Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 12 Feb 2012 07:58:49 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg Thanks for the quick reply. On 11 Feb 2012, at 15:09, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote: > Hello Arturo, > > good catch! The analysis on small sample 11 Feb 2012 11:30:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33378 Hello Arturo, good catch! The analysis on small samples is odd and I am still trying to work out the bug/inaccuracy. It's a complex mix of GeoIP on I 11 Feb 2012 09:09:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33377 Oliver, there is some odd data, for example, only two hosts in Guatemala? Regards, as On 8 Feb 2012, at 09:12, Olivier MJ Crepin-L 11 Feb 2012 05:21:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33376 On Thu, 2012-02-09, Dick Vassar wrote: > On 9 February 2012 15:12, Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Skype, like a small number of other 09 Feb 2012 10:08:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33371 On 9 February 2012 15:12, Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote: > Skype, like a small number of other applications, uses IPv4 referrals > in its 09 Feb 2012 08:03:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33369 On Wed, 2012-02-08, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 10:52:11AM +0100, Tayeb Meftah wrote: >> MS hate ipv6 you know? > > Given th 09 Feb 2012 07:13:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33368 On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> wrote: > > Le 2012-02-09 à 08:55, Truman Boyes <truman@suspicious.org> a écr 09 Feb 2012 06:12:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33364 Le 2012-02-09 à 08:55, Truman Boyes <truman@suspicious.org> a écrit : > Has anyone here used Skype through NAT64? Yes > Does it work? No Marc. 09 Feb 2012 06:07:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33363 Has anyone here used Skype through NAT64? Does it work? Cheers, Truman On 8 Feb 2012, at 6:44 AM, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Feb 08, 2 09 Feb 2012 05:55:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33362 >>>> From my point of view RFC 5963 should be updated to >>>> recommend the global announcement of IX prefixes for IPv6 or >>>> - as already mentioned 09 Feb 2012 02:19:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33359 On 2012-02-09 01:35, Stefan Neufeind wrote: ... >>> From my point of view RFC 5963 should be updated to recommend the >>> global announcement >>> of 08 Feb 2012 11:35:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33351 On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 04:57:46PM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote: > On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 01:26:11PM +0000, Phil Mayers wrote: > > On 08/02/12 12:35, S 08 Feb 2012 09:24:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33350 On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 04:20:48PM +0000, Phil Mayers wrote: > On 08/02/12 15:57, Daniel Roesen wrote: > >> >>> Of course it's a SHOULD, so it's reaso 08 Feb 2012 09:19:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33349 On 08/02/12 15:57, Daniel Roesen wrote: > >> Of course it's a SHOULD, so it's reasonable for an override option: >> >> ipv6 icmp source-address Loopb 08 Feb 2012 08:20:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33348 On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 01:26:11PM +0000, Phil Mayers wrote: > On 08/02/12 12:35, Stefan Neufeind wrote: > >> but why don't those routers source the I 08 Feb 2012 07:57:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33346 On 08/02/12 12:35, Stefan Neufeind wrote: > but why don't those routers source the ICMP-message from a > loopback-address or the like with an "offici 08 Feb 2012 05:26:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33345 On 02/08/2012 01:12 PM, Gert Doering wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 01:01:24PM +0100, Thomas Schmid wrote: >> On 08.02.2012 12:55, Bernhard Schmi 08 Feb 2012 04:35:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33344 Hi, On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 01:01:24PM +0100, Thomas Schmid wrote: > On 08.02.2012 12:55, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > > FYI, I've been informed that th 08 Feb 2012 04:12:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33342 Hi, On 08.02.2012 12:55, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > FYI, I've been informed that there has been a similar problem on the > RIPE ipv6-wg mailinglist la 08 Feb 2012 04:01:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33341 