by relying on the user&amp;#039;s static IPv4 address. Obviously this is a broken technique, bu</description>
<pubDate>17 Oct  2011 14:06:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32003</link>
</item><item>
<title>I must have missed something !?!?!? v.strange routes</title>
<description>Hi, This is from As 37084. I see some strange routes. from many origins. Only seen via 9498. not via other transit 6453. Do you see very strange thi</description>
<pubDate>14 Oct  2011 00:34:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/31965</link>
</item><item>
<title>Configuring Prefix delegation with lifetimes</title>
<description>Hi,  Is there any way we can assign individual lifetimes for each prefix6 under the subnet6 statement ? The configuration I have been using looks l</description>
<pubDate>10 Oct  2011 01:35:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/31882</link>
</item><item>
<title>IPv6 Day II</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve been hearing rumblings that there may be another day in planning, but searching for &amp;#039;ipv6 day&amp;#039; + anything just gets a lot of hits, but nothing us</description>
<pubDate>07 Oct  2011 06:24:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/31865</link>
</item><item>
<title>Windows Vista and Crashing CPE</title>
<description>I experienced this first hand this weekend, Vista machines with IPv6 enabled when attached to a small office WLAN took turns at causing the router to</description>
<pubDate>04 Oct  2011 03:12:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/31826</link>
</item><item>
<title>Verizon LTE and IPv6 under OS X 10.7</title>
<description>Does anyone have 10.7 and Verizon LTE? VZ connection manager is showing me an IPv6 address but it configures some entirely different address on the</description>
<pubDate>22 Sep  2011 09:12:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/31723</link>
</item><item>
<title>IPv6 packet creation tool</title>
<description>Hi. I need to create a single packet which has a fragmentation header and is not the first packet of this simulated fragmented IPv6 packet, and set</description>
<pubDate>16 Sep  2011 22:19:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/31634</link>
</item><item>
<title>TSP solutions</title>
<description>Hi, Is there anyone familiar with a TSP (rfc5572) compatible 6in4 software, preferably opensource? The only box I&amp;#039;m currently aware of that supports</description>
<pubDate>16 Sep  2011 01:43:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/31608</link>
</item><item>
<title>Open Letters to Sixxs</title>
<description>Hello People i have one question: why SIXXS is very strict like that ? forcing a special address format is a idiotic work everyone have a format o</description>
<pubDate>15 Sep  2011 07:02:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/31587</link>
</item><item>
<title>IPV6 route registries</title>
<description>Given that we are a private org, and not an ISP, is there any place we should be registering our ASN/routes other than RADB for ipv6? ---- Matthew Hu</description>
<pubDate>13 Sep  2011 09:03:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/31548</link>
</item><item>
<title>mobile devices (umts/LTE) and IPv6</title>
<description>Hi, according to http://labs.ripe.net/Members/marco/content-ipv6-cpe-survey is anywhere a overview of mobile-devices, like umts/lte-sticks and mob</description>
<pubDate>06 Sep  2011 03:02:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/31442</link>
</item><item>
<title>Maybe it&amp;#039;s time to talk about rational routing</title>
<description>Good news down under, it seems that TelstraClear is now supporting native IPv6, announced in Australia but observable in New Zealand too, with much le</description>
<pubDate>05 Sep  2011 18:34:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/31436</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Fwd: [Bloat] Interesting new study of wireless carrier &amp;quot;middle box&amp;quot; characteristics - buffering and strange TCP activities]</title>
<description>not really directly IPv6 but might point on how bad the mobilenetwork are/can be, and how much we need IPv6 :-) -------------------------- Opprinneli</description>
<pubDate>27 Aug  2011 03:38:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/31316</link>
</item><item>
<title>6to4 disabled by default on W7SP1</title>
<description>Seems 6to4 is now disabled by default on new installations of W7SP1. Hats off to Microsoft for committing this important change. Nick</description>
<pubDate>25 Aug  2011 05:38:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/31278</link>
</item><item>
<title>Lion + AnyConnect = b0rked IPv6</title>
<description>Hi I&amp;#039;m having trouble getting AnyConnect to work on MacOS X 10.7.1. I&amp;#039;ve tried the latest version of AnyConnect (3.0.3054), which has some Lion-speci</description>
<pubDate>25 Aug  2011 04:04:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/31273</link>
</item><item>
<title>When an RG should issue a DHCPv6 solicit</title>
<description>Should an RF issue a DHCPv6 solicit on its WAN interface only upon having received an RA message with the RA bits marked &amp;quot;M&amp;quot;? Or can/should it send o</description>
