<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>nsp | ipv6</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>12 Feb  2012 00:06:47 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: IPv6 Matrix results for Dec 2011</title>
<description>Thanks for the quick reply. On 11 Feb 2012, at 15:09, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote: &amp;gt; Hello Arturo, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; good catch! The analysis on small sample</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 11:30:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33378</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: IPv6 Matrix results for Dec 2011</title>
<description>Hello Arturo, good catch! The analysis on small samples is odd and I am still trying to work out the bug/inaccuracy. It&amp;#039;s a complex mix of GeoIP on I</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 09:09:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33377</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: IPv6 Matrix results for Dec 2011</title>
<description>Oliver,     there is some odd data, for example, only two hosts in Guatemala?      Regards, as On 8 Feb 2012, at 09:12, Olivier MJ Crepin-L</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 05:21:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33376</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Skype &amp;amp; IPv6</title>
<description>On Thu, 2012-02-09, Dick Vassar wrote: &amp;gt; On 9 February 2012 15:12, Cameron Byrne &amp;lt;cb.list6@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Skype, like a small number of other</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 10:08:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33371</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Skype &amp;amp; IPv6</title>
<description>On 9 February 2012 15:12, Cameron Byrne &amp;lt;cb.list6@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Skype, like a small number of other applications, uses IPv4 referrals &amp;gt; in its</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 08:03:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33369</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Skype &amp;amp; IPv6</title>
<description>On Wed, 2012-02-08, Gert Doering wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 10:52:11AM +0100, Tayeb Meftah wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; MS hate ipv6 you know? &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Given th</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 07:13:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33368</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Skype &amp;amp; IPv6</title>
<description>On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Marc Blanchet &amp;lt;marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Le 2012-02-09 à 08:55, Truman Boyes &amp;lt;truman@suspicious.org&amp;gt; a écr</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 06:12:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33364</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Skype &amp;amp; IPv6</title>
<description>Le 2012-02-09 Ã  08:55, Truman Boyes &amp;lt;truman@suspicious.org&amp;gt; a Ã©crit : &amp;gt; Has anyone here used Skype through NAT64? Yes &amp;gt; Does it work? No Marc.</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 06:07:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33363</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Skype &amp;amp; IPv6</title>
<description>Has anyone here used Skype through NAT64? Does it work? Cheers, Truman  On 8 Feb 2012, at 6:44 AM, Gert Doering wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Wed, Feb 08, 2</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 05:55:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33362</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: (Loose) uRPF vs. non-announced IXP space</title>
<description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; From my point of view RFC 5963 should be updated to &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; recommend the global announcement of IX prefixes for IPv6 or &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; - as already mentioned</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 02:19:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/33359</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