FYI, I've been informed that there has been a similar problem on the RIPE ipv6-wg mailinglist last June. Start here: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/a 08 Feb 2012 03:55:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33340 Hi, On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 10:52:11AM +0100, Tayeb Meftah wrote: > MS hate ipv6 you know? Given the very complete IPv6 support in all recent micros 08 Feb 2012 03:44:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33339 Hi, this problem is based on a local configuration, but I think the problem is generic enough to mandate a discussion. None of the parties shown here 08 Feb 2012 03:36:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33338 (apologies for cross-posting) Dear all, please find below my latest presentations for the IPv6 Matrix project. The latest one is the one I was going 08 Feb 2012 03:12:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33337 > MS hate ipv6 you know? That's not a very productive answer. I certainly have my disagreements with Microsoft, and FreeBSD is my normal working pla 08 Feb 2012 02:58:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33336 MS hate ipv6 you know? Envoyé de mon iPhone Le 8 févr. 2012 à 10:40, Dick Visser <visser@terena.org> a écrit : > When searching for "skype ipv6" on 08 Feb 2012 01:52:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33335 When searching for "skype ipv6" on Google, the first hit is: http://ipv6.com/articles/voip/VOIP-IPV6.htm That page displays basically says: VoIP is 08 Feb 2012 01:39:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33334 K C, first of all, I'm glad you're doing this, and am looking forward to your data and findings. I agree with you that --from my view, anyway--most v6 22 Jan 2012 05:17:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33109 might help if i included the survey URL: http://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/749797/ipv6survey tnx, k On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 03:37:08PM -0800, k claffy wr 21 Jan 2012 15:38:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33106 hello kind 6ops-folk, we're trying to do some quantitative modeling of 21 Jan 2012 15:37:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33105 Hi, On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:55:16AM +0100, Jens Weibler wrote: > I configure my currently prefix 2001:db8::/48 as prefix-set MY-NETWORK. > In a ru 19 Jan 2012 02:59:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33071 On 19.01.2012 09:48, Mohacsi Janos wrote: > Which is more frequent, renumbering or tweaking firewall rules? There > is a tradeoff - everybody should 19 Jan 2012 01:55:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33070 On 19.01.2012 08:25, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote: Hi, > traceroute: Warning: www.worldipv6launch.org has multiple addresses; using 2001:638:a:2::d4c9:6 19 Jan 2012 01:50:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33069 On Thu, 19 Jan 2012, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > On 2012-01-19 09:40, Cameron Byrne wrote: >> I guess I missed why the simplest answer does not apply 19 Jan 2012 00:48:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33068 On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 01:58:06PM +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > traceroute to www.worldipv6launch.org (2a02:26f0:3::5435:af08) from > 2001:1b10:1 18 Jan 2012 23:25:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33067 On 2012-01-19 09:40, Cameron Byrne wrote: > I guess I missed why the simplest answer does not apply > > If you are already creating host specific ipt 18 Jan 2012 17:56:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33064 I guess I missed why the simplest answer does not apply If you are already creating host specific iptables, why not just use a static address that is 18 Jan 2012 12:40:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33062 Or more simply, with modern (cough since 1995!) switches it is easy to get as many layer-2 domains as you want with VLAN. With IPv6, you usually recei 18 Jan 2012 12:32:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33061 On Tuesday 17 Jan 2012 17:04:00 Tom Perrine wrote: > Someone must have already figured this out; I'm feeling "virtual Monday" > pretty bad right now : 18 Jan 2012 11:57:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33055 The fact is that a) this sort of scenario is intrinsic to the design of IPv6, so get used to it. b) it is *very* hard to get border router and firew 18 Jan 2012 11:48:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33054 On Jan 18, 