<pubDate>22 Aug  2011 15:49:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/31242</link>
</item><item>
<title>Symantec Endpoint Protection for Windows disables ipv6</title>
<description>Symantec&amp;#039;s new Endpoint Protection client for enterprises includes a new rule based &amp;quot;network threat protection&amp;quot;. One of the default rules blocks all i</description>
<pubDate>22 Aug  2011 12:19:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/31235</link>
</item><item>
<title>Juniper screening large ICMP packets</title>
<description>Hi, FYI: Last week I found out the hard way that turning on Juniper screening of large ICMP messages (http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos</description>
<pubDate>22 Aug  2011 02:24:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/31229</link>
</item><item>
<title>DHCPv6 still feared and hated at Apple?, was Re: Mac OSX 10.7from Sabrina</title>
<description>On 07/22/11 09:18, Sander Steffann wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; It does use DHCPv6, but only if the RA has the O or M flag set. &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; right. per RFC... ;-) &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Since no</description>
<pubDate>18 Aug  2011 13:22:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/31191</link>
</item><item>
<title>IPv6 contact for www.citrix.com - MTU problem?</title>
<description>Hi, anybody responsible for IPv6 on www.citrix.com listening, or able to put me in touch with the right persons? It seems to run off AT&amp;amp;T IPv6 addre</description>
<pubDate>17 Aug  2011 13:03:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/31159</link>
</item><item>
<title>Adding IPv6 to Remote Access VPNs</title>
<description>Hello list, I have been working on adding IPv6 connectivity to our remote access VPN solution (Windows Routng and Remote Access services, a solution</description>
<pubDate>15 Aug  2011 06:54:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/31144</link>
</item><item>
<title>mailing list policies (was: Re: mail filtering based on reverse DNS)</title>
<description>Noel Butler &amp;lt;noel.butler@ausics.net&amp;gt; writes: &amp;gt; BTW, and this is NOT directed soley at Erik, but EVERYONE in this &amp;gt; thread, this morning I see my inbo</description>
<pubDate>12 Aug  2011 00:37:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/31117</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: mail filtering based on reverse DNS</title>
<description>&amp;quot;Bjoern A. Zeeb&amp;quot; &amp;lt;bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net&amp;gt; writes: &amp;gt; On Aug 9, 2011, at 4:17 PM, BjÃ¸rn Mork wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Anyway, if you reject mail from IPv6 a</description>
<pubDate>10 Aug  2011 01:43:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/31038</link>
</item><item>
<title>mail filtering based on reverse DNS (was: Re: IPv6 Hackers mailing-list)</title>
<description>&amp;quot;Bjoern A. Zeeb&amp;quot; &amp;lt;bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net&amp;gt; writes: &amp;gt; On Aug 9, 2011, at 3:51 AM, Fernando Gont wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; You can subscribe to the mailing-lis</description>
<pubDate>09 Aug  2011 09:17:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/31021</link>
</item><item>
<title>How to enable &amp;quot; ipv6 unicast-routing&amp;quot; to permit traceroute from 6PE to ipv6-cloud</title>
<description>Dear IPv6 Expert, We are on development IPv6 over MPLS using 6PE schenario. Our P using CRS-1 (IOS-XR). I Would like to know how to ensure/to test</description>
<pubDate>09 Aug  2011 03:36:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/31012</link>
</item><item>
<title>Session Checks and IPv6 Privacy Extensions</title>
<description>Hi, with the release of Lion it appears that the usage of temporary adresses has been enabled.. Anyone else got problems with sessions checks in Typ</description>
<pubDate>09 Aug  2011 00:57:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/31008</link>
</item><item>
<title>IPv6 Hackers mailing-list</title>
<description>Folks, We have created the &amp;quot;IPv6 Hackers&amp;quot; mailing-list for discussion of IPv6 security issues and low-level issues. The charter of the list is: ----</description>
<pubDate>08 Aug  2011 20:51:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/31002</link>
</item><item>
<title>IPv6 ::1 isolation</title>
<description>Will the lack of real ::1 in a virtual server guest be a serious problem, or will I be able to survive by allocating a /64 to the physical host, and s</description>
<pubDate>30 Jul  2011 04:05:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/30914</link>
</item><item>
<title>Active ipv6 &amp;#039;mapping&amp;#039; project ?</title>
<description>Just poking around in my home firewall logs. I have a tunnel to one of my data centers giving the house ipv6. I noticed a steady flow of icmp echo</description>
<pubDate>27 Jul  2011 13:18:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/30875</link>
</item><item>