2012, at 9:05 AM, Ð'алерий Солдатов wrote: > But > dig -6 www.worldipv6launch.org aaaa --- does not work.. > > ;; c 18 Jan 2012 09:49:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33053 Le 2012-01-18 à 08:54, Jared Mauch a écrit : > > On Jan 18, 2012, at 8:47 AM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > >> Me too >> >> Routing is a bit weird, th 18 Jan 2012 09:39:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33052 I haven't worked on the Linux boxes yet, but since I found the source of problem on the Solaris box and it was an understandable fix, I now know it is 18 Jan 2012 08:45:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33051 On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 09:52:48AM -0500, Matthew Huff wrote: > Found it. Ah, good! > Solaris doesn't do reverse lookups for ipv6 in DNS unless the 18 Jan 2012 07:55:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33049 Found it. Solaris doesn't do reverse lookups for ipv6 in DNS unless there is an entry for ipnodes in nsswitch.conf. Since we are probably using a te 18 Jan 2012 06:52:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33048 Hello, dig -4 www.worldipv6launch.org aaaa ---- works fine and returns ;; ANSWER SECTION: ...... a1448.dscb.akamai.net. 20 IN A 18 Jan 2012 06:05:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33047 On Jan 18, 2012, at 8:47 AM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > Me too > > Routing is a bit weird, the website CNAMEs to a1448.dscb.akamai.net. > Depending o 18 Jan 2012 05:54:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33046 Am 18.01.2012 14:31, schrieb Jared Mauch: > It does seem to be working for me now. Me too Routing is a bit weird, the website CNAMEs to a1448.dscb. 18 Jan 2012 05:47:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33045 It does seem to be working for me now. puck:~$ curl -v http://www.worldipv6launch.org/ * About to connect() to www.worldipv6launch.org port 80 (#0) * 18 Jan 2012 05:31:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33044 On 18 Jan 2012, at 12:26, Marc Blanchet wrote: > things that _may_ help you Tom is whether the provisioning of the host is done by DHCPv6, which is w 18 Jan 2012 05:04:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33043 >>>>> Gert Doering <gert@space.net> writes: >>>>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 05:04:00PM -0800, Tom Perrine wrote: >> When writing a host-specific ip6ta 18 Jan 2012 05:03:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33042 Am 18.01.2012 13:34, schrieb Jared Mauch: > I'm guessing someone needs to throw that lever. Hopefully they can work together to make that happen! Has 18 Jan 2012 04:58:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33041 Hi, > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 05:04:00PM -0800, Tom Perrine wrote: > > When writing a host-specific ip6tables rule, which address > do you need > > 18 Jan 2012 04:41:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33040 I'm guessing someone needs to throw that lever. Hopefully they can work together to make that happen! I for one welcome this great news! Can't wait 18 Jan 2012 04:34:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33039 Le 2012-01-18 à 02:10, Ben Jencks a écrit : > > On Jan 17, 2012, at 8:04 PM, Tom Perrine wrote: > >> Someone must have already figured this out; I' 18 Jan 2012 04:26:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33038 Hi, On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 05:04:00PM -0800, Tom Perrine wrote: > When writing a host-specific ip6tables rule, which address do you need > to list? 18 Jan 2012 01:50:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33037 Am 17.01.2012 18:59, schrieb Thomas Schäfer: > Am Dienstag, 17. Januar 2012, 18:32:21 schrieb Stefan Neufeind: >> Just wanted to try via IPv6. But it 17 Jan 2012 23:54:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33036 On Jan 17, 2012, at 8:04 PM, Tom Perrine wrote: > Someone must have already figured this out; I'm feeling "virtual Monday" pretty bad right now :-( > 17 Jan 2012 23:10:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33035 Someone must have already figured this out; I'm feeling "virtual Monday" pretty bad right now :-( With IPv6 a host can have "lots" (more than 1) of 17 Jan 2012 17:04:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33032 On 01/17/12 10:21, Thomas Schäfer wrote: > Am Dienstag, 17. Januar 2012, 19:03:16 schrieb Eric Vyncke (evyncke): >> Ddos or slashdotted? > > The diff 17 Jan 2012 10:47:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33028 Am Dienstag, 17. Januar 2012, 19:03:16 schrieb Eric Vyncke (evyncke): > Ddos or slashdotted? The difference is only the intention. Effect is the same 17 Jan 2012 10:21:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33027 On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote: > Looked like config error when I polled it. > I am assuming a transient 17 Jan 2012 10:16:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33024 Looked like config error when I polled it. - Jared On Jan 17, 2012, at 1:03 PM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote: > Ddos or slashdotted? > > Typed on a 17 Jan 2012 10:13:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33023 Ddos or slashdotted? Typed on a small keyboard sorry for lack of ponctuation and French accented letters. ----- Original Message ----- From: Thomas 17 Jan 2012 10:03:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33022 Am Dienstag, 17. Januar 2012, 18:32:21 schrieb Stefan Neufeind: > Just wanted to try via IPv6. But it's not IPv6-enabled :-) > Let's hope it will be u 17 Jan 2012 09:59:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33021 On Jan 17, 2012 9:32 AM, "Stefan Neufeind" <neufeind@gmx.de> wrote: > > Just wanted to try via IPv6. But it's not IPv6-enabled :-) > Let's hope it wil 17 Jan 2012 09:41:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33020 Just wanted to try via IPv6. But it's not IPv6-enabled :-) Let's hope it will be until launch-day ... Regards, Stefan On 01/17/2012 06:29 PM, Jare 17 Jan 2012 09:32:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33019 This website now seems to be down (over IPv4 at least). On Jan 17, 2012, at 9:42 AM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > FYI, http://www.worldipv6launch.org/p 17 Jan 2012 09:29:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33018 FYI, http://www.worldipv6launch.org/press/20120117-2/ World IPv6 Launch Solidifies Global Support for New Internet Protocol Top websites, Internet 17 Jan 2012 06:42:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33017 On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 08:12:21AM -0500, Matthew Huff wrote: > By servers, I meant the NIS clients, sorry (They are both Linux and Solaris servers). 17 Jan 2012 06:33:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33016 By servers, I meant the NIS clients, sorry (They are both Linux and Solaris servers). There are no logs that I can see (nothing is put in auth.* nor 17 Jan 2012 05:12:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33014 On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 09:27:51AM -0500, Matthew Huff wrote: > Both the short name and long name have been present for 15+ years. > The ipv4 and ipv 17 Jan 2012 02:52:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33013 Both the short name and long name have been present for 15+ years. The ipv4 and ipv6 resolve both forward and backward to the same name. However, any 16 Jan 2012 06:27:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32991 On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 04:50:25PM -0500, Matthew Huff wrote: > So far, it appears that ipv6 breaks netgroups in both Solaris and Linux. Has anyone ru 16 Jan 2012 05:54:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32990 On Jan 10, 2012, at 4:19 PM, Marco Hogewoning wrote: <snip looking for advice on small boxes doing IPv6> Hi all, Received many responses both on an 16 Jan 2012 01:19:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32988 So far, it appears that ipv6 breaks netgroups in both Solaris and Linux. Has anyone run into this or have a solution? Basically if two machines both 15 Jan 2012 13:50:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32984 On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 05:10:00PM +0100, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote: > > I tried to use them but noticed that temp_prefered_lft (86400) and > > temp_v 13 Jan 2012 11:18:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32969 Yes, it is set in the same file, some lines below. Regards. kix 13 Jan 2012 08:19:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32968 * Sebastian Wiesinger <ipv6-ops@ml.karotte.org> [2012-01-13 16:06]: > Hello, > > I don't know if anyone (except me) tries to use IPv6 temporary > add 13 Jan 2012 08:10:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32966 * rodolfo.garciapenas@telefonica.es <rodolfo.garciapenas@telefonica.es> [2012-01-13 16:31]: > > > Hi, > > Go to the kernel source folder ( /usr/src 13 Jan 2012 07:42:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32965 Hi, Go to the kernel source folder ( /usr/src/linux-source-*/net/ipv6) and search for "temp_prefered_lft" you will see that the variable is set at ad 13 Jan 2012 07:28:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32964 Hello, I don't know if anyone (except me) tries to use IPv6 temporary addresses (Privacy Extensions) on Linux. I tried to use them but noticed that 13 Jan 2012 07:04:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32963 On 15 August 2011 22:56, <visser@terena.org> wrote: > I had the same requirement. For my plans to move all internally used > services to IPv6 only (P 13 Jan 2012 00:46:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32962 Interesting to note that HTTPv6 access to both www.t-online.de and www.t-home.hu went up and down 3 times between 6:19 pm Central and 6:29 pm Central. 