<title>mailman.nanog.org ?</title>
<description>Hi! The website is only reachable via v4, but dns announces v6 as well ? $ any mailman.nanog.org mailman.nanog.org has IPv6 address 2001:1838::cc5d:</description>
<pubDate>27 Jul  2011 00:39:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/30849</link>
</item><item>
<title>A postgresql inet to ip6.arpa snippet</title>
<description>128-bit friends, I just took the time to come up with a IMHO quite clean way to create ip6.arpa strings from inet types in PostgreSQL and thought I&amp;#039;d</description>
<pubDate>25 Jul  2011 17:10:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/30832</link>
</item><item>
<title>NPTv6 Experimental Draft - RFC6296</title>
<description>On 2011-07-24 07:31, Cameron Byrne wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; guys are evidently braindead) - the privilege of a routed /64 comes at &amp;gt;&amp;gt; something like â‚¬24.95 a mont</description>
<pubDate>23 Jul  2011 13:35:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/30820</link>
</item><item>
<title>NAT66 Experimental Draft - RFC6296</title>
<description>Greetings to all, So, it would appear that things on the NAT66 front have progressed from the IETF over to RFC status. Whilst NAT66 is certainly so</description>
<pubDate>23 Jul  2011 08:59:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/30816</link>
</item><item>
<title>Francis Bishop est absent(e).</title>
<description>Je serai absent(e) du 22/07/2011 au 23/07/2011. Je suis à l&amp;#039;extérieur du bureau et je serai de retour le 9 août 2011. I am currently out of the offi</description>
<pubDate>22 Jul  2011 13:18:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/30805</link>
</item><item>
<title>DHCPv6 still feared and hated at Apple?, was Re: Mac OSX 10.7</title>
<description>Iljitsch, On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 17:05 +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: &amp;gt; On 20 jul 2011, at 17:01, Dyonisius Visser wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Just coughed up â</description>
<pubDate>22 Jul  2011 08:19:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/30786</link>
</item><item>
<title>Mac OSX 10.7</title>
<description>Just coughed up â‚¬22.99 in the Apple Store and upgraded to 10.7 (Lion). Some major improvements that are directly noticeable: * DHCPv6 * Samba over</description>
<pubDate>20 Jul  2011 08:01:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/30751</link>
</item><item>
<title>www.freebsd.org via ipv6 not reachable ?</title>
<description>Hi! It&amp;#039;s no longer reachable ? Any ideas ? home$ traceroute6 www.freebsd.org traceroute6 to red.freebsd.org (2001:4f8:fff6::22) from 2001:14f8:200::</description>
<pubDate>23 Jun  2011 00:28:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/30465</link>
</item><item>
<title>HE.net packet loss?</title>
<description>Hi, so what&amp;#039;s the deal with the HE.net packet loss I have been seeing for days in Atl and Chi on IPv6? Is anyone else seeing this? Bjoern -- Bjoe</description>
<pubDate>22 Jun  2011 13:06:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/30456</link>
</item><item>
<title>Invitation to connect on LinkedIn</title>
<description>LinkedIn ------------   I&amp;#039;d like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn. - Fahad Fahad Ali Khan IP Core Expert (Juniper focused) at No</description>
<pubDate>21 Jun  2011 20:47:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/30434</link>
</item><item>
<title>1000 localhosts in DNS</title>
<description>Hi, some discussions about ipv6- brokeness on client-site become obsolete as long on (web)server-site some people make bad jokes. From 1 0000 000 t</description>
<pubDate>21 Jun  2011 13:21:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/30423</link>
</item><item>
<title>Platform feature development for Cisco 7200 has ended, meaning open IPv6-related features will not be performed</title>
<description>I learned from our SE today that platform feature development for the 7200 has ended, and that SB code train is going to be EOL very soon. The recomm</description>
<pubDate>20 Jun  2011 13:46:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/30370</link>
</item><item>
<title>Fortigate and IPv6 RA</title>
<description>Hi All, I have been trying to configure a fortigate firewall running 4.0 MR2 for IPv6 I configured the interfaces and policies and if I manually conf</description>
<pubDate>20 Jun  2011 04:05:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/30358</link>
</item><item>
<title>Youtube over IPv6 for non-whitelist users?</title>
<description>I just noticed that I&amp;#039;m getting Youtube content (just the movie streams, not the web pages -- still no AAAA on www.youtube.com) over IPv6, despite not</description>
<pubDate>19 Jun  2011 23:05:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/30341</link>
</item><item>
<title>Connectivity issue to/from 2001:500:61:28::70 (ISC) (Was: Strange IPv6 reachability problem)</title>
<description>On 2011-06-20 01:08 , Seth Mattinen wrote: &amp;gt; On 6/19/2011 3:59 PM, Jeroen Massar wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Nevertheless, the point stands, do you have a traceroute</description>