12 Jan 2012 19:47:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32959 Am 12.01.2012 15:25, schrieb Olipro: > On Thursday 12 Jan 2012 15:07:36 Sven 'Darkman' Michels wrote: >> Hi, > >> >> to be honest, i don't see any IPv 12 Jan 2012 06:55:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32951 On Thursday 12 Jan 2012 15:07:36 Sven 'Darkman' Michels wrote: > Hi, > > Am 12.01.2012 04:08, schrieb Olipro: > > perhaps you might care to get your 12 Jan 2012 06:25:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32950 Hi, Am 12.01.2012 04:08, schrieb Olipro: > perhaps you might care to get your dear colleagues at www.t-home.hu to fix > their stuff too - to be perf 12 Jan 2012 06:07:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32949 On Wednesday 11 Jan 2012 16:29:11 Sven 'Darkman' Michels wrote: > Hi, > > the problem is now fixed, but some work needs to be done tomorrow. > We'll 11 Jan 2012 19:08:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32943 On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 05:30:12 PM Marco Hogewoning wrote: > It would make sense to start with the newest version, > unless somebody thinks 11 Jan 2012 08:10:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32939 Hi, the problem is now fixed, but some work needs to be done tomorrow. We'll keep an eye on it ;) Thanks for bringing this up! Best regards, Sven 11 Jan 2012 07:29:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32938 Thanks a lot for the confirmations. -- There’s no place like ::1 Thomas Schäfer (Systemverwaltung) Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Centrum 11 Jan 2012 06:17:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32937 On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 02:37:59PM +0100, Thomas Schäfer wrote: > Hi, > > since the 8 in morning (gmt+1) a lot of telekom-services are not > reachabl 11 Jan 2012 06:02:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32936 Hi, > Hi, > > since the 8 in morning (gmt+1) a lot of telekom-services are not reachable via ipv6. > > e.g. www.t-online.de hast AAAA records, I ca 11 Jan 2012 05:50:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32935 * Thomas Schäfer <thomas@cis.uni-muenchen.de> [2012-01-11 14:39]: > Hi, > > since the 8 in morning (gmt+1) a lot of telekom-services are not > reacha 11 Jan 2012 05:43:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32934 Hi, since the 8 in morning (gmt+1) a lot of telekom-services are not reachable via ipv6. e.g. www.t-online.de hast AAAA records, I can ping them, b 11 Jan 2012 05:37:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32933 On Jan 11, 2012, at 9:55 AM, Mark Tinka wrote: > On Tuesday, January 10, 2012 11:19:21 PM Marco Hogewoning > wrote: > >> Is there anybody that has 11 Jan 2012 01:30:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32930 On Tuesday, January 10, 2012 11:19:21 PM Marco Hogewoning wrote: > Is there anybody that has this feature set successfully > running or tested on th 11 Jan 2012 00:55:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32929 Hi Guys, If somebody from Cisco reads this, feel free to contact me off list, but maybe somebody else has something running and can confirm this as w 10 Jan 2012 07:19:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32921 Hi, Now that IPv6 is a supported 3G interface protocol for the Google Nexus S phone, i have begun the process of finding broken apps and trying to ge 09 Jan 2012 21:57:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32908 >>>>> "IS" == Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> writes: >>>>> Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org> writes: […] >> A traceroute (see http://www.sixxs 03 Jan 2012 22:26:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32831 >>>>> Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org> writes: >>>>> On 2012-01-01 19:34 , Ivan Shmakov wrote: >>>>> Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> w 03 Jan 2012 00:21:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/32813