<pubDate>19 Jun  2011 16:31:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/30337</link>
</item><item>
<title>Strange IPv6 reachability problem</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m having a strange IPv6 problem that I hope someone here can help with or at least generate some ideas on how to resolve. I have a strange partial</description>
<pubDate>19 Jun  2011 15:19:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/30330</link>
</item><item>
<title>OpenSource IPv6 monitoring software...</title>
<description>Hi there, I looking forward on OpenSource Monitoring software that support IPv6... Seems that old stuff like nagios (and thousand of packages based o</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2011 06:32:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/30321</link>
</item><item>
<title>Cisco/Linksys releases firmware with IPv6 support for E4200</title>
<description>Cisco/Linksys released firmware this week with IPv6 support for the E4200.  I&amp;#039;ve tried it and here are some of the highlights (or low lights): - GUI</description>
<pubDate>16 Jun  2011 21:42:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/30316</link>
</item><item>
<title>Odd DNS queries from Win2k3 DNS resolver</title>
<description>Hello All, We&amp;#039;re seeing alot of weird DNS queries from a MS DNS server on Win2k3 (yes, I know, it wasn&amp;#039;t my choice to run these). For example,  ::</description>
<pubDate>15 Jun  2011 20:04:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/30299</link>
</item><item>
<title>Covert Channels In IPv6</title>
<description>Hi folks, I´ve recently started off a research on IPv6 covert channels. It would be nice if anyone of you could give me whatever kind of infomation</description>
<pubDate>15 Jun  2011 05:36:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/30290</link>
</item><item>
<title>Toward more sensible whitelisting</title>
<description>The really big content providers are pretty hesitant to add sites to their whitelist (if they even have one). IPv6 testing primarily depends on users</description>
<pubDate>13 Jun  2011 16:36:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/30269</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ipv6-ops Digest, Vol 75, Issue 33</title>
<description>On 09/06/2011 17:45, ipv6-ops-request@lists.cluenet.de wrote: &amp;gt; On Jun 9, 2011, at 3:09 PM, Marc Blanchet wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; humm, the ripe dns survey seems t</description>
<pubDate>10 Jun  2011 20:58:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/30242</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Usage statistics of &amp;quot;World IPv6 Day Tools&amp;quot;? [was: Test your	connectivity for World IPv6 Day]</title>
<description>On 6/10/2011 5:13 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: &amp;gt; looking athttp://www.freebsd.org/ipv6/w6d-www-stats.html or if you want a longer term picture starting</description>
<pubDate>10 Jun  2011 11:53:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/30225</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Beowulf] IPv6 and clusters?</title>
<description>----- Forwarded message from Beat Rubischon &amp;lt;beat@0x1b.ch&amp;gt; ----- From: Beat Rubischon &amp;lt;beat@0x1b.ch&amp;gt; Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:02:51 +0200 To: beowul</description>
<pubDate>10 Jun  2011 04:55:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/30216</link>
</item><item>
<title>Philosophical question for IPv6 Day</title>
<description>Which is better, at this stage of IPv6 deployment and transition:  - a fully dual-stacked website, functional for a v6-only client without resorting</description>
<pubDate>08 Jun  2011 17:21:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/30162</link>
</item><item>
<title>Google Chrome updates over v6?</title>
<description>I came across a news article saying that Google had dropped version 12 of Chrome today, so I checked and sure enough my copy had already updated and w</description>
<pubDate>08 Jun  2011 13:44:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/30148</link>
</item><item>
<title>Firefox ShowIP Plugin</title>
<description>Potentially interesting on a day like today: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/showip/ If you haven&amp;#039;t heard about it or forgot about it</description>
<pubDate>08 Jun  2011 10:41:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/30126</link>
</item><item>
<title>Citrix Netscaler Fragmentation Issue</title>
<description>Using SLB-PT on Citrix Netscaler causes the entire unit to blow up when a client with a small IPv6 MTU connections and packets must be fragmented. It</description>
<pubDate>08 Jun  2011 09:26:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/30115</link>
</item><item>
<title>Level(3) and IPv6 Day</title>
<description>I hadn&amp;#039;t realized until today that Level3 was a participant in IPv6 Day, and sure enough they have a AAAA record: www.level3.com.     178   IN</description>
<pubDate>08 Jun  2011 07:55:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/30097</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

